Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2505.14119 · Physical Review A

Quantum contextuality requiring counterfactual gain

Yuki Sagawa, Jonte R. Hance, Holger Friedrich Hofmann, Takafumi Ono

Published Jan 2, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum contextuality, where measurement outcomes depend on the measurement context, implies a failure of classical realism in quantum systems. As recently shown, the transition between measurement contexts can be mapped onto the path that a quantum particle takes through an interferometer. Here, we investigate the relation between contextuality and the counterfactual gain observed in the output ports of such an interferometer when one of the paths is blocked. It is shown that experimental evidence of contextuality can only be obtained when counterfactual gain is observed for a specific combination of blocked path and output port. Using a silicon photonic integrated circuit, we experimentally observe the counterfactual gain for a selection of input states and evaluate the associated evidence for contextuality. The results confirm that contextuality can only be observed in the presence of counterfactual gain.

DOI
10.1103/ngxx-2kcp

Related papers

Sequential propagation of a single photon through five measurement contexts in a three-path interferometer

Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Quantum contextuality describes scenarios in which it is impossible to explain the experimental evidence in terms of a measurement-independent reality. Here a three-path interferometer is introduced in which all five contexts needed for a demonstration of contextuality are realized in sequence. It is then possible to observe a paradoxical situation where the paths connecting input ports to their corresponding output ports appear to be blocked by destructive interference. It is shown that the conditional currents observed in weak measurements provide a consistent explanation of the paradox, indicating that weak values might help to bridge the gap between wave-like propagation effects and local particle detection.

arXiv:2308.02086•Optica Quantum•Dec 1, 2023•6 citations

Counterfactuality, back-action, and information gain in multi-path interferometers

Jonte R. Hance, T Matsushita, HF Hofmann

The presence of an absorber in one of the paths of an interferometer changes the output statistics of that interferometer in a fundamental manner. Since the individual quantum particles detected at any of the outputs of the interferometer have not been absorbed, any non-trivial effect of the absorber on the distribution of these particles over these paths is a counterfactual effect. Here, we quantify counterfactual effects by evaluating the information about the presence or absence of the absorber obtained from the output statistics, distinguishing between classical and quantum counterfactual effects. We identify the counterfactual gain which quantifies the advantage of quantum counterfactual protocols over classical counterfactual protocols, and show that this counterfactual gain can be separated into two terms: a semi-classical term related to the amplitude blocked by the absorber, and a Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability assigning a joint probability to the blocked path and the output port. A negative Kirkwood-Dirac term between a path and an output port indicates that inserting the absorber into that path will have a focussing effect, increasing the probability of particles arriving at that output port, resulting in a significant enhancement of the counterfactual gain. We show that the magnitude of quantum counterfactual effects cannot be explained by a simple removal of the absorbed particles, but originates instead from a well-defined back-action effect caused by the presence of the absorber in one path, on particles in other paths.

•Jul 24, 2024•0 citations

Counterfactual control and quantum contextuality in multi-mode interferometers

Holger Friedrich Hofmann, Jonte R. Hance, Tomonori Matsushita +2 more

As shown in previous work, quantum contextuality can be represented by interference effects in a three-path interferometer. A Hardy-like paradox is obtained when the absence of photons in two internal paths seems to contradict the presence of photons in a specific input port. Here, we consider the effects of counterfactual control on this scenario by analyzing the changes to the paths through the interferometer when the seemingly impossible input path is blocked. The effects on photons that never interact with the absorber in the blocked path reveals a characteristic signature of quantum contextuality that may help to explain why quantum interference is incompatible with measurement independent realities.

Quantum Communications and Quantum Imaging•Oct 4, 2024•1 citation

Counterfactuality, back-action, and information gain in multi-path interferometers

Jonte R. Hance, Tomonori Matsushita, Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Abstract The presence of an absorber in one of the paths of an interferometer changes the output statistics of that interferometer in a fundamental manner. Since the individual quantum particles detected at any of the outputs of the interferometer have not been absorbed, any non-trivial effect of the absorber on the distribution of these particles over these paths is a counterfactual effect. Here, we quantify counterfactual effects by evaluating the information about the presence or absence of the absorber obtained from the output statistics, distinguishing between classical and quantum counterfactual effects. We identify the counterfactual gain which quantifies the advantage of quantum counterfactual protocols over classical counterfactual protocols, and show that this counterfactual gain can be separated into two terms: a semi-classical term related to the amplitude blocked by the absorber, and a Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability assigning a joint probability to the blocked path and the output port. A negative Kirkwood-Dirac term between a path and an output port indicates that inserting the absorber into that path will have a focussing effect, increasing the probability of particles arriving at that output port, resulting in a significant enhancement of the counterfactual gain. We show that the magnitude of quantum counterfactual effects cannot be explained by a simple removal of the absorbed particles, but originates instead from a well-defined back-action effect caused by the presence of the absorber in one path, on particles in other paths.

arXiv:2404.16477•Quantum Science and Technology•Jul 16, 2024•8 citations

Tracing quantum correlations back to collective interferences

M Ji, Jonte R. Hance, HF Hofmann

The presence of an absorber in one of the paths of an interferometer changes the output statistics of that interferometer in a fundamental manner. Since the individual quantum particles detected at any of the outputs of the interferometer have not been absorbed, any non-trivial effect of the absorber on the distribution of these particles over these paths is a counterfactual effect. Here, we quantify counterfactual effects by evaluating the information about the presence or absence of the absorber obtained from the output statistics, distinguishing between classical and quantum counterfactual effects. We identify the counterfactual gain which quantifies the advantage of quantum counterfactual protocols over classical counterfactual protocols, and show that this counterfactual gain can be separated into two terms: a semi-classical term related to the amplitude blocked by the absorber, and a Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability assigning a joint probability to the blocked path and the output port. A negative Kirkwood-Dirac term between a path and an output port indicates that inserting the absorber into that path will have a focussing effect, increasing the probability of particles arriving at that output port, resulting in a significant enhancement of the counterfactual gain. We show that the magnitude of quantum counterfactual effects cannot be explained by a simple removal of the absorbed particles, but originates instead from a well-defined back-action effect caused by the presence of the absorber in one path, on particles in other paths.

•Jun 19, 2024•0 citations

Contextuality and inequality violations in a three-path interferometer

Ming Ji, M. Iinuma, Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Quantum contextuality can be observed in three path interferometers, suggesting a fundamental contradiction between wave propagation and particle propagation inherent in the wave-particle dualism. Here, we investigate this contradiction in a three path interferometer specifically designed to illustrate the paradoxical aspects of single particle interference. A particularly clear violation of non-contextual assumptions is obtained when interference effects suppress detection probabilities to zero in paths that seem to be necessary to explain the observation of photons in the output. This contradiction between detection probabilities in the paths and detection probabilities in the output cannot be explained by any assignment of photon paths through the interferometer, demonstrating a fundamental incompatibility of wave propagation and particle propagation.

Quantum Communications and Quantum Imaging•Oct 3, 2023•1 citation
Quantum contextuality, where measurement outcomes depend on the measurement context, implies a failure of classical realism in quantum systems. As recently shown, the transition between measurement contexts can be mapped onto the path that a quantum particle takes through an interferometer. Here, we investigate the relation between contextuality and the counterfactual gain observed in the output ports of such an interferometer when one of the paths is blocked. It is shown that experimental evidence of contextuality can only be obtained when counterfactual gain is observed for a specific combination of blocked path and output port. Using a silicon photonic integrated circuit, we experimentally observe the counterfactual gain for a selection of input states and evaluate the associated evidence for contextuality. The results confirm that contextuality can only be observed in the presence of counterfactual gain.
Quantum contextuality describes scenarios in which it is impossible to explain the experimental evidence in terms of a measurement-independent reality. Here a three-path interferometer is introduced in which all five contexts needed for a demonstration of contextuality are realized in sequence. It is then possible to observe a paradoxical situation where the paths connecting input ports to their corresponding output ports appear to be blocked by destructive interference. It is shown that the conditional currents observed in weak measurements provide a consistent explanation of the paradox, indicating that weak values might help to bridge the gap between wave-like propagation effects and local particle detection.
The presence of an absorber in one of the paths of an interferometer changes the output statistics of that interferometer in a fundamental manner. Since the individual quantum particles detected at any of the outputs of the interferometer have not been absorbed, any non-trivial effect of the absorber on the distribution of these particles over these paths is a counterfactual effect. Here, we quantify counterfactual effects by evaluating the information about the presence or absence of the absorber obtained from the output statistics, distinguishing between classical and quantum counterfactual effects. We identify the counterfactual gain which quantifies the advantage of quantum counterfactual protocols over classical counterfactual protocols, and show that this counterfactual gain can be separated into two terms: a semi-classical term related to the amplitude blocked by the absorber, and a Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability assigning a joint probability to the blocked path and the output port. A negative Kirkwood-Dirac term between a path and an output port indicates that inserting the absorber into that path will have a focussing effect, increasing the probability of particles arriving at that output port, resulting in a significant enhancement of the counterfactual gain. We show that the magnitude of quantum counterfactual effects cannot be explained by a simple removal of the absorbed particles, but originates instead from a well-defined back-action effect caused by the presence of the absorber in one path, on particles in other paths.
As shown in previous work, quantum contextuality can be represented by interference effects in a three-path interferometer. A Hardy-like paradox is obtained when the absence of photons in two internal paths seems to contradict the presence of photons in a specific input port. Here, we consider the effects of counterfactual control on this scenario by analyzing the changes to the paths through the interferometer when the seemingly impossible input path is blocked. The effects on photons that never interact with the absorber in the blocked path reveals a characteristic signature of quantum contextuality that may help to explain why quantum interference is incompatible with measurement independent realities.
Abstract The presence of an absorber in one of the paths of an interferometer changes the output statistics of that interferometer in a fundamental manner. Since the individual quantum particles detected at any of the outputs of the interferometer have not been absorbed, any non-trivial effect of the absorber on the distribution of these particles over these paths is a counterfactual effect. Here, we quantify counterfactual effects by evaluating the information about the presence or absence of the absorber obtained from the output statistics, distinguishing between classical and quantum counterfactual effects. We identify the counterfactual gain which quantifies the advantage of quantum counterfactual protocols over classical counterfactual protocols, and show that this counterfactual gain can be separated into two terms: a semi-classical term related to the amplitude blocked by the absorber, and a Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability assigning a joint probability to the blocked path and the output port. A negative Kirkwood-Dirac term between a path and an output port indicates that inserting the absorber into that path will have a focussing effect, increasing the probability of particles arriving at that output port, resulting in a significant enhancement of the counterfactual gain. We show that the magnitude of quantum counterfactual effects cannot be explained by a simple removal of the absorbed particles, but originates instead from a well-defined back-action effect caused by the presence of the absorber in one path, on particles in other paths.
The presence of an absorber in one of the paths of an interferometer changes the output statistics of that interferometer in a fundamental manner. Since the individual quantum particles detected at any of the outputs of the interferometer have not been absorbed, any non-trivial effect of the absorber on the distribution of these particles over these paths is a counterfactual effect. Here, we quantify counterfactual effects by evaluating the information about the presence or absence of the absorber obtained from the output statistics, distinguishing between classical and quantum counterfactual effects. We identify the counterfactual gain which quantifies the advantage of quantum counterfactual protocols over classical counterfactual protocols, and show that this counterfactual gain can be separated into two terms: a semi-classical term related to the amplitude blocked by the absorber, and a Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability assigning a joint probability to the blocked path and the output port. A negative Kirkwood-Dirac term between a path and an output port indicates that inserting the absorber into that path will have a focussing effect, increasing the probability of particles arriving at that output port, resulting in a significant enhancement of the counterfactual gain. We show that the magnitude of quantum counterfactual effects cannot be explained by a simple removal of the absorbed particles, but originates instead from a well-defined back-action effect caused by the presence of the absorber in one path, on particles in other paths.
Quantum contextuality can be observed in three path interferometers, suggesting a fundamental contradiction between wave propagation and particle propagation inherent in the wave-particle dualism. Here, we investigate this contradiction in a three path interferometer specifically designed to illustrate the paradoxical aspects of single particle interference. A particularly clear violation of non-contextual assumptions is obtained when interference effects suppress detection probabilities to zero in paths that seem to be necessary to explain the observation of photons in the output. This contradiction between detection probabilities in the paths and detection probabilities in the output cannot be explained by any assignment of photon paths through the interferometer, demonstrating a fundamental incompatibility of wave propagation and particle propagation.