Introduction In the limit of zero temperature, the partition function is dominated by the ground state of the system, the free energy becomes equivalent to the ground state energy, and the central object of interest is the Hamiltonian of the system H (λ), dependent in general on one or more parameters λ. A ‘quantum’ Hamiltonian, as noted previously, is one which contains non-commuting operators. Here we concentrate on quantum spin Hamiltonians, of which the prime example is the Heisenberg model. Of particular interest is the possibility of a quantum phase transition , i.e. nonanalytic behaviour as a function of coupling λ. A quantum phase transition may exert a dominating influence on the system over a range of low temperatures above T = 0. Such phenomena have figured prominently in theoretical discussions of experiments on the cuprate superconductors, the heavy fermion materials, organic conductors, and related materials (e.g. Sachdev, 1999). In some cases, a correspondence can be found between a quantum system at zero temperature in 1 time and ( d – 1) space dimensions, and an equivalent classical system at finite temperature in d space dimensions, based on the Feynman path integral formalism – see Chapter 9 and Appendix 8 for further discussions. Under this mapping, the temperature kT in the classical system corresponds to a coupling λ in the equivalent quantum system. If a phase transition occurs, the same universal critical exponents are expected to apply in both cases.
Introduction In the limit of zero temperature, the partition function is dominated by the ground state of the system, the free energy becomes equivalent to the ground state energy, and the central object of interest is the Hamiltonian of the system H (λ), dependent in general on one or more parameters λ. A ‘quantum’ Hamiltonian, as noted previously, is one which contains non-commuting operators. Here we concentrate on quantum spin Hamiltonians, of which the prime example is the Heisenberg model. Of particular interest is the possibility of a quantum phase transition , i.e. nonanalytic behaviour as a function of coupling λ. A quantum phase transition may exert a dominating influence on the system over a range of low temperatures above T = 0. Such phenomena have figured prominently in theoretical discussions of experiments on the cuprate superconductors, the heavy fermion materials, organic conductors, and related materials (e.g. Sachdev, 1999). In some cases, a correspondence can be found between a quantum system at zero temperature in 1 time and ( d – 1) space dimensions, and an equivalent classical system at finite temperature in d space dimensions, based on the Feynman path integral formalism – see Chapter 9 and Appendix 8 for further discussions. Under this mapping, the temperature kT in the classical system corresponds to a coupling λ in the equivalent quantum system. If a phase transition occurs, the same universal critical exponents are expected to apply in both cases.
Quantum phase transitions occur at zero temperature driven by quantum fluctuations instead of thermal fluctuations. They take place due to competing ground state phases that are accessible for different values of certain non-thermal parameters such as coupling constants, pressure or magnetic field. The chapter starts with a discussion of the main phenomenological features of this class of non-thermal transitions. In particular, it is argued that traces of these transitions can be detected at finite (but low) temperature. Then, examples of materials that show this behaviour are provided. Finally, the quantum Ising model is discussed and it is shown that a quantum model in d dimensions can be mapped to a classical model in d+1 dimensions.
The past decade has seen a substantial rejuvenation of interest in the study of quantum phase transitions, driven by experiments on cuprate superconductors, heavy fermion materials, organic conductors, and related compounds. Although quantum phase transitions in simple spin systems, like the Ising model in a transverse field, were studied in the early 1970s, much of the subsequent theoretical work examined a particular example: the metal–insulator transition. While this is a subject of considerable experimental importance, the greatest theoretical progress was made for the case of the Anderson transition of non-interacting electrons, which is driven by localization of the electronic states in the presence of a random potential. The critical properties of this transition of noninteracting electrons constituted the primary basis upon which most condensed matter physicists have formed their intuition on the behavior of the systems near a quantum phase transition. However, it is clear that strong electronic interactions play a crucial role in the systems of current interest noted earlier, and simple paradigms for the behavior of such systems near quantum critical points are not widely known. It is the purpose of this book to move interactions to center stage by describing and classifying the physical properties of the simplest interacting systems undergoing a quantum phase transition. The effects of disorder will be neglected for the most part but will be considered in the concluding chapters. Our focus will be on the dynamical properties of such systems at nonzero temperature, and it will become apparent that these differ substantially from the noninteracting case.
Quantum Phase Transitions Quantum phase transitions, in contrast to temperature-driven critical phenomena, occur due to a competition between different parameters describing the basic interactions of the system. Their specific feature is the quantum character of the critical fluctuations. This implies, through the uncertainty principle, that energy fluctuations and time are coupled. Then at zero temperature time plays a crucial and fundamental role, the static properties being entangled with the dynamics (Continentino, 1994a; Sondhi et al ., 1997; Sachdev, 1999). In this book we are mainly interested in quantum phase transitions that occur in electronic many-body systems and how scaling concepts can be useful to understand their properties close to these transitions (Continentino, 1994a). Even though a similar approach has been used in the case of interacting bosons (Fisher et al ., 1989) the fermionic problem has its own idiosyncrasies and difficulties. For example, there is no natural order parameter associated with the localisation transition in the electronic case, while bosons at zero temperature are either localised or superfluid so that the superfluid order parameter can be used to distinguish between both phases. If the results of the study of quantum phase transitions were restricted to zero temperature, this would be an interesting but purely academic area of research. What is really exciting about this subject is the effect of quantum critical points (QCP) in the finite temperature phase diagram of actual physical systems, even far away from the QCP (Freitas, 2015). As we will show, there is a special line in this phase diagram, the quantum critical trajectory , where the temperature dependence of the thermodynamic and transport properties is governed by the quantum critical exponents, i.e. those associated with the QCP. This and the observed crossover effects induced by temperature in the non-critical side of the phase diagram of a material with a QCP are sufficient to make the study of quantum phase transitions an inevitable subject. We start this chapter by introducing the scaling theory of quantum critical phenomena, since scaling concepts are used throughout this book.
In the previous chapter, we discussed both the insulator–superconductor and the insulator–metal transitions. As such transitions are disorder or magnetic-field tuned, thermal fluctuations play no role. Phase transitions of the insulator–superconductor or insulator–metal type are called quantum phase transitions. Such phase transitions are not controlled by changing the temperature, as in the melting of ice or the λ-point of liquid helium, but rather by changing some system parameter, such as the number of defects or the concentration of charge carriers. In all such instances, the tuning parameter transforms the system between quantum mechanical states that either look different topologically (as in the transition between localized and extended electronic states) or have distinctly different magnetic properties. As quantum mechanics underlies such phase transitions, all quantum phase transitions obtain at the absolute zero of temperature and thus are governed by a T = 0 quantum critical point. While initially surprising, this state of affairs is expected, because quantum mechanics is explicitly a zero-temperature theory of matter. Of course, this is of no surprise to chemists who have known for quite some time that numerous materials can exhibit vastly distinct properties simply by changing the chemical composition and, most importantly, that such transformations persist down to zero temperature. Common examples include turning insulators such as the layered cuprates into superconductors simply by chemical doping or semiconductors into metals once again by doping, or ferromagnets such as Li(Ho, Tb) x Y 1- x F 4 into a spin glass (AR1998) by altering x .
In recent years, quantum phase transitions have attracted the interest of both theorists and experimentalists in condensed matter physics. These transitions, which are accessed at zero temperature by variation of a non-thermal control parameter, can influence the behaviour of electronic systems over a wide range of the phase diagram. Quantum phase transitions occur as a result of competing ground state phases. The cuprate superconductors which can be tuned from a Mott insulating to a d -wave superconducting phase by carrier doping are a paradigmatic example. This review introduces important concepts of phase transitions and discusses the interplay of quantum and classical fluctuations near criticality. The main part of the article is devoted to bulk quantum phase transitions in condensed matter systems. Several classes of transitions will be briefly reviewed, pointing out, e.g., conceptual differences between ordering transitions in metallic and insulating systems. An interesting separate class of transitions is boundary phase transitions where only degrees of freedom of a subsystem become critical; this will be illustrated in a few examples. The article is aimed at bridging the gap between high-level theoretical presentations and research papers specialized in certain classes of materials. It will give an overview on a variety of different quantum transitions, critically discuss open theoretical questions, and frequently make contact with recent experiments in condensed matter physics.
The dynamical critical exponent is introduced. The phase diagram and the phase transitions in the Bose–Hubbard model of interacting bosons on a lattice are determined. The concept of quantum fluctuations is introduced on the example of an interacting superfluid, and finally the special scaling of conductivity is discussed. Dynamical critical exponent The finite temperature phase transitions studied in previous chapters are the result of the competition between the entropy and the energy terms in the free energy: the weight of entropy increases with temperature, and ultimately destroys the order that may be existing in the system. A sharp phase transition between two phases exhibiting qualitatively different correlations may, however, occur even at zero temperature, by varying a coupling constant in the Hamiltonian. The transition then corresponds to a non-analyticity of the energy of the ground state. A simple example is provided by the interacting bosons, where the superfluid transition may be brought about by tuning the chemical potential at T = 0. Such T = 0 phase transitions are called quantum phase transitions , and will be the subject of the present chapter. In general, a quantum phase transition may lie at the end of a line of thermal phase transitions, as in the bosonic example mentioned above. It is possible, however, that the system may not even have an ordered state at finite temperatures, but still exhibits a quantum critical point. Two different situations are depicted in Fig. 8.1. Examples of such phase diagrams are provided by the system of interacting bosons which will be discussed in Sections 8.2 and 8.3.