arXiv:cond-mat/0004485 · Physical Review Letters

Palassini and Young Reply:

Matteo Palassini, A. P. Young

Published Oct 9, 2000• 4 citations

Abstract

We reply to the comment of Marinari and Parisi [cond-mat/0002457 v2] on our paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5126 (1999) and cond-mat/9906323]. We show that the data in the comment are affected by strong finite-size corrections. Therefore the original conclusion of our paper still stands.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.85.3333

Related papers

Jönsson, Yoshino, and Nordblad Reply:

Petra E. Jönsson, Hajime Yoshino, П. Нордблад

Reply to the Comment by L. Berthier and J.-P. Bouchaud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 059701 (2003), also cond-mat/0209165, on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 097201 (2002), also cond-mat/0203444

arXiv:cond-mat/0209385Physical Review LettersFeb 6, 200316 citations

Greiter replies to Demler, Zhang, Meixner, and Hanke

Martin Greiter

In a comment on my recent manuscript on the pi-particle [cond-mat/9705049], Demler et al. [cond-mat/9705191] argued that there is a correction to the chemical potential which enters the expression for the energy of the pi-particle given in [Demler and Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4126 (1995)]. This is shown to be incorrect. I further offer an interpretation for the low-energy resonances observed by Meixner et al. [cond-mat/9701217] in the pi-pi correlation function in a finite-size Hubbard cluster at low electron densities.

arXiv:cond-mat/9705282May 28, 19970 citations

Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Luming Duan, Guang‐Can Guo

In the comment, Zanardi and Rasetti argue that several claims in our recent letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1953, 1997) are questionable. The reply shows these claims remain true.

arXiv:quant-ph/9710014Oct 3, 19971 citation

Bokilet al.Reply:

Hemant Bokil, Alan J. Bray, Barbara Drossel +1 more

Physical Review LettersJun 21, 199911 citations

"Symmetry properties of magnetization in the Hubbard model at finite temperature": Comment on 'Reply to Comment'

Adolfo Avella, Francesco Paolo Mancini, D. Villani

We comment on the Reply of G. Su and M. Suzuki [cond-mat/9808011] to our Comment [cond-mat/9807402] about the papers of G. Su [Phys. Rev. B 54, 8291 (1996)] and G. Su and M. Suzuki [Phys. Rev. B 57, 13367 (1998)]. The algebraic mistake originating their incorrect solutions is evidenced in detail.

arXiv:cond-mat/9808109Aug 11, 19980 citations

Toninelli, Biroli, and Fisher Reply:

Cristina Toninelli, Giulio Biroli, Daniel S. Fisher

Physical Review LettersMar 19, 200732 citations