We analyze the relational quantum evolution of generally covariant systems in terms of Rovelli's evolving constants of motion and the generalized Heisenberg picture. In order to have a well-defined evolution, and a consistent quantum theory, evolving constants must be self-adjoint operators. We show that this condition imposes strong restrictions to the choices of the clock variables. We analyze four cases. The first one is nonrelativistic quantum mechanics in parametrized form; we show that, for the free particle case, the standard choice of time is the only one leading to self-adjoint evolving constants. Second, we study the relativistic case. We show that the resulting quantum theory is the free particle representation of the Klein-Gordon equation in which the position is a perfectly well defined quantum observable. The admissible choices of clock variables are the ones leading to spacelike simultaneity surfaces. In order to mimic the structure of general relativity we study the $\mathrm{SL}(2R)$ model with two Hamiltonian constraints. The evolving constants depend in this case on three independent variables. We show that it is possible to find clock variables and inner products leading to a consistent quantum theory. Finally, we discuss the quantization of a constrained model having a compact constraint surface. All the models considered may be consistently quantized, although some of them do not admit any time choice such that the equal time surfaces are transversal to the orbits.
We analyze the relational quantum evolution of generally covariant systems in terms of Rovelli's evolving constants of motion and the generalized Heisenberg picture. In order to have a well-defined evolution, and a consistent quantum theory, evolving constants must be self-adjoint operators. We show that this condition imposes strong restrictions to the choices of the clock variables. We analyze four cases. The first one is nonrelativistic quantum mechanics in parametrized form; we show that, for the free particle case, the standard choice of time is the only one leading to self-adjoint evolving constants. Second, we study the relativistic case. We show that the resulting quantum theory is the free particle representation of the Klein-Gordon equation in which the position is a perfectly well defined quantum observable. The admissible choices of clock variables are the ones leading to spacelike simultaneity surfaces. In order to mimic the structure of general relativity we study the SL(2R) model with two Hamiltonian constraints. The evolving constants depend in this case on three independent variables. We show that it is possible to find clock variables and inner products leading to a consistent quantum theory. Finally, we discuss the quantization of a constrained model having a compact constraint surface. All the models considered may be consistently quantized, although some of them do not admit any time choice such that the equal time surfaces are transversal to the orbits.
Abstract Every clock is a physical system and thereby ultimately quantum. A naturally arising question is thus how to describe time evolution relative to quantum clocks and, specifically, how the dynamics relative to different quantum clocks are related. This is a particularly pressing issue in view of the multiple choice facet of the problem of time in quantum gravity, which posits that there is no distinguished choice of internal clock in generic general relativistic systems and that different choices lead to inequivalent quantum theories. Exploiting a recent unifying approach to switching quantum reference systems [Vanrietvelde et al 2020 Quantum 4 225; Vanrietvelde et al 2018 arXiv:1809.05093[quant-ph])], we exhibit a systematic method for switching between different clock choices in the quantum theory. We illustrate it by means of the parametrized particle, which, like gravity, features a Hamiltonian constraint. We explicitly switch between the quantum evolution relative to the non-relativistic time variable and that relative to the particle’s position, which requires carefully regularizing the zero-modes in the so-called time-of-arrival observable. While this toy model is simple, our approach is general and, in particular, directly amenable to quantum cosmology. It proceeds by systematically linking the reduced quantum theories relative to different clock choices via the clock-choice-neutral Dirac quantized theory, in analogy to coordinate changes on a manifold. This method suggests a new perspective on the multiple choice problem, indicating that it is rather a multiple choice feature of the complete relational quantum theory, taken as the conjunction of Dirac quantized and quantum deparametrized theories. Precisely this conjunction permits one to consistently switch between different temporal reference systems, which is a prerequisite for a quantum notion of general covariance. Finally, we show that quantum uncertainties generically lead to a discontinuity in the relational dynamics when switching clocks, in contrast to the classical case.
In relational quantum dynamics, evolution emerges via the correlations between some system of interest and a clock system, which plays the role of a temporal reference frame. Their combined state satisfies a Wheeler-de Witt-like constraint equation, and therefore does not evolve, leading to a ``block universe'' picture. Here we investigate the interplay of two aspects, namely temporal localization and causal relations, when comparing emergent dynamics with respect to different choices of clock. We first explore the extent to which two clocks can agree on the temporal localization of events. Then, focussing on the operational notion of causality, we require a clearly defined notion of interventions, i.e. quantum operations, and consider two different approaches to modeling these operations within relational dynamics. The first considers their application via the choice of solutions to the constraint equation, i.e.~the choice of which ``history'' is considered. The second approach incorporates the operations into the constraint equation itself and thereby into its solutions, giving a dynamical picture of the interventions. From the perspective of a single clock, both approaches allow for a notion of operational causality in relational dynamics. However, for multiple clocks, only the second approach gives a consistent picture regarding causal relations, while necessarily manifesting some degree of temporal delocalization between frames. Moreover, this second approach, when considering certain cases of temporal delocalization, naturally describes scenarios with indefinite causal order, a well-known quantum feature of operational causality.
The nature of time has long been debated in human history and nowadays is considered of central importance for understanding quantum gravity. We focus on and advocate the relational concept of time, which was put forward in the 17th century in opposition to Newton's absolute time, and only in 1990 explored in a quantum mechanical framework by Carlo Rovelli. After a historical introduction the mathematical models of time are carefully analyzed in chapter 1, followed by a discussion of the role of time played in fundamental theories. Using as an example nonrelativistic mechanics, the process of parametrization is explained, leading to a separation of a 'canonical time coordinate' from an arbitrary evolution parameter. The discussion of the role of time in special and general relativity as well as in quantum mechanics shows that more fundamental theories use less structure of time. This is followed by an exposition of the history of the relational concept of time, which negates the existence of an absolute duration and therefore often is called "timeless". Next it is shown how fundamental theories can be formulated and re-interpreted using this concept. We put emphasis on the hitherto neglected connection between relationalism and non-extensibility, while absolute time is shown to be unproblematic in classical mechanics just because of the possibility to extend the system without changing its nature. We conclude chapter 1 with a new axiomatic basis for the construction of time observables based on a simultaneity relation between 'observations', which are treated as a primitive concept and intuitively correspond to measurement events, but without knowing 'when' these events occur. There is no fundamental time observable; any observable qualifies as a time observable, if it allows to separate all instants. Chapter 2 gives a brief account of three main problems connected with time: a) The problem of the arrow of time. This has to be disentangled from the problem of irreversibility: a solution of the latter essentially excludes cyclic motions and is required for a solution of the former, which consists in showing that a fundamental direction between any two non-identical instants is physically meaningful. We give a formal definition of the arrow of time. This classical analysis is followed by a review of the problem of the arrow of time in quantum theory, where the situation becomes more complicated because of indeterminism. The discussion shows that there is no experimental evidence for a fundamental arrow of time, so that no contradiction with the relational concept of time arises. b) The problem of time measurement, which is of particular importance for the relational approach, in which time has no reality except if measured by a clock. In quantum theory useful time operators seem to be possible only within the more general formalism of positive operator valued measures (POVM). Clocks based on an oscillation mechanism do however require phase measurements; quantum phase operators can be defined as certain POVMs. Phase difference operators do also exist in the traditional Hilbert space formalism, if another quantization is used, as is done with relational quantization. c) The problem of quantum gravity is sketched only briefly. Chapter 3 introduces and discusses a model of Rovelli consisting of two oscillators with no external time. In this model one oscillator is considered as a clock and defines a relational time for the other one. In the first section we introduce this model and generalize it to a free massless scalar field in one dimension. We establish the relation between a single field mode and the infrared behaviour of the field through constants of motion. In the second section after a short review of canonical quantization we review Rovelli's quantization and generalize it to the free field. We could not prove the existence of the quantization map, but calculations using computer algebra indicate that the quantization does exist. For an enlarged algebra we are able to prove the nonexistence of a quantization map similar to a proof by Groenewold and van Hove. In chapter 4 we observe that a clock time always requires infinitely many degrees of freedom, and we make the hypothesis that a time observable is given by the infrared behaviour of quantum fields, leading to a classical notion of time when using algebraic quantum mechanics. This does however not solve the main problem of quantum relationalism: Which conditions determine a particular evolution?
This work addresses the long-standing frozen formalism problem in the quantization of reparametrization-invariant systems. In Dirac quantization, physical states are defined by a quantum constraint of the form Ĉ Ψ = 0, a condition often interpreted as implying the absence of dynamics. This paper demonstrates that such an interpretation is structural rather than physical. For finite-dimensional constrained Hamiltonian systems, the paper introduces the concept of a renewal ordering: an intrinsic, locally monotonic ordering of distinguishable internal configurations constructed from relational observables. When the quantum constraint is expressed in variables adapted to this ordering, the condition Ĉ Ψ = 0 is shown to imply, under explicit and minimal assumptions, a Schrödinger-type evolution equation with respect to the renewal parameter. The analysis is purely operator-theoretic and local in character. It covers constraint operators that are either first order or quadratic with hyperbolic principal part in the renewal-direction derivative. No external time variable, physical Hamiltonian, reference fluid, or auxiliary clock system is introduced. No physical Hilbert space, inner product, or probabilistic interpretation is assumed or constructed. The central result establishes that the frozen formalism does not represent physical stasis. Instead, whenever a reparametrization-invariant quantum system admits a locally monotonic relational ordering, internal relational evolution is already encoded in the constraint equation itself and becomes explicit when expressed in renewal variables. The scope of the paper is deliberately restricted. It applies only to finite-dimensional constrained systems and makes no claims regarding global unitarity, factor-ordering uniqueness, gravitational field theories, cosmology, or the Wheeler–DeWitt operator. Within this domain, the results are exact and structural.
Two related problems in relativistic quantum mechanics, the apparent superluminal propagation of initially localized particles, and the dependence of their localization on the motion of the observer, are analyzed in the context of the theory of constraints. Time and energy operators are introduced for the free relativistic particle, and a parametrization invariant formulation is obtained through Dirac constraint theory. The resulting description is of a system constrained in momentum and energy, but not in position or time, for which observables are constants of the motion. The Klein-Gordon equation is recovered on a physical Hilbert space, constructed via integration over the proper time from an augmented Hilbert space, wherein time and energy are dynamical variables...
We have previously shown that three approaches to relational quantum dynamics—relational Dirac observables, the Page-Wootters formalism and quantum deparametrizations—are equivalent. Here we show that this “trinity” of relational quantum dynamics holds in relativistic settings per frequency superselection sector. Time according to a clock subsystem is defined via a positive operator-valued measure (POVM) that is covariant with respect to the group generated by its (quadratic) Hamiltonian. This differs from the usual choice of a self-adjoint clock observable conjugate to the clock momentum. It also resolves Kuchař's criticism that the Page-Wootters formalism yields incorrect localization probabilities for the relativistic particle when conditioning on a Minkowski time operator. We show that conditioning instead on the covariant clock POVM results in a Newton-Wigner type localization probability commonly used in relativistic quantum mechanics. By establishing the equivalence mentioned above, we also assign a consistent conditional-probability interpretation to relational observables and deparametrizations. Finally, we expand a recent method of changing temporal reference frames, and show how to transform states and observables frequency-sector-wise. We use this method to discuss an indirect clock self-reference effect and explore the state and temporal frame-dependence of the task of comparing and synchronizing different quantum clocks.