Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0001093 · Journal of Statistical Physics

Consistent Quantum Realism: A Reply to Bassi and Ghirardi

Robert B. Griffiths

Published Jun 1, 2000• 20 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1023/a:1018601225280

Related papers

Consistent Quantum Realism: A Reply to Griffiths

Angelo Bassi, G. C. Ghirardi

Journal of Statistical Physics•Jun 1, 2000•3 citations

Reply to Comments of Bassi, Ghirardi, and Tumulka on the Free Will Theorem

John Conway, Simon Kochen

arXiv:quant-ph/0701016•Foundations of Physics•Oct 1, 2007•14 citations

Counting Marbles with 'Accessible' Mass Density: A Reply to Bassi and Ghirardi

R. Clifton, Bradley Monton

In a previous article (cf. quant-ph/9905065) we argued that, while Lewis is correct that the enumeration principle fails in dynamical wavepacket reduction theories, one need not following Lewis in rejecting these theories. Because the dynamical reduction process itself prevents the failure of enumeration from ever becoming manifest, and because one can treat the semantics for dynamical reduction theories as not adding anything of ontological import to them, it is reasonable to accept these theories notwithstanding Lewis's counting anomaly. In their response to our paper (cf. quant-ph/9907050), Bassi and Ghirardi reject our criticisms of their own response to Lewis, as well as our argument against Lewis that dynamical reduction precludes failures of enumeration from ever becoming manifest. Our intention here is to demonstrate that Bassi and Ghirardi's responses to us do not succeed.

arXiv:quant-ph/9909071•The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science•Mar 1, 2000•22 citations

QUANTUM REALISM: THE INTERPRETATION OF AN INTERPRETATION?

Jan Faye

Danish Yearbook of Philosophy•Aug 2, 2006•0 citations

Reply to `On a recent proposal of faster than light quantum communication'

Anwar Y. Shiekh

In a recent paper the author proposed the possibility of an experiment to perform faster-than-light communication via the collapse of the quantum wave-function. This was analyzed by Bassi and Ghirardi, and it is believed that this analysis itself merits a detailed examination.

arXiv:0801.0099•Dec 29, 2007•0 citations

Realism and Quantum Mechanics

G. C. Ghirardi

BRILL eBooks•Jan 1, 1997•1 citation
In a previous article (cf. quant-ph/9905065) we argued that, while Lewis is correct that the enumeration principle fails in dynamical wavepacket reduction theories, one need not following Lewis in rejecting these theories. Because the dynamical reduction process itself prevents the failure of enumeration from ever becoming manifest, and because one can treat the semantics for dynamical reduction theories as not adding anything of ontological import to them, it is reasonable to accept these theories notwithstanding Lewis's counting anomaly. In their response to our paper (cf. quant-ph/9907050), Bassi and Ghirardi reject our criticisms of their own response to Lewis, as well as our argument against Lewis that dynamical reduction precludes failures of enumeration from ever becoming manifest. Our intention here is to demonstrate that Bassi and Ghirardi's responses to us do not succeed.