arXiv:quant-ph/0101088

Does Indeterminism Give Rise to an Intrinsic Time Arrow?

Shahar Dolev, Avshalom C. Elitzur, Meir Hemmo

Published Jan 18, 2001• 4 citations

Abstract

In any physical theory that admits true indeterminism, the thermodynamic arrow of time can arise regardless of the system's initial conditions. Hence on such theories time's arrow emerges out of the basic physical interactions. The example of the GRW theory is studied in detail.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0101088

Related papers

The Universal Arrow of Time is a Key for the Solution of the Basic Physical Paradoxes

Oleg Kupervasser

The modern classical statistical physics, thermodynamics, quantum mechanics and gravity theory are developed and well-known theories. The described theories are developed and well studied for a long time. Nevertheless, it contains a number of paradoxes. It forces many scientists to doubt internal consistency of these theories. However, the given paradoxes can be resolved within the framework of the existing physics, without introduction of new laws. Further, in this paper we discuss the paradoxes underlying classical statistical physics, thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, and non-quantum and quantum gravities. We suggest the approaches to solution of these paradoxes on basis universal arrow of time. The first one relies on the influence of the external observer (environment), which disrupts the correlations in the system and results in time arrows alignment. The basis of the second one is the limits of self-knowledge of the system in case of the observed system; the external observer and the environment are included in the considered system. We introduce the concepts of observable dynamics, ideal dynamics, and unpredictable dynamics. We contemplate the phenomenon of complex (living) systems from the point of view of these dynamics. Perspectives of practical use of Unpredictable systems for artificial intellect are considered. c Chapter 1. The Universal Arrow of Time: Classical Mechanics. Abstract: Solution of paradox for the entropy increase in reversible systems. Statistical physics cannot explain why the thermodynamic time arrow does exist un- less very special and so it postulates unnatural initial conditions. However, we are ready to state that statistical physics is able to explain why the thermodynamic time arrow is

Jan 1, 20138 citations

Irreversibility and the arrow of time

Jürg Martin Fröhlich

Within the general formalism of quantum theory irreversibility and the arrow of time and the in the evolution of various physical systems are studied. Irreversible behavior often manifests itself in the guise of “entropy production.” This motivates me to begin this chapter with a brief review of quantum-mechanical entropy, a subject that Elliott Lieb has made outstanding contributions to, followed by an enumeration of examples of irreversible behavior and of an arrow of time analyzed in later sections. Subsequently, a derivation of the laws of thermodynamics from (quantum) statistical mechanics, and, in particular, of the Second Law of thermodynamics, in the forms given to it by Clausius and Carnot, is presented. In a third part, results on diffusive (Brownian) motion of a quantum particle interacting with a quasi-free quantum-mechanical heat bath are reviewed. This is followed by an outline of a theory of friction by emission of Cherenkov radiation of sound waves in a system consisting of a particle moving through a Bose–Einstein condensate and interacting with it. In what may be the most important section of this chapter, the fundamental arrow of time inherent in Quantum Mechanics is discussed.

arXiv:2202.04619EMS Press eBooksJun 29, 20225 citations

A subquantum arrow of time

Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen

The outcome of a single quantum experiment is unpredictable, except in a pure-state limit. The definite process that takes place in the apparatus may either be intrinsically random or be explainable from a deeper theory. While the first scenario is the standard lore, the latter implies that quantum mechanics is emergent. In that case, it is likely that one has to reconsider radiation by accelerated charges as a physical effect, which thus must be compensated by an energy input. Stochastic electrodynamics, for example, asserts that the vacuum energy arises from classical fluctuations with energy 1/2 ℏω per mode. In such theories the stability of the hydrogen ground state will arise from energy input from fluctuations and output by radiation, hence due to an energy throughput. That flux of energy constitutes an arrow of time, which we call the "subquantum arrow of time". It is related to the stability of matter and it is more fundamental than, e.g., the thermodynamic and cosmological arrows.

arXiv:1409.3131Journal of Physics Conference SeriesApr 14, 20143 citations

Time, the Arrow of Time, and Quantum Mechanics

Gerard ’t Hooft

It is brought forward that viable theories of the physical world that have no variable at all that can play the role of time, do not exist; some notion of time is one of the very first ingredients a candidate theory should possess. Almost by definition, time has an arrow. In contrast, time reversibility, or even the possibility to run the equations of motion backwards in time, is not at all a primary requirement. This means that the direction of the arrow of time may well be uniquely defined in the theory, even locally. It is explained that a rigorous definition of time, as well as a formulation of the causality and locality concepts, can only be given when one has a model for the physical phenomena described. The only viable causality condition is one that is symmetric under time reversal. We explain these statements in terms of the author’s favoured deterministic cellular automaton interpretation of quantum mechanics, also to be referred to as 'vector space analysis', and expand on these ideas. It is also summarised how our more rigorous causality condition affects Bell’s theorems. What distinguishes quantum systems from classical ones is our fundamental inability to control the microscopic details of the initial state when phenomena are studied in the light of some theoretical model.

arXiv:1804.01383Frontiers in PhysicsAug 29, 201853 citations

Arrow of time and observer information

Henriksson, Andreas

In this article, the arrow of time as it appears in the statistical interpretation of the second law of thermodynamics is suggested to be of no relevance in understanding the true origin for the directionality of time. To arrive at this point of view, the theory of statistical mechanics is revisited, and restated in terms of the information content possessed by an observer of the system. By doing so, the statement that the arrow of time is due to the tendency of the entropy to increase with time, as encoded by the second law of thermodynamics, is argued to be equivalent to the statement that it is the increasing loss of information that causes time to flow towards the future.

Jan 1, 20210 citations

The Arrow of Time in Quantum Theory

J P Connerade

In Classical Mechanics, time is reversible, i.e. implies no particular choice: only the observer knows in which direction it flows. The present Comment re-examines whether this remains true in Quantum Mechanics. In the context of Atomic Physics, it is concluded that the existence of an arrow of time depends on the manner in which the radiation field is introduced, which must be non-perturbative.

AtomsOct 26, 20251 citation