Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:hep-ph/9907551

Neutrino oscillations as a "which-path" experiment

Harry J. Lipkin

Published Jul 29, 1999• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The role of simple quantum mechanics in understanding neutrino oscillation experiments is pointed out by comparison with two-slit and Bragg scattering experiments. The importance of considering the beam and the detector as a correlated quantum system is emphasized. Quantum mechanics alone shows that the difference observed in the same neutrino detector at Super-Kamiokande between upward and downward going neutrinos requires the existence of a neutrino mass difference. The localization of the source and detector in space in the laboratory system for long times leads to an uncertainty in the momentum but not of the energy of the neutrino and to coherence between states having different momenta and the same energy and not between states with different energies.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.hep-ph/9907551

Related papers

WHAT IS COHERENT IN NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS THE ANALOG WITH A TWO-SLIT EXPERIMENT

Harry J. Lipkin

The standard treatment of neutrino oscillations recalls the story of the mathematics lecturer who said "It is obvious that ...." then stopped and said; "Is it obvious?",went out for a half hour, and returned to say; "Yes it is obvious".The text book neutrino-oscillation wave function, a coherent linear combination of states with different energies, is not found in any real experiments.Its application to reality is obvious.But the interval between "Is it obvious?" and "Yes it is obvious" is filled with many wrong arguments, many wrong papers, and more papers showing that the wrong arguments are wrong.We clari& this issue by describing the passage of a neutrino from source to detector as a multipath experiment where knowing the path destroys coherence, considering the beam and the detector as a correlated quantum system and applying this approach to Bragg scattering by X-rays as well as neutrinos.Amplitudes with the same energy and different masses are detected coherently and produce oscillations.Amplitudes with different energies are incoherent.Quantum mechanics alone shows the existence of a neutrino mass difference to be required to explain the observed Super-Kamiokande data.

•May 1, 2001•0 citations

What is coherent in neutrino oscillations

Harry J. Lipkin

Simple rigorous quantum mechanics with no hand waving nor loopholes clarifies the confusion between three contradictory descriptions of the coherence between different neutrino mass eigenstates that can give rise to oscillations: (1) The standard textbook description of oscillations in time produced by coherence between states with different masses and different energies. (2) Stodolsky's proof that interference between states having different energies cannot be observed in realistic experiments. (3) The description of a pion decay at rest into an observed muon and unobserved neutrino as a “missing mass” experiment where coherence between different neutrino mass eigenstates is not observable. The known position in space of all realistic detectors is rigorously shown to provide the quantum-mechanical ignorance of the neutrino momentum needed to produce coherence between amplitudes from neutrino states with the same energy and different masses. Conditions are precisely formulated for the loss of coherence when mass eigenstate wave packets moving with different velocities separate. The example of Bragg scattering shows how quantum-mechanically imposed ignorance produces coherence.

arXiv:hep-ph/0304187•Physics Letters B•Dec 6, 2003•30 citations

Quantum Decoherence in Neutrino Oscillations

Emilio Ciuffoli

Quantum decoherence in neutrino oscillations was theorized almost 50 years ago, however there is still no clear theoretical understanding of this phenomenon, not even agreement on whether or not it could be observed at all. Treating all particles, including the source and detector, consistently in QFT, we are working on a model where the decoherence emerges from the time evolution of the initial state. We started by studying some simplified cases, obtaining nonetheless interesting results: we have shown that environmental interactions play crucial role in the emergence of decoherence, and if the neutrino creation happens in vacuum there is no maximal coherence length. We have also shown that some of the assumptions commonly used in literature (such as the covariance of the wavepackets) are inconsistent, since the time evolution would break the Lorentz invariance; moreover we have seen that, contrary to the usual intuition, the uncertainty on the detector momentum does not always play a relevant role in decoherence, at least as long as the detector particle is non-relativistic, since its contribution is suppressed by a factor proportional to p/M. Finally, we also notice the emergence of a new quantum effect: when the first neutrinos arrive, the oscillations do not starts immediately but only a very short amount of time; however, since the time window when this effect would be observable is extremely small, the precision required to measure such an effect is most likely well beyond the current technical capabilities

International Workshop on Neutrinos from Accelerators (NuFact)•Mar 31, 2022•0 citations

Neutrino oscillation measurements computed in quantum field theory

Andrew Kobach, Aneesh V. Manohar, John McGreevy

We perform such a calculation in quantum field theory, where we include simultaneously the source, detector, and neutrino fields in the Hamiltonian. Within the appropriate limits associated with current neutrino oscillation experiments, we recover the standard oscillation formula. On the other hand, we find that the dominant contributions to the amplitude are associated with different neutrino mass eigenstates being emitted at different times, such that they arrive at the detector at the same time. This is contrary to the neutrino wave packet picture, where they are emitted simultaneously and separate as they travel to the detector. This has direct consequences regarding the mechanisms that lead to a damping of neutrino oscillations for very long baselines. Our analysis also provides a pedagogical example of a measurement process in quantum mechanics.

arXiv:1711.07491•Physics Letters B•Jun 21, 2018•21 citations

Quantum Mechanics of ‘Two Path’ Experiments: Comparison of Neutrino Oscillations and the Young Double Slit

Département de Physique Nucléaire et Corpusculaire, Université de Genève 24, quai Ernest-Ansermet CH-1211Genève 4., J.H. Field

Feynman path integral analyses of a two-neutrino-flavour electron appearence experiment and the Young double slit are compared.The comparison reveals a conceptual flaw in previous work of the present author that led to a false claim of the incorrectness of standard formulas for the oscillation phase.In both calculations, path amplitudes add coherently, but no putative 'neutrino flavour eigenstates' are invoked in the former case.It is shown that the coherent production of these eigenstates is incompatible with the measured values of Γ (π → eν)/Γ (π → µν) and the PMNS matrix elements.Applications of the path integral approach to other two-path quantum interference experiments are compared with neutrino oscillations, and other treatments of the latter in the literature are critically discussed.

Journal of Particle Physics•Jul 19, 2017•0 citations

Neutrino oscillations in a model with a source and detector

Ken Kiers A, Nathan Weiss

We study the oscillations of neutrinos in a model in which the neutrino is coupled to a localized, idealized source and detector. By varying the spatial and temporal resolution of the source and detector we are able to model the full range of source and detector types ranging from coherent to incoherent. We find that this approach is useful in understanding the interface between the quantum mechanical nature of neutrino oscillations on the one hand and the production and detection systems on the other hand. This method can easily be extended to study the oscillations of other particles such as the neutral $K$ and $B$ mesons. We find that this approach gives a reliable way to treat the various ambiguities which arise when one examines the oscillations from a wave packet point of view. We demonstrate that the conventional oscillation formula is correct in the relativistic limit and that several recent claims of an extra factor of 2 in the oscillation length are incorrect. We also demonstrate explicitly that the oscillations of neutrinos which have separated spatially may be ``revived'' by a long coherent measurement.

arXiv:hep-ph/9710289•Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Mar 1, 1998•64 citations
The role of simple quantum mechanics in understanding neutrino oscillation experiments is pointed out by comparison with two-slit and Bragg scattering experiments. The importance of considering the beam and the detector as a correlated quantum system is emphasized. Quantum mechanics alone shows that the difference observed in the same neutrino detector at Super-Kamiokande between upward and downward going neutrinos requires the existence of a neutrino mass difference. The localization of the source and detector in space in the laboratory system for long times leads to an uncertainty in the momentum but not of the energy of the neutrino and to coherence between states having different momenta and the same energy and not between states with different energies.
The standard treatment of neutrino oscillations recalls the story of the mathematics lecturer who said "It is obvious that ...." then stopped and said; "Is it obvious?",went out for a half hour, and returned to say; "Yes it is obvious".The text book neutrino-oscillation wave function, a coherent linear combination of states with different energies, is not found in any real experiments.Its application to reality is obvious.But the interval between "Is it obvious?" and "Yes it is obvious" is filled with many wrong arguments, many wrong papers, and more papers showing that the wrong arguments are wrong.We clari& this issue by describing the passage of a neutrino from source to detector as a multipath experiment where knowing the path destroys coherence, considering the beam and the detector as a correlated quantum system and applying this approach to Bragg scattering by X-rays as well as neutrinos.Amplitudes with the same energy and different masses are detected coherently and produce oscillations.Amplitudes with different energies are incoherent.Quantum mechanics alone shows the existence of a neutrino mass difference to be required to explain the observed Super-Kamiokande data.
Simple rigorous quantum mechanics with no hand waving nor loopholes clarifies the confusion between three contradictory descriptions of the coherence between different neutrino mass eigenstates that can give rise to oscillations: (1) The standard textbook description of oscillations in time produced by coherence between states with different masses and different energies. (2) Stodolsky's proof that interference between states having different energies cannot be observed in realistic experiments. (3) The description of a pion decay at rest into an observed muon and unobserved neutrino as a “missing mass” experiment where coherence between different neutrino mass eigenstates is not observable. The known position in space of all realistic detectors is rigorously shown to provide the quantum-mechanical ignorance of the neutrino momentum needed to produce coherence between amplitudes from neutrino states with the same energy and different masses. Conditions are precisely formulated for the loss of coherence when mass eigenstate wave packets moving with different velocities separate. The example of Bragg scattering shows how quantum-mechanically imposed ignorance produces coherence.
Quantum decoherence in neutrino oscillations was theorized almost 50 years ago, however there is still no clear theoretical understanding of this phenomenon, not even agreement on whether or not it could be observed at all. Treating all particles, including the source and detector, consistently in QFT, we are working on a model where the decoherence emerges from the time evolution of the initial state. We started by studying some simplified cases, obtaining nonetheless interesting results: we have shown that environmental interactions play crucial role in the emergence of decoherence, and if the neutrino creation happens in vacuum there is no maximal coherence length. We have also shown that some of the assumptions commonly used in literature (such as the covariance of the wavepackets) are inconsistent, since the time evolution would break the Lorentz invariance; moreover we have seen that, contrary to the usual intuition, the uncertainty on the detector momentum does not always play a relevant role in decoherence, at least as long as the detector particle is non-relativistic, since its contribution is suppressed by a factor proportional to p/M. Finally, we also notice the emergence of a new quantum effect: when the first neutrinos arrive, the oscillations do not starts immediately but only a very short amount of time; however, since the time window when this effect would be observable is extremely small, the precision required to measure such an effect is most likely well beyond the current technical capabilities
We perform such a calculation in quantum field theory, where we include simultaneously the source, detector, and neutrino fields in the Hamiltonian. Within the appropriate limits associated with current neutrino oscillation experiments, we recover the standard oscillation formula. On the other hand, we find that the dominant contributions to the amplitude are associated with different neutrino mass eigenstates being emitted at different times, such that they arrive at the detector at the same time. This is contrary to the neutrino wave packet picture, where they are emitted simultaneously and separate as they travel to the detector. This has direct consequences regarding the mechanisms that lead to a damping of neutrino oscillations for very long baselines. Our analysis also provides a pedagogical example of a measurement process in quantum mechanics.
Feynman path integral analyses of a two-neutrino-flavour electron appearence experiment and the Young double slit are compared.The comparison reveals a conceptual flaw in previous work of the present author that led to a false claim of the incorrectness of standard formulas for the oscillation phase.In both calculations, path amplitudes add coherently, but no putative 'neutrino flavour eigenstates' are invoked in the former case.It is shown that the coherent production of these eigenstates is incompatible with the measured values of Γ (π → eν)/Γ (π → µν) and the PMNS matrix elements.Applications of the path integral approach to other two-path quantum interference experiments are compared with neutrino oscillations, and other treatments of the latter in the literature are critically discussed.
We study the oscillations of neutrinos in a model in which the neutrino is coupled to a localized, idealized source and detector. By varying the spatial and temporal resolution of the source and detector we are able to model the full range of source and detector types ranging from coherent to incoherent. We find that this approach is useful in understanding the interface between the quantum mechanical nature of neutrino oscillations on the one hand and the production and detection systems on the other hand. This method can easily be extended to study the oscillations of other particles such as the neutral KKK and BBB mesons. We find that this approach gives a reliable way to treat the various ambiguities which arise when one examines the oscillations from a wave packet point of view. We demonstrate that the conventional oscillation formula is correct in the relativistic limit and that several recent claims of an extra factor of 2 in the oscillation length are incorrect. We also demonstrate explicitly that the oscillations of neutrinos which have separated spatially may be ``revived'' by a long coherent measurement.