Abstract Every clock is a physical system and thereby ultimately quantum. A naturally arising question is thus how to describe time evolution relative to quantum clocks and, specifically, how the dynamics relative to different quantum clocks are related. This is a particularly pressing issue in view of the multiple choice facet of the problem of time in quantum gravity, which posits that there is no distinguished choice of internal clock in generic general relativistic systems and that different choices lead to inequivalent quantum theories. Exploiting a recent unifying approach to switching quantum reference systems [Vanrietvelde et al 2020 Quantum 4 225; Vanrietvelde et al 2018 arXiv:1809.05093[quant-ph])], we exhibit a systematic method for switching between different clock choices in the quantum theory. We illustrate it by means of the parametrized particle, which, like gravity, features a Hamiltonian constraint. We explicitly switch between the quantum evolution relative to the non-relativistic time variable and that relative to the particle’s position, which requires carefully regularizing the zero-modes in the so-called time-of-arrival observable. While this toy model is simple, our approach is general and, in particular, directly amenable to quantum cosmology. It proceeds by systematically linking the reduced quantum theories relative to different clock choices via the clock-choice-neutral Dirac quantized theory, in analogy to coordinate changes on a manifold. This method suggests a new perspective on the multiple choice problem, indicating that it is rather a multiple choice feature of the complete relational quantum theory, taken as the conjunction of Dirac quantized and quantum deparametrized theories. Precisely this conjunction permits one to consistently switch between different temporal reference systems, which is a prerequisite for a quantum notion of general covariance. Finally, we show that quantum uncertainties generically lead to a discontinuity in the relational dynamics when switching clocks, in contrast to the classical case.
Abstract Every clock is a physical system and thereby ultimately quantum. A naturally arising question is thus how to describe time evolution relative to quantum clocks and, specifically, how the dynamics relative to different quantum clocks are related. This is a particularly pressing issue in view of the multiple choice facet of the problem of time in quantum gravity, which posits that there is no distinguished choice of internal clock in generic general relativistic systems and that different choices lead to inequivalent quantum theories. Exploiting a recent unifying approach to switching quantum reference systems [Vanrietvelde et al 2020 Quantum 4 225; Vanrietvelde et al 2018 arXiv:1809.05093[quant-ph])], we exhibit a systematic method for switching between different clock choices in the quantum theory. We illustrate it by means of the parametrized particle, which, like gravity, features a Hamiltonian constraint. We explicitly switch between the quantum evolution relative to the non-relativistic time variable and that relative to the particle’s position, which requires carefully regularizing the zero-modes in the so-called time-of-arrival observable. While this toy model is simple, our approach is general and, in particular, directly amenable to quantum cosmology. It proceeds by systematically linking the reduced quantum theories relative to different clock choices via the clock-choice-neutral Dirac quantized theory, in analogy to coordinate changes on a manifold. This method suggests a new perspective on the multiple choice problem, indicating that it is rather a multiple choice feature of the complete relational quantum theory, taken as the conjunction of Dirac quantized and quantum deparametrized theories. Precisely this conjunction permits one to consistently switch between different temporal reference systems, which is a prerequisite for a quantum notion of general covariance. Finally, we show that quantum uncertainties generically lead to a discontinuity in the relational dynamics when switching clocks, in contrast to the classical case.
Despite its importance in general relativity, a quantum notion of general covariance has not yet been established in quantum gravity and cosmology, where, given the a priori absence of coordinates, it is necessary to replace classical frames with dynamical quantum reference systems. As such, quantum general covariance bears on the ability to consistently switch between the descriptions of the same physics relative to arbitrary choices of quantum reference system. Recently, a systematic approach for such switches has been developed. It links the descriptions relative to different choices of quantum reference system, identified as the correspondingly reduced quantum theories, via the reference-system-neutral Dirac quantization, in analogy to coordinate changes on a manifold. In this work, we apply this method to a simple cosmological model to demonstrate how to consistently switch between different internal time choices in quantum cosmology. We substantiate the argument that the conjunction of Dirac and reduced quantized versions of the theory defines a complete relational quantum theory that not only admits a quantum general covariance, but, we argue, also suggests a new perspective on the ‘wave function of the universe’. It assumes the role of a perspective-neutral global state, without immediate physical interpretation that, however, encodes all the descriptions of the universe relative to all possible choices of reference system at once and constitutes the crucial link between these internal perspectives. While, for simplicity, we use the Wheeler-DeWitt formulation, the method and arguments might be also adaptable to loop quantum cosmology.
Given the importance of quantum reference frames (QRFs) to both quantum and gravitational physics, it is pertinent to develop a systematic method for switching between the descriptions of physics relative to different choices of QRFs, which is valid in both fields. Here we continue with such a unifying approach, begun in [Quantum 4, 225 (2020)], whose key ingredient is a symmetry principle, which enforces physics to be relational. Thanks to gauge related redundancies, this leads to a perspective-neutral structure which contains all frame choices at once and via which frame perspectives can be consistently switched. Formulated in the language of constrained systems, the perspective-neutral structure is the constraint surface classically and the gauge invariant Hilbert space in the Dirac quantized theory. By contrast, a perspective relative to a specific frame corresponds to a gauge choice and the associated reduced phase and Hilbert space. QRF changes thus amount to a gauge transformation. We show that they take the form of `quantum coordinate changes'. We illustrate this in a general mechanical model, namely the relational N -body problem in 3D space with rotational and translational symmetry. This model is especially interesting because it features the Gribov problem so that globally valid gauge fixing conditions, and hence relational frame perspectives, are absent. The constraint surface is topologically non-trivial and foliated by 3-, 5- and 6-dimensional gauge orbits, where the lower dimensional orbits are a set of measure zero. The N -body problem also does not admit globally valid canonically conjugate pairs of Dirac observables. These challenges notwithstanding, we exhibit how one can construct the QRF transformations for the 3-body problem. Our construction also sheds new light on the generic inequivalence of Dirac and reduced quantization through its interplay with QRF perspectives.
In general relativity, the description of spacetime relies on idealised rods and clocks, which identify a reference frame. In any concrete scenario, reference frames are associated to physical systems, which are ultimately quantum in nature. A relativistic description of the laws of physics hence needs to take into account such quantum reference frames (QRFs), through which spacetime can be given an operational meaning. Here, we introduce the notion of a spacetime quantum reference frame, associated to a quantum particle in spacetime. Such formulation has the advantage of treating space and time on equal footing, and of allowing us to describe the dynamical evolution of a set of quantum systems from the perspective of another quantum system, where the parameter in which the rest of the physical systems evolves coincides with the proper time of the particle taken as the QRF. Crucially, the proper times in two different QRFs are not related by a standard transformation, but they might be in a quantum superposition one with respect to the other.Concretely, we consider a system of N relativistic quantum particles in a weak gravitational field, and introduce a timeless formulation in which the global state of the N particles appears "frozen", but the dynamical evolution is recovered in terms of relational quantities. The position and momentum Hilbert space of the particles is used to fix the QRF via a transformation to the local frame of the particle such that the metric is locally inertial at the origin of the QRF. The internal Hilbert space corresponds to the clock space, which keeps the proper time in the local frame of the particle. Thanks to this fully relational construction we show how the remaining particles evolve dynamically in the relational variables from the perspective of the QRF. The construction proposed here includes the Page-Wootters mechanism for non interacting clocks when the external degrees of freedom are neglected. Finally, we find that a quantum superposition of gravitational redshifts and a quantum superposition of special-relativistic time dilations can be observed in the QRF.
I. Introduction The problem of time in quantum gravity is the following. General relativity is a diffeomorphisminvariant theory: there is no preferred time variable, and the Hamiltonian constraint HΨ = 0 impliesthat all physical states are ‘frozen’ in the sense that they carry no manifest time dependence [Dirac1964; DeWitt 1967]. Yet quantum mechanics requires time as a background parameter againstwhich evolution is measured. Reconciling these two facts — the timelessness of diffeomorphisminvariant quantum gravity and the temporal structure required for quantum measurement theory—is the problem of time [Isham 1993; Kuchăř 1992]. The problem is not merely philosophical: ithas concrete consequences for the interpretation of quantum cosmological perturbations, includingthose that seed the CMB anisotropies we observe today.One of the most elegant proposed resolutions is the Page–Wootters (PW) mechanism [Page & Wootters 1983]: time is not a background parameter but a relational quantity, encoded in correlationsbetween a ‘clock’ subsystem and the rest of the universe. Physical time is the reading of the clock,and quantum evolution is the conditional state of the system given a particular clock reading. Thisidea has been placed on rigorous mathematical footing by Höhn, Smith & Lock (HSL) [2021], whoproved the equivalence of three apparently distinct quantization procedures — the Dirac constraintquantization, the Page–Wootters mechanism, and the deparametrized Heisenberg picture — undera precise set of conditions. The HSL result reduces the problem of time, for any system satisfyingthose conditions, to the problem of identifying a clock with the right algebraic properties.In Loop Quantum Cosmology (LQC), relational time has been implemented using material degreesof freedom: a minimally-coupled massless scalar field [Ashtekar, Pawlowski & Singh 2006], a GFTcondensate [Gielen & Sindoni 2016], or dust fields [Brown & Kuchăř 1995; Pawłowski 2014]. Allof these are material clocks: dynamical degrees of freedom that must be added to, or identified1within, the matter content of the model. No worked example exists in which the clock arises fromthe algebraic structure of the kinematic Hilbert space itself — as an invariant of the theory’s gaugegroup rather than an additional field. Such an algebraic clock would be conceptually preferable: itrequires no extension of the Hilbert space, its back-reaction on geometry is controlled, and it is notsubject to the multiple-choice ambiguity [Kuchăř 1992] that afflicts material clock choices when thesystem has multiple degrees of freedom.This paper provides the first such example. The LQC bounce, treated via the Pöschl–Teller (PT)effective potential established in the companion series [Hillard 2026a–d], admits a spectral threshold = √2 that is fixed by the zero of the SU(2) Casimir polynomial W() = ³(²−2)/[C·sinh(/2)],where C = 3.60329… is the Hillard constant [Hillard 2026a, Paper 8]. This zero is a representationtheoretic invariant of the kinematic Hilbert space: it exists prior to any dynamical input, beforeany clock is chosen. We show that instantiates the full HSL relational clock construction. TheClock Decomposition Theorem (Section III) establishes the tensor product factorization H̃_kin H H and constructs the covariant POVM on H. The Temporal Trinity Formula (Section IV)is identified as the HSL clock reading in all three quantization pictures, with explicit clock-changemap T (Appendix A). The result holds exactly: is not a perturbative approximation to a clockbut a genuine algebraic invariant.A relational clock that is an algebraic invariant makes a concrete, falsifiable prediction. The signchange multipole * — the CMB multipole at which the LQC bounce imprint changes sign in thepower spectrum [Hillard 2026a] — is precisely the PW temporal origin in Fourier space: * =/_B. When GFT interactions of strength are included, the PT potential is deformed to U_ =−(2−)sech²(), which remains within the exactly solvable PT family (Section VI). The thresholdshifts to () = √(2−), giving the exact non-perturbative prediction:()/ = √(1 − /2) − 1 −/4 + O(²).* (1)*The sign is negative: GFT interactions push * to lower multipoles. The detection threshold forLiteBIRD is _crit 4/*, placing the prediction within reach of the near-term CMB survey (SectionV). This is the first quantitative prediction from a relational clock interpretation of the LQC bounce.A word on the relationship between this paper and the companion series [Hillard 2026a–d]. ThePWinterpretation of the bounce established here depends on W() only through its functional form:W() ³(²−2). Any function with that polynomial zero structure has a scattering threshold at =√2, and any such function in the Hamiltonian constraint generates the relational clock constructionof Sections III–IV. The validity of the LQG derivation of W in [Hillard 2026a] is therefore not aprerequisite for the results of this paper. The companion series and the present paper are mutuallyreinforcing rather than circularly dependent: [Hillard 2026a] provides the physical motivation andprecise form of W; this paper provides the relational interpretation that explains why has thevalue it has.The paper is organised as follows. Section II reviews the relevant background on LQC, the PTeffective potential, and the HSL formalism. Section III establishes the Clock Decomposition Theorem: spectral factorization (Proposition 1), covariant POVM, and temporal origin. Section IVidentifies the Temporal Trinity Formula in all three HSL pictures (Lemma 1, Proposition 2). Section V derives the physical inner product by group averaging and the full observational prediction(Table 2). Section VI proves that the intertwiner deformation is shape-invariant and promotes theprediction to an exact formula (Proposition 3). Appendix A constructs the clock-change map Texplicitly (Proposition A.1, Corollary A.1).22Main results at a glanceClock Decomposition Theorem (Section III): H̃_kin H H + O(). POVM E(d) =|W()|²/‖W‖² d is covariant. = √2 is the temporal origin.Trinity Formula (Section IV): N_total = N + ln(··k_piv/) is a Dirac observable, clockchange invariant. T acts as identity on (Appendix A).Exact prediction (Sections V–VI): ()/ = √(1−/2) − 1 −/4. LiteBIRD detection threshold:_crit 4/*.First algebraic PW clock in LQC (Section V.4): is an SU(2) Casimir invariant, not amaterial d.o.f. Back-reaction is O(); no Hilbert space extension needed.
We have previously shown that three approaches to relational quantum dynamics—relational Dirac observables, the Page-Wootters formalism and quantum deparametrizations—are equivalent. Here we show that this “trinity” of relational quantum dynamics holds in relativistic settings per frequency superselection sector. Time according to a clock subsystem is defined via a positive operator-valued measure (POVM) that is covariant with respect to the group generated by its (quadratic) Hamiltonian. This differs from the usual choice of a self-adjoint clock observable conjugate to the clock momentum. It also resolves Kuchař's criticism that the Page-Wootters formalism yields incorrect localization probabilities for the relativistic particle when conditioning on a Minkowski time operator. We show that conditioning instead on the covariant clock POVM results in a Newton-Wigner type localization probability commonly used in relativistic quantum mechanics. By establishing the equivalence mentioned above, we also assign a consistent conditional-probability interpretation to relational observables and deparametrizations. Finally, we expand a recent method of changing temporal reference frames, and show how to transform states and observables frequency-sector-wise. We use this method to discuss an indirect clock self-reference effect and explore the state and temporal frame-dependence of the task of comparing and synchronizing different quantum clocks.
In relational quantum dynamics, evolution emerges via the correlations between some system of interest and a clock system, which plays the role of a temporal reference frame. Their combined state satisfies a Wheeler-de Witt-like constraint equation, and therefore does not evolve, leading to a ``block universe'' picture. Here we investigate the interplay of two aspects, namely temporal localization and causal relations, when comparing emergent dynamics with respect to different choices of clock. We first explore the extent to which two clocks can agree on the temporal localization of events. Then, focussing on the operational notion of causality, we require a clearly defined notion of interventions, i.e. quantum operations, and consider two different approaches to modeling these operations within relational dynamics. The first considers their application via the choice of solutions to the constraint equation, i.e.~the choice of which ``history'' is considered. The second approach incorporates the operations into the constraint equation itself and thereby into its solutions, giving a dynamical picture of the interventions. From the perspective of a single clock, both approaches allow for a notion of operational causality in relational dynamics. However, for multiple clocks, only the second approach gives a consistent picture regarding causal relations, while necessarily manifesting some degree of temporal delocalization between frames. Moreover, this second approach, when considering certain cases of temporal delocalization, naturally describes scenarios with indefinite causal order, a well-known quantum feature of operational causality.