Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/9705039

Reply to Comment on ``Scaling of the quasiparticle spectrum for d-wave superconductors''

Steven H. Simon, Patrick A. Lee

Published May 6, 1997• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Volovik and Kopnin make two seperate points regarding our recent paper (S. H. Simon and P. A. Lee, PRL 78, 1548 (1997); cond-mat/9611133). First they note that the scaling regime we address in our paper is limited by the curvature of the Fermi surface, and secondly they note that the crossover scale derived in our paper is incorrect. These points are valid and are discussed in this reply. With the exception of the incorrectly predicted crossover scale, the results of our paper remain unchanged.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.cond-mat/9705039

Related papers

Comment on ``Scaling of the Quasiparticle Spectrum for d -wave Superconductors''

Григорий Ефимович Воловик, Nikolai B. Kopnin

In a recent Letter Simon and Lee suggested a scaling law for thermodynamic and kinetic properties of superconductors with lines of gap nodes. However their crossover parameter between the bulk dominated regime and the vortex dominated regime is different from that found in our paper (N.B. Kopnin and G.E. Volovik, JETP Lett., {\bf 64}, 690 (1996); see also cond-mat/9702093). We discuss the origin of the disagreement.

arXiv:cond-mat/9703107•Physical Review Letters•Jun 30, 1997•30 citations

Reply to "Common on `Superfluidity in the interior-gap states'"

Shin-Tza Wu, Sungkit Yip

We show that the recent Comment by Liu and Wilczek (cond-mat/0304632) on our work (PRA 67, 053603) is incorrect.

arXiv:cond-mat/0305675•May 29, 2003•0 citations

Reply to the Comment on "Bound States in the One-dimensional Hubbard Model"

Daniel Braak, Natan Andrei

We reply to the comment (cond-mat/9806125) by Essler, Goehmann and Korepin, and show that their points are unfounded.

arXiv:cond-mat/9806225•Jun 18, 1998•0 citations

Reply to Comment on "Stripes and the t-J Model"

C. Stephen Hellberg, Efstratios Manousakis

This is a Reply to the Comment of S.R. White and D.J. Scalapino [cond-mat/9907243] on our recent paper ``Stripes and the t-J Model'' [Physical Review Letters 83, 132 (1999) and cond-mat/9812022].

arXiv:cond-mat/9910142•Oct 9, 1999•0 citations

Reply to Suslov

Keith Slevin, Tomi Ohtsuki

In a recent submission to this archive arXiv:cond-mat/0105325, Suslov has claimed that our recent numerical estimate of the critical exponent of the Anderson transition $\nu=1.57\pm.02$ is in error and that the available numerical data are consistent with a value of $\nu=1$. We contest this claim and demonstrate using Suslov's own scaling procedure that $\nu\ne 1$

•Jun 1, 2001•0 citations

Reply to Comment on " Universal Fluctuations in Correlated Systems"

S. T. Bramwell, Kim Christensen, Jean-Yves Fortin +7 more

Reply to the comment, cond-mat/0209398 by by N.W. Watkins, S.C. Chapman, and G. Rowlands

arXiv:cond-mat/0209416•Sep 17, 2002•3 citations
Volovik and Kopnin make two seperate points regarding our recent paper (S. H. Simon and P. A. Lee, PRL 78, 1548 (1997); cond-mat/9611133). First they note that the scaling regime we address in our paper is limited by the curvature of the Fermi surface, and secondly they note that the crossover scale derived in our paper is incorrect. These points are valid and are discussed in this reply. With the exception of the incorrectly predicted crossover scale, the results of our paper remain unchanged.
In a recent submission to this archive arXiv:cond-mat/0105325, Suslov has claimed that our recent numerical estimate of the critical exponent of the Anderson transition ν=1.57±.02\nu=1.57\pm.02ν=1.57±.02 is in error and that the available numerical data are consistent with a value of ν=1\nu=1ν=1. We contest this claim and demonstrate using Suslov's own scaling procedure that ν≠1\nu\ne 1ν=1