Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:cond-mat/0304056 · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications

Accurate Monte Carlo critical exponents for Ising lattices

Jorge Garcı́a, Julio A. Gonzalo

Published Jun 3, 2003• 17 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/s0378-4371(03)00362-5

Related papers

Accurate critical exponents for Ising like systems in non-integer dimensions

J. C. Le Guillou, Jean Zinn‐Justin

Current physics sources and comments•Jan 1, 1990•28 citations

Monte Carlo Study of Ising Critical Isotherms

J. G. García, Manuel I. Marqués, Julio A. Gonzalo

Monte Carlo investigations of magnetization versus field, Mc(H), at the critical temperature provide direct accurate results on the critical exponent δ−1 for one, two, three and four-dimensional lattices: δ−1 1D =0, δ−1 2D =0.0666(2)≈1/15, δ−1 3D =0.1997(4)≈1/5, δ−1 4D =0.332(5)≈1/3. This type of Monte Carlo data on δ, which is not easily found in studies of Ising lattices in the current literature, as far as we know, defines extremely well the numerical value of this exponent within very stringent limits.

Ferroelectrics•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

Monte Carlo simulations of Ising models

Walter Selke

Computer Physics Communications•Aug 1, 1996•1 citation

Universality of the Ising and the S=1 model on Archimedean lattices: A Monte Carlo determination

Anastasios Malakis, Gül Gülpınar, Yenal Karaaslan +2 more

The Ising models S=1/2 and S=1 are studied by efficient Monte Carlo schemes on the (3,4,6,4) and the (3,3,3,3,6) Archimedean lattices. The algorithms used, a hybrid Metropolis-Wolff algorithm and a parallel tempering protocol, are briefly described and compared with the simple Metropolis algorithm. Accurate Monte Carlo data are produced at the exact critical temperatures of the Ising model for these lattices. Their finite-size analysis provide, with high accuracy, all critical exponents which, as expected, are the same with the well-known 2D Ising model exact values. A detailed finite-size scaling analysis of our Monte Carlo data for the S=1 model on the same lattices provides very clear evidence that this model obeys, also very well, the 2D Ising model critical exponents. As a result, we find that recent Monte Carlo simulations and attempts to define effective dimensionality for the S=1 model on these lattices are misleading. Accurate estimates are obtained for the critical amplitudes of the logarithmic expansions of the specific heat for both models on the two Archimedean lattices.

arXiv:1203.4507•Physical Review E•Mar 29, 2012•10 citations

Monte Carlo Simulations of Dilute Ising Models

Walter Selke

Springer proceedings in physics•Jan 1, 1993•8 citations

Accurate Monte Carlo critical exponents for Ising lattices

J. G. García, Julio A. Gonzalo, Manuel I. Marqués

A careful Monte Carlo investigation of the phase transition very close to the critical point (T -> Tc, H -> 0) in relatively large d = 3, s = 1/2 Ising lattices did produce critical exponents beta = 0.3126(4) =~ 5/16, delta^{-1} = 0.1997(4) =~ 1/5 and gamma_{3D} = 1.253(4) =~ 5/4. Our results indicate that, within experimental error, they are given by simple fractions corresponding to the linear interpolations between the respective two-dimensional (Onsager) and four-dimensional (mean field) critical exponents. An analysis of our inverse susceptibility data chi^{-1}(T) vs. /T - Tc/ shows that these data lead to a value of gamma_{3D} compatible with gamma' = gamma and Tc = 4.51152(12), while gamma values obtained recently by high and low temperature series expansions and renormalization group methods are not.

arXiv:cond-mat/0211270•Nov 14, 2002•0 citations
Monte Carlo investigations of magnetization versus field, Mc(H), at the critical temperature provide direct accurate results on the critical exponent δ−1 for one, two, three and four-dimensional lattices: δ−1 1D =0, δ−1 2D =0.0666(2)≈1/15, δ−1 3D =0.1997(4)≈1/5, δ−1 4D =0.332(5)≈1/3. This type of Monte Carlo data on δ, which is not easily found in studies of Ising lattices in the current literature, as far as we know, defines extremely well the numerical value of this exponent within very stringent limits.
The Ising models S=1/2 and S=1 are studied by efficient Monte Carlo schemes on the (3,4,6,4) and the (3,3,3,3,6) Archimedean lattices. The algorithms used, a hybrid Metropolis-Wolff algorithm and a parallel tempering protocol, are briefly described and compared with the simple Metropolis algorithm. Accurate Monte Carlo data are produced at the exact critical temperatures of the Ising model for these lattices. Their finite-size analysis provide, with high accuracy, all critical exponents which, as expected, are the same with the well-known 2D Ising model exact values. A detailed finite-size scaling analysis of our Monte Carlo data for the S=1 model on the same lattices provides very clear evidence that this model obeys, also very well, the 2D Ising model critical exponents. As a result, we find that recent Monte Carlo simulations and attempts to define effective dimensionality for the S=1 model on these lattices are misleading. Accurate estimates are obtained for the critical amplitudes of the logarithmic expansions of the specific heat for both models on the two Archimedean lattices.
A careful Monte Carlo investigation of the phase transition very close to the critical point (T -> Tc, H -> 0) in relatively large d = 3, s = 1/2 Ising lattices did produce critical exponents beta = 0.3126(4) =~ 5/16, delta^{-1} = 0.1997(4) =~ 1/5 and gamma_{3D} = 1.253(4) =~ 5/4. Our results indicate that, within experimental error, they are given by simple fractions corresponding to the linear interpolations between the respective two-dimensional (Onsager) and four-dimensional (mean field) critical exponents. An analysis of our inverse susceptibility data chi^{-1}(T) vs. /T - Tc/ shows that these data lead to a value of gamma_{3D} compatible with gamma' = gamma and Tc = 4.51152(12), while gamma values obtained recently by high and low temperature series expansions and renormalization group methods are not.