Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/0504023 · Physical Review B

Exact ground states of quantum spin-2 models on the hexagonal lattice

Marc André Ahrens, Andreas Schadschneider, J. Zittartz

Published May 27, 2005• 17 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We construct exact nontrivial ground states of spin-2 quantum antiferromagnets on the hexagonal lattice. Using the optimum ground state approach we determine the ground state in different subspaces of a general spin-2 Hamiltonian consistent with some realistic symmetries. These states, which are not of simple product form, depend on two free parameters and can be shown to be only weakly degenerate. We find ground states with different types of magnetic order, i.e., a weak antiferromagnet with finite sublattice magnetization and a weak ferromagnet with ferrimagnetic order. For the latter it is argued that a quantum phase transition occurs within the solvable subspace.

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.71.174432

Related papers

Exact ground states of spin-2 chains

M. A Ahrens, Andreas Schadschneider, J Zittartz

We use the matrix product approach to construct all optimum ground states of general anisotropic spin-2 chains with nearest-neighbour interactions and common symmetries. These states are exact ground states of the model and their properties depend on up to three parameters. We find three different antiferromagnetic Haldane phases, one weak antiferromagnetic and one weak ferromagnetic phase. The antiferromagnetic phases can be described as spin liquids with exponentially decaying correlation functions. The variety of phases found with the matrix product ansatz also gives insight into the behaviour of spin chains with arbitrary higher spins.

arXiv:cond-mat/0206537•Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Sep 1, 2002•17 citations

Ground-state phases of the frustrated spin- 12 J1 – J2 – J3 Heisenberg ferromagnet ( J1<0 ) on the honeycomb lattice with J3=J2>0

P. H. Y. Li, R. F. Bishop, DAMIAN J. J. FARNELL +2 more

We study the ground-state (GS) properties of the frustrated spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ ${J}_{1}$--${J}_{2}$--${J}_{3}$ Heisenberg model on the two-dimensional honeycomb lattice with ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor (${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) exchange and frustrating antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor (${J}_{2}>0$) and next-next-nearest-neighbor (${J}_{3}>0$) exchanges, for the case ${J}_{3}={J}_{2}$. We use the coupled-cluster method implemented to high orders of approximation, complemented by the Lanczos exact diagonalization of a large finite lattice with 32 sites, in order to calculate the GS energy, magnetic order parameter, and spin-spin correlation functions. In one scenario we find a quantum phase transition point between regions characterized by ferromagnetic order and a form of antiferromagnetic (``striped'') collinear order at ${J}_{2}^{c}\ensuremath{\approx}0.1095\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.0005$, which is below the corresponding hypothetical transition point at ${J}_{2}^{\mathrm{cl}}=\frac{1}{7}$ ($\ensuremath{\approx}0.143$) for the classical version of the model, in which we momentarily ignore the intervening noncollinear spiral phase in the region $\frac{1}{10}<{J}_{2}<\frac{1}{5}$. Hence we see that quantum fluctuations appear to stabilize somewhat the collinear antiferromagnetic order in preference to the ferromagnetic order in this model. We compare results for the present ferromagnetic case (with ${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) to previous results for the corresponding antiferromagnetic case (with ${J}_{1}=+1$). The magnetic order parameter is found to behave similarly for the ferromagnetic and the antiferromagnetic models for large values of the frustration parameter ${J}_{2}$. However, there are considerable differences in the behavior of the order parameters for the two models for ${J}_{2}/|{J}_{1}|\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.6$. For example, the quasiclassical collinear magnetic long-range order for the antiferromagnetic model (with ${J}_{1}=+1$) breaks down at ${J}_{2}^{{c}_{2}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.60$, whereas the ``equivalent'' point for the ferromagnetic model (with ${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) occurs at ${J}_{2}^{c}\ensuremath{\approx}0.11$. Unlike in the antiferromagnetic model (with ${J}_{1}=+1$), where a plaquette valence-bond crystal phase intrudes between the two corresponding quasiclassical antiferromagnetic phases (with N\'eel and striped order) for ${J}_{2}^{{c}_{1}}<{J}_{2}<{J}_{2}^{{c}_{2}}$, with ${J}_{2}^{{c}_{1}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.47$, we find no clear indications at all in the ferromagnetic model for an intermediate magnetically disordered phase between the corresponding phases exhibiting ferromagnetic and striped order. Instead the evidence for the ferromagnetic model (with ${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) points to one of two scenarios: either there is a direct first-order transition between the two magnetically ordered phases, as mentioned above; or there exists an intervening phase between them in the very narrow range $0.10\ensuremath{\lesssim}{J}_{2}\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.12$, which is probably a remnant of the spiral phase that exists in the classical counterpart of the model over the larger range $\frac{1}{10}<{J}_{2}<\frac{1}{5}$.

arXiv:1109.6229•Physical Review B•Feb 21, 2012•31 citations

Exact magnetization plateaus and phase transitions in spin- S Heisenberg antiferromagnets in arbitrary dimensions

V. Ravi Chandra, Naveen Surendran

We generalize a class of Heisenberg antiferromagnets in one, two, and three dimensions, which have been shown to exhibit magnetization plateaus for spin-$\frac{1}{2}$. In a certain parameter range of the general model, which is formally defined in $D$ dimensions, we obtain the exact ground state(s) in the presence of an external magnetic field for arbitrary values of spin. In this range, the magnetization remains a constant as a function of the external field, except at some special values of the field where there is a jump from one plateau to the next. The plateaus are formed at certain specific fractions of the full magnetization which are determined by the spin and the lattice. Our general spin-$S$ result reproduces the known cases for spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ in various lattices. Furthermore, we argue that outside the exact regime, the mechanism for the plateau formation is different. This results in first order phase transitions along some of the plateaus as the coupling constant is varied. We rigorously show the existence of such transitions for some particular cases. Finally, we numerically analyze a spin-$1$ model in one dimension using exact diagonalization to obtain its complete phase diagram. It agrees with our analytic results.

arXiv:cond-mat/0604258•Physical Review B•Jul 21, 2006•13 citations

Decoupled phase of frustrated spin- 1 2 antiferromagnetic chains with and without long-range order in the ground state

Manoranjan Kumar, Z. G. Soos

The quantum phases of one-dimensional spin $s=1/2$ chains are discussed for models with two parameters, frustrating exchange $g={J}_{2}>0$ between second neighbors and normalized nonfrustrating power-law exchange with exponent $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ and distance dependence ${r}^{\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\alpha}}$. The ground state (GS) at $g=0$ has a long-range order (LRO) for $\ensuremath{\alpha}<2$ and long-range spin fluctuations for $\ensuremath{\alpha}>2$. The models conserve total spin $S={S}_{A}+{S}_{B}$, have singlet GS for any $g$, $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{\ge}0$ and decouple at $1/g=0$ to linear Heisenberg antiferromagnets on sublattices $A$ and $B$ of odd- and even-numbered sites. Exact diagonalization of finite chains gives the sublattice spin $\ensuremath{\langle}{S}_{A}^{2}\ensuremath{\rangle}$, the magnetic gap ${E}_{m}$ to the lowest triplet state, and the excitation ${E}_{\ensuremath{\sigma}}$ to the lowest singlet with opposite inversion symmetry to the GS. An analytical model that conserves sublattice spin has a first-order quantum transition at ${g}_{c}=1/4\mathrm{ln}2$ from a GS with perfect LRO to a decoupled phase with ${S}_{A}={S}_{B}=0$ for $g\ensuremath{\ge}4/{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{2}$ and no correlation between spins in different sublattices. The model with $\ensuremath{\alpha}=1$ has a first-order transition to a decoupled phase that closely resembles the analytical model. The bond order wave (BOW) phase and continuous quantum phase transitions of finite models with $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{\ge}2$ are discussed in terms of GS degeneracy where ${E}_{\ensuremath{\sigma}}(g)=0$, excited state degeneracy where ${E}_{\ensuremath{\sigma}}(g)={E}_{m}(g)$, and $\ensuremath{\langle}{S}_{A}^{2}\ensuremath{\rangle}$. The decoupled phase at large frustration has nondegenerate GS for any exponent $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ and excited states related to sublattice excitations.

arXiv:1309.7542•Physical Review B•Oct 14, 2013•17 citations

Exact ground state of one- and two-dimensional frustrated quantum spin systems

А. А. Овчинников, V. Ya. Krivnov, Д. В. Дмитриев

We outline the recent results on the ground state for a class of one- and two-dimensional frustrated quantum spin models with competing ferro(F)- and antiferromagnetic (AF) interactions. Frustrated spin systems are known to have many interesting properties due to large quantum fluctuations. As a result of these fluctuations usual mean-field approach gives quite crude (if not false) description of these systems. Therefore, exactly solvable models are very instructive at investigations of such systems. The exact ground state wave function of proposed models has a structure of the valence-bond state (VBS) type. One of the 1D model describes the transition line between the F and AF phase. The exact singlet ground state on this line has a double-spiral ordering. Using different approximation methods we study the magnetization curve in the AF phase. The second considered set of the 1D and 2D models has an exact non-degenerate ground state with exponentially decaying spin correlations. We also proposed the 1D and 2D electronic models with exact ground state represented in terms of singlet bond functions which are the generalization of the RVB functions including ionic states.

arXiv:cond-mat/0105295•May 15, 2001•0 citations

Honeycomb antiferromagnet with a triply degenerate dimer ground state

Rakesh Kumar, Dushyant Kumar, Brijesh Kumar

We present an antiferromagnetic quantum spin-1/2 model on honeycomb lattice. It has two parts, one of which is the usual nearest-neighbor Heisenberg model. The other part is a certain multiple spin interaction term, introduced by us, which is exactly solvable for the ground state. Without the Heisenberg part, the model has an exact threefold degenerate dimer ground state. This exact ground state is also noted to exist for the general spin-$S$ case. For the spin-1/2 case, we further carry out the triplon analysis in the ground state to study the competition between the Heisenberg and the multiple spin interactions. This approximate calculation exhibits a continuous quantum phase transition from the dimer order to N\'eel order.

arXiv:0906.0258•Physical Review B•Dec 30, 2009•11 citations
We construct exact nontrivial ground states of spin-2 quantum antiferromagnets on the hexagonal lattice. Using the optimum ground state approach we determine the ground state in different subspaces of a general spin-2 Hamiltonian consistent with some realistic symmetries. These states, which are not of simple product form, depend on two free parameters and can be shown to be only weakly degenerate. We find ground states with different types of magnetic order, i.e., a weak antiferromagnet with finite sublattice magnetization and a weak ferromagnet with ferrimagnetic order. For the latter it is argued that a quantum phase transition occurs within the solvable subspace.
We use the matrix product approach to construct all optimum ground states of general anisotropic spin-2 chains with nearest-neighbour interactions and common symmetries. These states are exact ground states of the model and their properties depend on up to three parameters. We find three different antiferromagnetic Haldane phases, one weak antiferromagnetic and one weak ferromagnetic phase. The antiferromagnetic phases can be described as spin liquids with exponentially decaying correlation functions. The variety of phases found with the matrix product ansatz also gives insight into the behaviour of spin chains with arbitrary higher spins.
We study the ground-state (GS) properties of the frustrated spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ J1{J}_{1}J1​--J2{J}_{2}J2​--J3{J}_{3}J3​ Heisenberg model on the two-dimensional honeycomb lattice with ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor (${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) exchange and frustrating antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor (J2>0{J}_{2}>0J2​>0) and next-next-nearest-neighbor (J3>0{J}_{3}>0J3​>0) exchanges, for the case J3=J2{J}_{3}={J}_{2}J3​=J2​. We use the coupled-cluster method implemented to high orders of approximation, complemented by the Lanczos exact diagonalization of a large finite lattice with 32 sites, in order to calculate the GS energy, magnetic order parameter, and spin-spin correlation functions. In one scenario we find a quantum phase transition point between regions characterized by ferromagnetic order and a form of antiferromagnetic (``striped'') collinear order at ${J}_{2}^{c}\ensuremath{\approx}0.1095\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.0005$, which is below the corresponding hypothetical transition point at J2cl=17{J}_{2}^{\mathrm{cl}}=\frac{1}{7}J2cl​=71​ ($\ensuremath{\approx}0.143$) for the classical version of the model, in which we momentarily ignore the intervening noncollinear spiral phase in the region 110<J2<15\frac{1}{10}<{J}_{2}<\frac{1}{5}101​<J2​<51​. Hence we see that quantum fluctuations appear to stabilize somewhat the collinear antiferromagnetic order in preference to the ferromagnetic order in this model. We compare results for the present ferromagnetic case (with ${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) to previous results for the corresponding antiferromagnetic case (with J1=+1{J}_{1}=+1J1​=+1). The magnetic order parameter is found to behave similarly for the ferromagnetic and the antiferromagnetic models for large values of the frustration parameter J2{J}_{2}J2​. However, there are considerable differences in the behavior of the order parameters for the two models for ${J}_{2}/|{J}_{1}|\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.6$. For example, the quasiclassical collinear magnetic long-range order for the antiferromagnetic model (with J1=+1{J}_{1}=+1J1​=+1) breaks down at ${J}_{2}^{{c}_{2}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.60$, whereas the ``equivalent'' point for the ferromagnetic model (with ${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) occurs at ${J}_{2}^{c}\ensuremath{\approx}0.11$. Unlike in the antiferromagnetic model (with J1=+1{J}_{1}=+1J1​=+1), where a plaquette valence-bond crystal phase intrudes between the two corresponding quasiclassical antiferromagnetic phases (with N\'eel and striped order) for J2c1<J2<J2c2{J}_{2}^{{c}_{1}}<{J}_{2}<{J}_{2}^{{c}_{2}}J2c1​​<J2​<J2c2​​, with ${J}_{2}^{{c}_{1}}\ensuremath{\approx}0.47$, we find no clear indications at all in the ferromagnetic model for an intermediate magnetically disordered phase between the corresponding phases exhibiting ferromagnetic and striped order. Instead the evidence for the ferromagnetic model (with ${J}_{1}=\ensuremath{-}1$) points to one of two scenarios: either there is a direct first-order transition between the two magnetically ordered phases, as mentioned above; or there exists an intervening phase between them in the very narrow range $0.10\ensuremath{\lesssim}{J}_{2}\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.12$, which is probably a remnant of the spiral phase that exists in the classical counterpart of the model over the larger range 110<J2<15\frac{1}{10}<{J}_{2}<\frac{1}{5}101​<J2​<51​.
We generalize a class of Heisenberg antiferromagnets in one, two, and three dimensions, which have been shown to exhibit magnetization plateaus for spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​. In a certain parameter range of the general model, which is formally defined in DDD dimensions, we obtain the exact ground state(s) in the presence of an external magnetic field for arbitrary values of spin. In this range, the magnetization remains a constant as a function of the external field, except at some special values of the field where there is a jump from one plateau to the next. The plateaus are formed at certain specific fractions of the full magnetization which are determined by the spin and the lattice. Our general spin-SSS result reproduces the known cases for spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ in various lattices. Furthermore, we argue that outside the exact regime, the mechanism for the plateau formation is different. This results in first order phase transitions along some of the plateaus as the coupling constant is varied. We rigorously show the existence of such transitions for some particular cases. Finally, we numerically analyze a spin-111 model in one dimension using exact diagonalization to obtain its complete phase diagram. It agrees with our analytic results.
The quantum phases of one-dimensional spin s=1/2s=1/2s=1/2 chains are discussed for models with two parameters, frustrating exchange g=J2>0g={J}_{2}>0g=J2​>0 between second neighbors and normalized nonfrustrating power-law exchange with exponent $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ and distance dependence ${r}^{\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\alpha}}$. The ground state (GS) at g=0g=0g=0 has a long-range order (LRO) for $\ensuremath{\alpha}<2$ and long-range spin fluctuations for $\ensuremath{\alpha}>2$. The models conserve total spin S=SA+SBS={S}_{A}+{S}_{B}S=SA​+SB​, have singlet GS for any ggg, $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{\ge}0$ and decouple at 1/g=01/g=01/g=0 to linear Heisenberg antiferromagnets on sublattices AAA and BBB of odd- and even-numbered sites. Exact diagonalization of finite chains gives the sublattice spin $\ensuremath{\langle}{S}_{A}^{2}\ensuremath{\rangle}$, the magnetic gap Em{E}_{m}Em​ to the lowest triplet state, and the excitation ${E}_{\ensuremath{\sigma}}$ to the lowest singlet with opposite inversion symmetry to the GS. An analytical model that conserves sublattice spin has a first-order quantum transition at gc=1/4ln2{g}_{c}=1/4\mathrm{ln}2gc​=1/4ln2 from a GS with perfect LRO to a decoupled phase with SA=SB=0{S}_{A}={S}_{B}=0SA​=SB​=0 for $g\ensuremath{\ge}4/{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{2}$ and no correlation between spins in different sublattices. The model with $\ensuremath{\alpha}=1$ has a first-order transition to a decoupled phase that closely resembles the analytical model. The bond order wave (BOW) phase and continuous quantum phase transitions of finite models with $\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{\ge}2$ are discussed in terms of GS degeneracy where ${E}_{\ensuremath{\sigma}}(g)=0$, excited state degeneracy where ${E}_{\ensuremath{\sigma}}(g)={E}_{m}(g)$, and $\ensuremath{\langle}{S}_{A}^{2}\ensuremath{\rangle}$. The decoupled phase at large frustration has nondegenerate GS for any exponent $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ and excited states related to sublattice excitations.
We outline the recent results on the ground state for a class of one- and two-dimensional frustrated quantum spin models with competing ferro(F)- and antiferromagnetic (AF) interactions. Frustrated spin systems are known to have many interesting properties due to large quantum fluctuations. As a result of these fluctuations usual mean-field approach gives quite crude (if not false) description of these systems. Therefore, exactly solvable models are very instructive at investigations of such systems. The exact ground state wave function of proposed models has a structure of the valence-bond state (VBS) type. One of the 1D model describes the transition line between the F and AF phase. The exact singlet ground state on this line has a double-spiral ordering. Using different approximation methods we study the magnetization curve in the AF phase. The second considered set of the 1D and 2D models has an exact non-degenerate ground state with exponentially decaying spin correlations. We also proposed the 1D and 2D electronic models with exact ground state represented in terms of singlet bond functions which are the generalization of the RVB functions including ionic states.
We present an antiferromagnetic quantum spin-1/2 model on honeycomb lattice. It has two parts, one of which is the usual nearest-neighbor Heisenberg model. The other part is a certain multiple spin interaction term, introduced by us, which is exactly solvable for the ground state. Without the Heisenberg part, the model has an exact threefold degenerate dimer ground state. This exact ground state is also noted to exist for the general spin-SSS case. For the spin-1/2 case, we further carry out the triplon analysis in the ground state to study the competition between the Heisenberg and the multiple spin interactions. This approximate calculation exhibits a continuous quantum phase transition from the dimer order to N\'eel order.