A mathematical model of computation is an idealized abstraction. We design algorithms and perform analysis on the assumption that the mathematical operations we specify will be carried out exactly, and without error. Physical devices that implement an abstract model of computation are imperfect and of limited precision. For example, when a digital circuit is implemented on a physical circuit board, unwanted electrical noise in the environment may cause components to behave differently than expected, and may cause voltage levels (bit-values) to change. These sources of error must be controlled or compensated for, or else the resulting loss of efficiency may reduce the power of the information-processing device. If individual steps in a computation succeed with probability p, then a computation involving t sequential steps will have a success probability that decreases exponentially as pt. Although it may be impossible to eliminate the sources of errors, we can devise schemes to allow us to recover from errors using a reasonable amount of additional resources. Many classical digital computing devices use error-correcting codes to perform detection of and recovery from errors. The theory of error-correcting codes is itself a mathematical abstraction, but it is one that explicitly accounts for errors introduced by the imperfection and imprecision of realistic devices. This theory has proven extremely effective in allowing engineers to build computing devices that are resilient against errors. Quantum computers are more susceptible to errors than classical digital computers, because quantum mechanical systems are more delicate and more difficult to control. If large-scale quantum computers are to be possible, a theory of quantum error correction is needed. The discovery of quantum error correction has given researchers confidence that realistic large-scale quantum computing devices can be built despite the presence of errors. We begin by considering fundamental concepts for error correction in a classical setting. We will focus on three of these concepts: (a) the characterization of the error model, (b) the introduction of redundancy through encoding, and (c) an error recovery procedure. We will later see that these concepts generalize quite naturally for quantum error correction.
A mathematical model of computation is an idealized abstraction. We design algorithms and perform analysis on the assumption that the mathematical operations we specify will be carried out exactly, and without error. Physical devices that implement an abstract model of computation are imperfect and of limited precision. For example, when a digital circuit is implemented on a physical circuit board, unwanted electrical noise in the environment may cause components to behave differently than expected, and may cause voltage levels (bit-values) to change. These sources of error must be controlled or compensated for, or else the resulting loss of efficiency may reduce the power of the information-processing device. If individual steps in a computation succeed with probability p, then a computation involving t sequential steps will have a success probability that decreases exponentially as pt. Although it may be impossible to eliminate the sources of errors, we can devise schemes to allow us to recover from errors using a reasonable amount of additional resources. Many classical digital computing devices use error-correcting codes to perform detection of and recovery from errors. The theory of error-correcting codes is itself a mathematical abstraction, but it is one that explicitly accounts for errors introduced by the imperfection and imprecision of realistic devices. This theory has proven extremely effective in allowing engineers to build computing devices that are resilient against errors. Quantum computers are more susceptible to errors than classical digital computers, because quantum mechanical systems are more delicate and more difficult to control. If large-scale quantum computers are to be possible, a theory of quantum error correction is needed. The discovery of quantum error correction has given researchers confidence that realistic large-scale quantum computing devices can be built despite the presence of errors. We begin by considering fundamental concepts for error correction in a classical setting. We will focus on three of these concepts: (a) the characterization of the error model, (b) the introduction of redundancy through encoding, and (c) an error recovery procedure. We will later see that these concepts generalize quite naturally for quantum error correction.
Quantum computing exists at the intersection of mathematics, physics, chemistry, and engineering; the main goal of quantum computing is the creation of devices and algorithms which use the properties of quantum mechanics to store, manipulate and measure information. There exist many families of algorithms, which, using non-classical logical operations, can outperform traditional, classical algorithms in terms of memory and processing requirements. In addition, quantum computing devices are fundamentally smaller than classical processors and memory elements; since the physical models governing their performance are applicable on all scales, as opposed to classical logic elements, whose underlying principles rely on the macroscopic nature of the device in question. \n \nQuantum algorithms, for the most part, are predicated on a theory of resources. It is often assumed that quantum computers can be placed in a precise fiducial state prior to computation, and that logical operations are perfect, inducing no error on the system which they affect. These assumptions greatly simplify algorithmic design, but are fundamentally unrealistic. In order to justify their use, it is necessary to develop a framework for using a large number of imperfect devices to simulate the action of a perfect device, with some acceptable probability of failure. This is the study of fault-tolerant quantum computing. In order to pursue this study effectively, it is necessary to understand the fundamental nature of generic quantum states and operations, as well as the means by which one can correct quantum errors. Additionally, it is important to attempt to minimize the use of computational resources in achieving error reduction and fault-tolerant computing. \n \nThis thesis is concerned with three projects related to the use of error-prone quantum systems to transmit and manipulate information. The first of these is concerned with the use of imperfectly-prepared states in error-correction routines. Using optimal quantum error correction, we are able to deduce a method of partially protecting encoded quantum information against preparation errors prior to encoding, using no additional qubits. The second of these projects details the search for entangled states which can be used to transmit classical information over quantum channels at a rate superior to classical states. The third of these projects concerns the transcoding of data from one quantum code into another using few ancillary resources. The descriptions of these projects are preceded by a brief introduction to representations of quantum states and channels, for completeness. \n \nThree techniques of general interest are presented in appendices. The first is an introduction to, and a minor advance in the development of optimal error correction codes. The second is a more efficient means of calculating the action of a quantum channel on a given state, given that the channel acts non-trivially only on a subsystem, rather than the entire system. Finally, we include documentation on a software package developed to aid the search for quantum transcoding operations.
In Chapter 4 we introduced different quantum gates and quantum circuits and in Chapter 5 we described several quantum algorithms. So far the analysis of the algorithms and the circuits has been made with the assumption that the required unitary operations can be implemented exactly without any error. This is an abstraction. In an actual physical system that implements a quantum algorithm or a quantum circuit there are several sources of errors. The situation is similar in classical computation and to circumvent this problem error correcting codes are used in classical digital computing. Since qubits are more delicate and more susceptible to errors we need to introduce quantum error correcting codes. It is very important, as without such codes it will not be possible to build a scalable quantum computer. Such quantum error correcting codes are introduced in this chapter. However, we will not limit ourselves to the discussion of error correcting codes alone. We will also discuss more general aspects of errors and error correction, like decoherence, decoherence free subspace and fault-tolerance.
Abstract Quantum computing1—the processing of information according to the fundamental laws of physics—offers a means to solve efficiently a small but significant set of classically intractable problems. Quantum computers are based on the controlled manipulation of entangled quantum states, which are extremely sensitive to noise and imprecision; active correction of errors must therefore be implemented without causing loss of coherence. Quantum error-correction theory2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 has made great progress in this regard, by predicting error-correcting ‘codeword’ quantum states. But the coding is inefficient and requires many quantum bits10, 11, 12, which results in physically unwieldy fault-tolerant quantum circuits10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18. Here I report a general technique for circumventing the trade-off between the achieved noise tolerance and the scale-up in computer size that is required to realize the error correction. I adapt the recovery operation (the process by which noise is suppressed through error detection and correction) to simultaneously correct errors and perform a useful measurement that drives the computation. The result is that a quantum computer need be only an order of magnitude larger than the logic device contained within it. For example, the physical scale-up factor10, 11 required to factorize a thousand-digit number is reduced from 1, 500 to 22, while preserving the original tolerated gate error rate (10−5) and memory noise per bit (10−7). The difficulty of realizing a useful quantum computer is therefore significantly reduced.
The Achilles' heel of quantum information processors is the fragility of quantum states and processes. Without a method to control imperfection and imprecision of quantum devices, the probability that a quantum computation succeed will decrease exponentially in the number of gates it requires. In the last fifteen years, building on the discovery of quantum error correction, accuracy threshold theorems were proved showing that error can be controlled using a reasonable amount of resources as long as the error rate is smaller than a certain threshold. We thus have a scalable theory describing how to control quantum systems. The next step is to turn this theory into practice. I will give an overview of some of the progress towards the implmentation of quantum error correction around the world with a focus on results since the last Quantum Error Correction conference at USC. I will compare the various achievements and point towards what still need to be done to get robust quantum information processors.
Quantum error correction (QEC) is required in quantum computers to mitigate the impact of errorson physical qubits. The goal is to optimize the neural network for high decoding performance whilemaintaining a minimalistic hardware implementation. The errors associated with decoherence can bereduced by adopting QEC schemes that encode multiple imperfect physical qubits into a logical quantumstate, similar to classical error correction. The relevance of these studies lies in the mathematicaland software modeling and implementation of corrective codes to correct several types of quantumerrors in the development and implementation of quantum algorithms for solving classes of problems ofa classical nature. The scientific novelty of this direction is expressed in the elimination of one of theshortcomings of the quantum computing process. The development of the theory and principles for constructingmodeling systems that are resistant to external interference (dependence of data distortion onnoise, dependence of the error of a quantum computing process on the measure and purity of entanglement)for modeling quantum computing is a dynamic area, as evidenced by a large number of existingmodels reflecting certain quantum computational processes and phenomena (quantum teleportation,parallelism, entanglement of quantum states) and scientific papers. Although quantum computing is notyet ready to move from theory to practice, it is nevertheless possible to reasonably guess what form aquantum computer might take, or, more importantly for programming language design, what interface itwould be possible to interact with such a quantum computer. It is natural to apply the lessons learnedfrom the programming of classical computing to quantum computing. The analysis of works in this areashowed that a new qualitative level has now been reached, which opens up promising opportunities forthe implementation of multi-qubit quantum computing. Prospects for implementation and developmentare associated not only with technological capabilities, but also with the solution of issues of buildingeffective quantum systems for solving actual mathematical problems, cryptography problems and control(optimization) problems.
Quantum computers have the potential to solve several interesting problems in polynomial \ntime for which no polynomial time classical algorithms have been found. However, \none of the major challenges in building quantum devices is that quantum systems are very \nsensitive to noise arising from undesired interactions with the environment. Noise can lead \nto errors which can corrupt the results of the computation. Quantum error correction is \none way to mitigate the effects of noise arising in quantum devices. \nWith a plethora of quantum error correcting codes that can be used in various settings, \none of the main challenges of quantum error correction is understanding how well various \ncodes perform under more realistic noise models that can be observed in experiments. \nThis thesis proposes a new decoding algorithm which can optimize threshold values of \nerror correcting codes under different noise models. The algorithm can be applied to \nany Markovian noise model. Further, it is shown that for certain noise models, logical \nClifford corrections can further improve a code's threshold value if the code obeys certain \nsymmetries. \n \nSince gates and measurements cannot in general be performed with perfect precision, \nthe operations required to perform quantum error correction can introduce more errors \ninto the system thus negating the benefits of error correction. Fault-tolerant quantum \ncomputing is a way to perform quantum error correction with imperfect operations while \nretaining the ability to suppress errors as long as the noise is below a code's threshold. \nOne of the main challenges in performing fault-tolerant error correction is the high resource \nrequirements that are needed to obtain very low logical noise rates. With the use of \nflag qubits, this thesis develops new fault-tolerant error correction protocols that are applicable \nto arbitrary distance codes. Various code families are shown to satisfy the requirements \nof flag fault-tolerant error correction. We also provide circuits using a constant number of \nqubits for these codes. It is shown that the proposed flag fault-tolerant method uses fewer \nqubits than previous fault-tolerant error correction protocols. \n \nIt is often the case that the noise afflicting a quantum device cannot be fully characterized. \nFurther, even with some knowledge of the noise, it can be very challenging to use \nanalytic decoding methods to improve the performance of a fault-tolerant scheme. This \nthesis presents decoding schemes using several state of the art machine learning techniques \nwith a focus on fault-tolerant quantum error correction in regimes that are relevant to near \nterm experiments. It is shown that even in low noise rate regimes and with no knowledge \nof the noise, noise can be further suppressed for small distance codes. Limitations of machine \nlearning decoders as well as the classical resources required to perform active error \ncorrection are discussed. \n \nIn many cases, gate times can be much shorter than typical measurement times of \nquantum states. Further, classical decoding of the syndrome information used in quantum \nerror correction to compute recovery operators can also be much slower than gate times. \nFor these reasons, schemes where error correction can be implemented in a frame (known \nas the Pauli frame) have been developed to avoid active error correction. In this thesis, we \ngeneralize previous Pauli frame schemes and show how Clifford frame error correction can \nbe implemented with minimal overhead. Clifford frame error correction is necessary if the \nlogical component of recovery operators were chosen from the Clifford group, but could \nalso be used in randomized benchmarking schemes.