Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Causal Thermodynamics, A Reconciliation of Quantum Mechanics, Relativism, and Classical Motion

Stefan Best

Published Oct 22, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A unified framework reconciling quantum mechanics, classical motion, and relativism.
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.23576872

Related papers

Materialized Idealism: Observer-Necessity and the Vindication of Perspectivism

Da Wei

This paper synthesizes Parts 3 and 4 and extends their implications to epistemology and ethics. We propose a framework termed “materialized idealism”: matter exists eternally as substance, while observers (through measurement basis selection) determine which properties become actualized. We argue that “observer is primary” means: not metaphysically (matter alone is substance), not causally (matter exists independently), but actualizing-wise (measurement basis selection determines which properties become real). This resolves tensions between observer-dependent quantum mechanics and classical physics, and provides rigorous grounding for Nietzsche’s perspectivism without collapsing into relativism. Key contributions: • A coherent interpretation of quantum measurement and classical emergence • Grounding for free will and moral agency within causal structure • Rigorous foundation for perspectivism avoiding both relativism and absolutism • Integration of quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, phenomenology, and ethics • Historical vindication of ancient philosophy and reinterpretation of modern thinkers

•May 1, 2026•0 citations

A unified quantum theory of mechanics and thermodynamics. Part I. Postulates

George Hatsopoulos, Elias P. Gyftopoulos

Foundations of Physics•Feb 1, 1976•87 citations

An interpretation within philosophy of the relationship between classical mechanics and quantum mechanics

Patrick Sibelius

Foundations of Physics•Nov 1, 1989•6 citations

Fork of Prosper's Unified Position Equation (PUPE): A Deterministic Framework for Unified Dynamics.

Chanda Prosper

One of the most persistent and profound goals in physics is the unification of its fundamental theories. For centuries, our understanding of the universe has advanced by developing distinct mathematical descriptions for different physical regimes. This specialization, while incredibly powerful, has bequeathed us a fractured portrait of reality, with different laws governing motion in different realms. A unified theory that can seamlessly describe phenomena across all scales—from the subatomic to the cosmological—remains a central objective of modern science.The current landscape of physics separates motion into several distinct domains, each governed by its own set of laws:Classical motion is described by Newton's second law, F = ma.Relativity governs high-velocity motion through the energy-momentum relation.Quantum mechanics describes the subatomic world using the Schrödinger equation and the concept of probability waves.Electromagnetic motion for charged particles is dictated by the Lorentz force laws.While these descriptions work exceptionally well within their intended domains, they are not unified. The PUPE framework proposes a direct solution to this fragmentation. It aims to reconcile these disparate views by defining all motion through a single position equation and a single momentum equation. This is achieved by incorporating relativistic and electromagnetic terms directly alongside a quantum component derived from the wave amplitude R and its gradient, which generates quantum behavior without disrupting the classical and relativistic foundations. This paper will now detail the core mathematical structure of this innovative framework.

•Jan 21, 2026•0 citations

Expanding Research Paradigms and Reconciling the Two Binary Oppositions: Exploring the Unified Path of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics

Runsheng Tu

By expanding the research paradigm and reconciling the two binary oppositions of "relative and absolute" and "quantum and classical" in physics, a new theoretical framework that is compatible with relativity and quantum mechanics is proposed. Firstly, excavate and establish three universal axioms: Axiom 1 (consensus guarantees equal rights), Axiom 2 (objective existence independent of measurement), and Axiom 3 (universality of causality and dialectical logic), based on which to criticize the logical contradictions of existing theories. In the field of relativity, this article points out that there is a logical paradox in the explanation of "clock slowing down depends on relative motion" in special relativity (A clock is both faster and slower than B clock), and proposes a relative absolute spacetime view that "absolute motion leads to clock slowing down". By extending the Lorentz transformation, absolute motion and relative motion are unified, solving problems such as the twin paradox. At the same time, based on the prediction of the Dirac equation for negative mass matter, the "negative mass spacetime curvature paradox" is proposed, challenging Einstein's physical explanation of spacetime curvature and arguing that it is only a mathematical tool (the mathematical expression of gravity) rather than a physical reality. In the field of quantum mechanics, this article criticizes the Copenhagen interpretation for violating Axiom 2 (denying the independent eigenstates of microscopic particles). By modifying the Schrödinger equation twice (For the first time, electromagnetic potential energy was replaced with gravitational potential energy, and the Schrödinger-Tu equation was established to describe macroscopic objects such as the Earth's revolution; The second step is to convert potential energy into electromagnetic/gravitational force and derive the wave mechanics equation of classical mechanics laws, such as Newton's second law with force operator), proves that quantum and classical theories are compatible within the same mathematical framework. In the experiment, it was demonstrated through the "anti-interference electron diffraction experiment" that a strong magnetic field only changes the shape of diffraction fringes without causing them to disappear, denying the inevitability of quantum decoherence. The establishment of "generalized wave dynamics" and "relative absolute spacetime view" breaks the binary opposition of traditional theories and provides a new paradigm for the unity of relativity and quantum mechanics. The core value of these jobs lies in: In terms of theoretical innovation, reconstruct the space-time and quantum interpretation system, while retaining the original mathematical form system; In terms of experimental verification, design feasible schemes such as hollow glass disk Jones experiment and geometric optical velocimetry experiment; In terms of philosophical significance, replacing "mathematical symmetry" with "content unity" and returning to the objectivity of physical mechanisms. The research conclusion indicates that by expanding paradigms and axiomatic constraints, the contradiction between relativity and quantum mechanics can be transformed into a complementary relationship, laying the foundation for the great unity of physics theory

Advances in Theoretical & Computational Physics•Aug 25, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics, Determinism, Causality, and Particles

Z. Marić, Milojevic, A, Daniel Sternheimer +2 more

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1976•63 citations
This paper synthesizes Parts 3 and 4 and extends their implications to epistemology and ethics. We propose a framework termed “materialized idealism”: matter exists eternally as substance, while observers (through measurement basis selection) determine which properties become actualized. We argue that “observer is primary” means: not metaphysically (matter alone is substance), not causally (matter exists independently), but actualizing-wise (measurement basis selection determines which properties become real). This resolves tensions between observer-dependent quantum mechanics and classical physics, and provides rigorous grounding for Nietzsche’s perspectivism without collapsing into relativism. Key contributions: • A coherent interpretation of quantum measurement and classical emergence • Grounding for free will and moral agency within causal structure • Rigorous foundation for perspectivism avoiding both relativism and absolutism • Integration of quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, phenomenology, and ethics • Historical vindication of ancient philosophy and reinterpretation of modern thinkers
One of the most persistent and profound goals in physics is the unification of its fundamental theories. For centuries, our understanding of the universe has advanced by developing distinct mathematical descriptions for different physical regimes. This specialization, while incredibly powerful, has bequeathed us a fractured portrait of reality, with different laws governing motion in different realms. A unified theory that can seamlessly describe phenomena across all scales—from the subatomic to the cosmological—remains a central objective of modern science.The current landscape of physics separates motion into several distinct domains, each governed by its own set of laws:Classical motion is described by Newton's second law, F = ma.Relativity governs high-velocity motion through the energy-momentum relation.Quantum mechanics describes the subatomic world using the Schrödinger equation and the concept of probability waves.Electromagnetic motion for charged particles is dictated by the Lorentz force laws.While these descriptions work exceptionally well within their intended domains, they are not unified. The PUPE framework proposes a direct solution to this fragmentation. It aims to reconcile these disparate views by defining all motion through a single position equation and a single momentum equation. This is achieved by incorporating relativistic and electromagnetic terms directly alongside a quantum component derived from the wave amplitude R and its gradient, which generates quantum behavior without disrupting the classical and relativistic foundations. This paper will now detail the core mathematical structure of this innovative framework.
By expanding the research paradigm and reconciling the two binary oppositions of "relative and absolute" and "quantum and classical" in physics, a new theoretical framework that is compatible with relativity and quantum mechanics is proposed. Firstly, excavate and establish three universal axioms: Axiom 1 (consensus guarantees equal rights), Axiom 2 (objective existence independent of measurement), and Axiom 3 (universality of causality and dialectical logic), based on which to criticize the logical contradictions of existing theories. In the field of relativity, this article points out that there is a logical paradox in the explanation of "clock slowing down depends on relative motion" in special relativity (A clock is both faster and slower than B clock), and proposes a relative absolute spacetime view that "absolute motion leads to clock slowing down". By extending the Lorentz transformation, absolute motion and relative motion are unified, solving problems such as the twin paradox. At the same time, based on the prediction of the Dirac equation for negative mass matter, the "negative mass spacetime curvature paradox" is proposed, challenging Einstein's physical explanation of spacetime curvature and arguing that it is only a mathematical tool (the mathematical expression of gravity) rather than a physical reality. In the field of quantum mechanics, this article criticizes the Copenhagen interpretation for violating Axiom 2 (denying the independent eigenstates of microscopic particles). By modifying the Schrödinger equation twice (For the first time, electromagnetic potential energy was replaced with gravitational potential energy, and the Schrödinger-Tu equation was established to describe macroscopic objects such as the Earth's revolution; The second step is to convert potential energy into electromagnetic/gravitational force and derive the wave mechanics equation of classical mechanics laws, such as Newton's second law with force operator), proves that quantum and classical theories are compatible within the same mathematical framework. In the experiment, it was demonstrated through the "anti-interference electron diffraction experiment" that a strong magnetic field only changes the shape of diffraction fringes without causing them to disappear, denying the inevitability of quantum decoherence. The establishment of "generalized wave dynamics" and "relative absolute spacetime view" breaks the binary opposition of traditional theories and provides a new paradigm for the unity of relativity and quantum mechanics. The core value of these jobs lies in: In terms of theoretical innovation, reconstruct the space-time and quantum interpretation system, while retaining the original mathematical form system; In terms of experimental verification, design feasible schemes such as hollow glass disk Jones experiment and geometric optical velocimetry experiment; In terms of philosophical significance, replacing "mathematical symmetry" with "content unity" and returning to the objectivity of physical mechanisms. The research conclusion indicates that by expanding paradigms and axiomatic constraints, the contradiction between relativity and quantum mechanics can be transformed into a complementary relationship, laying the foundation for the great unity of physics theory