Based on a number of experimentally verified physical observations, it is argued that the standard principles of quantum mechanics should be applied to the Universe as a whole. Thus, a paradigm is proposed in which the entire Universe is represented by a pure state wavefunction contained in a factorisable Hilbert space of enormous dimension, and where this statevector is developed by successive applications of operators that correspond to unitary rotations and Hermitian tests. Moreover, because by definition the Universe contains everything, it is argued that these operators must be chosen self-referentially; the overall dynamics of the system is envisaged to be analogous to a gigantic, self-governing, quantum computation. The issue of how the Universe could choose these operators without requiring or referring to a fictitious external observer is addressed. The processes by which conventional physics might be recovered from this fundamental, mathematical and global description of reality are particularly investigated. Specifically, it is demonstrated that by considering the changing properties, separabilities and factorisations of both the state and the operators as the Universe proceeds though a sequence of discrete computations, familiar notions such as classical distinguishability, particle physics, space, time, special relativity and endo-physical experiments can all begin to emerge from the proposed picture. A pregeometric vision of cosmology is therefore discussed, with all of physics ultimately arising from the relationships occurring between the elements of the underlying mathematical structure.
Based on a number of experimentally verified physical observations, it is argued that the standard principles of quantum mechanics should be applied to the Universe as a whole. Thus, a paradigm is proposed in which the entire Universe is represented by a pure state wavefunction contained in a factorisable Hilbert space of enormous dimension, and where this statevector is developed by successive applications of operators that correspond to unitary rotations and Hermitian tests. Moreover, because by definition the Universe contains everything, it is argued that these operators must be chosen self-referentially; the overall dynamics of the system is envisaged to be analogous to a gigantic, self-governing, quantum computation. The issue of how the Universe could choose these operators without requiring or referring to a fictitious external observer is addressed. The processes by which conventional physics might be recovered from this fundamental, mathematical and global description of reality are particularly investigated. Specifically, it is demonstrated that by considering the changing properties, separabilities and factorisations of both the state and the operators as the Universe proceeds though a sequence of discrete computations, familiar notions such as classical distinguishability, particle physics, space, time, special relativity and endo-physical experiments can all begin to emerge from the proposed picture. A pregeometric vision of cosmology is therefore discussed, with all of physics ultimately arising from the relationships occurring between the elements of the underlying mathematical structure.
We discuss the origin of causal set structure and the emergence of classical space and time in the universe. Given that the universe is a closed self-referential quantum automaton with a quantum register consisting of a vast number of elementary quantum subregisters, we find two distinct but intimately related causal sets. One of these is associated with the factorization and entanglement properties of states of the universe and encodes phenomena such as quantum correlations and violations of Bell-type inqualities. The concepts of separations and entanglements of states are used to show how state reduction dynamics generates the familial relationships which gives this causal set structure. The other causal set structure is generated by the factorization properties of the observables (the Hermitian operators) over the quantum register. The concept of skeleton sets of operators is used to show how the factorization properties of these operators could generate the classical causal set structures associated with Einstein locality.
The central motivating idea behind the development of this work is the concept of prespace, a hypothetical structure that is postulated by some physicists to underlie the fabric of space or space-time. I consider how such a structure could relate to space and space-time, and the rest of reality as we know it, and the implications of the existence of this structure for quantum theory. Understanding how this structure could relate to space and to the rest of reality requires, I believe, that we consider how space itself relates to reality, and how other so-called “spaces” used in physics relate to reality. In the first chapter I compare space and space-time to other spaces used in physics, such as configuration space, phase space and Hilbert space. I support what is known as the “property view” of space, opposing both the traditional views of space and space-time, substantivalism and relationism. I argue that all these spaces are property spaces. After examining the relationships of these spaces to causality, I argue that configuration space has, due to its role in quantum mechanics, a special status in the microscopic world similar to the status of position space in the macroscopic world. In chapter two prespace itself is considered. One way of approaching this structure is through the comparison of the prespace structure with a computational system, in particular to a cellular automaton, in which space or space-time and all other physical quantities are broken down into discrete units. I suggest that one way open for a prespace metaphysics can be found if physics is made fully discrete in this way. I suggest as a heuristic principle that the physical laws of our world are such that the computational cost of implementing those laws on an arbitrary computational system is minimized, adapting a heuristic principle of this type proposed by Feynman (1982). In the final chapter some of the ideas of the previous chapters are applied in an examination of the physics and metaphysics of quantum theory. I first discuss the “measurement problem” of quantum mechanics: this problem and its proposed solution are the primary subjects of the final chapter. It turns out that considering how quantum theory could be made fully discrete leads naturally to a suggestion of how standard linear quantum mechanics could be modified to give rise to a solution to the measurement problem. The computational heuristic principle reinforces the same solution. I call the modified quantum mechanics Critical Complexity Quantum Mechanics (CCQM). I compare CCQM with some of the other proposed solutions to the measurement problem, in particular the spontaneous localization model of Ghirardi, Rimini and Weber (1986). Finally I argue that the measure of complexity of quantum mechanical states I introduce in CCQM also provides a new definition of entropy for quantum mechanics, and suggests a solution to the problem of providing an objective foundation for statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, and the arrow of time.
In this thesis, we lay out the goal, and a broad outline, for a program that takes quantum mechanics in its minimal form to be the fundamental ontology of the universe. Everything else, including features like space-time, matter and gravity associated with classical reality, are emergent from these minimal quantum elements. We argue that the Hilbert space of quantum gravity is locally finite-dimensional, in sharp contrast to that of conventional field theory, which could have observable consequences for gravity. We also treat time and space on an equal footing in Hilbert space in a reparametrization invariant setting and show how symmetry transformations, both global and local, can be treated as unitary basis changes. Motivated by the finite-dimensional context, we use Generalized Pauli Operators as finite-dimensional conjugate variables and define a purely Hilbert space notion of locality based on the spread induced by conjugate operators which we call "Operator Collimation." We study deviations in the spectrum of physical theories, particularly the quantum harmonic oscillator, induced by finite-dimensional effects, and show that by including a black hole-based bound in a lattice field theory, the quantum contribution to the vacuum energy can be suppressed by multiple orders of magnitude. We then show how one can recover subsystem structure in Hilbert space which exhibits emergent quasi-classical dynamics. We explicitly connect classical features (such as pointer states of the system being relatively robust to entanglement production under environmental monitoring and the existence of approximately classical trajectories) with features of the Hamiltonian. We develop an in-principle algorithm based on extremization of an entropic quantity that can sift through different factorizations of Hilbert space to pick out the one with manifest classical dynamics. This discussion is then extended to include direct sum decompositions and their compatibility with Hamiltonian evolution. Following this, we study quantum coarse-graining and state-reduction maps in a broad context. In addition to developing a first-principle quantum coarse-graining algorithm based on principle component analysis, we construct more general state-reduction maps specified by a restricted set of observables which do not span the full algebra (as could be the case of limited access in a laboratory or in various situations in quantum gravity). We also present a general, not inherently numeric, algorithm for finding irreducible representations of matrix algebras. Throughout the thesis, we discuss implications of our work in the broader goal of understanding quantum gravity from minimal elements in quantum mechanics.
Quantum theory is the soul of contemporary physics. It was discovered in an adventurous way, under the urge to solve the puzzles posed by atomic spectra and blackbody radiation. But after its invention, it immediately became clear that it was not just a theory of specific physical systems: it was rather a new language of universal applicability. Already in 1928, the theory had received solid mathematical foundations by Hilbert, von Neumann, and Nordheim, and this work was brought to completion in the monumental work of von Neumann, in the form that we still study nowadays. The theory is extraordinarily successful, and its predictions have been confirmed to an astonishing level of precision in a large spectrum of experiments. However, almost 90 years after von Neumann's book, quantum theory remains mysterious. Its mathematical formulation – based on Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators – is far from having an intuitive interpretation. The association of physical systems to Hilbert spaces whose unit vectors represent pure states, the representation of transformations by unitary operators and of observables by self-adjoint operators – all such postulates look artificial and ad hoc . A slightly more operational approach is provided by the C * -algebraic formulation of quantum theory – still, this formulation relies on the assumption that observables form an algebra , where the physical meanings of the multiplication and the sum are far from clear. In short, the postulates of quantum theory impose mathematical structures without providing any simple reason for this choice: the mathematics of Hilbert spaces is adopted as a magic blackbox that “works well” at producing experimental predictions. However, in a satisfactory axiomatization of a physical theory the mathematical structures should emerge as a consequence of postulates that have a direct physical interpretation. By this we mean postulates referring, e.g., to primitive notions like physical system, measurement, or process, rather than notions like, e.g., Hilbert space, C * -algebra, unit vector, or selfadjoint operator. The crucial question thus remains unanswered: why quantum theory? Which are the principles at the basis of the theory? A case that is often invoked in contrast is that of Special Relativity theory, which directly follows from the simple understandable principle of relativity.
What is the proper metaphysics of quantum mechanics? In this dissertation, I approach the question from three different but related angles. First, I suggest that the quantum state can be understood intrinsically as relations holding among regions in ordinary space-time, from which we can recover the wave function uniquely up to an equivalence class (by representation and uniqueness theorems). The intrinsic account eliminates certain conventional elements (e.g. overall phase) in the representation of the quantum state. It also dispenses with first-order quantification over mathematical objects, which goes some way towards making the quantum world safe for a nominalistic metaphysics suggested in Field (1980, 2016). Second, I argue that the fundamental space of the quantum world is the low-dimensional physical space and not the high-dimensional space isomorphic to the ``configuration space.'' My arguments are based on considerations about dynamics, empirical adequacy, and symmetries of the quantum mechanics. Third, I show that, when we consider quantum mechanics in a time-asymmetric universe (with a large entropy gradient), we obtain new theoretical and conceptual possibilities. In such a model, we can use the low-entropy boundary condition known as the Past Hypothesis (Albert, 2000) to pin down a natural initial quantum state of the universe. However, the universal quantum state is not a pure state but a mixed state, represented by a density matrix that is the normalized projection onto the Past Hypothesis subspace. This particular choice has interesting consequences for Humean supervenience, statistical mechanical probabilities, and theoretical unity.
This treatise proposes a new paradigm to resolve the foundational fracture between General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. We argue that this schism does not reside in physical reality but in the classical mathematical language used to describe it—a language inadequate for a universe that is intrinsically relational, contextual, and participatory.The work is structured in three parts. First, we introduce the core hypothesis: physical space is not a static container but a dynamic, reconfigurable medium, whose geometry is conditioned by the active role of the observer. This is formalized through the "Fundamental Equation of Reality," where consciousness is not an epiphenomenon but a constitutive term.Second, we develop the formal apparatus required for this vision: a "New Mathematics." This axiomatic system replaces classical logic with principles of plurisemanticity, contextual operativity, and emergence. It operates on a model of "Information-Space," an emergent relational network whose properties provide intuitive explanations for non-locality and quantum entanglement.Finally, we apply this framework to construct a unified cosmological model based on a "Descending Harmonic Spiral," deriving fundamental forces and elementary particles as resonant modes of this underlying structure. The theory's practical implications are explored through the design of a novel LENR (Low-Energy Nuclear Reaction) device, the RNFC-432, engineered to create conditions of harmonic coherence.Ultimately, "Reconfigured Reality" offers a complete, coherent, and falsifiable framework that reintegrates consciousness into physics, reframing the cosmos as a self-organizing, fundamentally musical system accessible through a new language of resonance