© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0008098

Invariants of Elementary Observations

Johann Summhammer

Published Aug 23, 2000• 0 citations

Abstract

As physics searches for invariants in observations, this paper looks for invariants of probabilistic observation without assuming physical structure. Structure emerges from the basic assumption of science that new information shall lead to more accurate knowledge of the invariants. This leads to statistically unique random variables for expressing observed information: Complex probability amplitudes. Predictions are also just random variables computed from observed data, and must become more accurate with more observations as input. This singles out the quantum mechanical superposition principle. The external conditions of a probabilistic experiment can themselves be monitored at the most detailed level, resulting in observation of coicidence probabilities. The invariants of any multi-coincidence experiment are the same as those of a one-event experiment with the same number of possible outcomes. An observable probability turns out to be controllable by two independent experimental conditions, naturally parametrized as a direction in a 3-dimensional space. In summary, the probabilistic paradigm itself defines a unique method of forming concepts and making predictions. The method appears irrefutable within probability, because, whenever a prediction turns out wrong the existence of an as yet unmonitored condition is postulated, and a formal way to incoroporate it is shown. The Hilbert space formalism of quantum theory seems to be isomorphic to this method.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0008098

Related papers

Structure of Probabilistic Information and Quantum Laws

Summhammer, J

In quantum experiments the acquisition and representation of basic experimental information is governed by the multinomial probability distribution. There exist unique random variables, whose standard deviation becomes asymptotically invariant of physical conditions. Representing all information by means of such random variables gives the quantum mechanical probability amplitude and a real alternative. For predictions, the linear evolution law (Schrodinger or Dirac equation) turns out to be the only way to extend the invariance property of the standard deviation to the predicted quantities. This indicates that quantum theory originates in the structure of gaining pure, probabilistic information, without any mechanical underpinning.

•Feb 20, 2001•1 citation

STRUCTURE OF PROBABILISTIC INFORMATION AND QUANTUM LAWS

JOHANN SUMMHAMMER

In quantum experiments the acquisition and representation of basic experimental information is governed by the multinomial probability distribution. There exist unique random variables, whose standard deviation becomes asymptotically invariant of physical conditions. Representing all information by means of such random variables gives the quantum mechanical probability amplitude and a real alternative. For predictions, the linear evolution law (Schrodinger or Dirac equation) turns out to be the only way to extend the invariance property of the standard deviation to the predicted quantities. This indicates that quantum theory originates in the structure of gaining pure, probabilistic information, without any mechanical underpinning.

arXiv:quant-ph/0102099•Foundations of probability and physics•Dec 1, 2001•0 citations

The Quantum Mechanical Formalism Derived from the Probabilistic Nature of Quantitative Physical Predictions

Hans Rudolf Tschudi

It is a scientific truism nowadays that quantum mechanical predictions are of statistical or rather of probabilistic nature: a quantum theory assigns a probability distribution to each measurable quantity (observable) of a physical system prepared according to a given preparation prescription (state). Such sets of probability distributions represent the most general quantitative predictions of physical theories. The aim of this study is to determine all theoretical frameworks which yield such a kind of output taking the probabilistic nature of quantitative physical predictions as initial hypothesis. Astonishingly, this project succeeds with a minimal number of additional assumptions, which arise quite naturally in the course of the analysis, and which essentially amount to regularity conditions. The result is that there exist only two classes of physical theories providing quantitative probabilistic predictions: classical theories where observables are represented by real functions over a phase space and states are represented by probability measures upon the phase space, and quantum theories where observables are represented by selfadjoint operators acting on a complex Hilbert space and states are represented by state operators. On empirical grounds, classical theories cannot provide the all-encompassing, fundamental frame for the mathematical description of physical systems. Quantum theories remain, and there is no more complete formal frame for quantitative physical theories. As an additional result, it is shown that there exist physical systems which possess a quantum mechanical but no classical description; a prominent example is the spin system of two spin-1/2 particles. The classical hidden variables model, which J. Bell relates to this system in order to prove his theorem, cannot be a true description of it because no such classical model exists, and Bell's theorem loses its foundation.

•Mar 5, 2026•0 citations

Causal Structure Invariance in Quantum Theory

Marco Zaopo

Quantum theory is a mathematical formalism to compute probabilities for outcomes happenning in physical experiments. These outcomes constitute events happening in space-time. One of these events represents the fact that a system located in the region of space where is situated a physical device has a certain value of a physical observable at the time when the device fires the outcome corresponding to that value of the observable. The causal structure of these events is customarily assumed fixed in an absolute way. In this paper we show that this assumption cannot be substantiated on operational grounds proving that two observers looking at the same quantum experiment can calculate the probabilities of the experiment assuming a different causal structure for the space-time events constituted by the outcomes. We will thus say that in quantum theory we have relativity of causal structure.

arXiv:1110.5561•Oct 25, 2011•0 citations

Statistical Basis of Physical Laws

R. Collins

The premise that physical variables must be viewed as random variables, with observed values, assigned as averages over distributions, is shown to yield the formalisms of thermodynamics, Hamiltonian mechanics, and quantum theory. A general mathematical argument first establishes the validity of an embedding of th space of physical variables in a larger manifold of "hidden" variables and a general structure for the distribution of these variables. Then, by consideration of various ways of specifying the preparation of a system for measurement, the formalisms of physics cited above are deduced. It is also shown that the generalized Langevin equation follows from these premises and is applicable to a wide class of phenomena. This formulation yields a new definition for compatible observables as used in quantum theory and demonstrates, in a natural way, that physical laws should be invariant under orthogonal transformations of certain variables, which in one circumstance include the complex orthogonal transformations of the Lorentz form, as in special relativity. In summary, it appears that most of the formal structure of physical theory is a consequence of the statistical nature of physical variables.

Physical Review•Jul 25, 1969•5 citations

Quantum Theory as Efficient Representation of Probabilistic Information

Johann Summhammer

Quantum experiments yield random data. We show that the most efficient way to store this empirical information by a finite number of bits is by means of the vector of square roots of observed relative frequencies. This vector has the unique property that its dispersion becomes invariant of the underlying probabilities, and therefore invariant of the physical parameters. This also extends to the complex square roots, and it remains true under a unitary transformation. This reveals quantum theory as a theory for making predictions which are as accurate as the input information, without any statistical loss. Our analysis also suggests that from the point of view of information a slightly more accurate theory than quantum theory should be possible.

arXiv:quant-ph/0701181•Jan 25, 2007•4 citations

As physics searches for invariants in observations, this paper looks for invariants of probabilistic observation without assuming physical structure. Structure emerges from the basic assumption of science that new information shall lead to more accurate knowledge of the invariants. This leads to statistically unique random variables for expressing observed information: Complex probability amplitudes. Predictions are also just random variables computed from observed data, and must become more accurate with more observations as input. This singles out the quantum mechanical superposition principle. The external conditions of a probabilistic experiment can themselves be monitored at the most detailed level, resulting in observation of coicidence probabilities. The invariants of any multi-coincidence experiment are the same as those of a one-event experiment with the same number of possible outcomes. An observable probability turns out to be controllable by two independent experimental conditions, naturally parametrized as a direction in a 3-dimensional space. In summary, the probabilistic paradigm itself defines a unique method of forming concepts and making predictions. The method appears irrefutable within probability, because, whenever a prediction turns out wrong the existence of an as yet unmonitored condition is postulated, and a formal way to incoroporate it is shown. The Hilbert space formalism of quantum theory seems to be isomorphic to this method.

In quantum experiments the acquisition and representation of basic experimental information is governed by the multinomial probability distribution. There exist unique random variables, whose standard deviation becomes asymptotically invariant of physical conditions. Representing all information by means of such random variables gives the quantum mechanical probability amplitude and a real alternative. For predictions, the linear evolution law (Schrodinger or Dirac equation) turns out to be the only way to extend the invariance property of the standard deviation to the predicted quantities. This indicates that quantum theory originates in the structure of gaining pure, probabilistic information, without any mechanical underpinning.

In quantum experiments the acquisition and representation of basic experimental information is governed by the multinomial probability distribution. There exist unique random variables, whose standard deviation becomes asymptotically invariant of physical conditions. Representing all information by means of such random variables gives the quantum mechanical probability amplitude and a real alternative. For predictions, the linear evolution law (Schrodinger or Dirac equation) turns out to be the only way to extend the invariance property of the standard deviation to the predicted quantities. This indicates that quantum theory originates in the structure of gaining pure, probabilistic information, without any mechanical underpinning.

It is a scientific truism nowadays that quantum mechanical predictions are of statistical or rather of probabilistic nature: a quantum theory assigns a probability distribution to each measurable quantity (observable) of a physical system prepared according to a given preparation prescription (state). Such sets of probability distributions represent the most general quantitative predictions of physical theories. The aim of this study is to determine all theoretical frameworks which yield such a kind of output taking the probabilistic nature of quantitative physical predictions as initial hypothesis. Astonishingly, this project succeeds with a minimal number of additional assumptions, which arise quite naturally in the course of the analysis, and which essentially amount to regularity conditions. The result is that there exist only two classes of physical theories providing quantitative probabilistic predictions: classical theories where observables are represented by real functions over a phase space and states are represented by probability measures upon the phase space, and quantum theories where observables are represented by selfadjoint operators acting on a complex Hilbert space and states are represented by state operators. On empirical grounds, classical theories cannot provide the all-encompassing, fundamental frame for the mathematical description of physical systems. Quantum theories remain, and there is no more complete formal frame for quantitative physical theories. As an additional result, it is shown that there exist physical systems which possess a quantum mechanical but no classical description; a prominent example is the spin system of two spin-1/2 particles. The classical hidden variables model, which J. Bell relates to this system in order to prove his theorem, cannot be a true description of it because no such classical model exists, and Bell's theorem loses its foundation.

Quantum theory is a mathematical formalism to compute probabilities for outcomes happenning in physical experiments. These outcomes constitute events happening in space-time. One of these events represents the fact that a system located in the region of space where is situated a physical device has a certain value of a physical observable at the time when the device fires the outcome corresponding to that value of the observable. The causal structure of these events is customarily assumed fixed in an absolute way. In this paper we show that this assumption cannot be substantiated on operational grounds proving that two observers looking at the same quantum experiment can calculate the probabilities of the experiment assuming a different causal structure for the space-time events constituted by the outcomes. We will thus say that in quantum theory we have relativity of causal structure.

The premise that physical variables must be viewed as random variables, with observed values, assigned as averages over distributions, is shown to yield the formalisms of thermodynamics, Hamiltonian mechanics, and quantum theory. A general mathematical argument first establishes the validity of an embedding of th space of physical variables in a larger manifold of "hidden" variables and a general structure for the distribution of these variables. Then, by consideration of various ways of specifying the preparation of a system for measurement, the formalisms of physics cited above are deduced. It is also shown that the generalized Langevin equation follows from these premises and is applicable to a wide class of phenomena. This formulation yields a new definition for compatible observables as used in quantum theory and demonstrates, in a natural way, that physical laws should be invariant under orthogonal transformations of certain variables, which in one circumstance include the complex orthogonal transformations of the Lorentz form, as in special relativity. In summary, it appears that most of the formal structure of physical theory is a consequence of the statistical nature of physical variables.

Quantum experiments yield random data. We show that the most efficient way to store this empirical information by a finite number of bits is by means of the vector of square roots of observed relative frequencies. This vector has the unique property that its dispersion becomes invariant of the underlying probabilities, and therefore invariant of the physical parameters. This also extends to the complex square roots, and it remains true under a unitary transformation. This reveals quantum theory as a theory for making predictions which are as accurate as the input information, without any statistical loss. Our analysis also suggests that from the point of view of information a slightly more accurate theory than quantum theory should be possible.