Cambridge University Press eBooks

Geometry

FRANCESCO IACHELLO, P. Van Isacker

Published Aug 30, 1991• 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction Every algebraic structure has associated with it geometric structures. The choice of the geometric structure with which it is most convenient to visualize the situation depends on the physics that one wishes to expose. For boson systems of the type discussed in Volume 1 and also for those used in the description of molecules (Iachello and Levine, 1982), there is a very natural geometric structure provided by the coset space U( n )/U( n – 1)⊗ U(1). This leads in the case of nuclei to a description in terms of five variables, α μ (μ = 0, ±1, ±2), which can then be associated with the shape of a liquid drop with quadrupole deformation (Bohr and Mottelson, 1975). Similarly, in molecules, use of the coset space mentioned above leads to a description in terms of three variables, r μ (μ = 0, ±l), which can be associated with the vector distance between the two atoms in the molecule. For fermionic systems or when bosons and fermions coexist, the introduction of a geometric space is not so obvious. One can, if one wishes, introduce coset spaces, as briefly discussed in the following section, but even with this introduction, the geometric structure of the problem remains as abstract as before. A simpler situation arises if one is interested only in the case of a single fermion coupled to a system of bosons. In this case one can analyze the algebraic structure in terms of the motion of a single particle in a potential well generated by the bosons.

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511549724.007

Related papers

Operators

FRANCESCO IACHELLO, P. Van Isacker

Introduction In many cases in physics, one has to deal simultaneously with collective and single-particle excitations of the system. The collective excitations are usually bosonic in nature while the single-particle excitations are often fermionic. One is therefore led to consider a system which includes bosons and fermions. In this book we discuss applications of a general algebraic theory of mixed Bose- Fermi systems to atomic nuclei. The collective degrees of freedom here can be described in terms of a system of interacting bosons as discussed in a previous book (Iachello and Arima, 1987), henceforth referred to as Volume 1. The single-particle degrees of freedom represent the motion of individual nucleons in the average nuclear field. They are described in terms of a system of interacting fermions. The coupling of fermions and bosons leads to the interacting boson-fermion model which has been used extensively in recent years to discuss the properties of nuclei with an odd number of nucleons. The interacting boson-fermion model was introduced by Arima and one of us in 1975 (Arima and Iachello, 1975). It was subsequently expanded by Iachello and Scholten (1979) and cast into a form more readily amenable to calculations. As in the corresponding case of even-mass systems, the algebra of creation and annihilation operators can be realized in several ways. One of these is the Hoistein-Primakoff realization which leads to a slightly different version of the interacting boson-fermion model called the truncated quadrupole phonon-fermion model (Paar, 1980; Paar and Brant, 1981), based on the boson realization introduced by Janssen, Jolos and Donau in 1974 and discussed in Sect. 1.4.6 of Volume 1.

Cambridge University Press eBooksAug 30, 19910 citations

Quantum Theory

Ian D. Lawrie

Much of the remainder of this book will concern itself with those aspects of theoretical physics which seek to understand the nature of matter. Such understanding as we have has mainly been achieved by probing the structure of successively smaller constituents and, at least on the face of things, the regions of space and time we need to consider are far too small for spacetime curvature to be of any significance. Many of our considerations will therefore be restricted to Minkowski or, as in the present chapter, Galilean spacetime. Paradoxically, however, it seems that gravity and the structure of space and time may have a vital role to play in our understanding of matter on the very smallest scales, and we shall see something of the ways in which this comes about in later chapters.

Taylor & Francis eBooksMay 5, 20150 citations

Star products and geometric algebra

Peter Henselder

Considering physics as it is done today one notices that physics separates into two formally and conceptually different parts. There is on the one hand classical physics that deals with macroscopic phenomena and there is on the other hand quantum physics that deals with microscopic phenomena. Penrose [96] described this situation as a disturbing analogy to ancient Greece, where two different sets of laws for earth and heaven were applied. So immediately the question arises if one really has to use different formalisms on different scales or if it is possible to describe physics in a unified way. In order to investigate this question one first has to consider how classical and quantum physics are related. Quantum mechanics results from classical physics by a procedure called quantization and classical physics is reobtained by taking the classical limit. Both procedures are heavily plagued by problems [61, 100]. In the first chapter the mathematical problems of quantization will be addressed and it will be described how the star product formalism circumvents these problems. The star product formalism has the advantage that there is no formal break if one goes from classical physics to quantum physics. This formal advantage and the resulting beauty is then used as a guiding principle for the further development. The first question that arises is if the spin can be described in the star product formalism. That this is indeed possible is shown in the second chapter. As a starting point the spin description with pseudoclassical mechanics as it was developed by Berezin is used. One can then construct a fermionic star product and apply it for deformation quantization of pseudoclassical mechanics. In analogy to the bosonic star product formalism one obtains spin Wigner functions that act as spin projectors. Besides the nonrelativistic case it is also possible to formulate Dirac theory with star products. The Clifford algebra of the gamma matrices is hereby described as a deformed version of a four dimensional Grassmann algebra. The fermionic star product in combination with the bosonic Moyal product leads to a supersymmetric star product formalism that can be used to describe supersymmetric quantum mechanics and in the relativistic case to describe the supersymmetric structure of Dirac theory. The other direction of generalization of the star product formalism is the application of star products in quantum field theory that is described in chapter three. After constructing a suitable normal product it is shown that the algebraic structures of perturbative quantum field theory appear also in the star product formalism, which is an expression of the algebra morphism of the operator and the star product formalism. But moreover the quantum group structure that was recently found in perturbative quantum field theory is shown to be a natural algebraic structure of the star product. The essential advantage of deformation quantization is that the classical limit has a well defined meaning. In the context of the spin description with star products this leads to the question of the classical limit of spin, or equivalently to the question of the physical status of pseudoclassical mechanics. In chapter four it is shown that this question is solved if one realizes that the fermionic sector together with the fermionic star product describe the underlying geometric structure. The deformation of a Grassmann algebra leads to a Clifford calculus that is equivalent to geometric algebra. The formulation of geometric algebra in the star product formalism is given in chapter four. One sees there that geometric algebra as the most fundamental geometric formalism that unifies all geometric structures that appear in physics can be described in a supersymmetric manner that parallels the bosonic star product structures. Having obtained a formulation of geometry with fermionic star products this formalism is then applied in the fifth chapter to physical problems. As examples for the application of geometric algebra in classical physics the rigid body and the Kepler problem are considered. In both cases the formalism of geometric algebra gives the most elegant formulation of the problem. In the quantum case one can then combine the fermionic star product formalism that describes the underlying geometric structure with the bosonic star product that describes the noncommuative structure of quantum mechanics. The result is a noncommutative version of geometric algebra that leads to a natural appearance of spin terms. The same idea applied on the phase space leads to the split in supersymmetric partner systems. Geometric algebra gives in this way a natural geometric foundation of supersymmetric quantum mechanics. Similarly one can interpret the hidden BRST-structure of classical mechanics that was found by E. Gozzi and M. Reuter in the path integral formalism from a star product point of view.

Dec 13, 20078 citations

Quantum Theory

Ian D. Lawrie

Much of the remainder of this book will concern itself with those aspects of theoretical physics which seek to understand the nature of matter. Such understanding as we have has mainly been achieved by probing the structure of successively smaller constituents and, at least on the face of things, the regions of space and time we need to consider are far too small for spacetime curvature to be of any signicance. Many of our considerations will therefore be restricted to Minkowski or, as in the present chapter, Galilean spacetime. Paradoxically, however, it seems that gravity and the structure of space and time may have a vital role to play in our understanding of matter on the very smallest scales, and we shall see something of the ways in which this comes about in later chapters.

CRC Press eBooksNov 27, 20120 citations

GEOMETRİK KUANTUM MEKANİĞİ VE GÖZLENEBİLİRLERİN CEBİRSEL YAPILARI (GEOMETRIC QUANTUM MECHANICS AND ALGEBRAIC STRUCTURE OF OBSERVABLES)

Özgür Açık

Jan 1, 20090 citations

Historical Notes on Feshbach and Shape Resonances

A. R. P. Rau

In his interesting Reference Frame piece (Physics Today, August 2004, page 12), Daniel Kleppner relates Herman Feshbach’s reaction to the term “Feshbach resonance” and gives a capsule account of the topical and vital role this phenomenon plays in today’s explorations of cold collisions of fermions and bosons, and of condensates of atoms and molecules. Readers may be interested in the earlier history and why atomic physicists began to use a term that Feshbach himself dismissed as jargon.In the Los Alamos experiment of Howard Bryant’s group on photo-absorption by the negative ion of hydrogen, two prominent resonances were seen at photon energies of about 10.95 eV. This energy marks the position of the first excited state of the hydrogen atom above the single bound state of the negative ion.One narrow resonance occurs just below the threshold of that excitation, whereas the second, broad one occurs just above. Their physical mechanisms are different and, following the paradigm set by that historic experiment, it has become customary to refer to the two types of resonance, both common in atomic and molecular physics, as Feshbach and shape resonance, respectively. That is, a resonant coupling just below the relevant threshold, leading to narrow profiles, is distinguished from those lying just above the threshold to which they are most strongly coupled, and typically broad.The two types of resonances are most naturally viewed in state and coordinate space, respectively. Feshbach resonances are thought of in terms of the superposition of two quantum states, one with discrete and one with continuum character, leading to a temporary quasi-bound state that manifests itself as a resonance in that continuum channel. The independent and almost simultaneous work in nuclear physics by Feshbach using the language of projection operators and in atomic physics by Ugo Fano using the language of superposition of wave functions serves for their technical description.Shape resonances, on the other hand, may be associated with the shape of a trapping potential in real, coordinate space. Most often, the trapping potential is an angular momentum potential that combines with the internal one to create intervening barriers to low-energy particles. The resulting pictures often display “two-valley” potentials. In the case of the negative ion of hydrogen, such a barrier has been described in terms of the hyperspherical coordinates of that three-body system. Examples of such shape resonances abound in low-energy scattering of electrons from molecules.For more discussion and references, including to recent applications in mesoscopic condensed matter systems, see my pedagogical mini-review in Physica Scripta, volume 69, page C10, 2004.© 2005 American Institute of Physics.

Physics TodayFeb 1, 200522 citations