Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/0606571

Macro-orbitals and microscopic theory of a system of interacting bosons

Yatendra Singh Jain

Published Jun 22, 2006• 9 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Macro-orbital representation of a particle (detailed account given in cond-mat/0603784) has been used to develop the microscopic theory of a system of interacting bosons. It concludes that: (i) below certain temperature (say, $T_λ$), particles assume a state of (q, -q) bound pairs, (ii) the $λ-$transition is a consequence of inter-particle quantum correlations clubbed with zero-point repulsion and inter-particle attraction and represents an onset of the order-disorder of particles in their $ϕ-$space followed simultaneously by their BEC as (q, -q) bound pairs in a state of q = $q_o = π/d$ and K = 0, (iii) particles at $T \le T_λ$ acquire collective binding which locks them at = 0, = $λ/2$ and $Δϕ= 2nπ$ (with n = 1, 2, 3, ...), (iv) the entire system assumes mechanical strain in inter-particle bonds and behaves like a single macroscopic molecule, (v) there exists an energy gap between the superfluid and normal fluid phases of the system, (vi) the $λ-$transition represents the twin phenomena of broken gauge symmetry and phase coherence, (vii) the system does not have p = 0 condensate, (viii) a new kind of quantum quasi-particle "omon" (a phononlike wave of the oscillations of the momentum coordinates of particles) exists in superfluid phase, etc. It explains the properties of He-II, including the origin of quantized vortices, critical velocities, logarithmic singularity of specific heat, etc. at quantitative level and provides microscopic foundation to two fluid theory, $Ψ-$theory, idea of macroscopic wave function, etc. The framework of the theory can unify the physics of interacting bosons and fermions.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.cond-mat/0606571

Related papers

Basic Problems of a Microscopic Theory of a Many Body Quantum System

Yatendra Singh Jain

Basic problems of a microscopic theory of many body quantum systems and different aspects of a new approach which can help in solving them are discussed in detail. To this effect we make a critical study of the wave mechanics of two hard core quantum particles and discover its several untouched aspects, viz.: (i) the useful details of ψ_k(r) (representing the relative motion of two particles), (ii) the expectation value of hard core (HC) repulsion (), (iii) the inconsistency of the statements, r \leσand ψ_k(r \leσ)=0 (σ=HC diameter of a particle), with uncertainty principle particularly for low k values, (iv) the lower bound of allowed values of k=2q, (v) the dominance of interparticle phase correlation in low temperature phase. For the first time this study concludes that has zero value which does not agree with its non-zero value known for the last several decades. This also finds compelling reasons for a system of interacting bosons such as liquid ^4He to have (q, -q) pair condensation with allowed q, obviously controlled by V_{HC}(r), to satisfy q \geπ/d. Several important aspects of N body quantum systems like liquids ^4He and ^3He are also concluded. Free from any error [see editor's note J. Scientific Exploration 16(1), p.1 (2002)], our approach can help in developing nearly exact microscopic theories of widely different systems of interacting bosons and fermions, as demonstrated for liquids ^4He type systems [J. Scientific Exploration, 16, 77-116 (2002)]. The paper also sums up the expert observations with our response to facilitate one to have a critical assessment and better understanding of the new approach.

arXiv:cond-mat/0208445•Aug 23, 2002•0 citations

Quantum Condensates: An Overview

Anthony J. Leggett

As we all know, single microscopic particles such as electrons or atoms do not behave according to the familiar classical (Newtonian) physics which describes the everyday world, but rather according to the prescriptions of quantum mechanics, the outcome is often bizarre and counterintuitive. When a macroscopic number of such particles (say ∼ 10) is assembled under conditions where the effects of quantum mechanics are important, the results can be even more spectacular; they include macroscopic phenomena such as superfluidity and superconductivity, which are completely impossible to explain in classical terms. Most, though not all of these exotic phenomena, are a result of a phenomenon which I shall refer to generically as “quantum condensation,” in which a macroscopic number of particles or pairs of particles—a nonzero fraction of all particles present—occupy a single quantum state; this phenomenon is traditionally referred to as Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) when it occurs in a system of bosons such as liquid He, and as Cooper pairing when it occurs, for pairs of particles, in a system of fermions such as the electrons in a superconducting metal. As a result of quantum condensation, the characteristically quantum-mechanical behavior which we are used to seeing at the level of single electrons is as it were amplified by the cooperation of condensed particles and can manifest itself at the macroscopic level. The present essay is intended as a general introduction to the subject of quantum condensation and its consequences, as manifested in a variety of physical systems. I will try to review the fundamental physical ideas, usually without de-

The African review of physics•Oct 15, 2007•0 citations

Conclusion

Philippe Nozières, David Pines

We conclude our study of superfluidity in Bose liquids with a brief summary of the strengths, and of the inadequacies, of the theory. The cornerstone of our fundamental understanding of superfluidity has been the recognition of the central importance of the condensate, a single quantum state which is macroscopically occupied. For the Bose liquid one has a particle condensate, characterized by a non-vanishing expectation value of ψ (r). The existence of the condensate explains all major aspects of superfluid behavior; in particular, we now possess: A clear understanding of the static and the long wavelength dynamic properties of an equilibrium Bose liquid, including a microscopic basis for the two-fluid model. A precise microscopic theory at T = 0 for a specific model, the dilute Bose gas. Variational calculations of the excitation spectrum of liquid He II (and of the ground state properties as well), which are in good quantitative agreement with experiment. A satisfactory phenomenological treatment of the interactions between elementary excitations which give rise to various irreversible phenomena. A qualitative understanding of the role which is played by quantized vortices in both equilibrium and non-equilibrium phenomena.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 5, 2018•0 citations

Interaction Effects

Hui Zhai

1. Define Bose-Einstein condensation in an interacting boson system in term of macroscopic occupation. 2. Introduce the Gross-Pitaevskii equation and its applicable conditions. 3. Derive the hydrodynamic equations and various physical consequences of the hydrodynamics with or without harmonic trap. 4. Introduce sound wave and emphasize the difference between the wave behavior and the diffusive behavior. 5. Introduce the criterion for superfluidity and determine the superfluid critical velocity. 6. Introduce two-fluid hydrodynamics. 7. Introduce the Bogoliubov theory. 8. Introduce various concepts related to quasi-particle, including ground state as vacuum of quasi-particles, the zero-point energy of quasi-particle, quasi-particle lifetime and vacuum fluctuation. 9. Introduce healing length as the characteristic length scale for low-energy physics of an interacting Bose condensate. 10. Summarize the difference between an interacting and non-interacting Bose condensate. 11. Introduce the Bragg spectroscopy. 12. Show that the Bogoliubov theory fails in one-dimension due to the infrared divergence. 13. Discuss the basic idea of the Bethe-ansatz solution and the Tonks-Girardeau limit. 14. Introduce scale invariant quantum gases. 15. Introduce the Josephson effect and the self-trapping as two different transport phenomena driven by phase coherence. 16. Discuss the conjugate relation between the relative phase fluctuation and the relative particle number fluctuation, and show strong enough phase fluctuation renders the system into a Fock state. 17. Discuss an example of quantum measurement that can project two independent condensates to a coherent superposition state. 18. Discuss interference effects in density and density-density correlations. 19. Discuss the relation between the instability of the Sch\"odinger Cat state and the stability of symmetry breaking.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 30, 2021•0 citations

The Superfluid State of a Bose Liquid as a Superposition of a Single-Particle and Pair Coherent Condensates

Ernst A. Pashitskii, Stefan V. Mashkevich, S. I. Vilchynskyy

One considers the superfluid (SF) state of a Bose liquid with a strong repulsion between bosons, in which at T=0, along with a weak single-particle Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC), there exists an intensive pair coherent condensate (PCC), analogous to the Cooper condensate in a Fermi liquid with an attraction between the fermions. Such a PCC emerges in a system of bosons due to an oscillating sign-changing momentum dependence of the Fourier component of the pair interaction potential, which is characteristic of a certain family of repulsion potentials. In such cases, the Fourier component is negative in some domain of nonzero momentum transfer, which corresponds to an effective attraction. The collective effects of renormalization (``screening'') of the initial interaction lead to a suppression of the repulsion and an enhancement of the effective attraction. It is the ratio of the BEC density to the full density of the liquid $n_0/n\ll 1$ that is used as a small parameter---unlike in the Bogolyubov theory for a quasi-ideal Bose gas, in which the small parameter is the ratio of the number of supracondensate excitations to the number of particles in an intensive BEC, $(n-n_0)/n_0\ll 1$. A closed system of nonlinear integral equations for the normal and anomalous self-energy parts is obtained, in the framework of a renormalized perturbation theory built on combined hydrodynamic and field variables. In the framework of the hard-spheres model, a spectrum of quasiparticles is obtained, which is in good accordance with the experimental spectrum of elementary excitations in superfluid $^4$He. The question of applicability of the Landau criterion in the absence of quantum vortices is discussed.

arXiv:cond-mat/0104415•Apr 22, 2001•0 citations

Ground State of a System of N Hard Core Quantum Particles in 1D Box

Yatendra Singh Jain

The ground state of a system of $N$ impenetrable hard core quantum particles in a 1-D box is analyzed by using a new scheme applied recently to study a similar system of two such particles {\it [Centl. Eur. J. Phys., 2(4), 709 (2004)]}. Accordingly, each particle of the system behaves like an independent entity represented by a {\it macro-orbital}, -a kind of pair waveform identical to that of a pair of particles moving with ($q$, $-q$) momenta at their {\it center of mass} which may have any momentum $K$ in the laboratory frame. It concludes: (i) $ = 0$, (ii) $ \ge λ/2$ and (iii) $q \ge q_o (= π/d)$ (with $d = L/N$ being the average nearest neighbour distance), {\it etc.} While all bosons in their ground state have $q = q_o$ and $K = 0$, fermions have $q= q_o$ with different $K$ ranging between 0 and $K = K_F$ (the Fermi wave vector). Independent of their bosonic or fermionic nature, all particles in the ground state define a close packed arrangement of their equal size wave packets representing an ordered state in phase ($ϕ-$)space with $Δϕ= 2nπ$ (with $n$ = 1,2,3, ...), $ = λ/2 = d$, and $q = q_o$. As such our approach uses greatly simplified mathematical formulation and renders a visibly clear picture of the low energy states of the systems and its results supplement earlier studies in providing their complete understanding.

arXiv:cond-mat/0606409•Jun 15, 2006•2 citations
Macro-orbital representation of a particle (detailed account given in cond-mat/0603784) has been used to develop the microscopic theory of a system of interacting bosons. It concludes that: (i) below certain temperature (say, TλT_λTλ​), particles assume a state of (q, -q) bound pairs, (ii) the λ−λ-λ−transition is a consequence of inter-particle quantum correlations clubbed with zero-point repulsion and inter-particle attraction and represents an onset of the order-disorder of particles in their ϕ−ϕ-ϕ−space followed simultaneously by their BEC as (q, -q) bound pairs in a state of q = qo=π/dq_o = π/dqo​=π/d and K = 0, (iii) particles at T≤TλT \le T_λT≤Tλ​ acquire collective binding which locks them at = 0, = λ/2λ/2λ/2 and Δϕ=2nπΔϕ= 2nπΔϕ=2nπ (with n = 1, 2, 3, ...), (iv) the entire system assumes mechanical strain in inter-particle bonds and behaves like a single macroscopic molecule, (v) there exists an energy gap between the superfluid and normal fluid phases of the system, (vi) the λ−λ-λ−transition represents the twin phenomena of broken gauge symmetry and phase coherence, (vii) the system does not have p = 0 condensate, (viii) a new kind of quantum quasi-particle "omon" (a phononlike wave of the oscillations of the momentum coordinates of particles) exists in superfluid phase, etc. It explains the properties of He-II, including the origin of quantized vortices, critical velocities, logarithmic singularity of specific heat, etc. at quantitative level and provides microscopic foundation to two fluid theory, Ψ−Ψ-Ψ−theory, idea of macroscopic wave function, etc. The framework of the theory can unify the physics of interacting bosons and fermions.
Basic problems of a microscopic theory of many body quantum systems and different aspects of a new approach which can help in solving them are discussed in detail. To this effect we make a critical study of the wave mechanics of two hard core quantum particles and discover its several untouched aspects, viz.: (i) the useful details of ψ_k(r) (representing the relative motion of two particles), (ii) the expectation value of hard core (HC) repulsion (), (iii) the inconsistency of the statements, r \leσand ψ_k(r \leσ)=0 (σ=HC diameter of a particle), with uncertainty principle particularly for low k values, (iv) the lower bound of allowed values of k=2q, (v) the dominance of interparticle phase correlation in low temperature phase. For the first time this study concludes that has zero value which does not agree with its non-zero value known for the last several decades. This also finds compelling reasons for a system of interacting bosons such as liquid ^4He to have (q, -q) pair condensation with allowed q, obviously controlled by V_{HC}(r), to satisfy q \geπ/d. Several important aspects of N body quantum systems like liquids ^4He and ^3He are also concluded. Free from any error [see editor's note J. Scientific Exploration 16(1), p.1 (2002)], our approach can help in developing nearly exact microscopic theories of widely different systems of interacting bosons and fermions, as demonstrated for liquids ^4He type systems [J. Scientific Exploration, 16, 77-116 (2002)]. The paper also sums up the expert observations with our response to facilitate one to have a critical assessment and better understanding of the new approach.
As we all know, single microscopic particles such as electrons or atoms do not behave according to the familiar classical (Newtonian) physics which describes the everyday world, but rather according to the prescriptions of quantum mechanics, the outcome is often bizarre and counterintuitive. When a macroscopic number of such particles (say ∼ 10) is assembled under conditions where the effects of quantum mechanics are important, the results can be even more spectacular; they include macroscopic phenomena such as superfluidity and superconductivity, which are completely impossible to explain in classical terms. Most, though not all of these exotic phenomena, are a result of a phenomenon which I shall refer to generically as “quantum condensation,” in which a macroscopic number of particles or pairs of particles—a nonzero fraction of all particles present—occupy a single quantum state; this phenomenon is traditionally referred to as Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) when it occurs in a system of bosons such as liquid He, and as Cooper pairing when it occurs, for pairs of particles, in a system of fermions such as the electrons in a superconducting metal. As a result of quantum condensation, the characteristically quantum-mechanical behavior which we are used to seeing at the level of single electrons is as it were amplified by the cooperation of condensed particles and can manifest itself at the macroscopic level. The present essay is intended as a general introduction to the subject of quantum condensation and its consequences, as manifested in a variety of physical systems. I will try to review the fundamental physical ideas, usually without de-
We conclude our study of superfluidity in Bose liquids with a brief summary of the strengths, and of the inadequacies, of the theory. The cornerstone of our fundamental understanding of superfluidity has been the recognition of the central importance of the condensate, a single quantum state which is macroscopically occupied. For the Bose liquid one has a particle condensate, characterized by a non-vanishing expectation value of ψ (r). The existence of the condensate explains all major aspects of superfluid behavior; in particular, we now possess: A clear understanding of the static and the long wavelength dynamic properties of an equilibrium Bose liquid, including a microscopic basis for the two-fluid model. A precise microscopic theory at T = 0 for a specific model, the dilute Bose gas. Variational calculations of the excitation spectrum of liquid He II (and of the ground state properties as well), which are in good quantitative agreement with experiment. A satisfactory phenomenological treatment of the interactions between elementary excitations which give rise to various irreversible phenomena. A qualitative understanding of the role which is played by quantized vortices in both equilibrium and non-equilibrium phenomena.
1. Define Bose-Einstein condensation in an interacting boson system in term of macroscopic occupation. 2. Introduce the Gross-Pitaevskii equation and its applicable conditions. 3. Derive the hydrodynamic equations and various physical consequences of the hydrodynamics with or without harmonic trap. 4. Introduce sound wave and emphasize the difference between the wave behavior and the diffusive behavior. 5. Introduce the criterion for superfluidity and determine the superfluid critical velocity. 6. Introduce two-fluid hydrodynamics. 7. Introduce the Bogoliubov theory. 8. Introduce various concepts related to quasi-particle, including ground state as vacuum of quasi-particles, the zero-point energy of quasi-particle, quasi-particle lifetime and vacuum fluctuation. 9. Introduce healing length as the characteristic length scale for low-energy physics of an interacting Bose condensate. 10. Summarize the difference between an interacting and non-interacting Bose condensate. 11. Introduce the Bragg spectroscopy. 12. Show that the Bogoliubov theory fails in one-dimension due to the infrared divergence. 13. Discuss the basic idea of the Bethe-ansatz solution and the Tonks-Girardeau limit. 14. Introduce scale invariant quantum gases. 15. Introduce the Josephson effect and the self-trapping as two different transport phenomena driven by phase coherence. 16. Discuss the conjugate relation between the relative phase fluctuation and the relative particle number fluctuation, and show strong enough phase fluctuation renders the system into a Fock state. 17. Discuss an example of quantum measurement that can project two independent condensates to a coherent superposition state. 18. Discuss interference effects in density and density-density correlations. 19. Discuss the relation between the instability of the Sch\"odinger Cat state and the stability of symmetry breaking.
One considers the superfluid (SF) state of a Bose liquid with a strong repulsion between bosons, in which at T=0, along with a weak single-particle Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC), there exists an intensive pair coherent condensate (PCC), analogous to the Cooper condensate in a Fermi liquid with an attraction between the fermions. Such a PCC emerges in a system of bosons due to an oscillating sign-changing momentum dependence of the Fourier component of the pair interaction potential, which is characteristic of a certain family of repulsion potentials. In such cases, the Fourier component is negative in some domain of nonzero momentum transfer, which corresponds to an effective attraction. The collective effects of renormalization (``screening'') of the initial interaction lead to a suppression of the repulsion and an enhancement of the effective attraction. It is the ratio of the BEC density to the full density of the liquid n0/n≪1n_0/n\ll 1n0​/n≪1 that is used as a small parameter---unlike in the Bogolyubov theory for a quasi-ideal Bose gas, in which the small parameter is the ratio of the number of supracondensate excitations to the number of particles in an intensive BEC, (n−n0)/n0≪1(n-n_0)/n_0\ll 1(n−n0​)/n0​≪1. A closed system of nonlinear integral equations for the normal and anomalous self-energy parts is obtained, in the framework of a renormalized perturbation theory built on combined hydrodynamic and field variables. In the framework of the hard-spheres model, a spectrum of quasiparticles is obtained, which is in good accordance with the experimental spectrum of elementary excitations in superfluid 4^44He. The question of applicability of the Landau criterion in the absence of quantum vortices is discussed.
The ground state of a system of NNN impenetrable hard core quantum particles in a 1-D box is analyzed by using a new scheme applied recently to study a similar system of two such particles {\it [Centl. Eur. J. Phys., 2(4), 709 (2004)]}. Accordingly, each particle of the system behaves like an independent entity represented by a {\it macro-orbital}, -a kind of pair waveform identical to that of a pair of particles moving with (qqq, −q-q−q) momenta at their {\it center of mass} which may have any momentum KKK in the laboratory frame. It concludes: (i) $ = 0$, (ii) $ \ge λ/2$ and (iii) q≥qo(=π/d)q \ge q_o (= π/d)q≥qo​(=π/d) (with d=L/Nd = L/Nd=L/N being the average nearest neighbour distance), {\it etc.} While all bosons in their ground state have q=qoq = q_oq=qo​ and K=0K = 0K=0, fermions have q=qoq= q_oq=qo​ with different KKK ranging between 0 and K=KFK = K_FK=KF​ (the Fermi wave vector). Independent of their bosonic or fermionic nature, all particles in the ground state define a close packed arrangement of their equal size wave packets representing an ordered state in phase (ϕ−ϕ-ϕ−)space with Δϕ=2nπΔϕ= 2nπΔϕ=2nπ (with nnn = 1,2,3, ...), $ = λ/2 = d$, and q=qoq = q_oq=qo​. As such our approach uses greatly simplified mathematical formulation and renders a visibly clear picture of the low energy states of the systems and its results supplement earlier studies in providing their complete understanding.