Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

True Quantum Non-Locality Relies on Physical Field Continuity: Superluminal Substrate Causality in Entanglement Experiments

Emmanouil N. Markoulakis

Published Aug 23, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.13140/rg.2.2.20458.27846

Related papers

Quantum non-locality based on finite-speed causal influences leads to superluminal signalling

Jean-Daniel Bancal, Stefano Pironio, Antonio Acín +3 more

arXiv:1110.3795•Nature Physics•Oct 26, 2012•153 citations

Quantum Non-Locality Based on Finite-Speed Causal Influences Leads to Superluminal Signalling

Jean-Daniel Bancal

Springer theses•Nov 22, 2013•20 citations

Locality and causality in quantum optical entanglement

Johannes F. Geurdes

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

A Unified Classical Physical Interpretation of "Quantum Entanglement" Experimental Phenomena

Jiqing Zeng

The mainstream interpretation of quantum entanglement and its derivative phenomena has long relied on concepts such as non-locality and superposition, leading to a lack of dynamical mechanism description for wave function collapse and creating profound conflicts with physical causality. This paper, based on the "Great Tao Model" and its "Existence Field Theory," proposes a systematic and unified interpretation of quantum entanglement phenomena, exemplified by the experiments recognized by the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics. First, it analyzes the erroneous presuppositions in the derivation of Bell's inequality based on Existence Field Theory and establishes a general classical interpretation framework grounded in "static initial correlations" and "local interactions." Subsequently, through a classical physical reconstruction of milestone experiments such as Aspect's, it demonstrates that this framework is sufficient to explain all observed phenomena self-consistently, without introducing "non-local superluminal action." Building on this, the paper successfully extends this interpretative framework to core quantum phenomena such as quantum decoherence, teleportation, and many-body entanglement, revealing that they also originate from classical conservation law constraints and local field interactions. Furthermore, this paper compares the Great Tao Model with hidden variable theories, finding that although both belong to the classical realism camp and oppose non-locality, the Great Tao Model requires no introduction of any hidden variables. Instead, it explains phenomena directly based on the specific physical properties (charge, mass) of elementary particles and the local dynamics of their existence fields, thus providing a more physically realistic and unified theoretical framework. This study offers a unified, causality-compliant classical explanation for a series of quantum phenomena claimed to exhibit "non-locality," fundamentally challenging the conceptual foundation of related quantum information technologies and providing a new path for physics to return to a theoretical paradigm based on realism, locality, and clear dynamical mechanisms.

•Apr 16, 2026•0 citations

Aspects of Quantum Non-Locality II: Superluminal Causation and Relativity

Joseph Berkovitz

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Dec 1, 1998•23 citations

The Universe: A Computing Network Where Relationships Define Reality

Nestor Ramos, Nestor Ramos

Modern physics treats quantum entanglement, superluminal cosmic expansion, and the finite speed of light as separate domain-specific mysteries. We question the "spookiness" of entanglement but accept that space expands faster than light. We postulate c as a fundamental constant but rarely ask why it is finite. Computational Finitism resolves these tensions by reframing the universe not as a continuous container, but as a finite-state computational graph. In this substrate, entanglement is a shared topological state, expansion is a dynamic node insertion, and the speed of light is the maximum propagation rate of a causal update rule. These are not paradoxes; they are hardware constraints. This article not only demonstrates how a discrete, relationship-driven network unifies quantum and cosmological phenomena without invoking infinity, non-locality, or mystical postulates, but also makes falsifiable predictions.

•May 28, 2026•0 citations
The mainstream interpretation of quantum entanglement and its derivative phenomena has long relied on concepts such as non-locality and superposition, leading to a lack of dynamical mechanism description for wave function collapse and creating profound conflicts with physical causality. This paper, based on the "Great Tao Model" and its "Existence Field Theory," proposes a systematic and unified interpretation of quantum entanglement phenomena, exemplified by the experiments recognized by the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics. First, it analyzes the erroneous presuppositions in the derivation of Bell's inequality based on Existence Field Theory and establishes a general classical interpretation framework grounded in "static initial correlations" and "local interactions." Subsequently, through a classical physical reconstruction of milestone experiments such as Aspect's, it demonstrates that this framework is sufficient to explain all observed phenomena self-consistently, without introducing "non-local superluminal action." Building on this, the paper successfully extends this interpretative framework to core quantum phenomena such as quantum decoherence, teleportation, and many-body entanglement, revealing that they also originate from classical conservation law constraints and local field interactions. Furthermore, this paper compares the Great Tao Model with hidden variable theories, finding that although both belong to the classical realism camp and oppose non-locality, the Great Tao Model requires no introduction of any hidden variables. Instead, it explains phenomena directly based on the specific physical properties (charge, mass) of elementary particles and the local dynamics of their existence fields, thus providing a more physically realistic and unified theoretical framework. This study offers a unified, causality-compliant classical explanation for a series of quantum phenomena claimed to exhibit "non-locality," fundamentally challenging the conceptual foundation of related quantum information technologies and providing a new path for physics to return to a theoretical paradigm based on realism, locality, and clear dynamical mechanisms.
Modern physics treats quantum entanglement, superluminal cosmic expansion, and the finite speed of light as separate domain-specific mysteries. We question the "spookiness" of entanglement but accept that space expands faster than light. We postulate c as a fundamental constant but rarely ask why it is finite. Computational Finitism resolves these tensions by reframing the universe not as a continuous container, but as a finite-state computational graph. In this substrate, entanglement is a shared topological state, expansion is a dynamic node insertion, and the speed of light is the maximum propagation rate of a causal update rule. These are not paradoxes; they are hardware constraints. This article not only demonstrates how a discrete, relationship-driven network unifies quantum and cosmological phenomena without invoking infinity, non-locality, or mystical postulates, but also makes falsifiable predictions.