Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0009051 · Physical Review A

Reply to “Comment on ‘Quantum key distribution without alternative measurements’ ” [Phys. Rev. A63, 036301 (2001)]

Adán Cabello

Published Feb 13, 2001• 32 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Recently, Zhang, Li, and Guo have proposed a particular eavesdropping attack [Phys. Rev. A {\bf 63}, 036301 (2001), quant-ph/0009042] which shows that my quantum key distribution protocol based on entanglement swapping [Phys. Rev. A {\bf 61}, 052312 (2000), quant-ph/9911025] is insecure. However, security against this attack can be attained with a simple modification. In addition, a simpler version of the protocol using four qubits is introduced.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.63.036302

Related papers

Addendum to “Quantum key distribution without alternative measurements”

Adán Cabello

Recently, Zhang, Li, and Guo have proposed a particular eavesdropping attack [Phys. Rev. A 63, 036301 (2001)] that shows that my quantum key distribution protocol based on entanglement swapping [Phys. Rev. A 61, 052312 (2000)] is insecure. However, security against this attack can be attained with a simple modification. In addition, a simpler version of the protocol using four qubits is introduced.

Physical Review A•Jun 26, 2001•17 citations

Comment on “Quantum key distribution without alternative measurements” [Phys. Rev. A61, 052312 (2000)]

Yong-Sheng Zhang, Chuan‐Feng Li, Guang‐Can Guo

In a recent paper [A. Cabello, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052312 (2000)], a quantum key distribution protocol based on entanglement swapping was proposed. However, in this Comment, it is shown that this protocol is insecure if Eve uses a special strategy to attack.

arXiv:quant-ph/0009042•Physical Review A•Feb 13, 2001•100 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Quantum key distribution for d -level systems with generalized Bell states’ ”

Vahid Karimipour

In the preceding Comment it has been claimed that an entangled-based quantum key distribution protocol proposed by Zhang, Li, and Gao [Phys. Rev. A 64, 024302 (2001)] and its generalization to $d$-level systems by Karimipour, Bahraminasab, and Bagherinezhad [Phys. Rev. A 65, 052331 (2002)] are insecure against an attack devised by the authors of the Comment. We invalidate the arguments of the Comment and show that the protocols are still secure.

arXiv:quant-ph/0509189•Physical Review A•Dec 20, 2005•2 citations

Comment on “Multiparty quantum secret sharing of classical messages based on entanglement swapping”

Song Lin, Fei Gao, Fen-Zhuo Guo +2 more

In a recent paper [Z. J. Zhang and Z. X. Man, Phys. Rev. A 72, 022303 (2005)], a multiparty quantum secret sharing protocol based on entanglement swapping was presented. However, as we show, this protocol is insecure in the sense that an unauthorized agent group can recover the secret from the dealer. Hence we propose an improved version of this protocol which can stand against this kind of attack.

Physical Review A•Sep 26, 2007•84 citations

Comment on "Quantum key distribution via quantum encryption"

Fei Gao, Su‐Juan Qin, Qiaoyan Wen +1 more

In the paper [Zhang, Li and Guo, Phys. Rev. A 64, 024302 (2001)], a quantum key distribution protocol based on quantum encryption was proposed, in which the quantum key can be reused. However, it is shown that, if Eve employs a special strategy to attack, this protocol becomes insecure because of the reused quantum key. That is, Eve can elicit partial information about the key bits without being detected. Finally, a possible improvement of the Zhang-Li-Guo protocol is proposed.

arXiv:quant-ph/0505226•May 31, 2005•0 citations

A Modified Protocol of Quantum Key Distribution Based on Entanglement Swapping

Xin Huang, Li Shu-Min, Wang An-Min

By comparing Cabello's addendum to his quantum key distribution protocol [Phys. Rev. A 64 (2001) 024301], we propose a more convenient modified protocol based on the entanglement swapping which is secure against the eavesdropping strategy addressed by Zhang et al. [Phys. Rev. A 63 (2001) 036301] and other existing types of attack.

Chinese Physics Letters•Aug 23, 2007•6 citations
Recently, Zhang, Li, and Guo have proposed a particular eavesdropping attack [Phys. Rev. A {\bf 63}, 036301 (2001), quant-ph/0009042] which shows that my quantum key distribution protocol based on entanglement swapping [Phys. Rev. A {\bf 61}, 052312 (2000), quant-ph/9911025] is insecure. However, security against this attack can be attained with a simple modification. In addition, a simpler version of the protocol using four qubits is introduced.
In the preceding Comment it has been claimed that an entangled-based quantum key distribution protocol proposed by Zhang, Li, and Gao [Phys. Rev. A 64, 024302 (2001)] and its generalization to ddd-level systems by Karimipour, Bahraminasab, and Bagherinezhad [Phys. Rev. A 65, 052331 (2002)] are insecure against an attack devised by the authors of the Comment. We invalidate the arguments of the Comment and show that the protocols are still secure.