Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Revising Attitudes to Physical Reality: Quantum Physics and Visual Art

Lynden Stone

Published Jan 1, 2012• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

In 1935, Neils Bohr concluded that particular features of quantum physics force a 'radical revision' of our attitude to physical reality. Despite the passing of almost 100 years since the formulation of quantum physics, little, if any, revision has been made in our attitude to physical reality. This is because quantum concepts are outside our range of normal engagement and perception. In addition, the explanation of quantum physics is often couched in the language of mathematical formalism. Visual art, however, might assist us to conceive quantum concepts outside the bounds of scientific formalism and to possibly revise our attitude towards physical reality. In this paper, I will discuss some attempts of myself as a visual artist to address the challenge of visually representing quantum concepts and how my work might help towards a radical revision of our attitude towards physical reality.

Related papers

Re-Visioning Reality: Quantum Superposition in Visual Art

Lynden Stone

The counterintuitive phenomenon of quantum superposition requires a radical review of our ideas of reality. The author suggests that translations of quantum concepts into visual art may assist in provoking such a revision. This essay first introduces the concept of quantum superposition and points out its divergence from conventional perceptions of reality. The author then discusses how visual art might provide insight into quantum superposition. Finally she discusses the visual representation of quantum superposition by contemporary artists Jonathon Keats, Julian Voss-Andreae, Antony Gormley and Daniel Crooks; the problematic and paradoxical nature of such representations; and how these works might provoke a revision of our views of physical reality.

Leonardo•Jul 2, 2013•3 citations

The Quanturn Picture of the World

Lawrence Sklar

Abstract Quantum theory has presented scientists and philosophers of science with a series of perplexing questions. It seems to many that any attempt to comprehend a world described by quantum theory will require revision in our understanding of the nature of things far more radical than the revision in our understanding of the nature of space and time demanded by the theories of relativity. It has been claimed that to comprehend quantum theory we must revise our very understanding of such matters as the objective nature of reality and its independence from our perception of it, the nature of a complex system and its relation to its components, and the nature of causal and other kinds of determination in the world.

•Dec 17, 1992•0 citations

Art makes quantum intuitive

Grégoire Cattan, Karolina Duś, Sławomir Kuśmia +1 more

Not so long ago, humans were a group of primates living on the savannah. We are reasonably proficient at estimating the trajectory of medium-sized objects, such as falling rocks and arrows, moving at moderate speeds. However, one must acknowledge that our intuition falters when it comes to understanding the behaviour of micro objects moving at very high speeds.Consider, for instance, the famous double-slit experiment. If you throw a ball towards two slits, the ball will pass through one slit, according to a common-sense prediction. However, when small particles, such as photons or electrons, are projected through two closely spaced apertures, the result is as if the particles simultaneously pass through the two apertures. In quantum physics, this unintuitive observation is explained by the wave-particle duality. It means that, physical entities can possess wavelike as well as particle-like characteristics. The duality is analogous to the two sides of a coin; the same reality can be described from different perspectives. Unfortunately, this knowledge does not cause that quantum mechanisms are entirely understandable and intuitional. Therefore, the following question remains open, how can we define quantum art when we are unable to fully grasp quantum mechanics? On a similar note, art itself is challenging to understand, albeit for different reasons. It is widely accepted that art is, to a significant extent, a subjective experience. An artist creates a piece of art that evokes diverse emotions and interpretations when presented to different people. Consequently, how can we bridge the gap between quantum mechanics, which is primarily comprehended through mathematics, and art, which is intuitively understood without the need for conscious reasoning? In other words, how can quantum art make the enigmatic world of quantum more intuitive and accessible?To address these questions, we created a challenge for the HackYeah! hackathon, one of the most prominent stationary events in Europe. We invited people to find an artistic way to illustrate the principles of quantum mechanics, including quantum superposition, entanglement, and decoherence. Approximately 700 individuals attended the event. Multiple challenges were submitted by different companies, and the Quantum Art challenge was chosen by 15 teams that ranged in size from two to seven people. After a short description of the challenge in Section 2, we explore some of these contributions in Section 3. Lastly, Section 4 concludes the paper. In our opinion, the artwork presented, especially the visual ones, helped to makes quantum principles more understandable, intuitive.The purpose of the challenge was to find an artistic way to illustrate quantum mechanics, specifically quantum superposition, entanglement, and decoherence.Quantum superposition refers to a phenomenon where a single particle can exist in two states simultaneously. In contrast to a 'normal' bit, which can be either 0 or 1, a quantum bit is a superposition of both 0 and 1.The measurement operation is the process through which a quantum state is collapsed to either the state 0 or 1. Let us consider two quantum bits; the possible measurement outcomes can be one of the following four combinations: 00, 01, 10, or 11. When only two of these combinations are possible, such as 00 and 11 or 10 and 01, one can state that the quantum bits are entangled because the state of one qubit affects the state of the second qubit and vice-versa.Decoherence of the quantum state is an effect that results from microscopic interactions between the quantum bits and the environment. This environmental noise impacts the state of the quantum bits and can lead to errors in computation. In other words, multiple measurements of the same quantum computation may yield different results. Different quantum computer architectures exhibit varying levels of noise.Here, the following question arises: How can people represent the principles of quantum mechanics in a way that it is tangible, visible, or even audible?In this section, we present a selected panel of examples that were implemented during the HackYeah! hackathon.This project effectively demonstrates the concept of quantum decoherence. It showcases a mosaic in which the arrangement of image elements is determined by the outcomes of quantum measurements (Figure 1). Various mosaics are generated following these measurements and are subsequently combined into an animated GIF. Notably, the greater the instability of the quantum computer, the more pronounced the glitches become within the mosaic. As a testament to its excellence, this project emerged as the winner of the challenge. The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/lukilesny/quantmosaic.This code is based on the previous quantum art of Wiktor Mazin, 1 which exploits the Julia fractal set for image generation. Julia fractals are fractals based on a recursive suite of a complex number.The code performs a straightforward computation that involves the measurement of two qubits. The probabilities of these qubits being in either state 0 or 1 are employed to initialise the real and imaginary part of the complex numbers in the Julia set. The resulting Julia fractal is presented as an image, which is then further customised through user input. This customised image is subsequently passed to the text-to-image artificial intelligence model Stable Diffusion to create both personalised and quantum artwork. This project also illustrates the concept of quantum decoherence. The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/Havystar/QUANTIUM.This work is also inspired by the contributions of Wiktor Mazin; however, it diverges by focusing on the creation of music rather than images. It resonates with the European project on Quantum Music2 (e.g., (1)), with the distinction being that instead of encoding notes into quantum states, it employs fractals to generate eight distinct musical notes.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/kmazrolina/Quanterpoint.This project is also an application of quantum music. It breaks down musical compositions into 4/4 tempo measures. Each measure is encoded using a set of four qubit quantum circuits, with each quantum bit symbolising a distinct musical element, encompassing notes, rhythm, and pauses. Diverse variations of a melody are generated, each of which is closely tied to a specific quantum architecture. It is akin to experiencing music through a quantum lens that unveils the distinctive quantum voice of each architecture.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/git-stashic/quantum-art.This project serves as an in-depth exploration of variational quantum circuits (VQCs) applied to the classification of the IRIS dataset. The classification results are then presented through Seaborn graphs (a library for scientific visualisation). This project is classified as scientific visualisation rather than art, but the effort merits our attention. A similar approach with VQCs can be observed in the pyRiemann-qiskit library (2), as showcased in the library documentation. 3 In this example, the learning parameters of the VQC are ingeniously illustrated as a spiral, with each branch signifying the variation in weight of a specific parameter.Additionally, the project delves into Bubble Art, drawing inspiration from the work of Radha Pyari Sandhir. 4 The core concept involves encoding a string into qubits and subsequently measuring the outcomes of computations performed on them. The resulting measurements are then transformed into bubbles. The size and number of bubbles convey information, with smaller, numerous bubbles indicating more noise, while larger bubbles represent measurements that yield the same results.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/dr3du4/Quantium.Autoencoders are a class of neural networks that are commonly employed to extract an efficient representation of specific data, akin to dimension reduction techniques. In this particular scenario, the team proposed the use of a variational autoencoder, with its parameters initialised with the measurement of a quantum circuit. The autoencoder's purpose is to learn a concise representation of a cat by using the Kaggle CAT dataset. Dimensionality reduction essentially serves as a means of compressing the data, resulting in a deliberately artistic blurring or fuzziness effect on the original image.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/polish-mountain/quantum-vae.Here, the concept revolves around the initialisation of a quantum circuit with brain wave frequencies, such as alpha and beta waves. Quantum operations are run on these states, and the outputs are measured in classical bits. Then, the resulting measurements are translated into values of saturation and luminance, ultimately contributing to the customisation of a piece of artwork.Essentially, it can be described as an electroencephalography (EEG) state personalised through quantum randomness. What makes this idea particularly intriguing is its potential for expansion. By introducing different qubits that represent the mental states of other users, brain synchronisation could be further represented by entangled states. When two users are competing or cooperating to solve a task, the synchronization between their mental states only allow for certain measurement probabilities, which is akin to a form of entanglement. This notion also resonates with the concept of the quantum brain hypothesis (3), according to which the brain coexists in multiple states simultaneously, which subsequently collapse. In this idea, EEG measurements become a measurement of these quantum brain states, and the task executed by the user while recording the electroencephalogram could be further represented by specific quantum operations. Just to be clear, we do not pretend that this is actually the case, but this project could lead to interesting metaphors between brain states and quantum representation.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/kinga-marszalkowska/QuantumBrainArt.Various artistic viewpoints were submitted as part of the Quantum Art challenge at the HackYeah! hackathon, including images, animations, and music. By far, quantum decoherence -that is, quantum noise -was the most exploited quantum concept. While quantum superposition was used internally, it was not -in our opinion -sufficiently highlighted by the presented artworks. As for quantum entanglement, it was explored under the concept of quantum music. Apparently, it is not always intuitive for people to understand quantum entanglement simply by hearing music. Saying that, you need a certain level of knowledge to build appreciation. For example, children need to learn different tastes to appreciate food. Among the aforementioned works, we noticed the use of quantum principles for creating artistic visualisations of mental states through EEG, as well as the use of art to enhance the visualisation of machine learning techniques. Here, we see art's potential to enhance the comprehensibility and natural intuition of quantum phenomena. This is an interesting approach to make quantum more accessible, intuitive, especially for neophytes.The question that lingers is whether visualisation truly qualifies as art. The answer is nuanced and may rely on the intent itself. A good visualisation can be a piece of art if the machine learning model was created with the sole purpose of producing art rather than for merely explaining a machine learning algorithm.Another perspective is that of Japanese contemporary artist Matsuzawa Yutaka (1922-2006), although we admit that we have not had the opportunity to read the original Japanese text. Our understanding is based on the writings of Alan Longino from the Department of Art at the University of Chicago (4):"Trough Quantum Art, Matsuzawa invited future readers, viewers, and participants to conceive of a world where objects, bodies, images, and matter become less defined, more permeable, and bound together in limitless intimacy".In essence, the artist's manifesto is a call for renewal, a break from artistic conventions, similar to the role of quantum physics in the physical sciences.

Frontiers in Quantum Science and Technology•May 17, 2024•2 citations

Quantum Physics

Alastair I. M. Rae

Quantum physics is believed to be the fundamental theory underlying our understanding of the physical universe. However, it is based on concepts and principles that have always been difficult to understand and controversial in their interpretation. This book aims to explain these issues using a minimum of technical language and mathematics. After a brief introduction to the ideas of quantum physics, the problems of interpretation are identified and explained. The rest of the book surveys, describes and criticises a range of suggestions that have been made with the aim of resolving these problems; these include the traditional, or 'Copenhagen' interpretation, the possible role of the conscious mind in measurement and the postulate of parallel universes. This new edition has been revised throughout to take into account developments in this field over the past fifteen years, including the idea of 'consistent histories' to which a completely new chapter is devoted.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 26, 2012•3 citations

Quantum Physics

Alastair I. M. Rae

Quantum physics is believed to be the fundamental theory underlying our understanding of the physical universe. However, it is based on concepts and principles that have always been difficult to understand and controversial in their interpretation. This book aims to explain these issues using a minimum of technical language and mathematics. After a brief introduction to the ideas of quantum physics, the problems of interpretation are identified and explained. The rest of the book surveys, describes and criticises a range of suggestions that have been made with the aim of resolving these problems; these include the traditional, or 'Copenhagen' interpretation, the possible role of the conscious mind in measurement, and the postulate of parallel universes. This new edition has been revised throughout to take into account developments in this field over the past fifteen years, including the idea of 'consistent histories' to which a completely new chapter is devoted.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Oct 7, 2004•17 citations

From quantum mechanics toward quantum electrodynamics

Arthur I. Miller

Prior to and into the first decade of Niels Bohr's 1913 atomic theory, physicists dealt with physical systems in which the usual space and time pictures of classical physics were assumed trustworthy and so could be extrapolated to any sort of matter in motion, for example, electrons move like billiard balls and light behaves analogously to water waves. In the German scientific milieu this visual imagery was accorded a reality status higher than viewing merely with the senses and was referred to as ‘ordinary intuition [ gewöhnliche Anschauung ]’. Ordinary intuition is the visual imagery abstracted from phenomena that we have actually witnessed in the world of sense perceptions. The concept of ordinary intuition was much debated during 1923–27 by physicists like Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, Wolfgang Pauli and Erwin Schrödinger, all of whom used this term with proper Kantian overtones, and all of whom lamented its loss in the new quantum mechanics. Ordinary intuition is associated with the strong causality of classical mechanics. According to the law of causality, initial conditions (position and velocity or momentum and energy) can be ascertained with in-principle perfect accuracy. Consequently any system's continuous development in space and time can be traced with in-principle perfect accuracy using Newton's laws of motion and conservation of energy and momentum. Any limitations to the accuracy of measurements are assumed not to be intrinsic to the phenomena, that is they are interpreted to be systematic measurement errors that ideally can be made to vanish.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 6, 1994•0 citations
In 1935, Neils Bohr concluded that particular features of quantum physics force a 'radical revision' of our attitude to physical reality. Despite the passing of almost 100 years since the formulation of quantum physics, little, if any, revision has been made in our attitude to physical reality. This is because quantum concepts are outside our range of normal engagement and perception. In addition, the explanation of quantum physics is often couched in the language of mathematical formalism. Visual art, however, might assist us to conceive quantum concepts outside the bounds of scientific formalism and to possibly revise our attitude towards physical reality. In this paper, I will discuss some attempts of myself as a visual artist to address the challenge of visually representing quantum concepts and how my work might help towards a radical revision of our attitude towards physical reality.
The counterintuitive phenomenon of quantum superposition requires a radical review of our ideas of reality. The author suggests that translations of quantum concepts into visual art may assist in provoking such a revision. This essay first introduces the concept of quantum superposition and points out its divergence from conventional perceptions of reality. The author then discusses how visual art might provide insight into quantum superposition. Finally she discusses the visual representation of quantum superposition by contemporary artists Jonathon Keats, Julian Voss-Andreae, Antony Gormley and Daniel Crooks; the problematic and paradoxical nature of such representations; and how these works might provoke a revision of our views of physical reality.
Abstract Quantum theory has presented scientists and philosophers of science with a series of perplexing questions. It seems to many that any attempt to comprehend a world described by quantum theory will require revision in our understanding of the nature of things far more radical than the revision in our understanding of the nature of space and time demanded by the theories of relativity. It has been claimed that to comprehend quantum theory we must revise our very understanding of such matters as the objective nature of reality and its independence from our perception of it, the nature of a complex system and its relation to its components, and the nature of causal and other kinds of determination in the world.
Not so long ago, humans were a group of primates living on the savannah. We are reasonably proficient at estimating the trajectory of medium-sized objects, such as falling rocks and arrows, moving at moderate speeds. However, one must acknowledge that our intuition falters when it comes to understanding the behaviour of micro objects moving at very high speeds.Consider, for instance, the famous double-slit experiment. If you throw a ball towards two slits, the ball will pass through one slit, according to a common-sense prediction. However, when small particles, such as photons or electrons, are projected through two closely spaced apertures, the result is as if the particles simultaneously pass through the two apertures. In quantum physics, this unintuitive observation is explained by the wave-particle duality. It means that, physical entities can possess wavelike as well as particle-like characteristics. The duality is analogous to the two sides of a coin; the same reality can be described from different perspectives. Unfortunately, this knowledge does not cause that quantum mechanisms are entirely understandable and intuitional. Therefore, the following question remains open, how can we define quantum art when we are unable to fully grasp quantum mechanics? On a similar note, art itself is challenging to understand, albeit for different reasons. It is widely accepted that art is, to a significant extent, a subjective experience. An artist creates a piece of art that evokes diverse emotions and interpretations when presented to different people. Consequently, how can we bridge the gap between quantum mechanics, which is primarily comprehended through mathematics, and art, which is intuitively understood without the need for conscious reasoning? In other words, how can quantum art make the enigmatic world of quantum more intuitive and accessible?To address these questions, we created a challenge for the HackYeah! hackathon, one of the most prominent stationary events in Europe. We invited people to find an artistic way to illustrate the principles of quantum mechanics, including quantum superposition, entanglement, and decoherence. Approximately 700 individuals attended the event. Multiple challenges were submitted by different companies, and the Quantum Art challenge was chosen by 15 teams that ranged in size from two to seven people. After a short description of the challenge in Section 2, we explore some of these contributions in Section 3. Lastly, Section 4 concludes the paper. In our opinion, the artwork presented, especially the visual ones, helped to makes quantum principles more understandable, intuitive.The purpose of the challenge was to find an artistic way to illustrate quantum mechanics, specifically quantum superposition, entanglement, and decoherence.Quantum superposition refers to a phenomenon where a single particle can exist in two states simultaneously. In contrast to a 'normal' bit, which can be either 0 or 1, a quantum bit is a superposition of both 0 and 1.The measurement operation is the process through which a quantum state is collapsed to either the state 0 or 1. Let us consider two quantum bits; the possible measurement outcomes can be one of the following four combinations: 00, 01, 10, or 11. When only two of these combinations are possible, such as 00 and 11 or 10 and 01, one can state that the quantum bits are entangled because the state of one qubit affects the state of the second qubit and vice-versa.Decoherence of the quantum state is an effect that results from microscopic interactions between the quantum bits and the environment. This environmental noise impacts the state of the quantum bits and can lead to errors in computation. In other words, multiple measurements of the same quantum computation may yield different results. Different quantum computer architectures exhibit varying levels of noise.Here, the following question arises: How can people represent the principles of quantum mechanics in a way that it is tangible, visible, or even audible?In this section, we present a selected panel of examples that were implemented during the HackYeah! hackathon.This project effectively demonstrates the concept of quantum decoherence. It showcases a mosaic in which the arrangement of image elements is determined by the outcomes of quantum measurements (Figure 1). Various mosaics are generated following these measurements and are subsequently combined into an animated GIF. Notably, the greater the instability of the quantum computer, the more pronounced the glitches become within the mosaic. As a testament to its excellence, this project emerged as the winner of the challenge. The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/lukilesny/quantmosaic.This code is based on the previous quantum art of Wiktor Mazin, 1 which exploits the Julia fractal set for image generation. Julia fractals are fractals based on a recursive suite of a complex number.The code performs a straightforward computation that involves the measurement of two qubits. The probabilities of these qubits being in either state 0 or 1 are employed to initialise the real and imaginary part of the complex numbers in the Julia set. The resulting Julia fractal is presented as an image, which is then further customised through user input. This customised image is subsequently passed to the text-to-image artificial intelligence model Stable Diffusion to create both personalised and quantum artwork. This project also illustrates the concept of quantum decoherence. The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/Havystar/QUANTIUM.This work is also inspired by the contributions of Wiktor Mazin; however, it diverges by focusing on the creation of music rather than images. It resonates with the European project on Quantum Music2 (e.g., (1)), with the distinction being that instead of encoding notes into quantum states, it employs fractals to generate eight distinct musical notes.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/kmazrolina/Quanterpoint.This project is also an application of quantum music. It breaks down musical compositions into 4/4 tempo measures. Each measure is encoded using a set of four qubit quantum circuits, with each quantum bit symbolising a distinct musical element, encompassing notes, rhythm, and pauses. Diverse variations of a melody are generated, each of which is closely tied to a specific quantum architecture. It is akin to experiencing music through a quantum lens that unveils the distinctive quantum voice of each architecture.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/git-stashic/quantum-art.This project serves as an in-depth exploration of variational quantum circuits (VQCs) applied to the classification of the IRIS dataset. The classification results are then presented through Seaborn graphs (a library for scientific visualisation). This project is classified as scientific visualisation rather than art, but the effort merits our attention. A similar approach with VQCs can be observed in the pyRiemann-qiskit library (2), as showcased in the library documentation. 3 In this example, the learning parameters of the VQC are ingeniously illustrated as a spiral, with each branch signifying the variation in weight of a specific parameter.Additionally, the project delves into Bubble Art, drawing inspiration from the work of Radha Pyari Sandhir. 4 The core concept involves encoding a string into qubits and subsequently measuring the outcomes of computations performed on them. The resulting measurements are then transformed into bubbles. The size and number of bubbles convey information, with smaller, numerous bubbles indicating more noise, while larger bubbles represent measurements that yield the same results.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/dr3du4/Quantium.Autoencoders are a class of neural networks that are commonly employed to extract an efficient representation of specific data, akin to dimension reduction techniques. In this particular scenario, the team proposed the use of a variational autoencoder, with its parameters initialised with the measurement of a quantum circuit. The autoencoder's purpose is to learn a concise representation of a cat by using the Kaggle CAT dataset. Dimensionality reduction essentially serves as a means of compressing the data, resulting in a deliberately artistic blurring or fuzziness effect on the original image.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/polish-mountain/quantum-vae.Here, the concept revolves around the initialisation of a quantum circuit with brain wave frequencies, such as alpha and beta waves. Quantum operations are run on these states, and the outputs are measured in classical bits. Then, the resulting measurements are translated into values of saturation and luminance, ultimately contributing to the customisation of a piece of artwork.Essentially, it can be described as an electroencephalography (EEG) state personalised through quantum randomness. What makes this idea particularly intriguing is its potential for expansion. By introducing different qubits that represent the mental states of other users, brain synchronisation could be further represented by entangled states. When two users are competing or cooperating to solve a task, the synchronization between their mental states only allow for certain measurement probabilities, which is akin to a form of entanglement. This notion also resonates with the concept of the quantum brain hypothesis (3), according to which the brain coexists in multiple states simultaneously, which subsequently collapse. In this idea, EEG measurements become a measurement of these quantum brain states, and the task executed by the user while recording the electroencephalogram could be further represented by specific quantum operations. Just to be clear, we do not pretend that this is actually the case, but this project could lead to interesting metaphors between brain states and quantum representation.The project is available on GitHub at https://github.com/kinga-marszalkowska/QuantumBrainArt.Various artistic viewpoints were submitted as part of the Quantum Art challenge at the HackYeah! hackathon, including images, animations, and music. By far, quantum decoherence -that is, quantum noise -was the most exploited quantum concept. While quantum superposition was used internally, it was not -in our opinion -sufficiently highlighted by the presented artworks. As for quantum entanglement, it was explored under the concept of quantum music. Apparently, it is not always intuitive for people to understand quantum entanglement simply by hearing music. Saying that, you need a certain level of knowledge to build appreciation. For example, children need to learn different tastes to appreciate food. Among the aforementioned works, we noticed the use of quantum principles for creating artistic visualisations of mental states through EEG, as well as the use of art to enhance the visualisation of machine learning techniques. Here, we see art's potential to enhance the comprehensibility and natural intuition of quantum phenomena. This is an interesting approach to make quantum more accessible, intuitive, especially for neophytes.The question that lingers is whether visualisation truly qualifies as art. The answer is nuanced and may rely on the intent itself. A good visualisation can be a piece of art if the machine learning model was created with the sole purpose of producing art rather than for merely explaining a machine learning algorithm.Another perspective is that of Japanese contemporary artist Matsuzawa Yutaka (1922-2006), although we admit that we have not had the opportunity to read the original Japanese text. Our understanding is based on the writings of Alan Longino from the Department of Art at the University of Chicago (4):"Trough Quantum Art, Matsuzawa invited future readers, viewers, and participants to conceive of a world where objects, bodies, images, and matter become less defined, more permeable, and bound together in limitless intimacy".In essence, the artist's manifesto is a call for renewal, a break from artistic conventions, similar to the role of quantum physics in the physical sciences.
Quantum physics is believed to be the fundamental theory underlying our understanding of the physical universe. However, it is based on concepts and principles that have always been difficult to understand and controversial in their interpretation. This book aims to explain these issues using a minimum of technical language and mathematics. After a brief introduction to the ideas of quantum physics, the problems of interpretation are identified and explained. The rest of the book surveys, describes and criticises a range of suggestions that have been made with the aim of resolving these problems; these include the traditional, or 'Copenhagen' interpretation, the possible role of the conscious mind in measurement and the postulate of parallel universes. This new edition has been revised throughout to take into account developments in this field over the past fifteen years, including the idea of 'consistent histories' to which a completely new chapter is devoted.
Quantum physics is believed to be the fundamental theory underlying our understanding of the physical universe. However, it is based on concepts and principles that have always been difficult to understand and controversial in their interpretation. This book aims to explain these issues using a minimum of technical language and mathematics. After a brief introduction to the ideas of quantum physics, the problems of interpretation are identified and explained. The rest of the book surveys, describes and criticises a range of suggestions that have been made with the aim of resolving these problems; these include the traditional, or 'Copenhagen' interpretation, the possible role of the conscious mind in measurement, and the postulate of parallel universes. This new edition has been revised throughout to take into account developments in this field over the past fifteen years, including the idea of 'consistent histories' to which a completely new chapter is devoted.
Prior to and into the first decade of Niels Bohr's 1913 atomic theory, physicists dealt with physical systems in which the usual space and time pictures of classical physics were assumed trustworthy and so could be extrapolated to any sort of matter in motion, for example, electrons move like billiard balls and light behaves analogously to water waves. In the German scientific milieu this visual imagery was accorded a reality status higher than viewing merely with the senses and was referred to as ‘ordinary intuition [ gewöhnliche Anschauung ]’. Ordinary intuition is the visual imagery abstracted from phenomena that we have actually witnessed in the world of sense perceptions. The concept of ordinary intuition was much debated during 1923–27 by physicists like Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, Wolfgang Pauli and Erwin Schrödinger, all of whom used this term with proper Kantian overtones, and all of whom lamented its loss in the new quantum mechanics. Ordinary intuition is associated with the strong causality of classical mechanics. According to the law of causality, initial conditions (position and velocity or momentum and energy) can be ascertained with in-principle perfect accuracy. Consequently any system's continuous development in space and time can be traced with in-principle perfect accuracy using Newton's laws of motion and conservation of energy and momentum. Any limitations to the accuracy of measurements are assumed not to be intrinsic to the phenomena, that is they are interpreted to be systematic measurement errors that ideally can be made to vanish.