Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0006063

Time operator for the quantum harmonic oscillator: resolution of an apparent paradox

Alex Granik, Harry R. Lewis

Published Jun 14, 2000• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

An apparent paradox is resolved that concerns the existence of time operators which have been derived for the quantum harmonic oscillator. There is an apparent paradox because, although a time operator is canonically conjugate to the Hamiltonian, it has been asserted that no operator exists that is canonically conjugate to the Hamiltonian. In order to resolve the apparent paradox, we work in a representation where the phase operator is diagonal. The boundary condition on wave functions is such that they be periodic in the phase variable, which is related to the (continuous) eigenvalue of the time operator. Matrix elements of the commutator of the time operator with the Hamiltonian involve the phase variable itself in addition to periodic functions of the phase variable. The Hamiltonian is not hermitian when operating in space that includes the phase variable itself. The apparent paradox is resolved when this non-hermeticity is taken into account correctly in the evaluation of matrix elements of the commutation relation.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0006063

Related papers

Matrix representation of the time operator

Carl M. Bender, Mariagiovanna Gianfreda

In quantum mechanics the time operator Θ satisfies the commutation relation [Θ, H] = i, and thus it may be thought of as being formally canonically conjugate to the Hamiltonian H. The time operator associated with a given Hamiltonian H is not unique because one can replace Θ by Θ + Θhom, where Θhom satisfies the homogeneous condition [Θhom, H] = 0. To study this nonuniqueness the matrix elements of Θ for the harmonic-oscillator Hamiltonian are calculated in the eigenstate basis. This calculation requires the summation of divergent series, and the summation is accomplished by using zeta-summation techniques. It is shown that by including appropriate homogeneous contributions, the matrix elements of Θ simplify dramatically. However, it is still not clear whether there is an optimally simple representation of the time operator.

arXiv:1201.3838•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 2012•6 citations

Quantum Action-Angle Variables for the Harmonic Oscillator

Harry R. Lewis, W. E. Lawrence, Joseph David Harris

Operators conjugate to the Hamiltonian are constructed explicitly for the quantum harmonic oscillator by two approaches in the space spanned by the eigenstates of $q$ and the eigenstates of $p$. The operators are quantum analogs of a classical angle variable divided by the oscillator frequency. Matrix elements have been evaluated in the coherent state representation. Either conjugate operator can be used to construct an explicitly time-dependent operator invariant. It can be used as the starting point in a new perturbative procedure for constructing invariant operators for nonlinear, nonautonomous Hamiltonians.

Physical Review Letters•Dec 23, 1996•27 citations

On the Canonical Transformation of Time-Dependent Harmonic Oscillator

Akpan N. Ikot, Louis E. Akpabio, Ita O. Akpan +3 more

We performed a two-variable canonical transformation on the time momentum operator, and without loss of generality we carried out a three-variable transformation on the coordinate and momentum space operators to trivialize the Hamiltonian operator of the system. Fortunately, this operation separates the time-coordinate and space coordinate naturally, and the wave function of the time-dependent Harmonic Oscillator is evaluated via the generator.

Physics Research International•Dec 2, 2009•1 citation

Factorizing the time evolution operator

P. C. García Quijas, L. M. Arévalo, Aguilar Centro +4 more

There is a widespread belief in the quantum physical community, and in textbooks used to teach Quantum Mechanics, that it is a difficult task to apply the time evolution operator on an initial wave function. That is to say, because the hamiltonian operator generally is the sum of two operators, then it is a difficult task to apply the time evolution operator on an initial wave function, because it implies to apply terms like (A+B)^n. A possible solution of this problem is to factorize the time evolution operator and then apply successively the individual exponential operator on the initial wave function. However, the exponential operator does not directly factorize. In this work we present useful ways to factorizing the time evolution operator when the argument of the exponential is a sum of two operators which obey specific commutation relations. Then, we apply the exponential operator as an evolution operator for the case of elementary unidimensional potentials, like the harmonic oscillator. Also, we argue about an apparent paradox concerning the time evolution operator and non-spreading wave packets addressed in previous papers published in this Journal. Finally, we discuss the possible insight that can be learned using this approach in teaching Quantum Mechanics.

•Jan 1, 2006•15 citations

Pauli's theorem and quantum canonical pairs: the consistency of a bounded, self–adjoint time operator canonically conjugate to a Hamiltonian with non–empty point spectrum

Eric Galapon

In single Hilbert space, Pauli's well–known theorem implies that the existence of a self–adjoint time operator canonically conjugate to a given Hamiltonian requires the Hamiltonian to possess completely continuous spectra spanning the entire real line. Thus the conclusion that there exists no self–adjoint time operator conjugate to a semibounded or discrete Hamiltonian despite some well–known illustrative, implicit counterexamples. In this paper we evaluate Pauli's theorem against the single Hilbert space formulation of quantum mechanics, and consequently show the consistency of assuming a bounded, self–adjoint time operator canonically conjugate to a Hamiltonian with an unbounded, or semibounded, or finite point spectrum. We point out Pauli's implicit assumptions and show that they are not consistent. We demonstrate our analysis by giving two explicit examples. Moreover, we clarify issues surrounding the different solutions to the canonical commutation relations, and, consequently, expand the class of acceptable canonical pairs beyond the solutions required by Pauli's theorem.

arXiv:quant-ph/9908033•Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Jan 8, 2002•131 citations

The Wave Function and the Minimum Uncertainty Function of the Time Dependent Harmonic Oscillator(New Developments in Statistical Physics Similarities in Diversities,YITP Workshop)

Kyu Hwang Yeon, Chung‐In Um, Thomas F. George

The time dependent harmonic oscillator is solved explicitly for quantum mechanics by the operator method with an auxiliary condition as the classical solution. Two classical invariant quantities which determine whether or not the system is bound are derived by the classical equation of motion. We obtain the invariant operator from one classical invariant quantity. Its eigenfunction is related to the solution of Schrodinger equation of the system and its eigenvalue is related to another classical quantity. The wave function is evaluated exactly by the eigenfunction of the invariant operator but it is not the eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian of the system. The uncertainty which calculates with the wave function is not a minimum one. We will confirm that the function which holds minimum uncertainty is a eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian.

•Jul 20, 1993•0 citations
An apparent paradox is resolved that concerns the existence of time operators which have been derived for the quantum harmonic oscillator. There is an apparent paradox because, although a time operator is canonically conjugate to the Hamiltonian, it has been asserted that no operator exists that is canonically conjugate to the Hamiltonian. In order to resolve the apparent paradox, we work in a representation where the phase operator is diagonal. The boundary condition on wave functions is such that they be periodic in the phase variable, which is related to the (continuous) eigenvalue of the time operator. Matrix elements of the commutator of the time operator with the Hamiltonian involve the phase variable itself in addition to periodic functions of the phase variable. The Hamiltonian is not hermitian when operating in space that includes the phase variable itself. The apparent paradox is resolved when this non-hermeticity is taken into account correctly in the evaluation of matrix elements of the commutation relation.
In quantum mechanics the time operator Θ satisfies the commutation relation [Θ, H] = i, and thus it may be thought of as being formally canonically conjugate to the Hamiltonian H. The time operator associated with a given Hamiltonian H is not unique because one can replace Θ by Θ + Θhom, where Θhom satisfies the homogeneous condition [Θhom, H] = 0. To study this nonuniqueness the matrix elements of Θ for the harmonic-oscillator Hamiltonian are calculated in the eigenstate basis. This calculation requires the summation of divergent series, and the summation is accomplished by using zeta-summation techniques. It is shown that by including appropriate homogeneous contributions, the matrix elements of Θ simplify dramatically. However, it is still not clear whether there is an optimally simple representation of the time operator.
Operators conjugate to the Hamiltonian are constructed explicitly for the quantum harmonic oscillator by two approaches in the space spanned by the eigenstates of qqq and the eigenstates of ppp. The operators are quantum analogs of a classical angle variable divided by the oscillator frequency. Matrix elements have been evaluated in the coherent state representation. Either conjugate operator can be used to construct an explicitly time-dependent operator invariant. It can be used as the starting point in a new perturbative procedure for constructing invariant operators for nonlinear, nonautonomous Hamiltonians.
There is a widespread belief in the quantum physical community, and in textbooks used to teach Quantum Mechanics, that it is a difficult task to apply the time evolution operator on an initial wave function. That is to say, because the hamiltonian operator generally is the sum of two operators, then it is a difficult task to apply the time evolution operator on an initial wave function, because it implies to apply terms like (A+B)^n. A possible solution of this problem is to factorize the time evolution operator and then apply successively the individual exponential operator on the initial wave function. However, the exponential operator does not directly factorize. In this work we present useful ways to factorizing the time evolution operator when the argument of the exponential is a sum of two operators which obey specific commutation relations. Then, we apply the exponential operator as an evolution operator for the case of elementary unidimensional potentials, like the harmonic oscillator. Also, we argue about an apparent paradox concerning the time evolution operator and non-spreading wave packets addressed in previous papers published in this Journal. Finally, we discuss the possible insight that can be learned using this approach in teaching Quantum Mechanics.
In single Hilbert space, Pauli's well–known theorem implies that the existence of a self–adjoint time operator canonically conjugate to a given Hamiltonian requires the Hamiltonian to possess completely continuous spectra spanning the entire real line. Thus the conclusion that there exists no self–adjoint time operator conjugate to a semibounded or discrete Hamiltonian despite some well–known illustrative, implicit counterexamples. In this paper we evaluate Pauli's theorem against the single Hilbert space formulation of quantum mechanics, and consequently show the consistency of assuming a bounded, self–adjoint time operator canonically conjugate to a Hamiltonian with an unbounded, or semibounded, or finite point spectrum. We point out Pauli's implicit assumptions and show that they are not consistent. We demonstrate our analysis by giving two explicit examples. Moreover, we clarify issues surrounding the different solutions to the canonical commutation relations, and, consequently, expand the class of acceptable canonical pairs beyond the solutions required by Pauli's theorem.
The time dependent harmonic oscillator is solved explicitly for quantum mechanics by the operator method with an auxiliary condition as the classical solution. Two classical invariant quantities which determine whether or not the system is bound are derived by the classical equation of motion. We obtain the invariant operator from one classical invariant quantity. Its eigenfunction is related to the solution of Schrodinger equation of the system and its eigenvalue is related to another classical quantity. The wave function is evaluated exactly by the eigenfunction of the invariant operator but it is not the eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian of the system. The uncertainty which calculates with the wave function is not a minimum one. We will confirm that the function which holds minimum uncertainty is a eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian.