Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Mathematical Physics

Publisher’s Note: “Classification of integral modular data up to rank 13” [J. Math. Phys. 67, 081701 (2026)]

Max A. Alekseyev, Winfried Bruns, Sébastien Palcoux, Fedor Vladimirovich Petrov

Published Aug 1, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1063/5.0356319

Related papers

Publisher's Note: “A contribution to the many-fermion problem” [J. Math. Phys. 53, 095212 (2012)]

Daniel Charles Mattis

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Sep 28, 2012•0 citations

Classification of modular data up to rank 12

Siu‐Hung Ng, Eric C. Rowell, Xiao-Gang Wen

We use the computer algebra system GAP to classify modular data up to rank 12. This extends the previously obtained classification of modular data up to rank 6. Our classification includes all the modular data from modular tensor categories up to rank 12, with a few possible exceptions at rank 12 and levels $5,7$ and $14$. Those exceptions are eliminated up to a certain bound by an extensive finite search in place of required infinite search. Our list contains a few potential unitary modular data which are not known to correspond to any unitary modular tensor categories (such as those from Kac-Moody algebra, twisted quantum doubles of finite group, as well as their Abelian anyon condensations). It remains to be shown if those potential modular data can be realized by modular tensor categories or not. We provide some evidence that all may be constructed from centers of near-group categories or gauging group symmetries of known modular tensor categories, with the exception of a total of five cases at rank 11 (with $D^2 =1964.590$) and 12 (with $D^2 =3926.660$). The classification of modular data corresponds to a classification of modular tensor categories (up to modular isotopes which are not expected to be present at low ranks). The classification of modular tensor categories leads to a classification of gapped quantum phases of matter in 2-dimensional space for bosonic lattice systems with no symmetry, as well as a classification of generalized symmetries in 1-dimensional space.

arXiv:2308.09670•Aug 18, 2023•3 citations

Full characterization of modular values for finite-dimensional systems

Le Bin Ho, Nobuyuki Imoto

arXiv:1510.01062•Physics Letters A•May 4, 2016•17 citations

Classification of Rank 6 Modular Categories with Galois Group $\langle (012)(345)\rangle$

Green, David

Modular Tensor Categories (MTC's) arise in the study of certain condensed matter systems. There is an ongoing program to classify MTC's of low rank, up to modular data. We present an overview of the methods to classify modular tensor categories of low rank, applied to the specific case of a rank 6 category with Galois group $\langle(012)(345)\rangle$, and show that certain symmetries in this case imply nonunitarizable (hence, nonphysical) MTC's. We show that all the rank 6 MTC's with this Galois group have modular data conjugate to either the product of the semion category with $(A_1, 5)_{\frac{1}{2}}$ or a certain modular subcategory of $\mathcal{C}(\mathfrak{so}_5, 9, e^{jπi/9})$ with gcd$(18, j) = 1$.

arXiv:1908.07128•Aug 20, 2019•4 citations

Modular Invariance, Lattice Field Theories, and Finite Size Corrections

C. Nash, Denjoe O’Connor

arXiv:hep-th/9606137•Annals of Physics•Apr 1, 1999•17 citations

Modular Invariance and the A—D—E Classification

Michio Kaku

Graduate texts in contemporary physics•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations
We use the computer algebra system GAP to classify modular data up to rank 12. This extends the previously obtained classification of modular data up to rank 6. Our classification includes all the modular data from modular tensor categories up to rank 12, with a few possible exceptions at rank 12 and levels 5,75,75,7 and 141414. Those exceptions are eliminated up to a certain bound by an extensive finite search in place of required infinite search. Our list contains a few potential unitary modular data which are not known to correspond to any unitary modular tensor categories (such as those from Kac-Moody algebra, twisted quantum doubles of finite group, as well as their Abelian anyon condensations). It remains to be shown if those potential modular data can be realized by modular tensor categories or not. We provide some evidence that all may be constructed from centers of near-group categories or gauging group symmetries of known modular tensor categories, with the exception of a total of five cases at rank 11 (with D2=1964.590D^2 =1964.590D2=1964.590) and 12 (with D2=3926.660D^2 =3926.660D2=3926.660). The classification of modular data corresponds to a classification of modular tensor categories (up to modular isotopes which are not expected to be present at low ranks). The classification of modular tensor categories leads to a classification of gapped quantum phases of matter in 2-dimensional space for bosonic lattice systems with no symmetry, as well as a classification of generalized symmetries in 1-dimensional space.
Classification of Rank 6 Modular Categories with Galois Group ⟨(012)(345)⟩\langle (012)(345)\rangle⟨(012)(345)⟩
Modular Tensor Categories (MTC's) arise in the study of certain condensed matter systems. There is an ongoing program to classify MTC's of low rank, up to modular data. We present an overview of the methods to classify modular tensor categories of low rank, applied to the specific case of a rank 6 category with Galois group ⟨(012)(345)⟩\langle(012)(345)\rangle⟨(012)(345)⟩, and show that certain symmetries in this case imply nonunitarizable (hence, nonphysical) MTC's. We show that all the rank 6 MTC's with this Galois group have modular data conjugate to either the product of the semion category with (A1,5)12(A_1, 5)_{\frac{1}{2}}(A1​,5)21​​ or a certain modular subcategory of C(so5,9,ejπi/9)\mathcal{C}(\mathfrak{so}_5, 9, e^{jπi/9})C(so5​,9,ejπi/9) with gcd(18,j)=1(18, j) = 1(18,j)=1.