arXiv:quant-ph/0008007

Reply to `No Contradictions between Bohmian and quantum mechanics'

Partha Ghose

Published Aug 1, 2000• 3 citations

arXiv HTML PDF

Abstract

Marchildon's claim (quant-ph/0007068) regarding Ghose's papers (quant-ph/0001024 and 0003037) is shown to be erroneous.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0008007

Related papers

Comments on some recently proposed experiments that should distinguish Bohmian mechanics from quantum mechanics

Ward Struyve, Willy De Baere

Recently Ghose (quant-ph/0001024,quant-ph/0003037,quant-ph/0103126) and Golshani and Akhavan (quant-ph/0009040,quant-ph/0103100,quant-ph/0103101) claimed to have found experiments that should be able to distinguish between Standard Quantum Mechanics and Bohmian Mechanics. It is our aim to show that the claims made by Ghose, Golshani and Akhavan are unfounded.

arXiv:quant-ph/0108038Aug 8, 20015 citations

No contradictions between Bohmian and quantum mechanics

‎Louis Marchildon

Two recent claims by A. Neumaier (quant-ph/0001011) and P. Ghose (quant-ph/0001024) that Bohmian mechanics is incompatible with quantum mechanics for correlations involving time are shown to be unfounded.

arXiv:quant-ph/0007068Jul 19, 20008 citations

Comments on Struyve and Baere's paper on experiments to distinguish Bohmian mechanics from quantum mechanics

Partha Ghose

It is shown in detail why the arguments put forward by Struyve and Baere (quant-ph/0108038) against my conclusions are incorrect.

arXiv:quant-ph/0208192Aug 30, 20022 citations

On the measurement process in Bohmian mechanics (reply to Gao)

Dustin Lazarovici

This note clarifies several details about the description of the measurement process in Bohmian mechanics and responds to a recent preprint by Shan Gao, wrongly claiming a contradiction in the theory.

Feb 1, 20190 citations

Response to Mayants' Note on Bohm's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Larry Gould, Basil J. Hiley

Physics EssaysMar 1, 19930 citations

Reply to Marchildon: absorption and non-unitarity remain well-defined in the Relativistic Transactional Interpretation

Ruth E. Kastner

I rebut some erroneous statements and attempt to clear up some misunderstandings in a recent set of critical remarks by Marchildon regarding the Relativistic Transactional Interpretation (RTI), showing that his negative conclusions regarding the transactional model are ill-founded.

arXiv:1712.09697Dec 27, 20170 citations