arXiv:quant-ph/0006008

Pauli Exchange and Quantum Error Correction

Mary Beth Ruskai

Published Jun 1, 2000• 1 citation

Abstract

In many physically realistic models of quantum computation, Pauli exchange interactions cause a special type of two-qubit errors, called exchange errors, to occur as a first order effect of couplings within the computer. We discuss the physical mechanisms behind exchange errors and codes designed to explicitly deal with them.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0006008

Related papers

Pauli Exchange Errors in Quantum Computation

Mary Beth Ruskai

In many physically realistic models of quantum computation, Pauli exchange interactions cause a subset of 2-qubit errors to occur as a first-order effect of couplings within the computer, even in the absence of interactions with the computer's environment. We give an explicit 9-qubit code that corrects both Pauli exchange errors and all 1-qubit errors.

arXiv:quant-ph/9906114Physical Review LettersJul 3, 200050 citations

Introduction to quantum error correction

Andrew M. Steane

An introduction to quantum error correction (QEC) is given, and some recent developments are described. QEC consists of two parts: the physics of error processes and their reversal, and the construction of quantum error–correcting codes. Errors are caused both by imperfect quantum operations, and by coupling between the quantum system and its environment. Any such process can be analysed into a sum of ‘error operators’, which are tensor products of Pauli spin operators. These are the analogues of classical error vectors. A quantum error correcting code is a set of orthogonal states, ‘quantum codewords’, which behave in a certain useful way under the action of the most likely error operators. A computer or channel which only uses such states can be corrected by measurements which determine the error while yielding no information about which codeword or superposition of codewords is involved. Powerful codes can be found using a construction based on classical error–correcting codes. An analysis which allows even the corrective operations themselves to be imperfect leads to powerful and counter–intuitive results: the quantum coherence of a long quantum computation can be preserved even though every qubit in the computer relaxes spontaneously many times before the computation is complete.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesAug 15, 199838 citations

Quantum error correction and quantum computation

G. Alber, A. Delgado, M. Mussinger

In order to stabilize quantum algorithms against decoherence one has to fulfill two requirements. Firstly, one has to develop an appropriate quantum error correcting code. Secondly, one has to find a set of suitable unitary quantum transformations acting on the physical qubits which preserve the properties of this error correcting quantum code and which allow the implementation of a universal set of quantum gates. This is a challenging task in particular if we restrict ourselves to a limited class of two-particle interactions by which the physical qubits can be controlled. For the special cases of four and six physical qubits we discuss a set of such quantum gates which satisfy these two conditions for the recently developed detected-jump correcting quantum codes [1]. These quantum codes are capable of stabilizing distinguishable qubits against decoherence arising from spontaneous decay processes.

Laser PhysicsJan 1, 20020 citations

Quantum Error Correction

Phillip Kaye, Raymond Laflamme, Michele Mosca

A mathematical model of computation is an idealized abstraction. We design algorithms and perform analysis on the assumption that the mathematical operations we specify will be carried out exactly, and without error. Physical devices that implement an abstract model of computation are imperfect and of limited precision. For example, when a digital circuit is implemented on a physical circuit board, unwanted electrical noise in the environment may cause components to behave differently than expected, and may cause voltage levels (bit-values) to change. These sources of error must be controlled or compensated for, or else the resulting loss of efficiency may reduce the power of the information-processing device. If individual steps in a computation succeed with probability p, then a computation involving t sequential steps will have a success probability that decreases exponentially as pt. Although it may be impossible to eliminate the sources of errors, we can devise schemes to allow us to recover from errors using a reasonable amount of additional resources. Many classical digital computing devices use error-correcting codes to perform detection of and recovery from errors. The theory of error-correcting codes is itself a mathematical abstraction, but it is one that explicitly accounts for errors introduced by the imperfection and imprecision of realistic devices. This theory has proven extremely effective in allowing engineers to build computing devices that are resilient against errors. Quantum computers are more susceptible to errors than classical digital computers, because quantum mechanical systems are more delicate and more difficult to control. If large-scale quantum computers are to be possible, a theory of quantum error correction is needed. The discovery of quantum error correction has given researchers confidence that realistic large-scale quantum computing devices can be built despite the presence of errors. We begin by considering fundamental concepts for error correction in a classical setting. We will focus on three of these concepts: (a) the characterization of the error model, (b) the introduction of redundancy through encoding, and (c) an error recovery procedure. We will later see that these concepts generalize quite naturally for quantum error correction.

Oxford University Press eBooksNov 16, 20060 citations

Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation via Exchange Interactions

Masoud Mohseni, Daniel A. Lidar

Quantum computation can be performed by encoding logical qubits into the states of two or more physical qubits, and control of effective exchange interactions and possibly a global magnetic field. This "encoded universality" paradigm offers potential simplifications in quantum computer design since it does away with the need to control physical qubits individually. Here we show how encoded universality schemes can be combined with fault-tolerant quantum error correction, thus establishing the scalability of such schemes.

arXiv:quant-ph/0406198Physical Review LettersFeb 3, 200530 citations

Approximating Decoherence Processes for the Design and Simulation of Quantum Error Correction Codes on Classical Computers

Josu Etxezarreta Martínez, Patricio Fuentes, Pedro M. Crespo +1 more

Quantum information is prone to suffer from errors caused by the so-called decoherence, which describes the loss in coherence of quantum states associated to their interactions with the surrounding environment. This decoherence phenomenon is present in every quantum information task, be it transmission, processing or even storage of quantum information. Consequently, the protection of quantum information via quantum error correction codes (QECC) is of paramount importance to construct fully operational quantum computers. Understanding environmental decoherence processes and the way they are modeled is fundamental in order to construct effective error correction methods capable of protecting quantum information. Moreover, quantum channel models that are efficiently implementable and manageable on classical computers are required in order to design and simulate such error correction schemes. In this article, we present a survey of decoherence models, reviewing the manner in which these models can be approximated into quantum Pauli channel models, which can be efficiently implemented on classical computers. We also explain how certain families of quantum error correction codes can be entirely simulated in the classical domain, without the explicit need of a quantum computer. A quantum error correction code for the approximated channel is also a correctable code for the original channel, and its performance can be obtained by Monte Carlo simulations on a classical computer.

IEEE AccessJan 1, 202033 citations