Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

The Impossibility of Post-quantum Public Indifferentiability for Merkle-Damgård

Akinori Hosoyamada

Published Jan 1, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-032-35409-9_18

Related papers

Evaluating the Security of Merkle-Damgård Hash Functions and Combiners in Quantum Settings

Zhenzhen Bao, Jian Guo, Shun Li +1 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2022•7 citations

Redeeming Reset Indifferentiability and Applications to Post-quantum Security

Mark Zhandry

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2021•13 citations

Merkle Puzzles in a Quantum World

Gilles Brassard A, Peter Høyer, Kassem Kalach +3 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2011•32 citations

The Sponge Is Quantum Indifferentiable

Gorjan Alagic, Joseph Carolan, Christian Majenz +1 more

The sponge is a cryptographic construction that turns a public permutation into a hash function. When the Keccak permutation is used, the resulting design constitutes the Secure Hash Algorithm 3 (SHA-3), standardized by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). SHA-3 is a core component of most post-quantum public-key cryptography schemes slated for worldwide adoption. While one can consider many security properties for the sponge, the ultimate one is indifferentiability from a random oracle, or simply indifferentiability. The sponge was proved indifferentiable against classical adversaries by Bertoni et al. in 2008. Despite significant efforts in the years since, little is known about sponge security against quantum adversaries, even for simple properties like preimage or collision resistance beyond a single round. This is primarily due to the lack of a satisfactory quantum analog of the lazy sampling technique for permutations. In this work, we develop a specialized technique that overcomes this barrier in the case of the sponge. We prove that the sponge is in fact indifferentiable from a random oracle against quantum adversaries. Our result establishes that the domain extension technique behind SHA-3 is secure in the post-quantum setting. Our indifferentiability bound for the sponge is a loose, but we also give bounds on preimage and collision resistance that are tighter.

arXiv:2504.16887•Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science•Dec 14, 2025•6 citations

From Quantum Information to Post-Quantum Security

Rui A. P. Perdigão

Synergistic Manifolds eBooks•Oct 19, 2024•0 citations

Post-quantum Cryptography: An Introduction

Shweta Agrawal

IITK directions•Jan 1, 2020•1 citation
The sponge is a cryptographic construction that turns a public permutation into a hash function. When the Keccak permutation is used, the resulting design constitutes the Secure Hash Algorithm 3 (SHA-3), standardized by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). SHA-3 is a core component of most post-quantum public-key cryptography schemes slated for worldwide adoption. While one can consider many security properties for the sponge, the ultimate one is indifferentiability from a random oracle, or simply indifferentiability. The sponge was proved indifferentiable against classical adversaries by Bertoni et al. in 2008. Despite significant efforts in the years since, little is known about sponge security against quantum adversaries, even for simple properties like preimage or collision resistance beyond a single round. This is primarily due to the lack of a satisfactory quantum analog of the lazy sampling technique for permutations. In this work, we develop a specialized technique that overcomes this barrier in the case of the sponge. We prove that the sponge is in fact indifferentiable from a random oracle against quantum adversaries. Our result establishes that the domain extension technique behind SHA-3 is secure in the post-quantum setting. Our indifferentiability bound for the sponge is a loose, but we also give bounds on preimage and collision resistance that are tighter.