Schrödinger's "searchlight" made it possible to enlighten the atom and cast shadows on the "Screen of the Observer". But the main trouble of the modern "Quantum Theory" is precisely that it mistook the shadows from the "Elephant" for the "Elephant" itself, for Reality. This led to a catastrophic discrepancy between the allowed calculated energy levels of electrons and the experimental ionization potentials with an increase in the mass of atoms. But the inclusion of "normal illumination" - understanding gives a real Quantum Theory, which can be built on the path laid by Planck-de Broglie-Einstein-Heisenberg-Bohm. Quantization adds a new invariant and strictly mathematically, according to Planck, expands complements the Classics, and does not deny it - Resonant orbits of electrons in atoms - Electronic Orbitals correspond to resonant de Broglie waves. And pontryagin's dualism of functional sets translates schrödinger's uncertainty principle into the principle of certainty=observability.
Schrödinger's "searchlight" made it possible to enlighten the atom and cast shadows on the "Screen of the Observer". But the main trouble of the modern "Quantum Theory" is precisely that it mistook the shadows from the "Elephant" for the "Elephant" itself, for Reality. This led to a catastrophic discrepancy between the allowed calculated energy levels of electrons and the experimental ionization potentials with an increase in the mass of atoms. But the inclusion of "normal illumination" - understanding gives a real Quantum Theory, which can be built on the path laid by Planck-de Broglie-Einstein-Heisenberg-Bohm. Quantization adds a new invariant and strictly mathematically, according to Planck, expands complements the Classics, and does not deny it - Resonant orbits of electrons in atoms - Electronic Orbitals correspond to resonant de Broglie waves. And pontryagin's dualism of functional sets translates schrödinger's uncertainty principle into the principle of certainty=observability.
Schrödinger’s “searchlight” allowed the atom to be illuminated and cast its shadow on the “Observer’s Screen”. But the main problem of the modern “Quantum Theory” is precisely that it mistook the shadows from the “Elephant” for the “Elephant” itself, for Reality. This led to the stagnation of the “theory” and, with an increase in the mass of atoms, to a catastrophic discrepancy between the allowed calculated electron energy levels and the experimental Ionization Potentials. But the inclusion of “normal illumination”— UNDERSTANDING gives a “holographic image”—a REAL Quantum Theory, which can be CORRECTLY built on the path laid by Planck-de Broglie-Einstein-Heisenberg-Bohm. Quantization supplements with a new INVARIANT and, strictly mathematically according to Planck, expands and complements the Classics, and does not deny it. In this case, the Resonant orbits of electrons in atoms—Electron Orbitals correspond to the resonant de Broglie waves. Pontryagin’s Dualism of Functional Sets translates Schrödinger’s Uncertainty Principle into the Principle of Certainty = OBSERVABILITY.
The new quantum theory was a mathematical description of the way in which an electron behaves when bounded by some kind of potential – such as being in an electric field, acting as a harmonic oscillator or simply being confined to a certain area of space. This mathematical description was then interpreted to be a description of the electron as being probabilistic. It was Schrödinger’s wave equation, together with de Broglie’s concept of a matter wave, that led to various important concepts like the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, an explanation of the emission and absorption of photons in atoms, quantum tunnelling and so on. This chapter explains what Schrödinger did – the marriage of waves and particles.
The new quantum theory was a mathematical description of the way in which an electron behaves when bounded by some kind of potential – such as being in an electric field, acting as a harmonic oscillator or simply being confined to a certain area of space. This mathematical description was then interpreted to be a description of the electron as being probabilistic. It was Schrödinger’s wave equation, together with de Broglie’s concept of a matter wave, that led to various important concepts like the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, an explanation of the emission and absorption of photons in atoms, quantum tunnelling and so on. This chapter explains what Schrödinger did – the marriage of waves and particles.
The Schrödinger equation describes the basic physical models in a very contradictory way. And its canonization, which gives a catastrophic divergence of the energy of electronic levels with an increase in the mass of an atom, in principle, stalled the development of science. Nevertheless, it allowed, albeit roughly, to systematize and describe many phenomena of the microworld, primarily the hydrogen atom. And approximate descriptions of many “quantum” effects were obtained, but with the use of numerous adjustable parameters. So the bottom line from the century of development of quantum theory (QT) is, in fact, the development of some quantum mechanical methods.
It is argued that the key concepts of quantum theory—Planck’s quantum proposal, de Broglie’s wave–particle dualism and Schrodinger’s wave function idea—are neither incontestable nor integrated seamlessly into the fabric of quantum theory. In fact, it is doubtful whether classical wave treatments can serve as the basis for analysing (purported) matter waves at all. Also, an element of circular reasoning apparently surrounds the wave function concept, as the Hamiltonian-based Schrodinger equation is constrained to lead to the discrete solutions that represent quantization. These ambiguities appear particularly damning against the backdrop of the dubious Rayleigh–Jeans–Planck analysis of black body radiation, and the discredited evidence for the wave theory of radiation (based on purported diffraction phenomena). These considerations raise intriguing questions about the role of mathematical modelling in the study of natural phenomena (not to mention certain pedagogical quandaries). Thus, quantum theory—cloaked though it is in forbidding mathematical rigor—must submit to a dispassionate analysis of its extent and compass, particularly in view of its ostensible subversion of common-sense notions of reality.
Ideal resonance does not fade, and thus, it is, as it were, out of time. Therefore, the corresponding Planck QUANTUM, which determines the STATIONARY allowed states of energy, is simply a reflection of the ideal resonance. So the corresponding Planck QUANTUM, which determines the STATIONARY Allowed States of Energy, is simply a reflection of the Ideal Resonance. And modern “Quantum Mechanics,” which moved away from both Planck’s Quantization and the correct use of the Mechanical Model, simply used a simplified analysis of the Mechanical Harmonic Oscillator. The fundamental difference of QUANTUMS is only that for frequencies not equal to zero and their minimum energy of the resonance-quantum has a finite, non-zero initial value, which also determines the minimum distance between the allowed energy levels. At the same time, the internal structure of the QUANTUM can not only be electromagnetic, like Planck’s, and not only be acoustic, like Einstein’s, but also be determined by the so-called de Broglie matter waves. However, in order to remove any mysticism from QUANTUMS, one must UNDERSTAND that the DUALISM introduced by them is determined by Pontryagin’s functional connection of the ELEMENTARY PARTICLE and the packet of waves that form it.