Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:hep-th/9603138 · Nuclear Physics B

Duality in deformed coset fermionic models

D. C. Cabra, Enrique F. Moreno

Published Sep 1, 1996• 6 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/0550-3213(96)00329-x

Related papers

Spinons and parafermions in fermion cosets

D. C. Cabra

arXiv:hep-th/9704015•Springer eBooks•May 15, 2007•0 citations

Fermionic duality approach to strongly-interacting lattice models

Joe Mitchell, Tigran Sedrakyan, Victor M. Galitski

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 24, 2011•0 citations

Deformed Single-Particle Levels in the Boson-Fermion Model

A. Leviatan, Bin Shao

Physical Review Letters•Jan 1, 1990•7 citations

Q-deformed fermionic Lipkin model at finite temperature

D. Galetti, B. M. Pimentel, C. L. Lima +1 more

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Aug 1, 1997•14 citations

Gauge/Gravity Duality 2021

Junggi Yoon

<!--HTML-->In this talk, I will discuss the TTbar deformation of fermionic theories. First, I briefly review the TTbar deformation of two-dimensional QFTs. And, I demonstrate the Hamiltonian analysis of the TTbar deformation of free fermion, and I show how this reproduces the deformed spectrum. Then, I explain how negative norm states could appear in the TTbar deformed fermionic theories depending on the energy-momentum tensor. Finally, I shortly summarize our results on the TTbar deformation of N=(1,1) SUSY theory.

•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

Geometry

FRANCESCO IACHELLO, P. Van Isacker

Introduction Every algebraic structure has associated with it geometric structures. The choice of the geometric structure with which it is most convenient to visualize the situation depends on the physics that one wishes to expose. For boson systems of the type discussed in Volume 1 and also for those used in the description of molecules (Iachello and Levine, 1982), there is a very natural geometric structure provided by the coset space U( n )/U( n – 1)⊗ U(1). This leads in the case of nuclei to a description in terms of five variables, α μ (μ = 0, ±1, ±2), which can then be associated with the shape of a liquid drop with quadrupole deformation (Bohr and Mottelson, 1975). Similarly, in molecules, use of the coset space mentioned above leads to a description in terms of three variables, r μ (μ = 0, ±l), which can be associated with the vector distance between the two atoms in the molecule. For fermionic systems or when bosons and fermions coexist, the introduction of a geometric space is not so obvious. One can, if one wishes, introduce coset spaces, as briefly discussed in the following section, but even with this introduction, the geometric structure of the problem remains as abstract as before. A simpler situation arises if one is interested only in the case of a single fermion coupled to a system of bosons. In this case one can analyze the algebraic structure in terms of the motion of a single particle in a potential well generated by the bosons.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 30, 1991•0 citations
<!--HTML-->In this talk, I will discuss the TTbar deformation of fermionic theories. First, I briefly review the TTbar deformation of two-dimensional QFTs. And, I demonstrate the Hamiltonian analysis of the TTbar deformation of free fermion, and I show how this reproduces the deformed spectrum. Then, I explain how negative norm states could appear in the TTbar deformed fermionic theories depending on the energy-momentum tensor. Finally, I shortly summarize our results on the TTbar deformation of N=(1,1) SUSY theory.
Introduction Every algebraic structure has associated with it geometric structures. The choice of the geometric structure with which it is most convenient to visualize the situation depends on the physics that one wishes to expose. For boson systems of the type discussed in Volume 1 and also for those used in the description of molecules (Iachello and Levine, 1982), there is a very natural geometric structure provided by the coset space U( n )/U( n – 1)⊗ U(1). This leads in the case of nuclei to a description in terms of five variables, α μ (μ = 0, ±1, ±2), which can then be associated with the shape of a liquid drop with quadrupole deformation (Bohr and Mottelson, 1975). Similarly, in molecules, use of the coset space mentioned above leads to a description in terms of three variables, r μ (μ = 0, ±l), which can be associated with the vector distance between the two atoms in the molecule. For fermionic systems or when bosons and fermions coexist, the introduction of a geometric space is not so obvious. One can, if one wishes, introduce coset spaces, as briefly discussed in the following section, but even with this introduction, the geometric structure of the problem remains as abstract as before. A simpler situation arises if one is interested only in the case of a single fermion coupled to a system of bosons. In this case one can analyze the algebraic structure in terms of the motion of a single particle in a potential well generated by the bosons.