This paper proposes an integrative ontological framework—termed the Self-Consistent Global Mode (SCGM) model—that addresses the conceptual gap between fundamental physics, quantum non-locality, and high-level emergent phenomenology. Drawing from relational quantum mechanics, integrated information theory, and the non-local real properties of the universe, we posit that the observable universe represents a single, self-consistent mathematical solution within a broader Hilbert space topology. Rather than treating fundamental physical laws as isolated mechanical constraints, the SCGM model formulates them as structural expressions of a fundamental, information-based "source code." Under this framework, dark matter, dark energy, and non-local quantum correlations are reinterpreted not as missing physical entities, but as boundary conditions, geometric tensions, or marginal projections between adjacent global modes of higher structural coherence. Furthermore, the paper explores how conscious observation and intentional systems might interact with these fundamental informational conduits. By framing physical reality as a hierarchical network of self-consistent modes, this model provides a non-dogmatic, logically structured foundation aimed at fostering future mathematical formalization and empirical testing regarding the nature of physical law and observer-system interactions.
This paper proposes an integrative ontological framework—termed the Self-Consistent Global Mode (SCGM) model—that addresses the conceptual gap between fundamental physics, quantum non-locality, and high-level emergent phenomenology. Drawing from relational quantum mechanics, integrated information theory, and the non-local real properties of the universe, we posit that the observable universe represents a single, self-consistent mathematical solution within a broader Hilbert space topology. Rather than treating fundamental physical laws as isolated mechanical constraints, the SCGM model formulates them as structural expressions of a fundamental, information-based "source code." Under this framework, dark matter, dark energy, and non-local quantum correlations are reinterpreted not as missing physical entities, but as boundary conditions, geometric tensions, or marginal projections between adjacent global modes of higher structural coherence. Furthermore, the paper explores how conscious observation and intentional systems might interact with these fundamental informational conduits. By framing physical reality as a hierarchical network of self-consistent modes, this model provides a non-dogmatic, logically structured foundation aimed at fostering future mathematical formalization and empirical testing regarding the nature of physical law and observer-system interactions.
Modern physics has achieved extraordinary predictive success, yet it continues to face unresolved conceptual tensions concerning the role of the observer, the nature of information, and the origin of physical structure. From quantum measurement to cosmology, the assumption of an observer-neutral reality increasingly appears insufficient to fully account for empirical phenomena and theoretical inconsistencies. This manifesto proposes an Informational Observer-Centered Framework, in which information is treated as a fundamental ontological substrate and observation as an active, structured process rather than a passive act of measurement. Within this perspective, physical systems, observers, and informational exchanges form a unified dynamics, where state reduction, decoherence, and emergent classicality arise from informational interactions and constraints. Rather than introducing a new closed theory, this manifesto establishes a conceptual foundation unifying several complementary models—including Informational State Dynamics, observer-dependent informational compression, and informational interpretations of quantum and cosmological phenomena—into a coherent research program. The framework is explicitly non-dogmatic, open to falsification, and intended as a guiding structure for further theoretical development and empirical testing. The aim of this document is not to replace existing physical theories, but to clarify their conceptual boundaries and propose an integrative lens through which unresolved problems in quantum foundations, cosmology, and cognitive systems may be systematically explored.
This paper advances a deductive formulation of a consciousness-based ontology in which consciousness is posited as the sole ontological foundation of reality. Starting from a minimal set of axioms that introduce no external substances, the work develops a formal framework in which knowledge is represented as regular closed sets of actualized distinctions within a topological space of unified consciousness. Within this framework, the observer emerges as a stable localization of knowledge structures, and physical phenomena are derived as forms of the observer’s local knowledge rather than as independent ontological entities. Space and time are reinterpreted as epistemic structures describing relations and ordered transformations of stable knowledge configurations. Matter is defined as a highly stable, densely structured configuration of knowledge; mass as a measure of resistance of such structures to restructuring; energy and momentum as knowledge of the intensity and directionality of restructuring processes. Gravitation is shown to be a local manifestation of the global harmony of consciousness, aimed at preserving compactness, Hausdorffness, and connectedness of knowledge structures, and is demonstrated to be equivalent to the geometry of space. Singularities and black holes are interpreted as limits of the observer’s local knowledge rather than as physical infinities or objects. The proposed framework eliminates the dualism of consciousness and matter, unifies geometry, dynamics, and observation within a single formalized context, and provides an epistemic reinterpretation of classical physical relations. Physics, in this view, is understood as a structured mode of self-knowledge of consciousness through local observers. The results suggest new conceptual foundations for the philosophy of physics, epistemology, quantum theory, and the ontology of artificial intelligence.
This paper presents an ontological model of the universe based on information clusters and observer consciousness. The universe is not an independent physical spacetime structure, but a projective system composed of numerous self-consistent information clusters. Matter, motion, space, and time have no inherent reality; they only emerge as a stable, perceivable, and measurable "reality" when an observer’s consciousness enters an information cluster and interprets it. Different information clusters are independent or partially overlapping, corresponding to different projection angles and rule systems. Physical laws, dimensionality, particles, and interactions are merely internal narrative rules within an information cluster, not objective laws of an external world. This model unifies the understanding of quantum measurement, the holographic principle, the multiverse, and the apparent nature of spacetime, and is logically self-consistent without conflicting with known experimental phenomena.
Abstract This article does not claim to present a successful theory of quantum gravity. Instead, it undertakes a systematic and self-aware survey of the research program aiming to derive both quantum mechanics and general relativity from a purely relational network, based on a set of minimal ontological postulates. The framework rests on three axioms: (1) physical reality consists of nodes without intrinsic properties and their symmetric relations; (2) the relation strengths are non-negative and symmetric, with the total information capacity conserved as an ensemble expectation; (3) local evolution is restricted to redistribution of relations within triads. We honestly display and rigorously distinguish the conceptual achievements from the essential obstacles of this framework. On the quantum side, we obtain solid conceptual progress: the Born rule, unitary evolution, and topological nonlocality of entanglement all emerge naturally as representation-theoretic consequences of the statistical description of a finite information capacity network. This strongly suggests that the mathematical structure of quantum mechanics may be a generic feature of the statistical representation of any complex informational system satisfying “finite information + local relational evolution.” On the gravitational side, however, we encounter chasms that current mathematical and conceptual tools cannot bridge. A central contribution of this article is to clearly label these obstacles as fundamental open scientific problems: the conflict between a positive-definite relational ontology and the target of pseudo-Riemannian signature (signature problem); the missing coarse-graining procedure from a discrete network to a smooth manifold (coarse-graining problem); and the disharmony between external algorithmic time and emergent physical time (time problem). We argue that these are not technical details unique to this framework, but core challenges that any “spacetime from relations” program must confront. The article positions itself as a “conceptual cartography”—it precisely delineates the known boundaries of this research program, exposes the fatal rift often bypassed in mainstream discourse, and transforms all unresolved issues into a formal invitation for future investigation.
Quantum mechanics is often perceived as conceptually paradoxical because it appears to conflict with deeply rooted intuitions about fixed reality, determinism, and observation. This paper does not propose a new physical theory. Instead, it offers an epistemological reframing of quantum mechanics: not as a direct mathematical unveiling of a fully fixed pre-existing reality, but as a highly precise description of phenomenological structures emerging through observational conditions and interaction. The paper explores: the distinction between mathematical predictive success and ontological completeness, the role of human perception in constructing “fixed reality” intuitions, the phenomenological nature of qualities such as color and temperature, the possibility that some conceptual tensions in quantum mechanics arise from assumptions inherited from macroscopic cognition, and how quantum theory may be interpreted as describing observable structures rather than fixed hidden states. The work intentionally avoids mystical, anti-scientific, or consciousness-centric interpretations of quantum mechanics. It does not deny the existence of reality, nor reject modern physics. Rather, it attempts to clarify what exactly mathematical models are describing when applied to quantum phenomena. This text is positioned as a conceptual and phenomenological reorganization of perspective — a small doorway toward reconsidering how humans frame “reality” itself.
This paper proposes the Four-Layer Consciousness–Reality Integration Theory, a conceptual and structural framework intended to model the relationship between consciousness, observation, information, and physical reality. Contemporary physics and consciousness studies face persistent challenges, including observer-dependent asymmetries, information preservation in extreme systems, singularities, and the conceptual gap between quantum mechanics and gravity. Existing approaches often address these issues independently and lack a unified structural perspective that incorporates the observer as an integral component. The proposed framework introduces four hierarchical layers (Layers 0–4) that organize observability, constituent information, interaction dynamics, worldline-based conscious experience, and fundamental information preservation. The theory emphasizes internal structural coherence, layered information flow, and observer-relative consistency. Numerical estimations, conceptual algorithms, and theoretical test cases—such as black hole information scenarios—are presented to illustrate the framework’s internal logic. While not claiming definitive resolution of existing paradoxes, this work offers a unified organizational model and testable implications that may support future theoretical, simulation-based, and observational research.