Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0004046 · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Classical and quantum dynamics of a spin-½

Adrian Alscher, Hermann Grabert

Published May 3, 2000• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We reply to a comment on `Semiclassical dynamics of a spin-½ in an arbitrary magnetic field'.
DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/33/17/4n2

Related papers

Comment on “Spin evolution of a neutral particle in an oscillating magnetic field”

Apoorva G. Wagh, Veer Chand Rakhecha

Physics Letters A•Dec 1, 1994•0 citations

Semiclassical dynamics of a spin-½ in an arbitrary magnetic field

Adrian Alscher, Hermann Grabert

The spin coherent state path integral describing the dynamics of a spin-½ system in a magnetic field of arbitrary time dependence is considered. Defining the path integral as the limit of a Wiener regularized expression, the semiclassical approximation leads to a continuous minimal action path with jumps at the endpoints. The resulting semiclassical propagator is shown to coincide with the exact quantum mechanical propagator. A nonlinear transformation of the angle variables allows for a determination of the semiclassical path and the jumps without solving a boundary-value problem. The semiclassical spin dynamics is thus readily amenable to numerical methods.

arXiv:quant-ph/9904102•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jan 1, 1999•17 citations

Reply to a Comment by J. Bolte, R. Glaser and S. Keppeler on: Semiclassical theory of spin-orbit interactions using spin coherent states

Mikhail Pletyukhov, Ch. Amann, Mehta, M. +1 more

We reply to a Comment on our recently proposed semiclassical theory for systems with spin-orbit interactions.

arXiv:nlin/0209028•Sep 13, 2002•0 citations

On the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formulation of classical dynamics for particles with spin

Th.W. Ruijgrok, H. van der Vlist

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•May 1, 1980•10 citations

A comment on relativistic Hamiltonian equations for any spin

David Leo Weaver

Annals of Physics•Dec 1, 1975•0 citations

Comment on `Semiclassical dynamics of a spin-½ in an arbitrary magnetic field'

E. A. Kochetov

In a recent paper Alscher and Grabert claim to prove that a dominant (tree-level) stationary phase approximation to the Wiener regularized continuum su(2) coherent-state path integral for the quantum propagator : = ⟨zF | T exp (-i∫0τH ds ) | zI⟩ becomes exact, provided H is a linear combination of the su(2) generators with arbitrary time-dependent coefficients. I find the derivation of this in fact obvious result unduly complicated and somewhat obscure. The authors start from a classical spin action inconsistent with necessary boundary conditions and therefore are forced to invoke a nontrivial regularization of the action to render the latter meaningful. Alternatively, when a su(2) symplectic potential consistent with the boundary conditions is employed, no regularization is required to obtain the leading quasiclassical asymptotics.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•May 3, 2000•1 citation
The spin coherent state path integral describing the dynamics of a spin-½ system in a magnetic field of arbitrary time dependence is considered. Defining the path integral as the limit of a Wiener regularized expression, the semiclassical approximation leads to a continuous minimal action path with jumps at the endpoints. The resulting semiclassical propagator is shown to coincide with the exact quantum mechanical propagator. A nonlinear transformation of the angle variables allows for a determination of the semiclassical path and the jumps without solving a boundary-value problem. The semiclassical spin dynamics is thus readily amenable to numerical methods.
In a recent paper Alscher and Grabert claim to prove that a dominant (tree-level) stationary phase approximation to the Wiener regularized continuum su(2) coherent-state path integral for the quantum propagator : = ⟨zF | T exp (-i∫0τH ds ) | zI⟩ becomes exact, provided H is a linear combination of the su(2) generators with arbitrary time-dependent coefficients. I find the derivation of this in fact obvious result unduly complicated and somewhat obscure. The authors start from a classical spin action inconsistent with necessary boundary conditions and therefore are forced to invoke a nontrivial regularization of the action to render the latter meaningful. Alternatively, when a su(2) symplectic potential consistent with the boundary conditions is employed, no regularization is required to obtain the leading quasiclassical asymptotics.