Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Tracing quantum correlations back to collective interferences

M Ji, Jonte R. Hance, HF Hofmann

Published Jun 19, 2024• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The presence of an absorber in one of the paths of an interferometer changes the output statistics of that interferometer in a fundamental manner. Since the individual quantum particles detected at any of the outputs of the interferometer have not been absorbed, any non-trivial effect of the absorber on the distribution of these particles over these paths is a counterfactual effect. Here, we quantify counterfactual effects by evaluating the information about the presence or absence of the absorber obtained from the output statistics, distinguishing between classical and quantum counterfactual effects. We identify the counterfactual gain which quantifies the advantage of quantum counterfactual protocols over classical counterfactual protocols, and show that this counterfactual gain can be separated into two terms: a semi-classical term related to the amplitude blocked by the absorber, and a Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability assigning a joint probability to the blocked path and the output port. A negative Kirkwood-Dirac term between a path and an output port indicates that inserting the absorber into that path will have a focussing effect, increasing the probability of particles arriving at that output port, resulting in a significant enhancement of the counterfactual gain. We show that the magnitude of quantum counterfactual effects cannot be explained by a simple removal of the absorbed particles, but originates instead from a well-defined back-action effect caused by the presence of the absorber in one path, on particles in other paths.

DOI
10.25405/ncl.34500879

Related papers

Counterfactuality, back-action, and information gain in multi-path interferometers

Jonte R. Hance, Tomonori Matsushita, Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Abstract The presence of an absorber in one of the paths of an interferometer changes the output statistics of that interferometer in a fundamental manner. Since the individual quantum particles detected at any of the outputs of the interferometer have not been absorbed, any non-trivial effect of the absorber on the distribution of these particles over these paths is a counterfactual effect. Here, we quantify counterfactual effects by evaluating the information about the presence or absence of the absorber obtained from the output statistics, distinguishing between classical and quantum counterfactual effects. We identify the counterfactual gain which quantifies the advantage of quantum counterfactual protocols over classical counterfactual protocols, and show that this counterfactual gain can be separated into two terms: a semi-classical term related to the amplitude blocked by the absorber, and a Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability assigning a joint probability to the blocked path and the output port. A negative Kirkwood-Dirac term between a path and an output port indicates that inserting the absorber into that path will have a focussing effect, increasing the probability of particles arriving at that output port, resulting in a significant enhancement of the counterfactual gain. We show that the magnitude of quantum counterfactual effects cannot be explained by a simple removal of the absorbed particles, but originates instead from a well-defined back-action effect caused by the presence of the absorber in one path, on particles in other paths.

arXiv:2404.16477•Quantum Science and Technology•Jul 16, 2024•8 citations

Counterfactuality, back-action, and information gain in multi-path interferometers

Jonte R. Hance, T Matsushita, HF Hofmann

The presence of an absorber in one of the paths of an interferometer changes the output statistics of that interferometer in a fundamental manner. Since the individual quantum particles detected at any of the outputs of the interferometer have not been absorbed, any non-trivial effect of the absorber on the distribution of these particles over these paths is a counterfactual effect. Here, we quantify counterfactual effects by evaluating the information about the presence or absence of the absorber obtained from the output statistics, distinguishing between classical and quantum counterfactual effects. We identify the counterfactual gain which quantifies the advantage of quantum counterfactual protocols over classical counterfactual protocols, and show that this counterfactual gain can be separated into two terms: a semi-classical term related to the amplitude blocked by the absorber, and a Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability assigning a joint probability to the blocked path and the output port. A negative Kirkwood-Dirac term between a path and an output port indicates that inserting the absorber into that path will have a focussing effect, increasing the probability of particles arriving at that output port, resulting in a significant enhancement of the counterfactual gain. We show that the magnitude of quantum counterfactual effects cannot be explained by a simple removal of the absorbed particles, but originates instead from a well-defined back-action effect caused by the presence of the absorber in one path, on particles in other paths.

•Jul 24, 2024•0 citations

Quantum contextuality requiring counterfactual gain

Yuki Sagawa, Jonte R. Hance, Holger Friedrich Hofmann +1 more

Quantum contextuality, where measurement outcomes depend on the measurement context, implies a failure of classical realism in quantum systems. As recently shown, the transition between measurement contexts can be mapped onto the path that a quantum particle takes through an interferometer. Here, we investigate the relation between contextuality and the counterfactual gain observed in the output ports of such an interferometer when one of the paths is blocked. It is shown that experimental evidence of contextuality can only be obtained when counterfactual gain is observed for a specific combination of blocked path and output port. Using a silicon photonic integrated circuit, we experimentally observe the counterfactual gain for a selection of input states and evaluate the associated evidence for contextuality. The results confirm that contextuality can only be observed in the presence of counterfactual gain.

arXiv:2505.14119•Physical Review A•Jan 2, 2026•0 citations

Negative quasiprobabilities redistribute (and complex ones reduce) the information in unabsorbed photons

Jonte R. Hance

Negative Kirkwood--Dirac quasiprobabilities are credited with the quantum advantage of interaction-free measurement and postselected metrology. We test that claim on the task interaction-free measurement was designed for: learning about a sample letting it absorb as little light as possible. The Kirkwood--Dirac distribution of path and output gives the linear response to a weak sample: its real part responds to absorption, its imaginary part to a phase. For a pure single photon passing once through any interferometer, the Fisher information about transmittance per absorbed photon is the direct-transmission value minus a sum of squared imaginary parts: no interferometer or readout beats direct transmission. Negativity plays no role beyond concentrating information in weakly lit outputs. The imaginary parts of the Kirkwood-Dirac distribution depend on the output basis here, not on the sample, so a basis exists in which every term is real, which is optimal. A single photon gains information per absorbed photon only through a phase response, which for an optical line needs a thick or inhomogeneously broadened sample, or through many passes when absorptions go uncounted, as shown by a critically coupled resonator. For detecting a weak absorber, negativity gives a single-shot advantage that does not accumulate over multiple trials; advantage instead accumulates when there are outputs which are dark without the object, a case which needs no negativity.

quant-pharXiv:2610.00740•Oct 2, 2026•0 citations

Counterfactual control and quantum contextuality in multi-mode interferometers

Holger Friedrich Hofmann, Jonte R. Hance, Tomonori Matsushita +2 more

As shown in previous work, quantum contextuality can be represented by interference effects in a three-path interferometer. A Hardy-like paradox is obtained when the absence of photons in two internal paths seems to contradict the presence of photons in a specific input port. Here, we consider the effects of counterfactual control on this scenario by analyzing the changes to the paths through the interferometer when the seemingly impossible input path is blocked. The effects on photons that never interact with the absorber in the blocked path reveals a characteristic signature of quantum contextuality that may help to explain why quantum interference is incompatible with measurement independent realities.

Quantum Communications and Quantum Imaging•Oct 4, 2024•1 citation

The Quantum Plumber's Problem

Nicolas G. Underwood, Holger F. Hofmann, Jonte R. Hance

Recent work quantified the notion of quantum counterfactual gain for an extended Elitzur-Vaidman bomb test style scenario, through a connection to the negativity of the Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability distribution. We here extend this work to identifying quantum advantage in a new scenario, which we term the ``Quantum Plumber's Problem''. In this scenario, we imagine a ``quantum plumber'', who knows that one path of an interferometer is blocked, and wants to find the optimal strategy for identifying with certainty which path this is. We discuss various strategies for a generalised path-encoded interferometer, as well as for the specific case of Hofmann's three-path interferometer, introduced in a recent analysis of the relationship between states in five measurement contexts of a three level system. We support our arguments on the relative merit of competing strategies with data collected over many simulated attempts at locating blockages. We also present results for a variant of the game in which the blockage is replaced by a non-demolition detector.

quant-pharXiv:2609.11416•Sep 11, 2026•0 citations
The presence of an absorber in one of the paths of an interferometer changes the output statistics of that interferometer in a fundamental manner. Since the individual quantum particles detected at any of the outputs of the interferometer have not been absorbed, any non-trivial effect of the absorber on the distribution of these particles over these paths is a counterfactual effect. Here, we quantify counterfactual effects by evaluating the information about the presence or absence of the absorber obtained from the output statistics, distinguishing between classical and quantum counterfactual effects. We identify the counterfactual gain which quantifies the advantage of quantum counterfactual protocols over classical counterfactual protocols, and show that this counterfactual gain can be separated into two terms: a semi-classical term related to the amplitude blocked by the absorber, and a Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability assigning a joint probability to the blocked path and the output port. A negative Kirkwood-Dirac term between a path and an output port indicates that inserting the absorber into that path will have a focussing effect, increasing the probability of particles arriving at that output port, resulting in a significant enhancement of the counterfactual gain. We show that the magnitude of quantum counterfactual effects cannot be explained by a simple removal of the absorbed particles, but originates instead from a well-defined back-action effect caused by the presence of the absorber in one path, on particles in other paths.
Abstract The presence of an absorber in one of the paths of an interferometer changes the output statistics of that interferometer in a fundamental manner. Since the individual quantum particles detected at any of the outputs of the interferometer have not been absorbed, any non-trivial effect of the absorber on the distribution of these particles over these paths is a counterfactual effect. Here, we quantify counterfactual effects by evaluating the information about the presence or absence of the absorber obtained from the output statistics, distinguishing between classical and quantum counterfactual effects. We identify the counterfactual gain which quantifies the advantage of quantum counterfactual protocols over classical counterfactual protocols, and show that this counterfactual gain can be separated into two terms: a semi-classical term related to the amplitude blocked by the absorber, and a Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability assigning a joint probability to the blocked path and the output port. A negative Kirkwood-Dirac term between a path and an output port indicates that inserting the absorber into that path will have a focussing effect, increasing the probability of particles arriving at that output port, resulting in a significant enhancement of the counterfactual gain. We show that the magnitude of quantum counterfactual effects cannot be explained by a simple removal of the absorbed particles, but originates instead from a well-defined back-action effect caused by the presence of the absorber in one path, on particles in other paths.
The presence of an absorber in one of the paths of an interferometer changes the output statistics of that interferometer in a fundamental manner. Since the individual quantum particles detected at any of the outputs of the interferometer have not been absorbed, any non-trivial effect of the absorber on the distribution of these particles over these paths is a counterfactual effect. Here, we quantify counterfactual effects by evaluating the information about the presence or absence of the absorber obtained from the output statistics, distinguishing between classical and quantum counterfactual effects. We identify the counterfactual gain which quantifies the advantage of quantum counterfactual protocols over classical counterfactual protocols, and show that this counterfactual gain can be separated into two terms: a semi-classical term related to the amplitude blocked by the absorber, and a Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability assigning a joint probability to the blocked path and the output port. A negative Kirkwood-Dirac term between a path and an output port indicates that inserting the absorber into that path will have a focussing effect, increasing the probability of particles arriving at that output port, resulting in a significant enhancement of the counterfactual gain. We show that the magnitude of quantum counterfactual effects cannot be explained by a simple removal of the absorbed particles, but originates instead from a well-defined back-action effect caused by the presence of the absorber in one path, on particles in other paths.
Quantum contextuality, where measurement outcomes depend on the measurement context, implies a failure of classical realism in quantum systems. As recently shown, the transition between measurement contexts can be mapped onto the path that a quantum particle takes through an interferometer. Here, we investigate the relation between contextuality and the counterfactual gain observed in the output ports of such an interferometer when one of the paths is blocked. It is shown that experimental evidence of contextuality can only be obtained when counterfactual gain is observed for a specific combination of blocked path and output port. Using a silicon photonic integrated circuit, we experimentally observe the counterfactual gain for a selection of input states and evaluate the associated evidence for contextuality. The results confirm that contextuality can only be observed in the presence of counterfactual gain.
Negative Kirkwood--Dirac quasiprobabilities are credited with the quantum advantage of interaction-free measurement and postselected metrology. We test that claim on the task interaction-free measurement was designed for: learning about a sample letting it absorb as little light as possible. The Kirkwood--Dirac distribution of path and output gives the linear response to a weak sample: its real part responds to absorption, its imaginary part to a phase. For a pure single photon passing once through any interferometer, the Fisher information about transmittance per absorbed photon is the direct-transmission value minus a sum of squared imaginary parts: no interferometer or readout beats direct transmission. Negativity plays no role beyond concentrating information in weakly lit outputs. The imaginary parts of the Kirkwood-Dirac distribution depend on the output basis here, not on the sample, so a basis exists in which every term is real, which is optimal. A single photon gains information per absorbed photon only through a phase response, which for an optical line needs a thick or inhomogeneously broadened sample, or through many passes when absorptions go uncounted, as shown by a critically coupled resonator. For detecting a weak absorber, negativity gives a single-shot advantage that does not accumulate over multiple trials; advantage instead accumulates when there are outputs which are dark without the object, a case which needs no negativity.
As shown in previous work, quantum contextuality can be represented by interference effects in a three-path interferometer. A Hardy-like paradox is obtained when the absence of photons in two internal paths seems to contradict the presence of photons in a specific input port. Here, we consider the effects of counterfactual control on this scenario by analyzing the changes to the paths through the interferometer when the seemingly impossible input path is blocked. The effects on photons that never interact with the absorber in the blocked path reveals a characteristic signature of quantum contextuality that may help to explain why quantum interference is incompatible with measurement independent realities.
Recent work quantified the notion of quantum counterfactual gain for an extended Elitzur-Vaidman bomb test style scenario, through a connection to the negativity of the Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability distribution. We here extend this work to identifying quantum advantage in a new scenario, which we term the ``Quantum Plumber's Problem''. In this scenario, we imagine a ``quantum plumber'', who knows that one path of an interferometer is blocked, and wants to find the optimal strategy for identifying with certainty which path this is. We discuss various strategies for a generalised path-encoded interferometer, as well as for the specific case of Hofmann's three-path interferometer, introduced in a recent analysis of the relationship between states in five measurement contexts of a three level system. We support our arguments on the relative merit of competing strategies with data collected over many simulated attempts at locating blockages. We also present results for a variant of the game in which the blockage is replaced by a non-demolition detector.