Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Burden of Black-Hole Information Preservation: An Event-Horizon Premise Challenge

Rick - PraxisFoundry001

Published Oct 11, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This work examines a specific premise in the black-hole information problem: the assertion that complete quantum evolution preserves arbitrary initial quantum distinctions through the full formation and evaporation of an actual four-dimensional black hole possessing a genuine event horizon. The paper does not argue that fundamental information destruction occurs. It does not reject unitary quantum mechanics or the substantial mathematical progress represented by holography, quantum error correction, entanglement islands, replica wormholes, Page-curve calculations, asymptotic observable algebras, or gravitational reconstruction. Instead, it asks what establishes that the scope of such results reaches the complete physical black-hole process for which global preservation is asserted. For a registered ordinary future-directed causal route from strictly inside a genuine event horizon to the stipulated exterior future, the event-horizon and Structural Flow translation premises imply that ordinary outward Cascade and same-route Authorization do not occur. This route result does not determine the global fate of quantum information. The restricted horizon-facing premises entail neither guaranteed global quantum-information preservation nor fundamental global information destruction. The complete physical fate therefore remains dependent on additional physics-owned premises. The work distinguishes global preservation from restricted exterior recoverability. A preservation claim must specify the physical target process, admitted quantum input family, governing dynamics, physically complete output system, relevant quantum-coherence burden, and applicability of the mathematical result to the actual gravitational regime being claimed. Recovery from Hawking radiation alone is not privileged as the only admissible proof route, and inability to recover information from a restricted radiation subsystem is not sufficient to establish fundamental loss. A public falsification and reopening protocol accompanies the paper. It separates model- and code-level advances, physical preservation or loss results, event-horizon domain-translation failures, and genuine foundational Structural Flow counterderivations. A black-hole-specific failure does not automatically reopen universal Structural Flow, the Universal Kernel, or the TOE. The release also includes a machine companion and a consolidated Lean formal append evaluated with the unchanged Structural_Flow_Universal_Kernel_v1.0.lean. The supplied Lean Web execution record reported all 68 expected theorem checkpoints from the integrated source with no compiler errors reported. The consolidated BH-EH source contains 69 theorem declarations. Machine closure is explicitly limited to the encoded conditional logical scope. The formal layer does not establish the existence of an actual event horizon, the physical validity of the Structural Flow translation, complete quantum-gravitational dynamics, or the global information fate of real black holes. This coordinated package contains the scientific anchor, public falsification/reopening protocol, machine companion, scoped BH-EH formal append, and frozen Universal Kernel.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.23305558

Related papers

The Burden of Black-Hole Information Preservation: An Event-Horizon Premise Challenge

Rick - PraxisFoundry001

This work examines a specific premise in the black-hole information problem: the assertion that complete quantum evolution preserves arbitrary initial quantum distinctions through the full formation and evaporation of an actual four-dimensional black hole possessing a genuine event horizon. The paper does not argue that fundamental information destruction occurs. It does not reject unitary quantum mechanics or the substantial mathematical progress represented by holography, quantum error correction, entanglement islands, replica wormholes, Page-curve calculations, asymptotic observable algebras, or gravitational reconstruction. Instead, it asks what establishes that the scope of such results reaches the complete physical black-hole process for which global preservation is asserted. For a registered ordinary future-directed causal route from strictly inside a genuine event horizon to the stipulated exterior future, the event-horizon and Structural Flow translation premises imply that ordinary outward Cascade and same-route Authorization do not occur. This route result does not determine the global fate of quantum information. The restricted horizon-facing premises entail neither guaranteed global quantum-information preservation nor fundamental global information destruction. The complete physical fate therefore remains dependent on additional physics-owned premises. The work distinguishes global preservation from restricted exterior recoverability. A preservation claim must specify the physical target process, admitted quantum input family, governing dynamics, physically complete output system, relevant quantum-coherence burden, and applicability of the mathematical result to the actual gravitational regime being claimed. Recovery from Hawking radiation alone is not privileged as the only admissible proof route, and inability to recover information from a restricted radiation subsystem is not sufficient to establish fundamental loss. A public falsification and reopening protocol accompanies the paper. It separates model- and code-level advances, physical preservation or loss results, event-horizon domain-translation failures, and genuine foundational Structural Flow counterderivations. A black-hole-specific failure does not automatically reopen universal Structural Flow, the Universal Kernel, or the TOE. The release also includes a machine companion and a consolidated Lean formal append evaluated with the unchanged Structural_Flow_Universal_Kernel_v1.0.lean. The supplied Lean Web execution record reported all 68 expected theorem checkpoints from the integrated source with no compiler errors reported. The consolidated BH-EH source contains 69 theorem declarations. Machine closure is explicitly limited to the encoded conditional logical scope. The formal layer does not establish the existence of an actual event horizon, the physical validity of the Structural Flow translation, complete quantum-gravitational dynamics, or the global information fate of real black holes. This coordinated package contains the scientific anchor, public falsification/reopening protocol, machine companion, scoped BH-EH formal append, and frozen Universal Kernel.

•Oct 11, 2026•0 citations

Horizon-Indistinguishable Quantum Information Unitary Evaporation, Code Subspaces, and the Black-Hole Information-Loss Contradiction

Darren Jeffers

This paper presents a structural resolution of the black-hole information-loss contradiction using standard quantum-information and operator-algebraic ideas. The central argument is that local horizon regularity, unitary evolution, locally thermal-looking radiation, no cloning, and complete final information recovery are not mutually inconsistent unless one additionally assumes that the interior partner and the radiation reconstruction must remain permanently independent physical subsystems. The paper develops an alternative framework in which globally encoded quantum information can remain invisible to the local horizon observable algebra while being preserved exactly in the total quantum state and progressively transferred into correlations within the emitted radiation. An explicit finite-dimensional code model demonstrates that each individual emitted subsystem can appear locally universal while arbitrary quantum information, including entanglement with an external reference system, remains exactly preserved and fully recoverable from the final radiation. The analysis also distinguishes the local horizon-partner role from the global microstate information and from the physical carrier that realizes either role at a given stage of evaporation. This separation removes the apparent monogamy conflict without violating linearity, no cloning, or unitary quantum mechanics. A complementary entropy analysis shows how a Page-like transition can arise when the responsibility for purification becomes progressively reconstructible from the radiation. The paper does not claim a complete dynamical theory of astrophysical black-hole evaporation. Instead, it establishes a mathematically explicit consistency framework showing that the standard information-loss contradiction is not forced by local thermality and unitarity alone, and it identifies the remaining physical problem as the derivation of the appropriate horizon observable algebra and evaporation dynamics from a complete theory of gravity.

•Sep 15, 2026•0 citations

The Black Hole Information Paradox as Projection Boundary: Ω-Conservation, Event Horizons, and the Non-Destruction of Information

Vinness Aisingioro Ollervides

Abstract The black hole information paradox (Hawking, 19741976) poses a fundamental conict: quantum mechanics requires unitary evolution (information is preserved), while black hole evaporation via Hawking radiation appears to destroy information (the radiation is thermal, carrying no information about the in-fallen state). After fty years of debate, the paradox remains unresolvedHawking conceded it in 2004 [3] but no complete mechanism has been identied. ˆ We resolve the paradox by identifying its source: confusing Ω with Πext[Ω]. Information is never destroyed. Ω-conservation (Noether, P2) guarantees this. What is destroyed at the event horizon is not the information but the exterior ˆ observer's projection operator : Πext becomes inapplicable inside the horizon. The ˆ ˆ information encoded in the in-fallen matter passes from Πext[Ω] to Πint[Ω]two projections of the same Ω = 1 that agree in total but disagree in local accessibility. Hawking radiation is the κ→0 leakage of Ω-entanglement across the projection boundary. The Page curve [4]entanglement entropy rising and then falling as the black hole evaporatesfollows directly from Ω-conservation without invoking island formulas [8, 9] or specic stringy mechanisms. The paradox is not a paradox. It is a projection error.

•Mar 5, 2026•0 citations

Delayed Finality and the Black Hole Information Problem

Tomoyuki Uchida

This paper develops an interpretive reading of the black hole information problem within a consistency-history framework that distinguishes preservation, commitment, recoverability, feasible auditability, and public finality. Its central claim is narrow: the Page time should be understood as a transition in recoverability, not as the onset of redundant public facthood. In controlled island and quantum-extremal-surface models, an interior region associated with the black hole becomes reconstructible from the Hawking radiation after the Page transition. The paper redescribes this as a transition from hidden encoding to recoverable encoding. It does not derive the Page curve, the island formula, replica wormholes, or a solution to the black hole information problem; those results are supplied by the cited quantum-information and quantum-gravity literature. The paper argues that Hawking radiation is not, by itself, a Quantum-Darwinist broadcasting environment for the infalling microstate information. Recovery requires a large radiation region and a holistic decoding, while no small set of disjoint fragments independently carries the same infalling record. Recoverability-in-principle therefore remains distinct from strong public finality, which would require redundant, non-disturbing, and repeatable access by multiple independent observers. The Harlow–Hayden complexity barrier further separates formal reconstructibility from feasible auditability. On this reading, the Page curve schedules delayed recoverability rather than strong public finality. If the recovered information later becomes redundantly recorded in ordinary detectors and environments, that later public finality is a downstream process rather than something supplied by the black hole itself. The paper is interpretive and conceptual, has L2 status within the framework’s claim discipline, and makes no independent empirical prediction.

•Jun 17, 2026•10 citations

Escape of quantum information across an analogue black hole horizon

Zhilong Liu, Wentao Liu, Zehua Tian +1 more

The complete evaporation of black holes, as a natural endpoint of Hawking radiation, gives rise to the black hole information paradox, which fundamentally challenges the principles of unitarity and information conservation in quantum mechanics. Although the AdS/CFT correspondence indicates that information is preserved during black hole evaporation, the precise mechanism by which it is recovered from the Hawking radiation remains an open question. To explore a potential resolution, we investigate information transfer in a spin-chain model featuring an effective horizon realized via position-dependent couplings within an XY spin chain. We derive and demonstrate Page curve-like behavior, and analyze the transmission of quantum resources, such as entanglement and coherence, across the effective horizon. Our results show that quantum resources initially localized within an interior subsystem can be transferred to the exterior via particle radiation through the horizon. This study provides a novel perspective from quantum simulation on how information may escape from black holes, thereby contributing to the further understanding of the black hole information paradox.

gr-qcCross-listedarXiv:2602.07043•Feb 5, 2026•0 citations

Black Holes as Horizon-Mediated Transformers of Realised Physical Distinguishability in Compact S³ Geometry

Andrei Preece, Boris Batenin

What if the black-hole information problem begins with the wrong primitive? Rather than treating information as a substance that must be stored, hidden, destroyed, or recovered, this research reframes the problem around Realised Physical Distinguishability (RPD): the physically actual capacity to discriminate between alternative states by operations performed with finite energy, finite time, finite resolution, and access to a specified algebra of observables. Two states belong to the same operational class when no admissible measurement can distinguish them above a fixed threshold. The resulting structure is RPD(M) := 𝒮(M) / ~, while information appears only as the derived quantity I(M) := log₂ |RPD(M)|. From this perspective, a black hole is not primarily a container of inaccessible bits. It is a horizon-mediated transformer of distinguishability classes. The event horizon changes which operations remain available to an exterior observer. Because the exterior algebra 𝒜_ext is only a restricted part of the global algebra, states that remain globally distinct may become operationally indistinguishable from outside. This produces the observer-dependent quotient RPD_𝒜(M) := 𝒮(M) / ~_𝒜 and motivates a time-dependent transformation of the form T_H(t): RPD_𝒜₁(M,t₁) ⇝ RPD_𝒜₂(M,t₂). Horizon crossing therefore need not mean the destruction of physical distinctions; it may instead mean their removal from one accessible channel and their redistribution into others. The paper identifies three candidate channels: null-wave delocalisation, in which causal structure and redshift carry distinctions beyond ordinary localisation; gravitational-geometric re-expression, in which mass, angular momentum, multipole structure, gravitational waves, and memory preserve aspects of the preceding configuration; and quantum-radiative redistribution, in which correlations among Hawking radiation, residual geometry, and possible topological sectors may progressively restore exterior-accessible distinctions. Unitarity is consequently interpreted not as the miraculous reconstruction of a former macroscopic object, but as the possible lawful continuity of distinguishability through changing physical forms. The framework is developed on a compact or effectively compact S³ carrier, while Schwarzschild-, Kerr-, or de Sitter-type horizons remain local models of operational inaccessibility. A quantitative selector branch compares the causal-spectral capacity of S³ with explicitly declared external ceilings such as Bekenstein or holographic bounds. Its central filter is Σ_grav^(P) = min(1, B_ceil / (b_P Γ_R(T) N_P(ε))), where Γ_R(T) describes the causally accessible fraction of the compact carrier and N_P(ε) counts distinguishable spectral modes at resolution ε. In the local regime, a notable cancellation gives B_causal^(P) ~ (2b_P C_P / 3π)(cT/ε)³, removing the carrier radius R from the leading term and producing the threshold relation (ε_*^(P))³ = (2b_P C_P ln 2 / 3π²)cTℓ_P². This selector is not proposed as a force law or a complete microscopic theory; it is a disciplined diagnostic of how causal access, spectral resolution, and gravitational ceilings constrain physically realisable distinctions. The work further introduces topological horizon capacity as an open research object and explores whether holonomy, Berry phases, the Hopf fibration S¹ → S³ → S², and sectors labelled by Q_H ∈ ℤ could protect or transform distinguishability during collapse and evaporation. No final solution of the black-hole information paradox is claimed. The research contribution is a sharper foundational question: not “Where are the bits?”,but “Which physical differences remain realisable, for whom, through which channels, and under what geometric and topological limits?”

•Jul 10, 2026•0 citations
This work examines a specific premise in the black-hole information problem: the assertion that complete quantum evolution preserves arbitrary initial quantum distinctions through the full formation and evaporation of an actual four-dimensional black hole possessing a genuine event horizon. The paper does not argue that fundamental information destruction occurs. It does not reject unitary quantum mechanics or the substantial mathematical progress represented by holography, quantum error correction, entanglement islands, replica wormholes, Page-curve calculations, asymptotic observable algebras, or gravitational reconstruction. Instead, it asks what establishes that the scope of such results reaches the complete physical black-hole process for which global preservation is asserted. For a registered ordinary future-directed causal route from strictly inside a genuine event horizon to the stipulated exterior future, the event-horizon and Structural Flow translation premises imply that ordinary outward Cascade and same-route Authorization do not occur. This route result does not determine the global fate of quantum information. The restricted horizon-facing premises entail neither guaranteed global quantum-information preservation nor fundamental global information destruction. The complete physical fate therefore remains dependent on additional physics-owned premises. The work distinguishes global preservation from restricted exterior recoverability. A preservation claim must specify the physical target process, admitted quantum input family, governing dynamics, physically complete output system, relevant quantum-coherence burden, and applicability of the mathematical result to the actual gravitational regime being claimed. Recovery from Hawking radiation alone is not privileged as the only admissible proof route, and inability to recover information from a restricted radiation subsystem is not sufficient to establish fundamental loss. A public falsification and reopening protocol accompanies the paper. It separates model- and code-level advances, physical preservation or loss results, event-horizon domain-translation failures, and genuine foundational Structural Flow counterderivations. A black-hole-specific failure does not automatically reopen universal Structural Flow, the Universal Kernel, or the TOE. The release also includes a machine companion and a consolidated Lean formal append evaluated with the unchanged Structural_Flow_Universal_Kernel_v1.0.lean. The supplied Lean Web execution record reported all 68 expected theorem checkpoints from the integrated source with no compiler errors reported. The consolidated BH-EH source contains 69 theorem declarations. Machine closure is explicitly limited to the encoded conditional logical scope. The formal layer does not establish the existence of an actual event horizon, the physical validity of the Structural Flow translation, complete quantum-gravitational dynamics, or the global information fate of real black holes. This coordinated package contains the scientific anchor, public falsification/reopening protocol, machine companion, scoped BH-EH formal append, and frozen Universal Kernel.
This work examines a specific premise in the black-hole information problem: the assertion that complete quantum evolution preserves arbitrary initial quantum distinctions through the full formation and evaporation of an actual four-dimensional black hole possessing a genuine event horizon. The paper does not argue that fundamental information destruction occurs. It does not reject unitary quantum mechanics or the substantial mathematical progress represented by holography, quantum error correction, entanglement islands, replica wormholes, Page-curve calculations, asymptotic observable algebras, or gravitational reconstruction. Instead, it asks what establishes that the scope of such results reaches the complete physical black-hole process for which global preservation is asserted. For a registered ordinary future-directed causal route from strictly inside a genuine event horizon to the stipulated exterior future, the event-horizon and Structural Flow translation premises imply that ordinary outward Cascade and same-route Authorization do not occur. This route result does not determine the global fate of quantum information. The restricted horizon-facing premises entail neither guaranteed global quantum-information preservation nor fundamental global information destruction. The complete physical fate therefore remains dependent on additional physics-owned premises. The work distinguishes global preservation from restricted exterior recoverability. A preservation claim must specify the physical target process, admitted quantum input family, governing dynamics, physically complete output system, relevant quantum-coherence burden, and applicability of the mathematical result to the actual gravitational regime being claimed. Recovery from Hawking radiation alone is not privileged as the only admissible proof route, and inability to recover information from a restricted radiation subsystem is not sufficient to establish fundamental loss. A public falsification and reopening protocol accompanies the paper. It separates model- and code-level advances, physical preservation or loss results, event-horizon domain-translation failures, and genuine foundational Structural Flow counterderivations. A black-hole-specific failure does not automatically reopen universal Structural Flow, the Universal Kernel, or the TOE. The release also includes a machine companion and a consolidated Lean formal append evaluated with the unchanged Structural_Flow_Universal_Kernel_v1.0.lean. The supplied Lean Web execution record reported all 68 expected theorem checkpoints from the integrated source with no compiler errors reported. The consolidated BH-EH source contains 69 theorem declarations. Machine closure is explicitly limited to the encoded conditional logical scope. The formal layer does not establish the existence of an actual event horizon, the physical validity of the Structural Flow translation, complete quantum-gravitational dynamics, or the global information fate of real black holes. This coordinated package contains the scientific anchor, public falsification/reopening protocol, machine companion, scoped BH-EH formal append, and frozen Universal Kernel.
This paper presents a structural resolution of the black-hole information-loss contradiction using standard quantum-information and operator-algebraic ideas. The central argument is that local horizon regularity, unitary evolution, locally thermal-looking radiation, no cloning, and complete final information recovery are not mutually inconsistent unless one additionally assumes that the interior partner and the radiation reconstruction must remain permanently independent physical subsystems. The paper develops an alternative framework in which globally encoded quantum information can remain invisible to the local horizon observable algebra while being preserved exactly in the total quantum state and progressively transferred into correlations within the emitted radiation. An explicit finite-dimensional code model demonstrates that each individual emitted subsystem can appear locally universal while arbitrary quantum information, including entanglement with an external reference system, remains exactly preserved and fully recoverable from the final radiation. The analysis also distinguishes the local horizon-partner role from the global microstate information and from the physical carrier that realizes either role at a given stage of evaporation. This separation removes the apparent monogamy conflict without violating linearity, no cloning, or unitary quantum mechanics. A complementary entropy analysis shows how a Page-like transition can arise when the responsibility for purification becomes progressively reconstructible from the radiation. The paper does not claim a complete dynamical theory of astrophysical black-hole evaporation. Instead, it establishes a mathematically explicit consistency framework showing that the standard information-loss contradiction is not forced by local thermality and unitarity alone, and it identifies the remaining physical problem as the derivation of the appropriate horizon observable algebra and evaporation dynamics from a complete theory of gravity.
Abstract The black hole information paradox (Hawking, 19741976) poses a fundamental conict: quantum mechanics requires unitary evolution (information is preserved), while black hole evaporation via Hawking radiation appears to destroy information (the radiation is thermal, carrying no information about the in-fallen state). After fty years of debate, the paradox remains unresolvedHawking conceded it in 2004 [3] but no complete mechanism has been identied. ˆ We resolve the paradox by identifying its source: confusing Ω with Πext[Ω]. Information is never destroyed. Ω-conservation (Noether, P2) guarantees this. What is destroyed at the event horizon is not the information but the exterior ˆ observer's projection operator : Πext becomes inapplicable inside the horizon. The ˆ ˆ information encoded in the in-fallen matter passes from Πext[Ω] to Πint[Ω]two projections of the same Ω = 1 that agree in total but disagree in local accessibility. Hawking radiation is the κ→0 leakage of Ω-entanglement across the projection boundary. The Page curve [4]entanglement entropy rising and then falling as the black hole evaporatesfollows directly from Ω-conservation without invoking island formulas [8, 9] or specic stringy mechanisms. The paradox is not a paradox. It is a projection error.
This paper develops an interpretive reading of the black hole information problem within a consistency-history framework that distinguishes preservation, commitment, recoverability, feasible auditability, and public finality. Its central claim is narrow: the Page time should be understood as a transition in recoverability, not as the onset of redundant public facthood. In controlled island and quantum-extremal-surface models, an interior region associated with the black hole becomes reconstructible from the Hawking radiation after the Page transition. The paper redescribes this as a transition from hidden encoding to recoverable encoding. It does not derive the Page curve, the island formula, replica wormholes, or a solution to the black hole information problem; those results are supplied by the cited quantum-information and quantum-gravity literature. The paper argues that Hawking radiation is not, by itself, a Quantum-Darwinist broadcasting environment for the infalling microstate information. Recovery requires a large radiation region and a holistic decoding, while no small set of disjoint fragments independently carries the same infalling record. Recoverability-in-principle therefore remains distinct from strong public finality, which would require redundant, non-disturbing, and repeatable access by multiple independent observers. The Harlow–Hayden complexity barrier further separates formal reconstructibility from feasible auditability. On this reading, the Page curve schedules delayed recoverability rather than strong public finality. If the recovered information later becomes redundantly recorded in ordinary detectors and environments, that later public finality is a downstream process rather than something supplied by the black hole itself. The paper is interpretive and conceptual, has L2 status within the framework’s claim discipline, and makes no independent empirical prediction.
The complete evaporation of black holes, as a natural endpoint of Hawking radiation, gives rise to the black hole information paradox, which fundamentally challenges the principles of unitarity and information conservation in quantum mechanics. Although the AdS/CFT correspondence indicates that information is preserved during black hole evaporation, the precise mechanism by which it is recovered from the Hawking radiation remains an open question. To explore a potential resolution, we investigate information transfer in a spin-chain model featuring an effective horizon realized via position-dependent couplings within an XY spin chain. We derive and demonstrate Page curve-like behavior, and analyze the transmission of quantum resources, such as entanglement and coherence, across the effective horizon. Our results show that quantum resources initially localized within an interior subsystem can be transferred to the exterior via particle radiation through the horizon. This study provides a novel perspective from quantum simulation on how information may escape from black holes, thereby contributing to the further understanding of the black hole information paradox.
What if the black-hole information problem begins with the wrong primitive? Rather than treating information as a substance that must be stored, hidden, destroyed, or recovered, this research reframes the problem around Realised Physical Distinguishability (RPD): the physically actual capacity to discriminate between alternative states by operations performed with finite energy, finite time, finite resolution, and access to a specified algebra of observables. Two states belong to the same operational class when no admissible measurement can distinguish them above a fixed threshold. The resulting structure is RPD(M) := 𝒮(M) / ~, while information appears only as the derived quantity I(M) := log₂ |RPD(M)|. From this perspective, a black hole is not primarily a container of inaccessible bits. It is a horizon-mediated transformer of distinguishability classes. The event horizon changes which operations remain available to an exterior observer. Because the exterior algebra 𝒜_ext is only a restricted part of the global algebra, states that remain globally distinct may become operationally indistinguishable from outside. This produces the observer-dependent quotient RPD_𝒜(M) := 𝒮(M) / ~_𝒜 and motivates a time-dependent transformation of the form T_H(t): RPD_𝒜₁(M,t₁) ⇝ RPD_𝒜₂(M,t₂). Horizon crossing therefore need not mean the destruction of physical distinctions; it may instead mean their removal from one accessible channel and their redistribution into others. The paper identifies three candidate channels: null-wave delocalisation, in which causal structure and redshift carry distinctions beyond ordinary localisation; gravitational-geometric re-expression, in which mass, angular momentum, multipole structure, gravitational waves, and memory preserve aspects of the preceding configuration; and quantum-radiative redistribution, in which correlations among Hawking radiation, residual geometry, and possible topological sectors may progressively restore exterior-accessible distinctions. Unitarity is consequently interpreted not as the miraculous reconstruction of a former macroscopic object, but as the possible lawful continuity of distinguishability through changing physical forms. The framework is developed on a compact or effectively compact S³ carrier, while Schwarzschild-, Kerr-, or de Sitter-type horizons remain local models of operational inaccessibility. A quantitative selector branch compares the causal-spectral capacity of S³ with explicitly declared external ceilings such as Bekenstein or holographic bounds. Its central filter is Σ_grav^(P) = min(1, B_ceil / (b_P Γ_R(T) N_P(ε))), where Γ_R(T) describes the causally accessible fraction of the compact carrier and N_P(ε) counts distinguishable spectral modes at resolution ε. In the local regime, a notable cancellation gives B_causal^(P) ~ (2b_P C_P / 3π)(cT/ε)³, removing the carrier radius R from the leading term and producing the threshold relation (ε_*^(P))³ = (2b_P C_P ln 2 / 3π²)cTℓ_P². This selector is not proposed as a force law or a complete microscopic theory; it is a disciplined diagnostic of how causal access, spectral resolution, and gravitational ceilings constrain physically realisable distinctions. The work further introduces topological horizon capacity as an open research object and explores whether holonomy, Berry phases, the Hopf fibration S¹ → S³ → S², and sectors labelled by Q_H ∈ ℤ could protect or transform distinguishability during collapse and evaporation. No final solution of the black-hole information paradox is claimed. The research contribution is a sharper foundational question: not “Where are the bits?”,but “Which physical differences remain realisable, for whom, through which channels, and under what geometric and topological limits?”