arXiv:cond-mat/9705282

Greiter replies to Demler, Zhang, Meixner, and Hanke

Martin Greiter

Published May 28, 1997• 0 citations

Abstract

In a comment on my recent manuscript on the pi-particle [cond-mat/9705049], Demler et al. [cond-mat/9705191] argued that there is a correction to the chemical potential which enters the expression for the energy of the pi-particle given in [Demler and Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4126 (1995)]. This is shown to be incorrect. I further offer an interpretation for the low-energy resonances observed by Meixner et al. [cond-mat/9701217] in the pi-pi correlation function in a finite-size Hubbard cluster at low electron densities.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.cond-mat/9705282

Related papers

Response to Greiter's Comment

Eugene Demler, Shoucheng Zhang, Stefan Meixner +1 more

Greiter claimed erroneously that the pi-excitation of the Hubbard model has an energy of the order of U. This mistake originates from a inconsistent treatment of the two particle Hartree energy and the Hartee correction to the chemical potential. In any self-consistent calculations, these two contributions cancel exactly, as shown by Kohn, Luttinger and Ward. We also show that his interpretation of the finite-size studies is inconsistent.

arXiv:cond-mat/9705191May 20, 19970 citations

Reply to ``Comment on `On the Luttinger theorem concerning number of particles in the ground states of systems of interacting fermions','' arXiv:0711.3093v1, by A. Rosch

Behnam Farid

We reply to the Comment by Achim Rosch [1] (arXiv:0711.3093v1) who challenges our finding in Ref. [2] (arXiv:0711.0952v1) with regard to the validity of the Luttinger theorem in the cases of Mott insulating N-particle ground states (even) when the chemical potential used in applying this theorem coincides with the zero-temperature limit of the chemical potential satisfying the equation of state corresponding to N particles. Rosch further argues that the strong-coupling expression for the single-particle Green function presented in Ref. [3] (arXiv:cond-mat/0602656v2) and analyzed in Ref. [2] does not imply destruction of the Mott insulating state at half-filling as a result of an arbitrary weak hopping contribution that breaks particle-hole symmetry and therefore suggests that our conclusion in Ref. [2] to the contrary were incorrect. Here we show the shortcomings of Rosch's arguments.

arXiv:0711.3195Nov 20, 20070 citations

Reply to the Comment on "Bound States in the One-dimensional Hubbard Model"

Daniel Braak, Natan Andrei

We reply to the comment (cond-mat/9806125) by Essler, Goehmann and Korepin, and show that their points are unfounded.

arXiv:cond-mat/9806225Jun 18, 19980 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Accurate ground-state phase diagram of the one-dimensional extended Hubbard model at half filling’ ”

G. P. Zhang

We respond to Jeckelman's Comment on our paper [G. P. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 68, 153101 (2003)], which discusses his previous work [E. Jeckelmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 236401 (2002)]. We feel that it is important to point out that his previous results show a trend contradicting the weak-coupling limit, a conclusion that is independent of our calculation. Therefore, our comments on his previous results remain valid and our conclusion is unchanged.

Physical Review BMay 4, 20052 citations

Comment on “Accurate ground-state phase diagram of the one-dimensional extended Hubbard model at half filling”

Eric Jeckelmann

It is shown that Guoping Zhang's results [G. P. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 68, 153101 (2003)] for the charge-density wave-phase boundary in the half-filled one-dimensional extended Hubbard model are incorrect and that his criticism of my work [E. Jeckelmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 236401 (2002)] is groundless.

arXiv:cond-mat/0401490Physical Review BMay 4, 20058 citations

Comment on ``Orbital-selective Mott transitions in two-band Hubbard models''

A. Liebsch

A recent paper by Bluemer et al. [cond-mat/0609758] again criticizes earlier QMC/DMFT results by Liebsch [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 70}, 165103 (2004)]. This criticism is shown to be unfounded.

arXiv:cond-mat/0610482Oct 17, 20060 citations