摘要 本文提出一个关于既视感(déjà vu)、概率性预感及 “第六感” 等现象的统一假说,并回应关于 “平行宇宙” 与 “时间穿越” 的形而上学直觉。本文明确主张:不存在量子力学多世界诠释(MWI)所预设的、与当下现实实体并存的平行宇宙分支;尽管高维时空(如弦论中的额外蜷缩维度)是理论物理中为统一相互作用提出的合法几何构造,本文仅否定 “平行宇宙作为高维时空中的实体分叉” 这一流行本体论预设,而非额外空间维度本身的数学合理性。本文核心立场为:量子叠加态是单一时空背景下的潜在性演化,而非实体分支的并存;意识在面临选择时于量子层面预演所有可能路径,退相干完成后,演化路径的信息被编码到环境的经典自由度中。本文严格区分标准量子达尔文主义描述的 “实际化分支印记”(类型 A 印记)与本文提出的 “未实际化路径残余印记猜想”(类型 B 印记)。意识从中抽样读取极少数路径的印记碎片,被经典神经网络误标,从而产生 “似曾相识”“概率性预感” 或 “来自异时空” 的错觉。本文进一步指出,这类量子层面的残余印记是人类产生 “平行宇宙”“时间穿越” 及 “第六感” 直觉的认知根源。本文从过程哲学与量子潜在性诠释出发,界定本体论立场,讨论与 QBism、多世界诠释、预测编码及现象学的关系,并给出方向性预言。本文诚实声明其不可判决性及核心猜想超出标准物理框架的性质,提供一个有文献根基、内部一致的科学哲学假说。 关键词:量子潜在性;过程哲学;意识预演;既视感;概率性预感;第六感;退相干;量子达尔文主义;平行宇宙;高维时空 Abstract This paper proposes a unified hypothesis regarding phenomena such as déjà vu, probabilistic foresight, and the "sixth sense," while responding to metaphysical intuitions about "parallel universes" and "time travel." This paper explicitly argues that there are no parallel universe branches presupposed by the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics that coexist as entities with present reality. Although higher-dimensional spacetime (e.g., compactified extra dimensions in string theory) is a legitimate geometrical construct proposed in theoretical physics to unify interactions, this paper only rejects the popular ontological presupposition that "parallel universes are entity bifurcations within higher-dimensional spacetime," not the mathematical legitimacy of the extra spatial dimensions themselves. The core position of this paper is: quantum superposition is the evolution of potentiality within a single spacetime background, not the coexistence of actualized branches. Consciousness previews all possible paths at the quantum level when facing choices; after decoherence is completed, information about the evolutionary paths is encoded into the classical degrees of freedom of the environment. This paper strictly distinguishes between the "imprints of actualized branches" (Type-A imprints) described by standard Quantum Darwinism and the "conjectured residual imprints of unactualized paths" (Type-B imprints) proposed herein. Consciousness selectively samples minimal fragments of these imprints, which are mislabeled by classical neural networks, thereby generating the illusions of "déjà vu," "probabilistic foresight," or "originating from another spacetime." This paper further points out that such residual quantum imprints are the cognitive root of human intuitions regarding parallel universes, time travel, and the sixth sense. Starting from process philosophy and the potentiality interpretation of quantum mechanics, this paper delineates its ontological stance, discusses its relationship with QBism, MWI, predictive coding, and phenomenology, and offers directional predictions. This paper honestly declares its non-decidability and the nature of its core conjecture extending beyond the standard physical framework, providing a well-founded and internally consistent philosophical hypothesis of science. Keywords: Quantum Potentiality, Process Philosophy, Conscious Preview, Déjà Vu, Probabilistic Foresight, Sixth-Sense Illusion, Decoherence, Quantum Darwinism, Parallel Universes, Higher-Dimensional Spacetime
摘要 本文提出一个关于既视感(déjà vu)、概率性预感及 “第六感” 等现象的统一假说,并回应关于 “平行宇宙” 与 “时间穿越” 的形而上学直觉。本文明确主张:不存在量子力学多世界诠释(MWI)所预设的、与当下现实实体并存的平行宇宙分支;尽管高维时空(如弦论中的额外蜷缩维度)是理论物理中为统一相互作用提出的合法几何构造,本文仅否定 “平行宇宙作为高维时空中的实体分叉” 这一流行本体论预设,而非额外空间维度本身的数学合理性。本文核心立场为:量子叠加态是单一时空背景下的潜在性演化,而非实体分支的并存;意识在面临选择时于量子层面预演所有可能路径,退相干完成后,演化路径的信息被编码到环境的经典自由度中。本文严格区分标准量子达尔文主义描述的 “实际化分支印记”(类型 A 印记)与本文提出的 “未实际化路径残余印记猜想”(类型 B 印记)。意识从中抽样读取极少数路径的印记碎片,被经典神经网络误标,从而产生 “似曾相识”“概率性预感” 或 “来自异时空” 的错觉。本文进一步指出,这类量子层面的残余印记是人类产生 “平行宇宙”“时间穿越” 及 “第六感” 直觉的认知根源。本文从过程哲学与量子潜在性诠释出发,界定本体论立场,讨论与 QBism、多世界诠释、预测编码及现象学的关系,并给出方向性预言。本文诚实声明其不可判决性及核心猜想超出标准物理框架的性质,提供一个有文献根基、内部一致的科学哲学假说。 关键词:量子潜在性;过程哲学;意识预演;既视感;概率性预感;第六感;退相干;量子达尔文主义;平行宇宙;高维时空 Abstract This paper proposes a unified hypothesis regarding phenomena such as déjà vu, probabilistic foresight, and the "sixth sense," while responding to metaphysical intuitions about "parallel universes" and "time travel." This paper explicitly argues that there are no parallel universe branches presupposed by the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics that coexist as entities with present reality. Although higher-dimensional spacetime (e.g., compactified extra dimensions in string theory) is a legitimate geometrical construct proposed in theoretical physics to unify interactions, this paper only rejects the popular ontological presupposition that "parallel universes are entity bifurcations within higher-dimensional spacetime," not the mathematical legitimacy of the extra spatial dimensions themselves. The core position of this paper is: quantum superposition is the evolution of potentiality within a single spacetime background, not the coexistence of actualized branches. Consciousness previews all possible paths at the quantum level when facing choices; after decoherence is completed, information about the evolutionary paths is encoded into the classical degrees of freedom of the environment. This paper strictly distinguishes between the "imprints of actualized branches" (Type-A imprints) described by standard Quantum Darwinism and the "conjectured residual imprints of unactualized paths" (Type-B imprints) proposed herein. Consciousness selectively samples minimal fragments of these imprints, which are mislabeled by classical neural networks, thereby generating the illusions of "déjà vu," "probabilistic foresight," or "originating from another spacetime." This paper further points out that such residual quantum imprints are the cognitive root of human intuitions regarding parallel universes, time travel, and the sixth sense. Starting from process philosophy and the potentiality interpretation of quantum mechanics, this paper delineates its ontological stance, discusses its relationship with QBism, MWI, predictive coding, and phenomenology, and offers directional predictions. This paper honestly declares its non-decidability and the nature of its core conjecture extending beyond the standard physical framework, providing a well-founded and internally consistent philosophical hypothesis of science. Keywords: Quantum Potentiality, Process Philosophy, Conscious Preview, Déjà Vu, Probabilistic Foresight, Sixth-Sense Illusion, Decoherence, Quantum Darwinism, Parallel Universes, Higher-Dimensional Spacetime
摘要 本文提出一个关于既视感(déjà vu)、概率性预感及 “第六感” 等现象的统一假说,并回应关于 “平行宇宙” 与 “时间穿越” 的形而上学直觉。本文明确主张:不存在量子力学多世界诠释(MWI)所预设的、与当下现实实体并存的平行宇宙分支;尽管高维时空(如弦论中的额外蜷缩维度)是理论物理中为统一相互作用提出的合法几何构造,本文仅否定 “平行宇宙作为高维时空中的实体分叉” 这一流行本体论预设,而非额外空间维度本身的数学合理性。本文核心立场为:量子叠加态是单一时空背景下的潜在性演化,而非实体分支的并存;意识在面临选择时于量子层面预演所有可能路径,退相干完成后,演化路径的信息被编码到环境的经典自由度中。本文严格区分标准量子达尔文主义描述的 “实际化分支印记”(类型 A 印记)与本文提出的 “未实际化路径残余印记猜想”(类型 B 印记)。意识从中抽样读取极少数路径的印记碎片,被经典神经网络误标,从而产生 “似曾相识”“概率性预感” 或 “来自异时空” 的错觉。本文进一步指出,这类量子层面的残余印记是人类产生 “平行宇宙”“时间穿越” 及 “第六感” 直觉的认知根源。本文从过程哲学与量子潜在性诠释出发,界定本体论立场,讨论与 QBism、多世界诠释、预测编码及现象学的关系,并给出方向性预言。本文诚实声明其不可判决性及核心猜想超出标准物理框架的性质,提供一个有文献根基、内部一致的科学哲学假说。 关键词:量子潜在性;过程哲学;意识预演;既视感;概率性预感;第六感;退相干;量子达尔文主义;平行宇宙;高维时空 Abstract This paper proposes a unified hypothesis regarding phenomena such as déjà vu, probabilistic foresight, and the "sixth sense," while responding to metaphysical intuitions about "parallel universes" and "time travel." This paper explicitly argues that there are no parallel universe branches presupposed by the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics that coexist as entities with present reality. Although higher-dimensional spacetime (e.g., compactified extra dimensions in string theory) is a legitimate geometrical construct proposed in theoretical physics to unify interactions, this paper only rejects the popular ontological presupposition that "parallel universes are entity bifurcations within higher-dimensional spacetime," not the mathematical legitimacy of the extra spatial dimensions themselves. The core position of this paper is: quantum superposition is the evolution of potentiality within a single spacetime background, not the coexistence of actualized branches. Consciousness previews all possible paths at the quantum level when facing choices; after decoherence is completed, information about the evolutionary paths is encoded into the classical degrees of freedom of the environment. This paper strictly distinguishes between the "imprints of actualized branches" (Type-A imprints) described by standard Quantum Darwinism and the "conjectured residual imprints of unactualized paths" (Type-B imprints) proposed herein. Consciousness selectively samples minimal fragments of these imprints, which are mislabeled by classical neural networks, thereby generating the illusions of "déjà vu," "probabilistic foresight," or "originating from another spacetime." This paper further points out that such residual quantum imprints are the cognitive root of human intuitions regarding parallel universes, time travel, and the sixth sense. Starting from process philosophy and the potentiality interpretation of quantum mechanics, this paper delineates its ontological stance, discusses its relationship with QBism, MWI, predictive coding, and phenomenology, and offers directional predictions. This paper honestly declares its non-decidability and the nature of its core conjecture extending beyond the standard physical framework, providing a well-founded and internally consistent philosophical hypothesis of science. Keywords: Quantum Potentiality, Process Philosophy, Conscious Preview, Déjà Vu, Probabilistic Foresight, Sixth-Sense Illusion, Decoherence, Quantum Darwinism, Parallel Universes, Higher-Dimensional Spacetime
Quantum mechanics does not require parallel universes — only phase-relative structure within a shared spacetime manifold. This preprint presents an interpretive framework for quantum multiplicity that avoids spatial “parallel universe” metaphors. Building on standard quantum field theory, Everettian quantum mechanics, and decoherence theory, it argues that apparent multiplicity can be understood as phase-relative branch structure within a single shared spacetime manifold, rather than as spatially separate worlds. The work introduces no new dynamics, equations, or empirical predictions. Its contribution is conceptual: clarifying how mutually exclusive classical outcomes arise through branch-relative accessibility and loss of correlation, while preserving all governing invariants, including conservation laws and universal gravitational coupling in the semiclassical regime. A companion supplementary document presents the standard mathematical formalism—Hilbert space structure, density matrices, decoherence, and expectation-value stress–energy—to demonstrate that the interpretation remains fully consistent with established physics. In approaches to quantum gravity where spacetime is emergent—such as loop quantum gravity or holographic dualities—the framework would naturally reformulate in relational or entanglement-theoretic terms. In that context, branch-relative multiplicity corresponds not to multiple times or geometries, but to multiple decohered relational histories or bulk reconstructions supported by a single underlying quantum state. This paper is intended as a foundations-level reinterpretation for physicists and philosophers of physics interested in quantum ontology, decoherence, and the conceptual structure of spacetime.
Aiming at the logical paradoxes and intuitive conflicts in mainstream quantum mechanics interpretations, this paper proposes a novel Dynamic Cosmic Splitting-Merging Hypothesis Driven by Inter-Universe Quantum Entanglement. When a physical event has two or more mutually exclusive possibilities, the universe instantaneously splits into corresponding parallel branches, which maintain global inter-universe quantum entanglement. Conscious observation or subjective final choice acts as the trigger for non-local entanglement synchronization, forcing all branched universes to collapse and merge into a unique macroscopic reality. This hypothesis eliminates the counter-intuitive quantum superposition of the Copenhagen interpretation and the infinite proliferation of parallel universes in the Many-Worlds Interpretation, providing a self-consistent and closed explanation for the double-slit interference experiment, Schrödinger's cat gedankenexperiment, and Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment. A minimal mathematical formalism is constructed to formalize the core physical mechanism.