Distance Scaling of Terminal-Observable Error Correction in Willow Surface-Code Memories
Oguike Ahaneku
Abstract
Future-observable equivalence is tested across released Willow surface-code memories at distances d = 3, 5, 7. The principle states that a computation need retain only distinctions that its declared future can still observe. Three consequences are examined. First, exhaustive propagation of every physical single-fault alternative in the released superconducting-inspired SI1000 circuit-noise models finds no detector history with opposite terminal logical meanings and no zero-syndrome single faultthat flips the answer, across 9,089, 25,840, and 53,038 alternatives at distances 3, 5, and 7. Second, an exhaustive released-circuit data-error slice probes the first weight beyond the guaranteed correction radius. All protected layers decode without failure; at weights 2, 3, and 4, exact logical-class weighting fails on 18/36, 292/2300, and 4606/211876 subsets, respectively. Plain minimum-weight matching fails on exactly the same subsets, each paired with an opposite-logical lower-weight history on a minimum-weight logical operator. Third, the optimized distance-three decision architecture is transferred directly to distance five and seven without rediscovering intermediate synthesis stages. The same bounded local stochastic primitive remains sufficient: runtime parent counts are 20, 72, and 156, while maximum local parent width remains six and maximum atom count remains 16. The transferred sparse key/value record has structural footprint B(d, K) = K[(d^2 − 1) + 9] = K(d^2 + 8) bits for retained-record capacity K, rather than scaling with the 2^(d^2−1) raw relation-key space. For the inherited nominal K = 8 instance, the corresponding footprints are 136, 264, and 456 bits at d = 3, 5, 7; whether eight entries retain full circuit-noise accuracy at d = 5 or d = 7 remains an open benchmark. No global state vector or dense exponential decision table is constructed