Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:math-ph/9902024

Geometric quantization of generalized oscillator

Sergey V. Zuev

Published Feb 18, 1999• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Using geometric quantization procedure, the quantization of algebra of observables for physical system with Ricci-flat phase space is obtained. In the classical case the appointed physical system is reduced to harmonic oscillator when the one real parameter is vanished.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.math-ph/9902024

Related papers

An Introduction to Geometric Quantization

Artim L. Bassant

An Introduction to the geometric quantization procedure which is the attempt at finding a procedure that maps classical observables to quantum observables.\n\nFrom this idea, we made a more mathematical approach to some very interesting physics.\nWe derived a mapping and while analysing it. It becomes clear that more conditions have to be imposed for this to produce physically correct answers. \nFrom geometric quantization, we produced the canonical quantization and the operator form of the Hamiltonian of the harmonic oscillator.\nAlong the way, we also found some physical consequences of the math.

•Jan 1, 2020•1 citation

Remarks on the geometric quantization of a class of harmonic oscillator type potentials

Iacob, Felix

The conditions that must be fulfilled by a certain physical system to apply geometric quantization prescription on it are investigated. These terms are sought as mathematical requirements, which can be traced in an analysis of integrable systems, from the perspective of both potential function and Hamiltonian vector field. The answer is found in momentum map critical points. Basically, a certain disposal of points that allow a momentum map $C^*$ isomorphism, of observables, with harmonic oscillator momentum map enforce geometric quantization rules. Following the general theory, two newly presented examples, which exhibits these properties, are quantified through geometric quantization prescription. The Lennard-Jones' type potential is one of the examples, it is known as describing molecules in interaction. We end with a third example that shows the local isomorphism of potentials do not induce $C^*$ isomorphism of observables.

arXiv:1607.06630•Jul 22, 2016•0 citations

Quantization as deformation theory

F. J. Bloore, M. Assimakopoulos, I. R. Ghobrial

We show that any rule for quantization of functions on the phase space of a dynamical system is equivalent to a deformation of the Poisson bracket, in the sense of Lie algebras. All Schrödinger-type quantizations are equivalent mathematically but not physically. We examine whether a quantization rule exists in which the Poisson bracket of the free Hamiltonian and any function not more than quadratic in momentum gets quantized into the commutator of the quantized versions of these two observables. We show that if the (Riemannian) configuration manifold is irreducible, this condition uniquely specifies the quantization of these functions, in the cases when it can be satisfied. However, it can only be satisfied for systems whose configuration manifolds are one-dimensional, or have vanishing Ricci tensor, or are spaces of constant curvature. Thus the condition will not serve as a general physical principle which could be invoked to fix a quantization rule.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 1976•5 citations

Geometric quantization and algebraic Lagrangian geometry

Nikolai Andreevich Tyurin

Introduction The main theme of this survey is the quantization of classical mechanical systems in terms of algebraic geometry. The aim is thus to relate questions of mathematics and theoretical physics. We first recall briefly the main problems and methods which turn us to study the new subject. Quantization itself is the main problem of theoretical physics. The need to introduce and develop it was dictated by the creators of quantum theory. According to the ‘Copenhagen philosophy’, the physical predictions of a quantum theory must be formulated in terms of classical concepts (the first sentence of Woodhouse; here we quote the beginning of this survey). Thus in addition to the usual structures (Hilbert space, unitary transformations, selfadjoint operators …, see, for example, Landau and Lifschitz) any reasonable quantum theory has to admit an appropriate passage to a classical limit under which quantum observables are transferred to their classical analogues. However, as Dirac pointed out at the beginning of the quantum age, the correspondence between quantum theory and classical theory should be based not just on numerical coincidences taking place in the limit h → ∞, but on an analogy between their mathematical structures. Classical theory does approximate the quantum theory, but it does more – it supplies a framework for some interpretation of quantum theory. Using this idea, we can in general understand a quantization procedure as a correspondence between classical and quantum theories. In this sense, quantization of the classical mechanical systems is a movement in one direction, while taking the quasiclassical limit goes in the opposite direction.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 18, 2007•15 citations

LANDAU LEVELS AND GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

John R. Klauder, E. Onofri

The geometrical approach to phase-space quantization introduced by Klauder [KQ] is interpreted in terms of a universal magnetic field acting on a free particle moving in a higher dimensional configuration space; quantization corresponds to freezing the particle to its first Landau level. The Geometric Quantization [GQ] scheme appears as the natural technique to define the interaction with the magnetic field for a particle on a general Riemannian manifold. The freedom of redefining the operators' ordering makes it possible to select that particular definition of the Hamiltonian which is adapted to a specific polarization; in this way the first Landau level acquires the expected degeneracy. This unification with GQ makes it clear how algebraic relations between classical observables are or are not preserved under quantization. From this point of view all quantum systems appear as the low energy sector of a generalized theory in which all classical observables have a uniquely assigned quantum counterpart such that Poisson bracket relations are isomorphic to the commutation relations.

International Journal of Modern Physics A•Sep 1, 1989•45 citations

Quantization as a consequence of the symmetry group: An approach to geometric quantization

V. Aldaya, J. A. de Azcárraga

A method is proposed to obtain the dynamics of a system which only makes use of the group law. It incorporates many features of the traditional geometric quantization program as well as the possibility of obtaining the classical dynamics: The classical or quantum character of the theory is related to the choice of the group, avoiding thus the need of quantizing preexisting classical systems and providing a group connection between the quantum and classical systems, i.e., the classical limit. The method is applied to the free-particle dynamics and the harmonic oscillator.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jul 1, 1982•106 citations
An Introduction to the geometric quantization procedure which is the attempt at finding a procedure that maps classical observables to quantum observables.\n\nFrom this idea, we made a more mathematical approach to some very interesting physics.\nWe derived a mapping and while analysing it. It becomes clear that more conditions have to be imposed for this to produce physically correct answers. \nFrom geometric quantization, we produced the canonical quantization and the operator form of the Hamiltonian of the harmonic oscillator.\nAlong the way, we also found some physical consequences of the math.
The conditions that must be fulfilled by a certain physical system to apply geometric quantization prescription on it are investigated. These terms are sought as mathematical requirements, which can be traced in an analysis of integrable systems, from the perspective of both potential function and Hamiltonian vector field. The answer is found in momentum map critical points. Basically, a certain disposal of points that allow a momentum map C∗C^*C∗ isomorphism, of observables, with harmonic oscillator momentum map enforce geometric quantization rules. Following the general theory, two newly presented examples, which exhibits these properties, are quantified through geometric quantization prescription. The Lennard-Jones' type potential is one of the examples, it is known as describing molecules in interaction. We end with a third example that shows the local isomorphism of potentials do not induce C∗C^*C∗ isomorphism of observables.
We show that any rule for quantization of functions on the phase space of a dynamical system is equivalent to a deformation of the Poisson bracket, in the sense of Lie algebras. All Schrödinger-type quantizations are equivalent mathematically but not physically. We examine whether a quantization rule exists in which the Poisson bracket of the free Hamiltonian and any function not more than quadratic in momentum gets quantized into the commutator of the quantized versions of these two observables. We show that if the (Riemannian) configuration manifold is irreducible, this condition uniquely specifies the quantization of these functions, in the cases when it can be satisfied. However, it can only be satisfied for systems whose configuration manifolds are one-dimensional, or have vanishing Ricci tensor, or are spaces of constant curvature. Thus the condition will not serve as a general physical principle which could be invoked to fix a quantization rule.
Introduction The main theme of this survey is the quantization of classical mechanical systems in terms of algebraic geometry. The aim is thus to relate questions of mathematics and theoretical physics. We first recall briefly the main problems and methods which turn us to study the new subject. Quantization itself is the main problem of theoretical physics. The need to introduce and develop it was dictated by the creators of quantum theory. According to the ‘Copenhagen philosophy’, the physical predictions of a quantum theory must be formulated in terms of classical concepts (the first sentence of Woodhouse; here we quote the beginning of this survey). Thus in addition to the usual structures (Hilbert space, unitary transformations, selfadjoint operators …, see, for example, Landau and Lifschitz) any reasonable quantum theory has to admit an appropriate passage to a classical limit under which quantum observables are transferred to their classical analogues. However, as Dirac pointed out at the beginning of the quantum age, the correspondence between quantum theory and classical theory should be based not just on numerical coincidences taking place in the limit h → ∞, but on an analogy between their mathematical structures. Classical theory does approximate the quantum theory, but it does more – it supplies a framework for some interpretation of quantum theory. Using this idea, we can in general understand a quantization procedure as a correspondence between classical and quantum theories. In this sense, quantization of the classical mechanical systems is a movement in one direction, while taking the quasiclassical limit goes in the opposite direction.
The geometrical approach to phase-space quantization introduced by Klauder [KQ] is interpreted in terms of a universal magnetic field acting on a free particle moving in a higher dimensional configuration space; quantization corresponds to freezing the particle to its first Landau level. The Geometric Quantization [GQ] scheme appears as the natural technique to define the interaction with the magnetic field for a particle on a general Riemannian manifold. The freedom of redefining the operators' ordering makes it possible to select that particular definition of the Hamiltonian which is adapted to a specific polarization; in this way the first Landau level acquires the expected degeneracy. This unification with GQ makes it clear how algebraic relations between classical observables are or are not preserved under quantization. From this point of view all quantum systems appear as the low energy sector of a generalized theory in which all classical observables have a uniquely assigned quantum counterpart such that Poisson bracket relations are isomorphic to the commutation relations.
A method is proposed to obtain the dynamics of a system which only makes use of the group law. It incorporates many features of the traditional geometric quantization program as well as the possibility of obtaining the classical dynamics: The classical or quantum character of the theory is related to the choice of the group, avoiding thus the need of quantizing preexisting classical systems and providing a group connection between the quantum and classical systems, i.e., the classical limit. The method is applied to the free-particle dynamics and the harmonic oscillator.