Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Maxwell's Equations from Relativistic Quantum Mechanics II: The Dirac Equation, Spin Currents, and the Quantum Vacuum

Daniel Scretching

Published Oct 2, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This paper extends the preceding Schrödinger-based analysis to the relativistic Dirac framework and examines how gauge covariance, spin magnetism, and quantum-vacuum effects deepen the connection between quantum theory and Maxwell electrodynamics. Local phase invariance of the Dirac equation yields the electromagnetic field tensor, while the conserved Dirac four-current provides a covariant source for Maxwell’s equations. The Pauli limit recovers g=2g=2 and the Bohr magneton, and the Gordon decomposition separates convection and spin-magnetization currents. The Foldy–Wouthuysen expansion further connects relativistic quantum dynamics to spin–orbit and Darwin terms involving the electromagnetic fields. Hydrogen fine-structure and Darwin-shift benchmarks are evaluated quantitatively, while the Dirac velocity operator and Zitterbewegung scale are compared with the magnetic dipole length appearing in the SQC/MSC M1 formulation. The analysis is then extended to the quantum vacuum through the Schwinger critical fields and Euler–Heisenberg effective theory, including vacuum birefringence. The paper distinguishes structural consequences of relativistic quantum mechanics from electromagnetic field dynamics that must still be specified independently.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.23100842

Related papers

Maxwell's Equations from Quantum Mechanics I: Gauge Invariance, Conserved Currents, and Hydrogen Atoms as the Sources of the Electromagnetic Field

Daniel Scretching

This paper examines how Maxwell electrodynamics can be recovered as the field-theoretic structure required to consistently couple quantum matter to electromagnetism, while distinguishing what follows from quantum mechanics from what must be supplied independently. Local phase invariance introduces electromagnetic potentials through minimal coupling and yields the homogeneous Maxwell equations as geometric identities, while quantum probability conservation provides a conserved electric current and Ehrenfest dynamics recover the Lorentz-force form. The inhomogeneous Maxwell equations require an additional Lorentz- and gauge-invariant electromagnetic field action, whose vacuum constants satisfy μ0ε0=1/c2\mu_0\varepsilon_0=1/c^2, linking the construction to the SQC/MSC electric–magnetic prefactor relation. Hydrogen is used as an explicit microscopic source: the 1s1s state generates a quantum charge distribution, 2p2p states provide orbital currents and magnetic moments, and 1s1s–2p2p superpositions produce radiative dipole transitions. The treatment is then extended from individual atoms to a hydrogen gas, where polarization and magnetization generate the macroscopic fields DD and HH. The resulting framework shows how quantum sources and material response fit consistently within Maxwell electrodynamics without claiming that quantum mechanics alone uniquely derives the complete electromagnetic field dynamics.

•Oct 2, 2026•0 citations

Maxwell's Equations from Quantum Mechanics III: Synthesis: Gauge Invariance, Conserved Currents, and Hydrogen Atoms as the Sources of the Electromagnetic Field

Daniel Scretching

Maxwell’s equations, formulated in 1865, preceded quantum mechanics by six decades. When the logical direction is reversed, however, the electromagnetic field structure can be interpreted as the form required for a quantum theory of charged matter once three standard ingredients are imposed: local gauge invariance, conserved electric current, and a dynamical electromagnetic field. Quantum mechanics supplies the charged-particle state, probability amplitudes, quantum currents, and—through the Dirac equation—a relativistically consistent description of electron charge and spin. Gauge symmetry then organizes the electromagnetic interaction, while current conservation constrains the admissible source structure. The homogeneous Maxwell identities follow naturally from expressing the field through a four-potential, whereas the sourced Maxwell equations require an additional electromagnetic field action or equivalent dynamical assumption. The resulting framework clarifies both the strength and the limit of a “Maxwell from quantum mechanics” program: quantum theory and gauge structure strongly constrain electromagnetism, but Maxwell field dynamics are not obtained from the electron wave equation alone.

•Oct 4, 2026•0 citations

Spin-spin effects from non-relativistic limit of Dirac-Pauli-Maxwell Lagrangian

Radmehr Fathi, Nima Khosravi

It is natural to expect that the electromagnetic spin-spin interaction has roots in a more fundamental theory: quantum electrodynamics in this case. To show this, we take the non-relativistic limit of the Dirac-Maxwell Lagrangian, using the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation and derive the Breit interaction by an alternative approach. By adding the Pauli term (i.e., a higher-order interaction between spin and the electromagnetic field), we calculate the correction terms to electromagnetic spin-spin interactions in the non-relativistic limit. Finally, we study some of the physical effects of these terms regarding spin-spin interactions and spin-spin entanglements. Accordingly, we provide theoretical estimates that are not yet accessible with current experiments.

quant-pharXiv:2608.28904•Sep 1, 2026•0 citations

The Dirac equation: historical context, comparisons with the Schrödinger and Klein–Gordon equations, and elementary consequences

Thiago Takaji Tsutsui, Edilberto Oliveira Silva, Antonio S. M. de Castro +1 more

Abstract This paper offers educational insight into the Dirac equation, examining its historical context and contrasting it with the earlier Schrödinger and Klein–Gordon equations. The comparison highlights their Lorentz transformation symmetry and potential probabilistic interpretations. We explicitly solve the free particle dynamics in Dirac’s model, revealing the emergence of solutions with negative energy. In this discussion, we examine the Dirac Sea Hypothesis and explore the inherent helicity of the solutions. Additionally, we demonstrate how the Dirac equation accounts for spin and derive the Pauli equation in the non-relativistic limit. Through the Foldy–Wouthuysen transformation, we reveal how the equation incorporates spin–orbit interaction and other relativistic effects, ultimately leading to the hydrogen fine structure. A section on relativistic covariant notation is included to emphasize the invariance of the Dirac equation, along with more refined formulations of both the Klein–Gordon and Dirac equations. Designed for undergraduate students with an interest in the Dirac equation, this resource provides a historical perspective without being purely theoretical. Our approach underscores the significance of a pedagogical method that combines historical and comparative elements to profoundly understand the role of the Dirac equation in modern physics.

arXiv:2504.17797•European Journal of Physics•Aug 8, 2025•0 citations

Relativistic Dynamics, Electromagnetic Field, and Spin, as All Quantum Effects

Eliade N. Stefanescu

We consider a quantum particle as a wave packet in the coordinate space. When the conjugate wave packet in the momentum space is considered, we find that the group velocities of these two wave packets, which describe the particle dynamics, are in agreement with the Hamilton equations only if in the time dependent phases one considers the Lagrangian instead of the Hamiltonian which leads to the conventional Schrodinger equation. We define a relativistic quantum principle asserting that a quantum particle has a finite frequency spectrum, with a cutoff propagation velocity c as a universal constant not depending on the coordinate system, and that any time dependent phase variation is the same in any system of coordinates. From the time dependent phase invariance, the relativistic kinematics is obtained. We consider two types of possible interactions: 1) An interaction with an external field, by a modification of the time dependent phase differential with the terms proportional to the differentials of the space-time coordinates multiplied with the components of this field four-potential, and 2) an interaction by a deformation of the space-time coordinates, due to a gravitational field. From the invariance of the time dependent phase with field components, we obtain a mechanical force of the form of Lorentz’s force, and three Maxwell equations: The Gauss-Maxwell equations for the electric and magnetic fluxes, and the Faraday-Maxwell equation for the electromagnetic induction. When the fourth equation, Ampere-Maxwell, is considered, the interaction field takes the form of the electromagnetic field. For a low propagation velocity of the particle waves, we get a packet of waves with the time dependent phases proportional to the relativistic Hamiltonian, as in Dirac’s famous theory of spin, and a slowly-varying amplitude with a phase proportional to the momentum and this velocity. In the framework of our theory, the spin is obtained as an all quantum effect, without any additional assumption to the quantum theory. When a space-time deformation is considered in the time dependent phase of a quantum particle, from the group velocity we get the particle dynamics according to the general theory of relativity. In this way, the relativistic dynamics, the electromagnetic field, and the spin of a quantum particle are obtained only from the invariance of the time dependent phases of the particle wave functions.

Journal of Electronic Science and Technology•Dec 25, 2017•1 citation

The Dirac Equation Derived from the Relativistic Coulomb Field: Stochastic Mechanics in Four-Dimensional Spacetime

Fusao Ishii

This paper extends the stochastic electrodynamic framework of Papers 1, 2, and 3 [1–3] to relativistic quantum mechanics, deriving the Dirac equation from the relativistic Coulomb field. The non-relativistic Brownian motion of Paper 1 is generalised to a four-dimensional stochastic process in Minkowski spacetime, parameterised by proper time τ . The relativistic diffusion coefficient isD4D = ℏ/m—exactly twice the non-relativistic value ℏ/2m—arising from the additional contribution of the temporal component of the four-dimensional Wiener process. The covariant zero-point field spectral tensor Sμν(ω) = (ℏω^3/6π^2ϵ0c^3)gμν is derived from the relativistic Coulomb field through the Lorentz-covariant Einstein–Hopf detailed balance and the ergodic theorem, whose applicability to the SED electron-vacuum system is proved in Paper 3 [3]. Relativistic stochastic optimal control gives the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) equation in four-dimensional configuration space, which yields the Klein–Gordon equation for spin-0 particles through the relativistic Itô correction (ℏ/2m)□. Linearisation of the relativistic Lagrangian −mc√uμuμ via Dirac matrices γμ satisfying {γμ, γν} = 2gμν converts the second-order HJB equation into a first-order equation—the Dirac equation: (iℏγμ∂μ−eγμAμ/c−mc)ψ = 0. The central new result is that spin- 1/2 is not introduced by the linearisation: it is already present in the geometry of the four-dimensional stochastic path. The mass-shell constraint uμuμ = −c^2 forces the relativistic Brownian path to be helical, with radius ℏ/mc and angular frequency 2mc^2/ℏ (Zitterbewegung). The angular momentum of this helix is ℏ/2 (spin- 1/2 ) and the magnetic moment gives g = 2—both following from the Coulomb field without additional assumptions. The linearisation then finds the unique first-order wave equation consistent with this pre-existing helical spin structure. The four-component Dirac spinor encodes four degrees of freedom already determined by the stochastic path: two spin states (helix handedness) and two time directions (particle/antiparticle).

•Jun 17, 2026•0 citations
This paper extends the preceding Schrödinger-based analysis to the relativistic Dirac framework and examines how gauge covariance, spin magnetism, and quantum-vacuum effects deepen the connection between quantum theory and Maxwell electrodynamics. Local phase invariance of the Dirac equation yields the electromagnetic field tensor, while the conserved Dirac four-current provides a covariant source for Maxwell’s equations. The Pauli limit recovers g=2g=2 and the Bohr magneton, and the Gordon decomposition separates convection and spin-magnetization currents. The Foldy–Wouthuysen expansion further connects relativistic quantum dynamics to spin–orbit and Darwin terms involving the electromagnetic fields. Hydrogen fine-structure and Darwin-shift benchmarks are evaluated quantitatively, while the Dirac velocity operator and Zitterbewegung scale are compared with the magnetic dipole length appearing in the SQC/MSC M1 formulation. The analysis is then extended to the quantum vacuum through the Schwinger critical fields and Euler–Heisenberg effective theory, including vacuum birefringence. The paper distinguishes structural consequences of relativistic quantum mechanics from electromagnetic field dynamics that must still be specified independently.
This paper examines how Maxwell electrodynamics can be recovered as the field-theoretic structure required to consistently couple quantum matter to electromagnetism, while distinguishing what follows from quantum mechanics from what must be supplied independently. Local phase invariance introduces electromagnetic potentials through minimal coupling and yields the homogeneous Maxwell equations as geometric identities, while quantum probability conservation provides a conserved electric current and Ehrenfest dynamics recover the Lorentz-force form. The inhomogeneous Maxwell equations require an additional Lorentz- and gauge-invariant electromagnetic field action, whose vacuum constants satisfy μ0ε0=1/c2\mu_0\varepsilon_0=1/c^2, linking the construction to the SQC/MSC electric–magnetic prefactor relation. Hydrogen is used as an explicit microscopic source: the 1s1s state generates a quantum charge distribution, 2p2p states provide orbital currents and magnetic moments, and 1s1s–2p2p superpositions produce radiative dipole transitions. The treatment is then extended from individual atoms to a hydrogen gas, where polarization and magnetization generate the macroscopic fields DD and HH. The resulting framework shows how quantum sources and material response fit consistently within Maxwell electrodynamics without claiming that quantum mechanics alone uniquely derives the complete electromagnetic field dynamics.
Maxwell’s equations, formulated in 1865, preceded quantum mechanics by six decades. When the logical direction is reversed, however, the electromagnetic field structure can be interpreted as the form required for a quantum theory of charged matter once three standard ingredients are imposed: local gauge invariance, conserved electric current, and a dynamical electromagnetic field. Quantum mechanics supplies the charged-particle state, probability amplitudes, quantum currents, and—through the Dirac equation—a relativistically consistent description of electron charge and spin. Gauge symmetry then organizes the electromagnetic interaction, while current conservation constrains the admissible source structure. The homogeneous Maxwell identities follow naturally from expressing the field through a four-potential, whereas the sourced Maxwell equations require an additional electromagnetic field action or equivalent dynamical assumption. The resulting framework clarifies both the strength and the limit of a “Maxwell from quantum mechanics” program: quantum theory and gauge structure strongly constrain electromagnetism, but Maxwell field dynamics are not obtained from the electron wave equation alone.
It is natural to expect that the electromagnetic spin-spin interaction has roots in a more fundamental theory: quantum electrodynamics in this case. To show this, we take the non-relativistic limit of the Dirac-Maxwell Lagrangian, using the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation and derive the Breit interaction by an alternative approach. By adding the Pauli term (i.e., a higher-order interaction between spin and the electromagnetic field), we calculate the correction terms to electromagnetic spin-spin interactions in the non-relativistic limit. Finally, we study some of the physical effects of these terms regarding spin-spin interactions and spin-spin entanglements. Accordingly, we provide theoretical estimates that are not yet accessible with current experiments.
Abstract This paper offers educational insight into the Dirac equation, examining its historical context and contrasting it with the earlier Schrödinger and Klein–Gordon equations. The comparison highlights their Lorentz transformation symmetry and potential probabilistic interpretations. We explicitly solve the free particle dynamics in Dirac’s model, revealing the emergence of solutions with negative energy. In this discussion, we examine the Dirac Sea Hypothesis and explore the inherent helicity of the solutions. Additionally, we demonstrate how the Dirac equation accounts for spin and derive the Pauli equation in the non-relativistic limit. Through the Foldy–Wouthuysen transformation, we reveal how the equation incorporates spin–orbit interaction and other relativistic effects, ultimately leading to the hydrogen fine structure. A section on relativistic covariant notation is included to emphasize the invariance of the Dirac equation, along with more refined formulations of both the Klein–Gordon and Dirac equations. Designed for undergraduate students with an interest in the Dirac equation, this resource provides a historical perspective without being purely theoretical. Our approach underscores the significance of a pedagogical method that combines historical and comparative elements to profoundly understand the role of the Dirac equation in modern physics.
We consider a quantum particle as a wave packet in the coordinate space. When the conjugate wave packet in the momentum space is considered, we find that the group velocities of these two wave packets, which describe the particle dynamics, are in agreement with the Hamilton equations only if in the time dependent phases one considers the Lagrangian instead of the Hamiltonian which leads to the conventional Schrodinger equation. We define a relativistic quantum principle asserting that a quantum particle has a finite frequency spectrum, with a cutoff propagation velocity c as a universal constant not depending on the coordinate system, and that any time dependent phase variation is the same in any system of coordinates. From the time dependent phase invariance, the relativistic kinematics is obtained. We consider two types of possible interactions: 1) An interaction with an external field, by a modification of the time dependent phase differential with the terms proportional to the differentials of the space-time coordinates multiplied with the components of this field four-potential, and 2) an interaction by a deformation of the space-time coordinates, due to a gravitational field. From the invariance of the time dependent phase with field components, we obtain a mechanical force of the form of Lorentz’s force, and three Maxwell equations: The Gauss-Maxwell equations for the electric and magnetic fluxes, and the Faraday-Maxwell equation for the electromagnetic induction. When the fourth equation, Ampere-Maxwell, is considered, the interaction field takes the form of the electromagnetic field. For a low propagation velocity of the particle waves, we get a packet of waves with the time dependent phases proportional to the relativistic Hamiltonian, as in Dirac’s famous theory of spin, and a slowly-varying amplitude with a phase proportional to the momentum and this velocity. In the framework of our theory, the spin is obtained as an all quantum effect, without any additional assumption to the quantum theory. When a space-time deformation is considered in the time dependent phase of a quantum particle, from the group velocity we get the particle dynamics according to the general theory of relativity. In this way, the relativistic dynamics, the electromagnetic field, and the spin of a quantum particle are obtained only from the invariance of the time dependent phases of the particle wave functions.
This paper extends the stochastic electrodynamic framework of Papers 1, 2, and 3 [1–3] to relativistic quantum mechanics, deriving the Dirac equation from the relativistic Coulomb field. The non-relativistic Brownian motion of Paper 1 is generalised to a four-dimensional stochastic process in Minkowski spacetime, parameterised by proper time τ . The relativistic diffusion coefficient isD4D = ℏ/m—exactly twice the non-relativistic value ℏ/2m—arising from the additional contribution of the temporal component of the four-dimensional Wiener process. The covariant zero-point field spectral tensor Sμν(ω) = (ℏω^3/6π^2ϵ0c^3)gμν is derived from the relativistic Coulomb field through the Lorentz-covariant Einstein–Hopf detailed balance and the ergodic theorem, whose applicability to the SED electron-vacuum system is proved in Paper 3 [3]. Relativistic stochastic optimal control gives the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) equation in four-dimensional configuration space, which yields the Klein–Gordon equation for spin-0 particles through the relativistic Itô correction (ℏ/2m)□. Linearisation of the relativistic Lagrangian −mc√uμuμ via Dirac matrices γμ satisfying {γμ, γν} = 2gμν converts the second-order HJB equation into a first-order equation—the Dirac equation: (iℏγμ∂μ−eγμAμ/c−mc)ψ = 0. The central new result is that spin- 1/2 is not introduced by the linearisation: it is already present in the geometry of the four-dimensional stochastic path. The mass-shell constraint uμuμ = −c^2 forces the relativistic Brownian path to be helical, with radius ℏ/mc and angular frequency 2mc^2/ℏ (Zitterbewegung). The angular momentum of this helix is ℏ/2 (spin- 1/2 ) and the magnetic moment gives g = 2—both following from the Coulomb field without additional assumptions. The linearisation then finds the unique first-order wave equation consistent with this pre-existing helical spin structure. The four-component Dirac spinor encodes four degrees of freedom already determined by the stochastic path: two spin states (helix handedness) and two time directions (particle/antiparticle).