The Deutsch multiverse is collection of parallel universes. In this article a formal theory and a topos-theoretic model of the Deutsch multiverse are given. For this the Lawvere-Kock Synthetic Differential Geometry and topos models for smooth infinitesimal analysis are used. Physical properties of multi-variant and many-dimensional parallel universes are discussed. Quantum fluctuations of universe geometry are considered. Photon ghosts in parallel universes are found.
The Deutsch multiverse is collection of parallel universes. In this article a formal theory and a topos-theoretic model of the Deutsch multiverse are given. For this the Lawvere-Kock Synthetic Differential Geometry and topos models for smooth infinitesimal analysis are used. Physical properties of multi-variant and many-dimensional parallel universes are discussed. Quantum fluctuations of universe geometry are considered. Photon ghosts in parallel universes are found.
We strengthen the case that the new logical perspective afforded by topos theory is suitable to the task of describing the physical world around us. In exploring some of the aspects of construction of a simple quantum-mechanical system in a mathematical universe different from that represented by set theory, we show that more thought and a better appreciation of the assumptions going into any mathematical model of the physical world are needed. We reflect on some of the mathematical consequences of this wider perspective of physics, explaining one interpretation of probabilistic values and numerical calculations in two mathematical universes governed by the less restrictive intuitionistic logic, and known to support the theory of synthetic differential geometry.
A quantum theory of the universe consists of a theory of its quantum dynamics and a theory of its quantum state The theory predicts quantum multiverses in the form of decoherent sets of alternative histories describing the evolution of the universe's spacetime geometry and matter content. These consequences follow: (a) The universe generally exhibits different quantum multiverses at different levels and kinds of coarse graining. (b) Quantum multiverses are not a choice or an assumption but are consequences of the theory or not. (c) Quantum multiverses are generic for simple theories (d) Anthropic selection is automatic because observers are physical systems within the universe not somehow outside it. (e) Quantum multiverses can provide different mechanisms for the variation constants in effective theories (like the cosmological constant) enabling anthropic selection. (f) Different levels of coarse grained multiverses provide different routes to calculation as a consequence of decoherence. We support these conclusions by analyzing the quantum multiverses of a variety of quantum cosmological models aimed at the prediction of observable properties of our universe. In particular we show how the example of a multiverse consisting of a vast classical spacetime containing many pocket universes arises automatically as part of a quantum multiverse describing an eternally inflating false vacuum that decays by the quantum nucleation of true vacuum bubbles. In a FAQ we argue that the quantum multiverses of the universe are scientific, real, testable, falsifiable, and similar to those in other areas of science even if they are not directly observable on arbitrarily large scales.
Ever since its foundations were laid nearly a century ago, quantum theory has provoked questions about the very nature of reality. We address these questions by considering the universe – and the multiverse – fundamentally as complex patterns, or mathematical structures. Basic mathematical structures can be expressed more simply in terms of emergent parameters. Even simple mathematical structures can interact within their own structural environment, in a rudimentary form of self-awareness, which suggests a definition of reality in a mathematical structure as simply the complete structure. The absolute randomness of quantum outcomes is most satisfactorily explained by a multiverse of discrete, parallel universes. Some of these have to be identical to each other, but that introduces a dilemma, because each mathematical structure must be unique. The resolution is that the parallel universes must be embedded within a mathematical structure – the multiverse – which allows universes to be identical within themselves, but nevertheless distinct, as determined by their position in the structure. The multiverse needs more emergent parameters than our universe and so it can be considered to be a superstructure. Correspondingly, its reality can be called a super-reality. While every universe in the multiverse is part of the super-reality, the complete super-reality is forever beyond the horizon of any of its component universes.
Abstract Ever since its foundations were laid nearly a century ago, quantum theory has provoked questions about the very nature of reality. We address these questions by considering the universe—and the multiverse—fundamentally as complex patterns, or mathematical structures. Basic mathematical structures can be expressed more simply in terms of emergent parameters. Even simple mathematical structures can interact within their own structural environment, in a rudimentary form of self-awareness, which suggests a definition of reality in a mathematical structure as simply the complete structure. The absolute randomness of quantum outcomes is most satisfactorily explained by a multiverse of discrete, parallel universes. Some of these have to be identical to each other, but that introduces a dilemma, because each mathematical structure must be unique. The resolution is that the parallel universes must be embedded within a mathematical structure—the multiverse—which allows universes to be identical within themselves, but nevertheless distinct, as determined by their position in the structure. The multiverse needs more emergent parameters than our universe and so it can be considered to be a superstructure. Correspondingly, its reality can be called a super-reality. While every universe in the multiverse is part of the super-reality, the complete super-reality is forever beyond the horizon of any of its component universes.
The usual analytic approach to differential geometry was explored in the early 18th century using the defining notion of limit.With the advent of topos theory in the late 20th century, it has been possible to rediscover without the use of limits the differential and integral calculus, and its development into Synthetic Differential Geometry (SDG), in mathematical universes other than that represented by set theory.These universes obey a subtle but well understood generalisation of classical logic: intuitionistic logic.This thesis presents an exploration of the construction of quantum mechanics in the context of SDG.Chapter 1 introduces SDG, intuitionistic logic, topos theory and a particular topos used in the thesis.Chapter 2 explores the new logical perspective afforded by topos theory and SDG in describing the quantum world from an intuitionistic viewpoint.We build a working quantum-mechanical model using topos theory and analyse the physical and philosophical relevance of the logical steps taken, and account for the consistency of the model with its set-theoretic predecessor by suggesting a certain physical interpretation for the mathematics.In chapter 3, we analyse the extension of this quantum mechanics to state spaces with an infinite number of dimensions, and the associated use of various mathematical constructions that are taken for granted in set theory.Chapter 4 reaches an important proof of the lack of validity of the Spectral 4 The Spectral Theorem 108 4.1 Proof of Failure 4.2 The Internal Logic of the Spectral Theorem 4.3 Measurement-Enforced Validity 5 Conclusions 118 5.
The article proposes a new interpretation of parallel universes: they are not located "somewhere far away," but exist in the very same volume of space as our Universe. Different universes are different sets of active elements of reality that we "read" from a single "set" at different levels of description G. The key metaphor is the airport board: the board is one and the same, but by opening different cells we get different symbols. Formally: Universe U(G) = P(G)(Ω), where P(G) is the projection operator, Ω is the complete set of all degrees of freedom. The transition between universes is a change of the level of description G, not movement in space. This distinguishes the model from Everett's many-worlds interpretation, where branching is irreversible: in the proposed model the transition is reversible. A comparison is conducted with existing interpretations: Everett's MWI, Tegmark's Multiverse, MIW of Hall, Wiseman, and Deckert, brane worlds in string theory. It is shown that the model occupies a unique niche: not branching, not interaction, not remoteness, but an ontological choice. Consequences for superluminal communication are discussed: the signal does not fly through a brane but switches to another G. Verifiable consequences are proposed: anomalies in the cosmic microwave background, vacuum fluctuations, indirect markers. The model is consistent with the principles of the projection ontology of EFOS and resolves the problems of the standard many-worlds interpretation: it does not require infinite energy, does not require postulating irreversible branching. Key conclusions: parallel universes are here, in one volume; the transition between them is a change of G; the model has verifiable consequences.