Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Global Journal of Human Social Science

Explaining the Influence of the Observer on Quantum Measurements and the Influence of Sick Patients on the Doctor

Maria Kuman

Published Sep 23, 2022• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

The article explains for the first time the influence of the observer on quantum measurements. 1/ In one set of experiments, it was found that the lifetime of decay of radioactive elements is longer in the presence of spinning liquids or solids. This could only be explained if media between them was present, which was influenced by the spinning. 2/ In another set of experiments, it was found that the lifetime of decay of radioactive elements is longer in the presence of people. Since the Russian scientist Shkatov developed equipment allowing him to measure the spinning of the human's aura, the longer lifetime of radioactive elements in the presence of people could be explained with the influence of their spinning aura (but again the influence could only be explained with the presence of media, which was influenced by the spinning). 3/ In another set of experiments, it was found that without the presence of observer photons and electrons behaved like waves and diffraction pattern was observed when they were passing through two slits. When observer with his spinning aura was present, the photons and electrons behave like particles -diffraction was not observed but only two slits of light. This means that under the influence of observers' spinning aura the photons and electrons behave like particles, which could only be explained if there was a media influenced by the spinning aura of the observer.

Related papers

Collapse of Wave Nature is a Necessity for Measurement to Take Place (Intuitive)

Krishan Vats

This is an example description of why and how the wave nature of quantum objects collapses on measurement. The article takes double slit experiment as an example where observing the electrons/photons causes them to abandon the wave nature and start behaving like particles. I.e. the interference pattern disappears. Why the measurement causes a switch from wave nature to particle behavior? It is explained with one specific example scenario. This example can be extended to other scenarios with necessary adjustments.

•Sep 1, 2016•0 citations

Quantum behavior in the Double Slit Experiment and the limitations of the equipment used.

Ernest Heinz

Abstract: Many problems exist in the Double Slit Experiment when you consider that the elements in the test are moving as waves. Outside of the pattern resembling peeks and troughs that overlap each other; there is no real scientific explanation on how this is taking place. In a more accurate and classical way, can we explain how the dark and light areas of the interference pattern are being made? Why is an Interference pattern being made when particles are being sent through the exercise one at a time? And how is it that through observation the Interference pattern collapses in on itself. Waves add more questions than they do answers, a very typical outcome of an incorrect solution. Maybe the unanswered questions left behind by the wave theory is a confirmation of its inaccuracy and not the mystique of its results. Rather than double down on the wave theory with time traveling particles, elements of duality, and the Copenhagen Interpretation; l reconsidered that elements tested in the double slit experiment behave as particles. But this time, I weighed the thought that these bits of matter are much smaller than previously thought. This new logic allowed particles with straight trajectories to interact with the edge of materials used in the double slit wall in a very detailed way. This created a storm of new ways to look at what is really taking place in the test; revealing the competence of the detectors utilized and the capacity of the Nonlinear Optical Crystal. Everything solved from just one idea, that quantum move as particles but on a much smaller scale. This is the enigma of the Double Slit Experiment.

•May 1, 2018•0 citations

The observer effect in the double-slit experiment: the role of experimental parameters in forming the interference pattern

R.KH. RAKHIMOV

Changes in experimental conditions significantly influence the interference pattern in the double-slit experiment, which is determined by various factors, including the distance and width of the slits, the wavelength, the position of the detector, and the spectral properties of the detector itself. The observer effect, manifested in the alteration of quantum objects’ behavior depending on the measurement conditions, underscores the critical importance of experimental conditions in quantum mechanics and their direct impact on the observed results. Understanding these factors deepens our knowledge of quantum interactions and contributes to the development of more reliable and effective quantum systems, such as quantum computers and quantum communication networks. This knowledge opens new horizons in the study of the nature of light and matter, as well as fostering a deeper understanding of the “observer effect” and the application of quantum technologies to practical problems.

Computational nanotechnology•Sep 24, 2024•2 citations

Study on the diffraction-like and interference-like mechanisms of particle flow

Jiqing Zeng, Tianhe Zeng

Abstract The Young's double slit experiment and the electron double slit experiment are generally considered to prove the wave nature of light and electrons. The most obvious sign of the double-slit experiment is that there are bright and dark stripes on the screen. However, people have not carefully studied the causes of the light and dark stripes. Here, we demonstrates that the light and dark fringe in Young's double-slit experiment is not actually the diffraction and interference pattern of light wave, and tries to reveal the real reason for its formation. We have studied the scattering phenomenon of particle flow after passing through the gap, and found that the scattering type and scattering degree of freedom of particle flow are determined by the physical parameters of particles and the gap, and the uniform scattering of particle flow can form a "yes" and "no" discrete distribution pattern on the receiving screen. Based on the "diffraction like" and "interference like" mechanism of particle flow, this paper explains the electron diffraction and interference experiment, as well as the Young's double-slit interference experiment and the diffraction of light through circular holes and plates. This paper negates the wave-particle duality and the de Broglie material wave hypothesis, fundamentally shaking the foundation of modern quantum mechanics, and has great scientific significance.

•Mar 23, 2023•0 citations

Ancient India's Contribution to Science

Madiha, P. Bindal, R. Kumar +1 more

In this paper, we study single slit and double slit diffraction using theory, experiment and simulation. The aim of this study is to understand the behaviour of light subjected to different conditions and also try to relate it with the concept of Maya from Indian philosophy. In the experiments, sodium light is used to observe diffraction patterns. We also study how different parameters like slit width, wavelength, intensity and distance between slits influence the pattern. The results show that light behaves like a wave in diffraction. In quantum mechanics experiments, it also behaves like a particle when observed. This idea is compared with the concept of Maya, where reality depends on observation. The study shows that there is some similarity between modern physics and ancient Indian philosophy.

•Jun 5, 2026•0 citations

The quantum physics of observers

Bruce Mills

The observer is herein studied as an aspect of laboratory physics. It is generally accepted that our status as observers is mediated by our material aspects: our body and brain. But, observers are typically equated with classical coordinate systems. An alternative, modelling the observer as a quantum entity, is considered. The corresponding transformations between two quantum observers affect the computed wavefunctions of other quantum entities in a physically meaningful manner.

Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Aug 1, 2002•0 citations
The article explains for the first time the influence of the observer on quantum measurements. 1/ In one set of experiments, it was found that the lifetime of decay of radioactive elements is longer in the presence of spinning liquids or solids. This could only be explained if media between them was present, which was influenced by the spinning. 2/ In another set of experiments, it was found that the lifetime of decay of radioactive elements is longer in the presence of people. Since the Russian scientist Shkatov developed equipment allowing him to measure the spinning of the human's aura, the longer lifetime of radioactive elements in the presence of people could be explained with the influence of their spinning aura (but again the influence could only be explained with the presence of media, which was influenced by the spinning). 3/ In another set of experiments, it was found that without the presence of observer photons and electrons behaved like waves and diffraction pattern was observed when they were passing through two slits. When observer with his spinning aura was present, the photons and electrons behave like particles -diffraction was not observed but only two slits of light. This means that under the influence of observers' spinning aura the photons and electrons behave like particles, which could only be explained if there was a media influenced by the spinning aura of the observer.
This is an example description of why and how the wave nature of quantum objects collapses on measurement. The article takes double slit experiment as an example where observing the electrons/photons causes them to abandon the wave nature and start behaving like particles. I.e. the interference pattern disappears. Why the measurement causes a switch from wave nature to particle behavior? It is explained with one specific example scenario. This example can be extended to other scenarios with necessary adjustments.
Abstract: Many problems exist in the Double Slit Experiment when you consider that the elements in the test are moving as waves. Outside of the pattern resembling peeks and troughs that overlap each other; there is no real scientific explanation on how this is taking place. In a more accurate and classical way, can we explain how the dark and light areas of the interference pattern are being made? Why is an Interference pattern being made when particles are being sent through the exercise one at a time? And how is it that through observation the Interference pattern collapses in on itself. Waves add more questions than they do answers, a very typical outcome of an incorrect solution. Maybe the unanswered questions left behind by the wave theory is a confirmation of its inaccuracy and not the mystique of its results. Rather than double down on the wave theory with time traveling particles, elements of duality, and the Copenhagen Interpretation; l reconsidered that elements tested in the double slit experiment behave as particles. But this time, I weighed the thought that these bits of matter are much smaller than previously thought. This new logic allowed particles with straight trajectories to interact with the edge of materials used in the double slit wall in a very detailed way. This created a storm of new ways to look at what is really taking place in the test; revealing the competence of the detectors utilized and the capacity of the Nonlinear Optical Crystal. Everything solved from just one idea, that quantum move as particles but on a much smaller scale. This is the enigma of the Double Slit Experiment.
Changes in experimental conditions significantly influence the interference pattern in the double-slit experiment, which is determined by various factors, including the distance and width of the slits, the wavelength, the position of the detector, and the spectral properties of the detector itself. The observer effect, manifested in the alteration of quantum objects’ behavior depending on the measurement conditions, underscores the critical importance of experimental conditions in quantum mechanics and their direct impact on the observed results. Understanding these factors deepens our knowledge of quantum interactions and contributes to the development of more reliable and effective quantum systems, such as quantum computers and quantum communication networks. This knowledge opens new horizons in the study of the nature of light and matter, as well as fostering a deeper understanding of the “observer effect” and the application of quantum technologies to practical problems.
Abstract The Young's double slit experiment and the electron double slit experiment are generally considered to prove the wave nature of light and electrons. The most obvious sign of the double-slit experiment is that there are bright and dark stripes on the screen. However, people have not carefully studied the causes of the light and dark stripes. Here, we demonstrates that the light and dark fringe in Young's double-slit experiment is not actually the diffraction and interference pattern of light wave, and tries to reveal the real reason for its formation. We have studied the scattering phenomenon of particle flow after passing through the gap, and found that the scattering type and scattering degree of freedom of particle flow are determined by the physical parameters of particles and the gap, and the uniform scattering of particle flow can form a "yes" and "no" discrete distribution pattern on the receiving screen. Based on the "diffraction like" and "interference like" mechanism of particle flow, this paper explains the electron diffraction and interference experiment, as well as the Young's double-slit interference experiment and the diffraction of light through circular holes and plates. This paper negates the wave-particle duality and the de Broglie material wave hypothesis, fundamentally shaking the foundation of modern quantum mechanics, and has great scientific significance.
In this paper, we study single slit and double slit diffraction using theory, experiment and simulation. The aim of this study is to understand the behaviour of light subjected to different conditions and also try to relate it with the concept of Maya from Indian philosophy. In the experiments, sodium light is used to observe diffraction patterns. We also study how different parameters like slit width, wavelength, intensity and distance between slits influence the pattern. The results show that light behaves like a wave in diffraction. In quantum mechanics experiments, it also behaves like a particle when observed. This idea is compared with the concept of Maya, where reality depends on observation. The study shows that there is some similarity between modern physics and ancient Indian philosophy.