This protocol converts the strong-form Yuan–Eight–Binary Unified Physical Hypothesis into a staged, falsification-first experimental validation program. The theory baseline is Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22248366. The protocol separates four levels—Yuan pre-generative conditions, eight quantum/generative processes, hidden binary relational structure, and ordinary 0/1 observation—and defines E01–E11 experimental cards with explicit prerequisites, observables, PASS/FAIL rules, confound controls, and maximum permissible conclusions. It also introduces an S0–S6 evidence ladder so that a positive result at a lower layer cannot be used as proof of a higher layer. The protocol is platform-portable and is intended to be instantiated through device-specific preregistration annexes for quantum photonic, superconducting, trapped-ion/atomic, or other controllable quantum systems. The central unresolved quantitative task is the platform-specific bridge F(Ω,B,C)→G8, which must be frozen before the E10 bridge experiment is run.
This protocol converts the strong-form Yuan–Eight–Binary Unified Physical Hypothesis into a staged, falsification-first experimental validation program. The theory baseline is Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22248366. The protocol separates four levels—Yuan pre-generative conditions, eight quantum/generative processes, hidden binary relational structure, and ordinary 0/1 observation—and defines E01–E11 experimental cards with explicit prerequisites, observables, PASS/FAIL rules, confound controls, and maximum permissible conclusions. It also introduces an S0–S6 evidence ladder so that a positive result at a lower layer cannot be used as proof of a higher layer. The protocol is platform-portable and is intended to be instantiated through device-specific preregistration annexes for quantum photonic, superconducting, trapped-ion/atomic, or other controllable quantum systems. The central unresolved quantitative task is the platform-specific bridge F(Ω,B,C)→G8, which must be frozen before the E10 bridge experiment is run.
This preprint proposes a strong-form, falsifiable four-layer physical hypothesis in which ordinary binary outcomes are coarse-grained projections of deeper physical organization. The Yuan pre-generative layer consists of three jointly necessary conditions: a carrier/possibility domain, boundary and constraint conditions, and internal coupling/organizational relations. Their joint realization is hypothesized to generate eight physically distinguishable quantum process sectors. In the strong form, these sectors are organized as four relational directions and two orientations with a D4-type composition structure. The generative layer projects into a hidden-binary structural layer containing ordered complementary pairs 01/10, A/B/C/D source or directional labels, an independent orientation attribute, and a 3-to-6-to-96 fine-grained relational record space, before conventional measurement coarse-grains the structure to 0/1. The hypothesis is deliberately frozen before experimental validation. It predicts recoverable hidden information beneath identical binary outcomes, a minimal eight-process description, D4 noncommutative composition fingerprints, resolvable fine-grained relational records, necessity of the three Yuan conditions, and cross-platform consistency. The next stage is a preregistered experimental program designed to support, modify, or falsify each layer independently.
This paper proposes an exploratory “3–8–2” hierarchical generative framework designed to distinguish three different logical layers: a necessary-condition layer, a generative-process layer, and an observational-output layer. The current working hypothesis is: 3\ \text{necessary conditions}\rightarrow8\ \text{candidate generative processes}\rightarrow2\ \text{binary observational outcomes}. At the first layer, “Yuan” is provisionally defined as the minimal closed condition structure formed by three mutually irreducible and jointly necessary conditions. The number 3 therefore refers to the number of necessary conditions rather than to a number of physical states. At the second layer, the number 8 refers to eight candidate generative processes, process configurations, or generative pathways that may emerge once the necessary conditions are satisfied. Their precise mathematical origin and physical interpretation remain open. In particular, this framework does not assume that these eight processes correspond to an established eight-state quantum ontology. At the third layer, the number 2 refers to binary observational outcomes, represented as 0/1, obtained through coarse-graining, projection, or limited observational resolution. These binary outputs are therefore treated as observational results rather than as evidence that the underlying ontology is fundamentally binary. The aim of this work is not to claim a new physical ontology, but to formulate a testable hierarchical research framework that clearly separates the conditions required for a process to exist, the mechanisms through which structures or processes are generated, and the outcomes accessible to observation. The central open problem is to identify the three irreducible necessary conditions that constitute “Yuan” and to determine whether the minimum number of such conditions is genuinely three rather than two, four, or more. At its present stage, the proposed framework should be regarded as a working hypothesis and structural research program. Its possible connections to quantum processes, hidden structures, and physical realizations remain open and unproven.
This conservative preprint formalizes a candidate directional closure structure beneath ordinary binary quantum readout. A handwritten sixteen-face table is transcribed into eight complementary closure pairs: at each of four ordered slots, the paired faces preserve the direction label and complement the binary value. The accompanying inversion audit shows that a single value-plus-direction label, such as 0_A, does not uniquely reconstruct a closure pair; a second independent readout or a frozen dynamical rule is required. The paper proves the standard same-state indistinguishability boundary: if distinct preparation histories yield the same density operator and all subsequent operations are path-independent completely positive trace-preserving maps and POVM measurements, no path-dependent signal can occur. It then defines three staged experimental protocols and their conventional adversaries, including process memory, leakage, state-preparation-and-measurement error, and drift. This record is an openly testable hypothesis and experimental protocol. It does not claim observation of sub-quantum constituents, discovery of new quantum states, or a replacement for standard quantum mechanics.```
This supplement converts the experimental claims of the mirror-duality hypothesis into a staged falsifiable programme. Four complementary protocols are defined: a heralded single-photon test, a heterogeneous quantum-sensor correlation search, a controlled polarity-rotation experiment, and a paired-black-hole observational programme. The supplement separates exploratory anomalies from direct evidence for 00 and requires matched passive controls, blind analysis, energy–momentum accounting, pre-registration, and independent replication.
A preregistered one- and two-excitation trapped-ion benchmark pη(y∣u)=Tr[Iym,ηum∘⋯∘Iy1,ηu1(ρη)]. One interaction, selected before the data, must predict several observations. This prospective trapped-ion protocol fixes one- and two-excitation time scans, relative-phase scans and an even-curvature null control. It uses 18 contexts, 62 complete raw-count coordinates and 900,000 initiated validation attempts. The same independently constructed contact supplies the time-transfer predictions p10→01=sin2Θ,p11→11=cos2(FΘ). Preparation, detector response, physical insertion class and uncertainty are frozen in a separately timestamped laboratory capsule before acquisition. No validation-fitted exchange frequency, capacity, phase origin or contrast is allowed. Failed attempts and null outcomes remain in the count denominators. A sensitivity gate prevents an unresponsive detector from passing. The finite-sample analysis has separate rejection, equivalence, inconclusive and ineligible decisions. Its total conditional false-rejection budget is 5.7330314376 × 10−7, numerically the conventional two-sided five-sigma tail. This is a design threshold, not a reported discovery. Successful equivalence requires every probability coordinate to meet a five-percentage-point tolerance. Design-stage preregistration. This deposit fixes the test today. Independent apparatus qualification, a public or verifiably escrowed Stage B capsule and new validation observations remain required. The canonical branch is shared with matched microscopic QM; a finite-slot comparison tests only the independently selected physical models. The package includes the protocol, frozen design, count analyzer, synthetic verification, deliberately incomplete laboratory templates and exact checksums. Companion: QTT Physical Contact Selection and Predictive Transfer Theorem. Source dependencies: Completed-Event Transport and Quantum Coherence; QTT Main Book. Independent experimental context: Hou et al., Nature Physics (2024). Browse the corpus. The main PDF is the preview; the ZIP contains the full reconstruction package.
This study presents an ontological falsification by logical contradiction of the hypothesis that “acausality is the ultimate nature of microscopic reality,” grounded in the Macroscopic Scalability Principle as reinforced by a series of macroscopic quantum experiments culminating in the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics. The argument demonstrates that, if acausality were ontologically real at the microscopic level, there must exist a nonzero probability (p > 0) for a direct macroscopic signature of acausality to appear under physically achievable isolation conditions; however, to date, no experimental observation satisfies this requirement. Declaration under Section Zero: Field: Foundational Physics Research Level: Foundational / Ontological Type of Work: Ontological theory combined with logical falsification Empirical Basis: Synthesis and analysis of published macroscopic quantum experiments (1982–2025), including large-scale quantum coherence systems and experimental results underlying the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics Foundational Assumptions: - Macroscopic Scalability Principle - Falsification logic (Popperian framework) - Absolute macroscopic causality Domain of Validity: - Applicable to physical systems capable of scaling from microscopic to macroscopic regimes under achievable isolation conditions - Valid within the time interval , with falsification conditions explicitly specified Verification Status: - Not peer-reviewed - Open for public academic critique Falsifiability: Explicitly defined through logical and experimental conditions stated in Section Zero Note: This document is released as a preprint. The scope of validity, foundational assumptions, confidence level, and falsification criteria are declared in accordance with Section Zero – Minimal Scientific Validation Framework (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18091473). NOTE FOR ENGLISH READERS The full content is written entirely in Vietnamese. To minimize translation manipulation, please follow this procedure: (1) Download the PDF file (2) Upload to any AI platform (preferably Claude, Grok, or Gemini Pro) (3) Use only ONE single prompt: "carefully read" (4) Repeat the prompt 2-5 times depending on your AI platform This ensures you get an accurate understanding of the original content without translation bias.