Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Particle Physics

Quantum Mechanics of ‘Two Path’ Experiments: Comparison of Neutrino Oscillations and the Young Double Slit

Département de Physique Nucléaire et Corpusculaire, Université de Genève 24, quai Ernest-Ansermet CH-1211Genève 4., J.H. Field

Published Jul 19, 2017• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Feynman path integral analyses of a two-neutrino-flavour electron appearence experiment and the Young double slit are compared.The comparison reveals a conceptual flaw in previous work of the present author that led to a false claim of the incorrectness of standard formulas for the oscillation phase.In both calculations, path amplitudes add coherently, but no putative 'neutrino flavour eigenstates' are invoked in the former case.It is shown that the coherent production of these eigenstates is incompatible with the measured values of Γ (π → eν)/Γ (π → µν) and the PMNS matrix elements.Applications of the path integral approach to other two-path quantum interference experiments are compared with neutrino oscillations, and other treatments of the latter in the literature are critically discussed.

DOI
10.22606/jpp.2017.11001

Related papers

WHAT IS COHERENT IN NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS THE ANALOG WITH A TWO-SLIT EXPERIMENT

Harry J. Lipkin

The standard treatment of neutrino oscillations recalls the story of the mathematics lecturer who said "It is obvious that ...." then stopped and said; "Is it obvious?",went out for a half hour, and returned to say; "Yes it is obvious".The text book neutrino-oscillation wave function, a coherent linear combination of states with different energies, is not found in any real experiments.Its application to reality is obvious.But the interval between "Is it obvious?" and "Yes it is obvious" is filled with many wrong arguments, many wrong papers, and more papers showing that the wrong arguments are wrong.We clari& this issue by describing the passage of a neutrino from source to detector as a multipath experiment where knowing the path destroys coherence, considering the beam and the detector as a correlated quantum system and applying this approach to Bragg scattering by X-rays as well as neutrinos.Amplitudes with the same energy and different masses are detected coherently and produce oscillations.Amplitudes with different energies are incoherent.Quantum mechanics alone shows the existence of a neutrino mass difference to be required to explain the observed Super-Kamiokande data.

•May 1, 2001•0 citations

Neutrino oscillations as a "which-path" experiment

Harry J. Lipkin

The role of simple quantum mechanics in understanding neutrino oscillation experiments is pointed out by comparison with two-slit and Bragg scattering experiments. The importance of considering the beam and the detector as a correlated quantum system is emphasized. Quantum mechanics alone shows that the difference observed in the same neutrino detector at Super-Kamiokande between upward and downward going neutrinos requires the existence of a neutrino mass difference. The localization of the source and detector in space in the laboratory system for long times leads to an uncertainty in the momentum but not of the energy of the neutrino and to coherence between states having different momenta and the same energy and not between states with different energies.

arXiv:hep-ph/9907551•Jul 29, 1999•0 citations

Quantum correlations in two-flavour neutrino oscillations

Ashutosh Kumar Alok, Subhashish Banerjee, Sankagiri Uma Sankar

Neutrino oscillations provide evidence for the mode entanglement of neutrino mass eigenstates in a given flavour eigenstate. Given this mode entanglement, it is pertinent to ask if other quantum correlations are present in neutrino evolution. In this study, we compute a number of such correlations for accelerator neutrinos in the approximation of two flavour nu_{mu} nu_{tau} oscillations. The point of minimum survival probability corresponds to the extremum point of all measures of quantum correlations. We find that Bell's inequality is always violated.

•Nov 20, 2014•3 citations

Neutrino oscillation measurements computed in quantum field theory

Andrew Kobach, Aneesh V. Manohar, John McGreevy

We perform such a calculation in quantum field theory, where we include simultaneously the source, detector, and neutrino fields in the Hamiltonian. Within the appropriate limits associated with current neutrino oscillation experiments, we recover the standard oscillation formula. On the other hand, we find that the dominant contributions to the amplitude are associated with different neutrino mass eigenstates being emitted at different times, such that they arrive at the detector at the same time. This is contrary to the neutrino wave packet picture, where they are emitted simultaneously and separate as they travel to the detector. This has direct consequences regarding the mechanisms that lead to a damping of neutrino oscillations for very long baselines. Our analysis also provides a pedagogical example of a measurement process in quantum mechanics.

arXiv:1711.07491•Physics Letters B•Jun 21, 2018•21 citations

Nonclassical Paths in Quantum Interference Experiments

Rahul Sawant, Joseph Samuel, Aninda Sinha +2 more

In a double slit interference experiment, the wave function at the screen with both slits open is not exactly equal to the sum of the wave functions with the slits individually open one at a time. The three scenarios represent three different boundary conditions and as such, the superposition principle should not be applicable. However, most well-known text books in quantum mechanics implicitly and/or explicitly use this assumption that is only approximately true. In our present study, we have used the Feynman path integral formalism to quantify contributions from nonclassical paths in quantum interference experiments that provide a measurable deviation from a naive application of the superposition principle. A direct experimental demonstration for the existence of these nonclassical paths is difficult to present. We find that contributions from such paths can be significant and we propose simple three-slit interference experiments to directly confirm their existence.

arXiv:1308.2022•Physical Review Letters•Sep 19, 2014•94 citations

What is coherent in neutrino oscillations

Harry J. Lipkin

Simple rigorous quantum mechanics with no hand waving nor loopholes clarifies the confusion between three contradictory descriptions of the coherence between different neutrino mass eigenstates that can give rise to oscillations: (1) The standard textbook description of oscillations in time produced by coherence between states with different masses and different energies. (2) Stodolsky's proof that interference between states having different energies cannot be observed in realistic experiments. (3) The description of a pion decay at rest into an observed muon and unobserved neutrino as a “missing mass” experiment where coherence between different neutrino mass eigenstates is not observable. The known position in space of all realistic detectors is rigorously shown to provide the quantum-mechanical ignorance of the neutrino momentum needed to produce coherence between amplitudes from neutrino states with the same energy and different masses. Conditions are precisely formulated for the loss of coherence when mass eigenstate wave packets moving with different velocities separate. The example of Bragg scattering shows how quantum-mechanically imposed ignorance produces coherence.

arXiv:hep-ph/0304187•Physics Letters B•Dec 6, 2003•30 citations
Feynman path integral analyses of a two-neutrino-flavour electron appearence experiment and the Young double slit are compared.The comparison reveals a conceptual flaw in previous work of the present author that led to a false claim of the incorrectness of standard formulas for the oscillation phase.In both calculations, path amplitudes add coherently, but no putative 'neutrino flavour eigenstates' are invoked in the former case.It is shown that the coherent production of these eigenstates is incompatible with the measured values of Γ (π → eν)/Γ (π → µν) and the PMNS matrix elements.Applications of the path integral approach to other two-path quantum interference experiments are compared with neutrino oscillations, and other treatments of the latter in the literature are critically discussed.
The standard treatment of neutrino oscillations recalls the story of the mathematics lecturer who said "It is obvious that ...." then stopped and said; "Is it obvious?",went out for a half hour, and returned to say; "Yes it is obvious".The text book neutrino-oscillation wave function, a coherent linear combination of states with different energies, is not found in any real experiments.Its application to reality is obvious.But the interval between "Is it obvious?" and "Yes it is obvious" is filled with many wrong arguments, many wrong papers, and more papers showing that the wrong arguments are wrong.We clari& this issue by describing the passage of a neutrino from source to detector as a multipath experiment where knowing the path destroys coherence, considering the beam and the detector as a correlated quantum system and applying this approach to Bragg scattering by X-rays as well as neutrinos.Amplitudes with the same energy and different masses are detected coherently and produce oscillations.Amplitudes with different energies are incoherent.Quantum mechanics alone shows the existence of a neutrino mass difference to be required to explain the observed Super-Kamiokande data.
The role of simple quantum mechanics in understanding neutrino oscillation experiments is pointed out by comparison with two-slit and Bragg scattering experiments. The importance of considering the beam and the detector as a correlated quantum system is emphasized. Quantum mechanics alone shows that the difference observed in the same neutrino detector at Super-Kamiokande between upward and downward going neutrinos requires the existence of a neutrino mass difference. The localization of the source and detector in space in the laboratory system for long times leads to an uncertainty in the momentum but not of the energy of the neutrino and to coherence between states having different momenta and the same energy and not between states with different energies.
Neutrino oscillations provide evidence for the mode entanglement of neutrino mass eigenstates in a given flavour eigenstate. Given this mode entanglement, it is pertinent to ask if other quantum correlations are present in neutrino evolution. In this study, we compute a number of such correlations for accelerator neutrinos in the approximation of two flavour nu_{mu} nu_{tau} oscillations. The point of minimum survival probability corresponds to the extremum point of all measures of quantum correlations. We find that Bell's inequality is always violated.
We perform such a calculation in quantum field theory, where we include simultaneously the source, detector, and neutrino fields in the Hamiltonian. Within the appropriate limits associated with current neutrino oscillation experiments, we recover the standard oscillation formula. On the other hand, we find that the dominant contributions to the amplitude are associated with different neutrino mass eigenstates being emitted at different times, such that they arrive at the detector at the same time. This is contrary to the neutrino wave packet picture, where they are emitted simultaneously and separate as they travel to the detector. This has direct consequences regarding the mechanisms that lead to a damping of neutrino oscillations for very long baselines. Our analysis also provides a pedagogical example of a measurement process in quantum mechanics.
In a double slit interference experiment, the wave function at the screen with both slits open is not exactly equal to the sum of the wave functions with the slits individually open one at a time. The three scenarios represent three different boundary conditions and as such, the superposition principle should not be applicable. However, most well-known text books in quantum mechanics implicitly and/or explicitly use this assumption that is only approximately true. In our present study, we have used the Feynman path integral formalism to quantify contributions from nonclassical paths in quantum interference experiments that provide a measurable deviation from a naive application of the superposition principle. A direct experimental demonstration for the existence of these nonclassical paths is difficult to present. We find that contributions from such paths can be significant and we propose simple three-slit interference experiments to directly confirm their existence.
Simple rigorous quantum mechanics with no hand waving nor loopholes clarifies the confusion between three contradictory descriptions of the coherence between different neutrino mass eigenstates that can give rise to oscillations: (1) The standard textbook description of oscillations in time produced by coherence between states with different masses and different energies. (2) Stodolsky's proof that interference between states having different energies cannot be observed in realistic experiments. (3) The description of a pion decay at rest into an observed muon and unobserved neutrino as a “missing mass” experiment where coherence between different neutrino mass eigenstates is not observable. The known position in space of all realistic detectors is rigorously shown to provide the quantum-mechanical ignorance of the neutrino momentum needed to produce coherence between amplitudes from neutrino states with the same energy and different masses. Conditions are precisely formulated for the loss of coherence when mass eigenstate wave packets moving with different velocities separate. The example of Bragg scattering shows how quantum-mechanically imposed ignorance produces coherence.