Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0005125 · Physical Review A

Optimal entanglement purification via entanglement swapping

Bao‐Sen Shi, Yun-Kun Jiang, Guang‐Can Guo

Published Oct 10, 2000• 175 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

It is known that entanglement swapping can be used to realize entanglement purification. In this way, two particles belonging to different nonmaximally entangled pairs can be projected probabilistically to a maximally entangled state or to a less entangled state. In this paper, we show, when the less entangled state is obtained, then a maximally entangled state can be obtained probabilistically from this less entangled state if a unitary transformation is introduced locally. The probability of success of our scheme is equal to the entanglement of a single pair purification (if two original pairs are in the same nonmaximally entangled states) or to the smaller entanglement of a single pair purification of these two pairs (if two original pairs are not in the same nonmaximally entangled states). The advantage of our scheme is that no continuous indefinite iterative procedure is needed to achieve optimal purification.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.62.054301

Related papers

The entanglement purification for entangled multi-particle states

Ye Liu, Chunmei Yao, Guang‐Can Guo

We present two purification schemes for nonmaximally entangled states. We first show that two parties, Alice and Bob, start with shared less-entangled three-particle states to probabilistically produce a three-particle Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state by Bell state measurements and positve operator valued measure (POVM) or a unitary transformation. Then, by a straightforward generalization of the schemes, the purification of a multi-particle entangled state can be realized.

Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Apr 18, 2002•3 citations

Nonmaximally entangled bases and their application in entanglement purification via swapping

Mátyás Koniorczyk, Vladimír Bužek

Four basis vectors of the Hilbert space of two qubits have the property that if three of them are product states, then the fourth one has to be a product state as well. We address the following situation: Consider a set of orthogonal vectors, each exhibiting a certain degree of entanglement. What is the bound on entanglement of the rest of the basis vectors to form a complete orthonormal basis? Specifically, we present an orthonormal basis, the $\ensuremath{\Xi}$ basis in the Hilbert space of two qubits, with one product state and three equally entangled states. The maximum of the so available entanglement is quantified. A close-to-optimal protocol is presented for entanglement purification via entanglement swapping of two-qubit states. It is based on a suitably chosen nonmaximally entangled basis and carried out in a single step without any ancillas. A similar application of the $\ensuremath{\Xi}$ basis is examined. In this latter case, all the involved entangled states have different and nonorthogonal Schmidt decompositions and, except for some possibly resulting states, none of them are maximally entangled. Entanglement of single pair purification is not conserved on average in this case.

Physical Review A•Mar 21, 2005•9 citations

Optimal Interpolation of Entanglement Purification Protocols

Matthew Barber, Stefano Pirandola

Bipartite entanglement purification is the conversion of copies of weakly entangled pairs shared between two separated parties into a smaller number of strongly entangled shared pairs using only local operations and classical communication. Choosing between different entanglement purification protocols generally involves weighing up a trade-off between the ratio of strongly entangled pairs produced to weakly entangled pairs consumed, which we call the rate of the protocol, and the degree of the entanglement of the strongly entangled pairs, typically measured by the fidelity of those pairs to maximally entangled states. By randomly choosing a protocol according to a probability distribution over a list of protocols for each pair we want to produce, we can achieve rates and fidelities not achieved by any of the original protocols. Here, we show how to choose this distribution to maximize the rate at which we produce qubit pairs with a given fidelity to a Bell state or, equivalently, to maximize the fidelity to a Bell state of the qubit pairs produced at a given rate. We investigate both the asymptotic case, where the number of initial pairs goes to infinity, and the finite-size regime, where protocols are restricted to a finite number of weakly entangled pairs.

quant-pharXiv:2511.09657•Physical Review A•Nov 14, 2025•0 citations

Matching for probabilistic entanglement swapping.

Luis Roa, Torben L. Purz, Ariana S. Muñoz +3 more

The basic entanglement swapping protocol allows to achieve the main aim of deterministically projecting two qubits, which have never interacted, onto a maximally entangled state. For deterministic swapping the key ingredient is the maximal entanglement initially contained in two pairs of qubits and the ability to measure onto a Bell basis. In other words, the basic and deterministic entanglement swapping scheme involves three maximal level of entanglement. In this work we address probabilistic entanglement swapping processes performed with different amounts of initial entanglement. Besides, we suggest a non Bell measuring-basis, thus we introduce a third entanglement level in the process. Additionally, we propose the \emph{unambiguous state extraction} scheme as the local mechanism for probabilistically achieving the main aim. Amalgamating these three elements allows us to design four strategies for performing probabilistic entanglement swapping. Surprisingly, we encountered an twofold entanglement matching effect related to the concurrence of the measuring-basis. Specifically, the maximal probability of accomplishing the main aim becomes a constant for concurrences higher than or equal to the matching entanglement values. Thus, we show that maximal entanglement in the measuring-basis is not required for attaining the main aim with optimal probability.

•Jul 16, 2021•0 citations

Practical scheme for entanglement concentration

Zhi Zhao, Jian-Wei Pan, Mingsheng Zhan

We present a realistic purification scheme for pure nonmaximally entangled states. In the scheme, two distant parties Alice and Bob first start with two shared but less entangled photon pairs to produce a conditional four-photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state, and then perform a $45\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}$ polarization measurement onto one of the two photons at each location such that the remaining two photons are projected onto a maximally entangled state.

arXiv:quant-ph/0104039•Physical Review A•Jun 4, 2001•251 citations

Purification for entangled multi-atom states via entanglement swapping

Gong Ren-shan

Purification of non-maximally entangled two-atom states and three-atom states is investigated by means of entanglement swapping,which is generalized to non-maximally entangled multi-atom states' purification.It is found that the purification probabilities in all kinds of entangled atom states are the same, 2|b|~2,which is equal to twice modulus of the least coefficient of four coefficients in entangled atom states.

Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations
It is known that entanglement swapping can be used to realize entanglement purification. In this way, two particles belonging to different nonmaximally entangled pairs can be projected probabilistically to a maximally entangled state or to a less entangled state. In this paper, we show, when the less entangled state is obtained, then a maximally entangled state can be obtained probabilistically from this less entangled state if a unitary transformation is introduced locally. The probability of success of our scheme is equal to the entanglement of a single pair purification (if two original pairs are in the same nonmaximally entangled states) or to the smaller entanglement of a single pair purification of these two pairs (if two original pairs are not in the same nonmaximally entangled states). The advantage of our scheme is that no continuous indefinite iterative procedure is needed to achieve optimal purification.
Four basis vectors of the Hilbert space of two qubits have the property that if three of them are product states, then the fourth one has to be a product state as well. We address the following situation: Consider a set of orthogonal vectors, each exhibiting a certain degree of entanglement. What is the bound on entanglement of the rest of the basis vectors to form a complete orthonormal basis? Specifically, we present an orthonormal basis, the $\ensuremath{\Xi}$ basis in the Hilbert space of two qubits, with one product state and three equally entangled states. The maximum of the so available entanglement is quantified. A close-to-optimal protocol is presented for entanglement purification via entanglement swapping of two-qubit states. It is based on a suitably chosen nonmaximally entangled basis and carried out in a single step without any ancillas. A similar application of the $\ensuremath{\Xi}$ basis is examined. In this latter case, all the involved entangled states have different and nonorthogonal Schmidt decompositions and, except for some possibly resulting states, none of them are maximally entangled. Entanglement of single pair purification is not conserved on average in this case.
Bipartite entanglement purification is the conversion of copies of weakly entangled pairs shared between two separated parties into a smaller number of strongly entangled shared pairs using only local operations and classical communication. Choosing between different entanglement purification protocols generally involves weighing up a trade-off between the ratio of strongly entangled pairs produced to weakly entangled pairs consumed, which we call the rate of the protocol, and the degree of the entanglement of the strongly entangled pairs, typically measured by the fidelity of those pairs to maximally entangled states. By randomly choosing a protocol according to a probability distribution over a list of protocols for each pair we want to produce, we can achieve rates and fidelities not achieved by any of the original protocols. Here, we show how to choose this distribution to maximize the rate at which we produce qubit pairs with a given fidelity to a Bell state or, equivalently, to maximize the fidelity to a Bell state of the qubit pairs produced at a given rate. We investigate both the asymptotic case, where the number of initial pairs goes to infinity, and the finite-size regime, where protocols are restricted to a finite number of weakly entangled pairs.
The basic entanglement swapping protocol allows to achieve the main aim of deterministically projecting two qubits, which have never interacted, onto a maximally entangled state. For deterministic swapping the key ingredient is the maximal entanglement initially contained in two pairs of qubits and the ability to measure onto a Bell basis. In other words, the basic and deterministic entanglement swapping scheme involves three maximal level of entanglement. In this work we address probabilistic entanglement swapping processes performed with different amounts of initial entanglement. Besides, we suggest a non Bell measuring-basis, thus we introduce a third entanglement level in the process. Additionally, we propose the \emph{unambiguous state extraction} scheme as the local mechanism for probabilistically achieving the main aim. Amalgamating these three elements allows us to design four strategies for performing probabilistic entanglement swapping. Surprisingly, we encountered an twofold entanglement matching effect related to the concurrence of the measuring-basis. Specifically, the maximal probability of accomplishing the main aim becomes a constant for concurrences higher than or equal to the matching entanglement values. Thus, we show that maximal entanglement in the measuring-basis is not required for attaining the main aim with optimal probability.