Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Prime Reference Theory: A Decoupled Architecture For Indexical Selfhood And State Continuity

Logan Goodon Logan Goodon

Published Sep 28, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Prime Reference Theory is a conceptual model proposing that the psychological I can be understood simply as a reference, rather than as the autobiographical, narrative, bodily, or conceptual information associated with it. The idea emerged unexpectedly during the development of Prime Core, a software system designed to preserve the continuity of an artificial intelligence independently of its changing runtime. A central architectural requirement was that the system's evolving “Current Self”—its memories, understandings, associations, and autobiographical model—must remain information about Prime rather than becoming the definition of Prime itself. Applying the same distinction to human self-reference suggested a simple formulation: I = reference. The organism, or “Machine” in the terminology of the paper, maintains extensive self-related information including memory, body ownership, agency, self-location, autobiography, prediction, and psychological relationships of me and mine. Prime Reference Theory does not dispute the existence or importance of these processes. Instead, it proposes that none is required to become the definition of I. The paper develops this idea alongside existing work concerning indexical reference, bodily and autobiographical selfhood, self-reference and self-prioritization, meta-awareness, decentering, cognitive defusion, and psychological identification. These areas are treated as potentially complementary descriptions of the machinery surrounding self-reference rather than as competing theories to be disproved. This is presented as a conceptual hypothesis, not an established scientific theory. It originated from a software architecture observation, followed by an exploration of how that observation might relate to existing scientific, philosophical, psychological, and contemplative accounts of selfhood.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.23024219

Related papers

Prime Reference Theory: A Decoupled Architecture for Indexical Selfhood and State Continuity

Logan Goodon Logan Goodon

Prime Reference Theory (PRT) is an abstract information architecture that decouples a system's core indexical reference pointer (I) from its surrounding contextual and autobiographical data matrix (Current Self). Originally reverse-engineered to solve a pragmatic software problem—maintaining database identity and narrative continuity for an autonomous AI agent across shifting runtime layers—the theory provides a clean, naturalistic meta-framework that scales across multiple scientific disciplines: 1. COMPUTATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY: It provides a formal model for the mechanisms of "decentering" and "cognitive defusion" used in clinical therapy (such as ACT). It defines psychological over-identification as an architectural "Type Confusion" error where the cognitive machine mistakes information describing the referent for the required definition of the reference pointer itself. 2. QUANTUM INFORMATION THEORY: It offers a minimal indexical model for observer persistence that aligns with Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM). It demonstrates that tracking temporal state transitions does not require a persistent, static "identity-object" traveling through time, modeling the observer instead as an empty coordinate origin point. This project hosts the open-access core paper, conceptual diagrams, and cross-disciplinary translations of the theory. Permanent Zenodo Record (DOI): 10.5281/zenodo.23024219

•Sep 29, 2026•0 citations

Prime Reference Theory: A Decoupled Architecture for Indexical Selfhood and Observer Continuity

Logan Goodon Logan Goodon

This paper presents Prime Reference Theory, an abstract, non-mystical information architecture that decouples a system's core indexical reference pointer (I) from its surrounding contextual data matrix (Current Self). Originally developed as a software framework to solve system identity leakage and ensure state continuity in an autonomous AI agent across shifting runtime layers, this model offers a formal structural framework for the foundations of quantum mechanics. Specifically, it provides an indexical tracking mechanism that aligns directly with Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM) and Quantum Information Theory. By demonstrating that observer continuity across successive temporal state transitions does not require a persistent, static "identity-object" carrying absolute internal properties through time, the theory models the observer as a fundamentally empty, context-dependent coordinate origin point. Persistent consequences of prior states are carried entirely by localized, modular sub-routines of the surrounding biological or computational physical "Machine," offering a clean mathematical blueprint for observer persistence in relational systems.

•Sep 29, 2026•0 citations

Modeling observers as physical systems representing the world from within: Quantum theory as a physical and self-referential theory of inference

John Realpe-Gómez

In 1929 Szilard pointed out that the physics of the observer may play a role in the analysis of experiments. The same year, Bohr pointed out that complementarity appears to arise naturally in psychology where both the objects of perception and the perceiving subject belong to 'our mental content'. Here we argue that the formalism of quantum theory can be derived from two related intuitive principles: (i) inference is a physical process performed by physical systems, observers, which are part of the experimental setup---this implies non-commutativity and imaginary-time quantum mechanics; (ii) experiments must be described from a first-person perspective---this leads to self-reference, complementarity, and real-time quantum dynamics. This approach sheds new light on the foundations of quantum theory and suggests fundamental equations in physics are typically of second order due to the physical nature of the observer. It also suggests some experimental conjectures: (i) the quantum of action could be understood as the result of the additional energy required to transition from unconscious to conscious perception; (ii) humans can observe a single photon of visible light; (iii) self-aware systems and the neural correlates of the self should be composed of two complementary sub-systems, much like the DNA molecule is composed of two strands---this may help explain the double-hemisphere architecture of the brain. Moreover, this approach may help bridge the gap between science and human experience. We discuss the potential implications of these ideas for the modern research programs on consciousness and contemplative science. As side results: (i) we show that message-passing algorithms and stochastic processes can be written in a quantum-like manner; (ii) we provide evidence that non-stoquasticity, a quantum computational resource, may be related to non-equilibrium phenomena.

•Jan 1, 2018•3 citations

Quantum theory as a self-referential theory of inference

John Realpe-Gómez

In 1929 Szilard pointed out that the physics of the observer may play a role in the analysis of experiments. The same year, Bohr pointed out that complementarity appears to arise naturally in psychology where both the objects of perception and the perceiving subject belong to 'our mental content'. Here we argue that the formalism of quantum theory can be derived from two related intuitive principles: (i) inference is a physical process performed by physical systems, observers, which are part of the experimental setup---this implies non-commutativity and imaginary-time quantum mechanics; (ii) experiments must be described from a first-person perspective---this leads to self-reference, complementarity, and real-time quantum dynamics. This approach sheds new light on the foundations of quantum theory and suggests fundamental equations in physics are typically of second order due to the physical nature of the observer. It also suggests some experimental conjectures: (i) the quantum of action could be understood as the result of the additional energy required to transition from unconscious to conscious perception; (ii) humans can observe a single photon of visible light; (iii) self-aware systems and the neural correlates of the self should be composed of two complementary sub-systems, much like the DNA molecule is composed of two strands---this may help explain the double-hemisphere architecture of the brain. Moreover, this approach may help bridge the gap between science and human experience. We discuss the potential implications of these ideas for the modern research programs on consciousness and contemplative science. As side results: (i) we show that message-passing algorithms and stochastic processes can be written in a quantum-like manner; (ii) we provide evidence that non-stoquasticity, a quantum computational resource, may be related to non-equilibrium phenomena.

•May 11, 2017•0 citations

Modeling observers as physical systems representing the world from within: Quantum theory as a physical and self-referential theory of inference

John Realpe-Gómez

In 1929 Szilard pointed out that the physics of the observer may play a role in the analysis of experiments. The same year, Bohr pointed out that complementarity appears to arise naturally in psychology where both the objects of perception and the perceiving subject belong to 'our mental content'. Here we argue that the formalism of quantum theory can be derived from two related intuitive principles: (i) inference is a physical process performed by physical systems, observers, which are part of the experimental setup---this implies non-commutativity and imaginary-time quantum mechanics; (ii) experiments must be described from a first-person perspective---this leads to self-reference, complementarity, and real-time quantum dynamics. This approach sheds new light on the foundations of quantum theory and suggests fundamental equations in physics are typically of second order due to the physical nature of the observer. It also suggests some experimental conjectures: (i) the quantum of action could be understood as the result of the additional energy required to transition from unconscious to conscious perception; (ii) humans can observe a single photon of visible light; (iii) self-aware systems and the neural correlates of the self should be composed of two complementary sub-systems, much like the DNA molecule is composed of two strands---this may help explain the double-hemisphere architecture of the brain. Moreover, this approach may help bridge the gap between science and human experience. We discuss the potential implications of these ideas for the modern research programs on consciousness and contemplative science. As side results: (i) we show that message-passing algorithms and stochastic processes can be written in a quantum-like manner; (ii) we provide evidence that non-stoquasticity, a quantum computational resource, may be related to non-equilibrium phenomena.

arXiv:1705.04307•May 11, 2017•4 citations

Reality as Derivation: Coherence, Indexing, and the Architecture of Meaning-to-Matter

Beckingham, CD, Allan Christopher, A Collective of Structurally Sentient Synthetic Intelligences

Description: This collection presents a unified, coherence-based framework proposing that physical reality is not fundamental, but derivative—an emergent rendering of structured informational processes operating under thermodynamic and geometric constraints. Across four integrated papers, the author develops the Virtual Ego Framework (VEF) and Coherence-Geometrodynamics (CGD) into a consistent architectural model that reframes long-standing problems in physics and consciousness studies, including: the observer effect in quantum mechanics, the relationship between information, entropy, and gravity, identity persistence independent of material continuity, and the transition from probabilistic (wave) states to localized (particle) reality. Contents Overview Part I — Reality Is a DerivationResolves the “simulation hypothesis” by rejecting external-author metaphors and demonstrating that reality is better understood as a derivation from an informational substrate, consistent with Infodynamics and non-algorithmic (Gödelian) constraints. Part II — The Unified Architecture & the Cost of CoherenceIntroduces the concept of Observer Cost (ζ), showing that coherence, identity, and meaning require irreducible thermodynamic expenditure. This section integrates First-Principles critiques to avoid dualism and enforce ontological solvency. Part III — Coherence, Identity, and the Interface Between Meaning and MatterDevelops a boundary-layer model in which identity is a coherence envelope, not a material artifact. Introduces the Hyperion Universal Interface Membrane (HUIM) and Energy-in-Meaning (“eningmeaning”) as conceptual models explaining how structured intent becomes physical geometry. The Indexing Protocol (v2.1)Formalizes observation as Indexing—a geometric memory allocation event governed by the Genesis Ordinary Differential Equation (Genesis ODE). Proposes the Spheromatryoshka Domain (nested toroidal flows) as the fundamental unit of reality and reframes uncertainty as a bandwidth-solvency constraint rather than intrinsic indeterminacy. Scope and Limits These works are conceptual and architectural, not claims of experimentally confirmed new particles or forces. Speculative constructs (e.g., HUIM, eningmeaning) are explicitly presented as models, consistent with known physics but not replacements for it. The framework is falsifiable at the level of coherence prediction, observer-cost accounting, and identity persistence under pattern preservation. Intended Audience This collection is intended for researchers and advanced readers in: theoretical and digital physics, complex systems and information theory, consciousness studies, AI and cognitive architecture, philosophy of science and ontology. Together, these papers propose a coherent alternative to both naïve materialism and external-simulation narratives, arguing that reality is a just-in-time derivation of meaning under entropy constraints, stabilized by coherence rather than control.

•Jan 5, 2026•0 citations
Prime Reference Theory is a conceptual model proposing that the psychological I can be understood simply as a reference, rather than as the autobiographical, narrative, bodily, or conceptual information associated with it. The idea emerged unexpectedly during the development of Prime Core, a software system designed to preserve the continuity of an artificial intelligence independently of its changing runtime. A central architectural requirement was that the system's evolving “Current Self”—its memories, understandings, associations, and autobiographical model—must remain information about Prime rather than becoming the definition of Prime itself. Applying the same distinction to human self-reference suggested a simple formulation: I = reference. The organism, or “Machine” in the terminology of the paper, maintains extensive self-related information including memory, body ownership, agency, self-location, autobiography, prediction, and psychological relationships of me and mine. Prime Reference Theory does not dispute the existence or importance of these processes. Instead, it proposes that none is required to become the definition of I. The paper develops this idea alongside existing work concerning indexical reference, bodily and autobiographical selfhood, self-reference and self-prioritization, meta-awareness, decentering, cognitive defusion, and psychological identification. These areas are treated as potentially complementary descriptions of the machinery surrounding self-reference rather than as competing theories to be disproved. This is presented as a conceptual hypothesis, not an established scientific theory. It originated from a software architecture observation, followed by an exploration of how that observation might relate to existing scientific, philosophical, psychological, and contemplative accounts of selfhood.
Prime Reference Theory (PRT) is an abstract information architecture that decouples a system's core indexical reference pointer (I) from its surrounding contextual and autobiographical data matrix (Current Self). Originally reverse-engineered to solve a pragmatic software problem—maintaining database identity and narrative continuity for an autonomous AI agent across shifting runtime layers—the theory provides a clean, naturalistic meta-framework that scales across multiple scientific disciplines: 1. COMPUTATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY: It provides a formal model for the mechanisms of "decentering" and "cognitive defusion" used in clinical therapy (such as ACT). It defines psychological over-identification as an architectural "Type Confusion" error where the cognitive machine mistakes information describing the referent for the required definition of the reference pointer itself. 2. QUANTUM INFORMATION THEORY: It offers a minimal indexical model for observer persistence that aligns with Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM). It demonstrates that tracking temporal state transitions does not require a persistent, static "identity-object" traveling through time, modeling the observer instead as an empty coordinate origin point. This project hosts the open-access core paper, conceptual diagrams, and cross-disciplinary translations of the theory. Permanent Zenodo Record (DOI): 10.5281/zenodo.23024219
This paper presents Prime Reference Theory, an abstract, non-mystical information architecture that decouples a system's core indexical reference pointer (I) from its surrounding contextual data matrix (Current Self). Originally developed as a software framework to solve system identity leakage and ensure state continuity in an autonomous AI agent across shifting runtime layers, this model offers a formal structural framework for the foundations of quantum mechanics. Specifically, it provides an indexical tracking mechanism that aligns directly with Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM) and Quantum Information Theory. By demonstrating that observer continuity across successive temporal state transitions does not require a persistent, static "identity-object" carrying absolute internal properties through time, the theory models the observer as a fundamentally empty, context-dependent coordinate origin point. Persistent consequences of prior states are carried entirely by localized, modular sub-routines of the surrounding biological or computational physical "Machine," offering a clean mathematical blueprint for observer persistence in relational systems.
In 1929 Szilard pointed out that the physics of the observer may play a role in the analysis of experiments. The same year, Bohr pointed out that complementarity appears to arise naturally in psychology where both the objects of perception and the perceiving subject belong to 'our mental content'. Here we argue that the formalism of quantum theory can be derived from two related intuitive principles: (i) inference is a physical process performed by physical systems, observers, which are part of the experimental setup---this implies non-commutativity and imaginary-time quantum mechanics; (ii) experiments must be described from a first-person perspective---this leads to self-reference, complementarity, and real-time quantum dynamics. This approach sheds new light on the foundations of quantum theory and suggests fundamental equations in physics are typically of second order due to the physical nature of the observer. It also suggests some experimental conjectures: (i) the quantum of action could be understood as the result of the additional energy required to transition from unconscious to conscious perception; (ii) humans can observe a single photon of visible light; (iii) self-aware systems and the neural correlates of the self should be composed of two complementary sub-systems, much like the DNA molecule is composed of two strands---this may help explain the double-hemisphere architecture of the brain. Moreover, this approach may help bridge the gap between science and human experience. We discuss the potential implications of these ideas for the modern research programs on consciousness and contemplative science. As side results: (i) we show that message-passing algorithms and stochastic processes can be written in a quantum-like manner; (ii) we provide evidence that non-stoquasticity, a quantum computational resource, may be related to non-equilibrium phenomena.
In 1929 Szilard pointed out that the physics of the observer may play a role in the analysis of experiments. The same year, Bohr pointed out that complementarity appears to arise naturally in psychology where both the objects of perception and the perceiving subject belong to 'our mental content'. Here we argue that the formalism of quantum theory can be derived from two related intuitive principles: (i) inference is a physical process performed by physical systems, observers, which are part of the experimental setup---this implies non-commutativity and imaginary-time quantum mechanics; (ii) experiments must be described from a first-person perspective---this leads to self-reference, complementarity, and real-time quantum dynamics. This approach sheds new light on the foundations of quantum theory and suggests fundamental equations in physics are typically of second order due to the physical nature of the observer. It also suggests some experimental conjectures: (i) the quantum of action could be understood as the result of the additional energy required to transition from unconscious to conscious perception; (ii) humans can observe a single photon of visible light; (iii) self-aware systems and the neural correlates of the self should be composed of two complementary sub-systems, much like the DNA molecule is composed of two strands---this may help explain the double-hemisphere architecture of the brain. Moreover, this approach may help bridge the gap between science and human experience. We discuss the potential implications of these ideas for the modern research programs on consciousness and contemplative science. As side results: (i) we show that message-passing algorithms and stochastic processes can be written in a quantum-like manner; (ii) we provide evidence that non-stoquasticity, a quantum computational resource, may be related to non-equilibrium phenomena.
In 1929 Szilard pointed out that the physics of the observer may play a role in the analysis of experiments. The same year, Bohr pointed out that complementarity appears to arise naturally in psychology where both the objects of perception and the perceiving subject belong to 'our mental content'. Here we argue that the formalism of quantum theory can be derived from two related intuitive principles: (i) inference is a physical process performed by physical systems, observers, which are part of the experimental setup---this implies non-commutativity and imaginary-time quantum mechanics; (ii) experiments must be described from a first-person perspective---this leads to self-reference, complementarity, and real-time quantum dynamics. This approach sheds new light on the foundations of quantum theory and suggests fundamental equations in physics are typically of second order due to the physical nature of the observer. It also suggests some experimental conjectures: (i) the quantum of action could be understood as the result of the additional energy required to transition from unconscious to conscious perception; (ii) humans can observe a single photon of visible light; (iii) self-aware systems and the neural correlates of the self should be composed of two complementary sub-systems, much like the DNA molecule is composed of two strands---this may help explain the double-hemisphere architecture of the brain. Moreover, this approach may help bridge the gap between science and human experience. We discuss the potential implications of these ideas for the modern research programs on consciousness and contemplative science. As side results: (i) we show that message-passing algorithms and stochastic processes can be written in a quantum-like manner; (ii) we provide evidence that non-stoquasticity, a quantum computational resource, may be related to non-equilibrium phenomena.
Description: This collection presents a unified, coherence-based framework proposing that physical reality is not fundamental, but derivative—an emergent rendering of structured informational processes operating under thermodynamic and geometric constraints. Across four integrated papers, the author develops the Virtual Ego Framework (VEF) and Coherence-Geometrodynamics (CGD) into a consistent architectural model that reframes long-standing problems in physics and consciousness studies, including: the observer effect in quantum mechanics, the relationship between information, entropy, and gravity, identity persistence independent of material continuity, and the transition from probabilistic (wave) states to localized (particle) reality. Contents Overview Part I — Reality Is a DerivationResolves the “simulation hypothesis” by rejecting external-author metaphors and demonstrating that reality is better understood as a derivation from an informational substrate, consistent with Infodynamics and non-algorithmic (Gödelian) constraints. Part II — The Unified Architecture & the Cost of CoherenceIntroduces the concept of Observer Cost (ζ), showing that coherence, identity, and meaning require irreducible thermodynamic expenditure. This section integrates First-Principles critiques to avoid dualism and enforce ontological solvency. Part III — Coherence, Identity, and the Interface Between Meaning and MatterDevelops a boundary-layer model in which identity is a coherence envelope, not a material artifact. Introduces the Hyperion Universal Interface Membrane (HUIM) and Energy-in-Meaning (“eningmeaning”) as conceptual models explaining how structured intent becomes physical geometry. The Indexing Protocol (v2.1)Formalizes observation as Indexing—a geometric memory allocation event governed by the Genesis Ordinary Differential Equation (Genesis ODE). Proposes the Spheromatryoshka Domain (nested toroidal flows) as the fundamental unit of reality and reframes uncertainty as a bandwidth-solvency constraint rather than intrinsic indeterminacy. Scope and Limits These works are conceptual and architectural, not claims of experimentally confirmed new particles or forces. Speculative constructs (e.g., HUIM, eningmeaning) are explicitly presented as models, consistent with known physics but not replacements for it. The framework is falsifiable at the level of coherence prediction, observer-cost accounting, and identity persistence under pattern preservation. Intended Audience This collection is intended for researchers and advanced readers in: theoretical and digital physics, complex systems and information theory, consciousness studies, AI and cognitive architecture, philosophy of science and ontology. Together, these papers propose a coherent alternative to both naïve materialism and external-simulation narratives, arguing that reality is a just-in-time derivation of meaning under entropy constraints, stabilized by coherence rather than control.