Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

M1:state-map(叠加原理的映射公式)

guobin ouyang

Published Sep 23, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

M1 答案,★★★ 「态」= 几何的基态;不需要额外写一条 state-map 公式 叠加原理,不是额外公设 —— 它是基态在任何一组本征基下的展开 为什么必须由几何导出,映射清单(CAPACITY.md I1–I8)里没有「态」这一项 ⇒ 态只能导出,不能「搬进来」 基态简并,2³ = 8;在 (J_diag, S₃) 下 = (3/2, 平凡) ⊕ (1/2, 标准)×2 简并是否被拆开,⚠ 取决于 T6 耦合的函数形式(本步扫描:7 种取法里 5 种拆开、2 种不拆) 仍缺,T6 的显式系数(Q316)⇒ ⚠ build_119 订正:Q316 就是已登记的 Q5(界依赖函数 F(d_a)) ④ 诚实度,本步推翻了自己的两个过度断言(见 §1、§4) ---

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.22919084

Related papers

M2:场层面的纠缠熵

guobin ouyang

先订正 build_116,❌ 「M2 无自由度」是错的 ⇒ M2 依赖 M1(state-map) 框架钉住的部分,~~✅ T6(m 非子代数 ⇒ 三界必须经 diag 耦合)⇒ 场态不是乘积态 ⇒ S > 0~~ ❌ 本条已被 build_119 推翻,基态流形含乘积态(\,↑⟩₁⊗\,singlet⟩₂₃)⇒ 几何只给 S ∈ [0, ln2],不是 S > 0 定量范围(订正后),S ∈ [0, ln2](左端点 0 可达) 框架确定的候选,纯乘积 S = 0;diag 加权平均 S = 0.3872;主导分量 S = 0.6365 —— ⚠ 都不被几何选出 与 build_116 一致,✅ 不矛盾(几何层面 vs 场态层面,不同对象) 框架独有陈述,~~★ 几何不纠缠 + 场态必然纠缠(T6)~~ ⇒ ❌ 撤回:后半句不是几何结论(需要 Q5 的 F) ✅ 后续(build_118 / QM_STATE_MAP.md) M1 已收敛:态 = 几何基态(清单里没有「态」⇒ 只能由几何导出)。 ⇒ §0 的「定量范围」与 §4「层 2」的候选表现在应读作 「具体数值待 Q316 = T6 耦合的显式系数」,而不是「待 state-map」。 ❌ 再后续(build_119 / Q316_T6_COUPLING_COEFFICIENTS.md) 上面那句「本步的定性结论(S > 0)不变」也不成立 —— 已被 build_119 推翻: Q316 就是框架已登记的 Q5;几何层面的耦合必须相等(R11)⇒ H ∝ J² ⇒ 基态是 4 维流形,其上的可达区间是 S ∈ [0, ln2],且 0 可达 (见证 |↑⟩₁⊗|singlet⟩₂₃)⇒ S > 0 既不是几何结论,也没有几何正下界。 ---

•Sep 23, 2026•0 citations

量子力学侧的映射公式推进

guobin ouyang

QM 侧映射公式表(12 条),✅ 已覆盖 4 / 部分 3 / 未覆盖 4 / 待判 1 ★ 纠缠分叉的链式判定,✅ 几何层面 = 甲(θ_a 确定);乙若用在几何层面矛盾(Var[d] = 0.5) ★★ 由此澄清,「参数相关 ≠ 量子纠缠」⇒ 纠缠被收窄到场层面 顺手抓到的矛盾,✅ MASS_OPERATOR.md 的 Σθ=90° 残留(已修) 下一步最该做,~~M2 场层面纠缠 —— 已被收窄,几何量全确定,无自由度~~ ⇒ 见 §4 订正 ⇒ 现为 Q316(T6 显式系数) ✅ 后续进展(build_117 / build_118) M2 已做(QM_FIELD_ENTANGLEMENT.md),M1 已收敛(QM_STATE_MAP.md)。 两条都指向同一个收窄后的缺口:Q316 = T6 耦合的显式系数。 ---

•Sep 23, 2026•0 citations

10.85 矩代数约束与测量噪声代数纠正(几何论解码新理论)

guobin ouyang

经典解码理论(BP、MWPM、软信息)处理测量噪声靠**概率推断**。本文建立 **纯代数的测量噪声处理理论**:CSS(RM(r,m)) 码的 syndrome(次数 ≤ r 矩) 不是独立的——矩矩阵 M₂ 满足**代数分解约束** M₂ = Σ_{a∈A} v_a v_aᵀ (v_a 为错误点 a 的坐标向量,GF(2))。测量噪声翻转矩位会破坏该约束, 用"翻转哪些矩位能使分解约束恢复"可**确定性**检测并纠正测量噪声, 完全不需要概率模型。 核心结果(m=5 全枚举验证 100%): - **秩约束**:|A| = w 的错误,rank(M₂) ≤ min(仿射包维数+1, w); 单点特例 M₂ = m₁⊗m₁(m₁ 为线性矩) - **解析可解性**:两点错误可由矩**解析解出**(非枚举),O(m) 时间 - **代数纠正**:两点错误 + 1/2 位测量噪声,枚举翻转位 + 解析约束 校验,**纠正率 100%**(m=5 全枚举)

•Sep 9, 2026•0 citations

态|ψ3^(3)〉q中广义磁场分量的等幂次高次和压缩

孙中禹, 陈光德, 杨志勇 +1 more

根据量子力学中态的线性叠加原理,构造了由多模复共轭相干态|{Z*j}〉q(j=1,2,......q)、多模复共轭虚相干态|{iZ*j}〉q和多模真空态|{0j}〉q的线性叠加组成的第Ⅲ类三态叠加多模叠加态光场|ψ(3)3〉q.利用多模压缩态理论,研究了态|ψ(3)3〉q广义磁场分量(即第一正交相位分量)的广义非线性等幂次高次和压缩特性.结果发现:当腔模总数q与压缩次数N之积qN取偶数时,态|ψ(3)3〉q广义磁场分量在一定条件下可分别呈现出周期性变化的、广义非线性等幂次奇数模-偶数次、偶数模-奇数次或偶数模-偶数次的高次和压缩效应.

ACTA PHOTONICA SINICA•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

Restrictions of holomorphic sections to products

Manimugdha Saikia

We associate quantum states with subsets of a product of two compact connected Kähler manifolds $M_1$ and $M_2$. To associate the quantum state with the subset, we use the map that restricts holomorphic sections of the quantum line bundle over the product of the two Kähler manifolds to the subset. We present a description of the kernel of this restriction map when the subset is a finite union of products. This in turn shows that the quantum states associated with the finite union of products are separable. Finally, for every pure state and certain mixed state, we construct subsets of $M_1\times M_2$ such that the states associated with these subsets are the original states, to begin with.

arXiv:2403.17435•Mar 26, 2024•0 citations

Computable Multibranch Transfer Kernels for Endpoint Quantum Usefulness

Boris Batenin, Andrei Preece

This work introduces a finite-dimensional operational framework for analysing multibranch quantum transfer when only the endpoint interference data are relevant. Instead of treating the full parent state as the primary object, the paper identifies the correct computable quantity: the branch-transfer kernel K_br, a positive contraction satisfying 0 ≤ K_br ≤ I. This kernel captures how distinguishability, decoherence, and branch-overlap structure are transferred into the observable endpoint state. The central idea is simple but powerful: given branch amplitudes collected in D_a and a branch-transfer kernel K, the observable endpoint state is determined by R = D_a K D_a† / p, where p = Tr(D_a K D_a†). This provides a compact normal form for multibranch interference experiments, quantum-channel reductions, and operational reconstructions in finite dimension. The framework is not proposed as a new physical dynamics; it is a computable representation theorem for how endpoint-visible coherence is encoded. A key result is the converse realization theorem: every admissible positive contraction K can be realised by an appropriate environment or transfer construction. This makes the formalism operationally complete: K is not merely a fitting matrix, but a valid effective object that can arise from an underlying quantum process. The paper also clarifies an important limitation of pairwise visibility data: for d ≥ 3, knowing all pairwise overlaps is generally insufficient to reconstruct the full multibranch structure. Higher-order consistency is encoded in cycle phases, such as Φ_ijk = arg(K_ij K_jk K_ki), which capture genuinely multibranch interference information. The manuscript also provides a practical computational layer. It includes Python routines for checking positivity, estimating diagonal feasibility, constructing transfer kernels, and testing whether endpoint data admit a valid kernel representation. This turns the theoretical result into a usable finite-dimensional tool for quantum information, interferometry, decoherence modelling, and operational state reconstruction. The main contribution of the work is therefore the identification of K_br as the natural endpoint object: not the full parent tensor, not merely pairwise visibilities, but a positive semidefinite transfer kernel carrying both magnitude and phase consistency. In this sense, the paper provides a clean bridge between abstract quantum coherence and computable experimental data. It is a compact mathematical framework for asking: what part of a multibranch quantum process is actually visible at the endpoint, and how can it be represented, checked, and reconstructed? 📊 Open-Access Presentation Slides Computable Multibranch Transfer KernelsA Mathematical and Operational Normal Form for Evaluating Endpoint Quantum Usefulness (.pdf) 🔴 Video Podcast on YouTube🎙️Episode 109-SG: Computable Multibranch Transfer Kernels 🤖🧠 Interactive Research AIOrpheus Praxis AI — Explore the Fractal Bindu (S³) Framework

•May 7, 2026•0 citations
M1 答案,★★★ 「态」= 几何的基态;不需要额外写一条 state-map 公式 叠加原理,不是额外公设 —— 它是基态在任何一组本征基下的展开 为什么必须由几何导出,映射清单(CAPACITY.md I1–I8)里没有「态」这一项 ⇒ 态只能导出,不能「搬进来」 基态简并,2³ = 8;在 (J_diag, S₃) 下 = (3/2, 平凡) ⊕ (1/2, 标准)×2 简并是否被拆开,⚠ 取决于 T6 耦合的函数形式(本步扫描:7 种取法里 5 种拆开、2 种不拆) 仍缺,T6 的显式系数(Q316)⇒ ⚠ build_119 订正:Q316 就是已登记的 Q5(界依赖函数 F(d_a)) ④ 诚实度,本步推翻了自己的两个过度断言(见 §1、§4) ---
先订正 build_116,❌ 「M2 无自由度」是错的 ⇒ M2 依赖 M1(state-map) 框架钉住的部分,~~✅ T6(m 非子代数 ⇒ 三界必须经 diag 耦合)⇒ 场态不是乘积态 ⇒ S > 0~~ ❌ 本条已被 build_119 推翻,基态流形含乘积态(\,↑⟩₁⊗\,singlet⟩₂₃)⇒ 几何只给 S ∈ [0, ln2],不是 S > 0 定量范围(订正后),S ∈ [0, ln2](左端点 0 可达) 框架确定的候选,纯乘积 S = 0;diag 加权平均 S = 0.3872;主导分量 S = 0.6365 —— ⚠ 都不被几何选出 与 build_116 一致,✅ 不矛盾(几何层面 vs 场态层面,不同对象) 框架独有陈述,~~★ 几何不纠缠 + 场态必然纠缠(T6)~~ ⇒ ❌ 撤回:后半句不是几何结论(需要 Q5 的 F) ✅ 后续(build_118 / QM_STATE_MAP.md) M1 已收敛:态 = 几何基态(清单里没有「态」⇒ 只能由几何导出)。 ⇒ §0 的「定量范围」与 §4「层 2」的候选表现在应读作 「具体数值待 Q316 = T6 耦合的显式系数」,而不是「待 state-map」。 ❌ 再后续(build_119 / Q316_T6_COUPLING_COEFFICIENTS.md) 上面那句「本步的定性结论(S > 0)不变」也不成立 —— 已被 build_119 推翻: Q316 就是框架已登记的 Q5;几何层面的耦合必须相等(R11)⇒ H ∝ J² ⇒ 基态是 4 维流形,其上的可达区间是 S ∈ [0, ln2],且 0 可达 (见证 |↑⟩₁⊗|singlet⟩₂₃)⇒ S > 0 既不是几何结论,也没有几何正下界。 ---
QM 侧映射公式表(12 条),✅ 已覆盖 4 / 部分 3 / 未覆盖 4 / 待判 1 ★ 纠缠分叉的链式判定,✅ 几何层面 = 甲(θ_a 确定);乙若用在几何层面矛盾(Var[d] = 0.5) ★★ 由此澄清,「参数相关 ≠ 量子纠缠」⇒ 纠缠被收窄到场层面 顺手抓到的矛盾,✅ MASS_OPERATOR.md 的 Σθ=90° 残留(已修) 下一步最该做,~~M2 场层面纠缠 —— 已被收窄,几何量全确定,无自由度~~ ⇒ 见 §4 订正 ⇒ 现为 Q316(T6 显式系数) ✅ 后续进展(build_117 / build_118) M2 已做(QM_FIELD_ENTANGLEMENT.md),M1 已收敛(QM_STATE_MAP.md)。 两条都指向同一个收窄后的缺口:Q316 = T6 耦合的显式系数。 ---
经典解码理论(BP、MWPM、软信息)处理测量噪声靠**概率推断**。本文建立 **纯代数的测量噪声处理理论**:CSS(RM(r,m)) 码的 syndrome(次数 ≤ r 矩) 不是独立的——矩矩阵 M₂ 满足**代数分解约束** M₂ = Σ_{a∈A} v_a v_aᵀ (v_a 为错误点 a 的坐标向量,GF(2))。测量噪声翻转矩位会破坏该约束, 用"翻转哪些矩位能使分解约束恢复"可**确定性**检测并纠正测量噪声, 完全不需要概率模型。 核心结果(m=5 全枚举验证 100%): - **秩约束**:|A| = w 的错误,rank(M₂) ≤ min(仿射包维数+1, w); 单点特例 M₂ = m₁⊗m₁(m₁ 为线性矩) - **解析可解性**:两点错误可由矩**解析解出**(非枚举),O(m) 时间 - **代数纠正**:两点错误 + 1/2 位测量噪声,枚举翻转位 + 解析约束 校验,**纠正率 100%**(m=5 全枚举)
根据量子力学中态的线性叠加原理,构造了由多模复共轭相干态|{Z*j}〉q(j=1,2,......q)、多模复共轭虚相干态|{iZ*j}〉q和多模真空态|{0j}〉q的线性叠加组成的第Ⅲ类三态叠加多模叠加态光场|ψ(3)3〉q.利用多模压缩态理论,研究了态|ψ(3)3〉q广义磁场分量(即第一正交相位分量)的广义非线性等幂次高次和压缩特性.结果发现:当腔模总数q与压缩次数N之积qN取偶数时,态|ψ(3)3〉q广义磁场分量在一定条件下可分别呈现出周期性变化的、广义非线性等幂次奇数模-偶数次、偶数模-奇数次或偶数模-偶数次的高次和压缩效应.
We associate quantum states with subsets of a product of two compact connected Kähler manifolds M1M_1M1​ and M2M_2M2​. To associate the quantum state with the subset, we use the map that restricts holomorphic sections of the quantum line bundle over the product of the two Kähler manifolds to the subset. We present a description of the kernel of this restriction map when the subset is a finite union of products. This in turn shows that the quantum states associated with the finite union of products are separable. Finally, for every pure state and certain mixed state, we construct subsets of M1×M2M_1\times M_2M1​×M2​ such that the states associated with these subsets are the original states, to begin with.
This work introduces a finite-dimensional operational framework for analysing multibranch quantum transfer when only the endpoint interference data are relevant. Instead of treating the full parent state as the primary object, the paper identifies the correct computable quantity: the branch-transfer kernel K_br, a positive contraction satisfying 0 ≤ K_br ≤ I. This kernel captures how distinguishability, decoherence, and branch-overlap structure are transferred into the observable endpoint state. The central idea is simple but powerful: given branch amplitudes collected in D_a and a branch-transfer kernel K, the observable endpoint state is determined by R = D_a K D_a† / p, where p = Tr(D_a K D_a†). This provides a compact normal form for multibranch interference experiments, quantum-channel reductions, and operational reconstructions in finite dimension. The framework is not proposed as a new physical dynamics; it is a computable representation theorem for how endpoint-visible coherence is encoded. A key result is the converse realization theorem: every admissible positive contraction K can be realised by an appropriate environment or transfer construction. This makes the formalism operationally complete: K is not merely a fitting matrix, but a valid effective object that can arise from an underlying quantum process. The paper also clarifies an important limitation of pairwise visibility data: for d ≥ 3, knowing all pairwise overlaps is generally insufficient to reconstruct the full multibranch structure. Higher-order consistency is encoded in cycle phases, such as Φ_ijk = arg(K_ij K_jk K_ki), which capture genuinely multibranch interference information. The manuscript also provides a practical computational layer. It includes Python routines for checking positivity, estimating diagonal feasibility, constructing transfer kernels, and testing whether endpoint data admit a valid kernel representation. This turns the theoretical result into a usable finite-dimensional tool for quantum information, interferometry, decoherence modelling, and operational state reconstruction. The main contribution of the work is therefore the identification of K_br as the natural endpoint object: not the full parent tensor, not merely pairwise visibilities, but a positive semidefinite transfer kernel carrying both magnitude and phase consistency. In this sense, the paper provides a clean bridge between abstract quantum coherence and computable experimental data. It is a compact mathematical framework for asking: what part of a multibranch quantum process is actually visible at the endpoint, and how can it be represented, checked, and reconstructed? 📊 Open-Access Presentation Slides Computable Multibranch Transfer KernelsA Mathematical and Operational Normal Form for Evaluating Endpoint Quantum Usefulness (.pdf) 🔴 Video Podcast on YouTube🎙️Episode 109-SG: Computable Multibranch Transfer Kernels 🤖🧠 Interactive Research AIOrpheus Praxis AI — Explore the Fractal Bindu (S³) Framework