arXiv:physics/0306079

Physical Framework of Quantization Problem

M. Grigorescu

Published Jun 10, 2003• 5 citations

Abstract

The paper presents shortly the geometric approach to the problem of a general quantization formalism, both physically meaningful and mathematically consistent.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.physics/0306079

Related papers

The Law of Geometric Consistency (LGC): A Proposed Structural Principle for Quantum States, Information Geometry, and Physical Realizability

Halil Özbil

The Law of Geometric Consistency (LGC) is introduced as a proposed theoretical framework investigating whether physically realizable states require compatibility with underlying geometric and structural constraints.This work explores the possibility that not every mathematically allowed configuration corresponds to a physically admissible state. A geometric mapping perspective is developed to study relationships between quantum states, spacetime structure, information geometry, and complex physical systems.The framework discusses:geometric consistency as a possible state-selection principle,structural constraints in physical theories,connections with quantum foundations and measurement problems,potential applications in information geometry and complex systems.LGC is presented as an open research proposal requiring further mathematical formalization, independent validation, and experimental investigation.This work is part of the Structure-Sensitive Science Research Program (2026–2035).

Jun 4, 20260 citations

Some aspects of geometric quantization and their physical basis

John Andrew Pinto

Jan 1, 19870 citations

Introduction

V. P. Nair

Abstract The motivation for geometric quantization and how it relates to other approaches to quantization are briefly discussed.

SpringerBriefs in physicsJan 1, 20240 citations

Research Framework: Physical Distinguishability in HCC-S³

Andrei Preece, Boris Batenin

What makes information physically possible? This research framework marks a significant shift in the evolution of the HCC-S³ programme. Rather than asking how much information a physical system can store, it asks a more fundamental question: under what conditions can a difference between two quantum states become physically real? The framework proposes that information is not a primitive entity, but a derived quantity arising from realised physical distinguishability. In this view, geometry does not merely provide a background for physics—it constrains which distinctions can exist as physically meaningful states. The central conceptual chain is intentionally reversed with respect to classical information theory: Physical Carrier (M, g) → Geometric Constraints → Physical Distinguishability → RPD(M) → N_dist = |RPD(M)| → I = log₂ N_dist. Here, RPD(M) denotes the set of realised physically distinguishable equivalence classes on a compact carrier, while I = log₂ N_dist becomes a consequence rather than an axiom. This approach shifts the focus from counting bits to identifying the geometric and operational conditions that make bits possible in the first place. A key feature of the framework is the introduction of the general geometric functional 𝒢(M), combining candidate structures such as holonomy, Berry phase, spin structure, curvature invariants, Dirac and Laplace spectra, and spectral gaps. The framework does not claim that any single element determines distinguishability. Instead, it establishes a disciplined research programme in which these geometric structures are investigated as potential constraints on physically admissible differences between quantum states. The framework also introduces an operational definition of distinguishability: two states are physically distinguishable only if there exists a finite-energy, finite-time local operation capable of discriminating them above a prescribed threshold. This deliberately separates physical distinguishability from purely mathematical orthogonality and places experimental accessibility at the centre of the formalism. Importantly, HCC-S³ is presented as the primary compact test carrier, not as an exclusive description of physical reality. The formalism is intentionally written for a general compact manifold M, allowing future comparison with alternative compact geometries. This makes the programme methodologically open while preserving a concrete reference model for mathematical development. Rather than proposing a completed theory, this work establishes a research framework. It introduces precise definitions, axioms, candidate criteria, research questions, and open mathematical problems, providing a structured path toward a future ontology of physical information. The long-term objective is not merely to measure information, but to understand how geometry, quantum structure, and operational constraints give rise to physically realised distinguishability, from which information naturally emerges as a derived concept.

Jul 7, 20260 citations

On geometric quantization and its connections with the Maslov theory

J. Czyż

Reports on Mathematical PhysicsFeb 1, 197928 citations

Change without time. Relationalism and field quantization

Johannes Simon

The nature of time has long been debated in human history and nowadays is considered of central importance for understanding quantum gravity. We focus on and advocate the relational concept of time, which was put forward in the 17th century in opposition to Newton's absolute time, and only in 1990 explored in a quantum mechanical framework by Carlo Rovelli. After a historical introduction the mathematical models of time are carefully analyzed in chapter 1, followed by a discussion of the role of time played in fundamental theories. Using as an example nonrelativistic mechanics, the process of parametrization is explained, leading to a separation of a 'canonical time coordinate' from an arbitrary evolution parameter. The discussion of the role of time in special and general relativity as well as in quantum mechanics shows that more fundamental theories use less structure of time. This is followed by an exposition of the history of the relational concept of time, which negates the existence of an absolute duration and therefore often is called "timeless". Next it is shown how fundamental theories can be formulated and re-interpreted using this concept. We put emphasis on the hitherto neglected connection between relationalism and non-extensibility, while absolute time is shown to be unproblematic in classical mechanics just because of the possibility to extend the system without changing its nature. We conclude chapter 1 with a new axiomatic basis for the construction of time observables based on a simultaneity relation between 'observations', which are treated as a primitive concept and intuitively correspond to measurement events, but without knowing 'when' these events occur. There is no fundamental time observable; any observable qualifies as a time observable, if it allows to separate all instants. Chapter 2 gives a brief account of three main problems connected with time: a) The problem of the arrow of time. This has to be disentangled from the problem of irreversibility: a solution of the latter essentially excludes cyclic motions and is required for a solution of the former, which consists in showing that a fundamental direction between any two non-identical instants is physically meaningful. We give a formal definition of the arrow of time. This classical analysis is followed by a review of the problem of the arrow of time in quantum theory, where the situation becomes more complicated because of indeterminism. The discussion shows that there is no experimental evidence for a fundamental arrow of time, so that no contradiction with the relational concept of time arises. b) The problem of time measurement, which is of particular importance for the relational approach, in which time has no reality except if measured by a clock. In quantum theory useful time operators seem to be possible only within the more general formalism of positive operator valued measures (POVM). Clocks based on an oscillation mechanism do however require phase measurements; quantum phase operators can be defined as certain POVMs. Phase difference operators do also exist in the traditional Hilbert space formalism, if another quantization is used, as is done with relational quantization. c) The problem of quantum gravity is sketched only briefly. Chapter 3 introduces and discusses a model of Rovelli consisting of two oscillators with no external time. In this model one oscillator is considered as a clock and defines a relational time for the other one. In the first section we introduce this model and generalize it to a free massless scalar field in one dimension. We establish the relation between a single field mode and the infrared behaviour of the field through constants of motion. In the second section after a short review of canonical quantization we review Rovelli's quantization and generalize it to the free field. We could not prove the existence of the quantization map, but calculations using computer algebra indicate that the quantization does exist. For an enlarged algebra we are able to prove the nonexistence of a quantization map similar to a proof by Groenewold and van Hove. In chapter 4 we observe that a clock time always requires infinitely many degrees of freedom, and we make the hypothesis that a time observable is given by the infrared behaviour of quantum fields, leading to a classical notion of time when using algebraic quantum mechanics. This does however not solve the main problem of quantum relationalism: Which conditions determine a particular evolution?

Jan 1, 20050 citations