Low-Overhead Quantum Error Correction with Boundary-Connected Planar Modules: A Reconciled Quantitative Assessment
Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas
Abstract
The planar surface code protects quantum information robustly but pays for its two-dimensional layout with an encoding rate that vanishes as the distance grows, so fault-tolerant memories require hundreds to thousands of physical qubits per logical qubit. A recent proposal constructs modular hyperbolic surface and color codes by partitioning a quantum processor into flat Euclidean modules and wiring sparse, static boundary connections between them, yielding semi-hyperbolic codes with constant encoding rate [1,4]. In this paper we provide an independent, fully explicit quantitative analysis of that proposal. Taking the reported parameters — encoding rate $k/n = 1/16$ and distance $d \geq 22$ — as inputs, we compute that a twelve-logical-qubit modular memory requires $n_{\mathrm{mod}} = 192$ physical qubits, versus $11100$ data qubits for twelve distance-$22$ rotated surface-code patches, a raw overhead reduction of $57.8\times$; the reduction remains $\geq 30\times$ even if the true modular implementation uses up to $370$ physical qubits. We further develop a seam-noise mixture model and compute the seam-error budget under which the modular advantage survives: with a seam fraction $f = 0.1443$, seam links may carry up to $\gamma \approx 2.5\times$ the intra-module error rate before a tenfold advantage at matched distance is exhausted. We compare against the $[[288,12,18]]$ bivariate bicycle code ($1.5\times$ fewer qubits for the modular code, at strictly larger distance) and situate the proposal within the low-overhead QEC landscape. All arithmetic is shown step by step; all projections are labeled with stated assumptions. ## 1. Introduction Quantum error correction (QEC) is the accepted route to fault-tolerant quantum computation, but the leading practical scheme — the planar surface code — has an encoding rate $k/n$ that tends to zero as the code distance $d$ grows. For a target logical error rate, the required physical-to-logical qubit ratio grows roughly quadra Full text and updates: papers.qnfo.org/papers/low-overhead-quantum-error-correction-with-boundary-connected-planar-modules-a-r/