Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

Merkle Puzzles in a Quantum World

Gilles Brassard A, Peter Høyer, Kassem Kalach, Marc Kaplan, Sophie Laplante, Louis Salvail

Published Jan 1, 2011• 32 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-22792-9_22

Related papers

Distributed Merkle’s Puzzles

Itai Dinur, Ben Hasson

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2021•3 citations

A key agreement protocol based-on object identifier for Internet of Things

Yanjiong Wang, Qiaoyan Wen

By the improvements of R.C. Merkle proposed key agreement protocol, we proposed a unique identifier based on the object identifier key agreement protocol ID-Merkle. The protocol can be widely applied to different objects or items coded system. The ID-Merkle protocol also can be running in an unsafe channel, through cryptography encryption/decryption technology, the protection of the Puzzle was significantly improved. On the one hand, the adjustment of key length can exponentially increase the difficulty an attacker to crack the Puzzle; the other hand, increasing the number of total Puzzles can quadratic increase the amount of time of cracking.

Procedia Engineering•Jan 1, 2011•1 citation

Quantum Merkle Puzzles

Gilles Brassard A, Louis Salvail

Starting in 1974, Ralph Merkle proposed the first unclassified systems for secure communications over insecure channels. When legitimate communicating parties are willing to spend an amount of computational effort proportional to some parameter N, an eavesdropper cannot break into their communication without spending a time in the order ofN2, which is quadratically more than the legitimate effort. We investigate quantum analogues to this technique. First, we show that Merkle's systems are completely insecure if the legitimate parties are classical but the eavesdropper uses quantum computation. Then, we describe simple modifications on Merkle's proposals, in which the legitimate parties still use classical communication but benefit from local quantum computation to agree on a common key. We show that the optimal quantum eavesdropping strategy against our protocols requires a time in the order o/7V3/2. We conjecture these Quantum Merkle Puzzles to be optimal in the classical communication model, in which case quantum mechanics does more harm than good for the purpose of secure communications over insecure classical channels. This is in sharp contrast with Quantum Key Distribution, which ensures unconditionally secure communications over quantum channels.

International Conference on Quantum, Nano and Micro Technologies (ICQNM)•Feb 1, 2008•24 citations

Cryptography in a Quantum World

Gilles Brassard A

arXiv:1510.04256•Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2016•5 citations

The Quantum Computer Puzzle

Gil Kalai

Notices of the American Mathematical Society•Apr 19, 2016•22 citations

Nested Merkle’s Puzzles against Sampling Attacks

Shlomi Dolev, Ora Nova Fandina, Ximing Li

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2013•1 citation
By the improvements of R.C. Merkle proposed key agreement protocol, we proposed a unique identifier based on the object identifier key agreement protocol ID-Merkle. The protocol can be widely applied to different objects or items coded system. The ID-Merkle protocol also can be running in an unsafe channel, through cryptography encryption/decryption technology, the protection of the Puzzle was significantly improved. On the one hand, the adjustment of key length can exponentially increase the difficulty an attacker to crack the Puzzle; the other hand, increasing the number of total Puzzles can quadratic increase the amount of time of cracking.
Starting in 1974, Ralph Merkle proposed the first unclassified systems for secure communications over insecure channels. When legitimate communicating parties are willing to spend an amount of computational effort proportional to some parameter N, an eavesdropper cannot break into their communication without spending a time in the order ofN2, which is quadratically more than the legitimate effort. We investigate quantum analogues to this technique. First, we show that Merkle's systems are completely insecure if the legitimate parties are classical but the eavesdropper uses quantum computation. Then, we describe simple modifications on Merkle's proposals, in which the legitimate parties still use classical communication but benefit from local quantum computation to agree on a common key. We show that the optimal quantum eavesdropping strategy against our protocols requires a time in the order o/7V3/2. We conjecture these Quantum Merkle Puzzles to be optimal in the classical communication model, in which case quantum mechanics does more harm than good for the purpose of secure communications over insecure classical channels. This is in sharp contrast with Quantum Key Distribution, which ensures unconditionally secure communications over quantum channels.