Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

QForge™ A Next-Generation Engineering Platform for Scalable Quantum Computing Design, Verification, and Industrial Algorithm Development

QInsight Labs Pvt Ltd

Published Aug 9, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Quantum computing is transitioning from an academic discipline into an engineering technology. Yet despite substantial global investment in quantum hardware, the software ecosystem remains fragmented and mismatched to that transition. The dominant frameworks were built for physicists writing low-level quantum programs, and they typically depend on external cloud hardware. They are poorly suited to engineering design, industrial deployment, education at scale, and large-scale algorithm development. QForge™ was developed to address this gap. QForge is not another quantum programming library. It is an engineering-oriented quantumdesign environment in which users construct, analyse, optimise, simulate, verify and document quantum systems within a single unified workflow. It integrates visual circuit design, a multiengine simulation architecture, intelligent execution routing, engineering resource estimation, multi-level verification and automated documentation — the quantum analogue of what electronic design automation provides to classical hardware engineering. Three properties distinguish it. It is an engineering environment, not a library. The primary artefact is a circuit on a canvas, not code that generates a circuit. A complete workflow — design, validate, simulate, verify, estimate, report, export — is achievable without writing a line of anything. Code export exists as an exit ramp for users who want it, never as an entry requirement. It routes execution intelligently across multiple engines. Rather than relying exclusively on brute-force state-vector simulation, QForge analyses circuit structure and selects the appropriate computational method automatically. Exact simulation is used wherever feasible; specialised analytical methods are invoked for structured algorithms. Exact QAOA expectation values have been validated at 48 qubits through causal-cone decomposition, and a reduced-space engine handles Grover search on problem spaces intractable under naivedense simulation. Vectorised kernel engineering has delivered 26 ×–79 × speedups over the platform’s reference implementation. It never overstates what it computed.Every result carries explicit method provenance. Exact results are labelled exact and can be independently cross-checked. Approximations are labelled as approximations and carry their error characteristics. Where the platform cannot deliver what was asked, it says so rather than returning something adjacent. QForge runs entirely on commodity hardware with no quantum backend, no cloud account and no network connection — making it deployable in ordinary teaching laboratories, in low-resourceinstitutions, and in air-gapped government and defence environments.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.21857594

Related papers

Evolution of Quantum Computing: A Review of Tools, Platforms and Future Directions

Addala Satyanarayana Varma, Ch. E.S. Sindhu Priya, J. Sudhakar

Quantum Computing (QC) has evolved into a computational model that can potentially solve problems of classes that cannot be solved by classical systems. This review gives a discussion on the innovation of software frameworks, experimental platforms and quantum computing tools used to compute quantum algorithm development, simulation and implementation. It concentrates on widely used programming environments, which compile abstract quantum models into practical workflows, including Cirq, TensorFlow Quantum, ProjectQ and Qiskit. The paper, besides describing the long-lasting problems related to scalability, error correction, and hardware reliability, also considers the architecture of the modern quantum computing platforms. Finally, new advances are outlined, such as quantum cloud service and the integration of artificial intelligence and quantum computing, and their role in the development of QC to viable and lucrative deployments. All in all, the discussion suggests that even now quantum computing still needs to be taken to the next level in terms of hardware infrastructure and software development that would allow progressing to the next stage of quantum technology testing and implementation.

CRC Press eBooks•Sep 29, 2026•0 citations

HybridQ: A Hybrid Simulator for Quantum Circuits

Salvatore Mandrà, Jeffrey Marshall, Eleanor Gilbert Rieffel +1 more

Developing state-of-the-art classical simulators of quantum circuits is of utmost importance to test and evaluate early quantum technology and understand the true potential of full-blown error-corrected quantum computers. In the past few years, multiple theoretical and numerical advances have continuously pushed the boundary of what is classically simulable, hence the development of a plethora of tools which are often limited to a specific purpose or designed for a particular hardware (e.g. CPUs vs. GPUs). Moreover, such tools are typically developed using tailored languages and syntax, which makes it hard to compare results from, and create hybrid approaches using, different simulation techniques. To support unified and optimized use of these techniques across platforms, we developed HybridQ , a highly extensible platform designed to provide a common framework to integrate multiple state-of-the-art techniques to run on a variety of hardware. The philosophy behind its development has been driven by three main pillars: Easy to Use, Easy to Extend, and Use the Best Available Technology. The powerful tools of HybridQ allow users to manipulate, develop, and extend noiseless and noisy circuits for different hardware architectures. HybridQ supports large-scale high-performance computing (HPC) simulations, automatically balancing workload among different processor nodes and enabling the use of multiple backends to maximize parallel efficiency. Everything is then glued together by a simple and expressive language that allows seamless switching from one technique to another as well as from one hardware to the next, without the need to write lengthy translations, thus greatly simplifying the development of new hybrid algorithms and techniques.

arXiv:2111.06868•IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Quantum Computing Software (QCS)•Nov 1, 2021•11 citations

Towards a scalable quantum computer

Carmen G. Almudéver, Nader Khammassi, Louis Hutin +5 more

A quantum machine may solve some complex problems that are intractable for even the most powerful classical computers. By exploiting quantum superposition and entanglement phenomena, quantum algorithms can achieve from polynomial to exponential speed up when compared to their best classical counterparts. A quantum computer will be a part of a heterogeneous, multi-core computer in which a classical processor will interact with several accelerators such as FPGAs, GPUs and also a quantum co-processor. Figure 1 shows the different layers of the quantum computer system stack [1]. Building such a quantum system requires contributions from different fields such as physics, electronics, computer science and computer engineering for addressing the following challenges: i) build scalable quantum chips integrating qubits with long coherence times and high-fidelity operations, ii) develop classical control electronics at possibly cryogenic temperatures and iii) create the microarchitecture as well as the software for quantum computation.

International Conference on Design & Technology of Integrated Systems in Nanoscale Era (DTIS)•Apr 1, 2018•7 citations

QForge Applications: A Unified Problem-to-Evidence Framework for Industrial Optimization, Molecular Simulation, Finance, Cybersecurity, and Quantum Machine Learning

QInsight Labs

Quantum-computing application studies often stop at the implementation of an isolated circuit or the solution of a small demonstration problem. Industrial adoption requires a more complete engineering process involving problem formulation, quantum encoding, algorithm selection, execution, verification, resource estimation, comparison with strong classical baselines, and assessment of operational relevance. This paper presents an application-oriented framework for QForge, extending its role as a quantum-computing design, emulation, verification, and algorithmdevelopment platform. The framework maps quantum and hybrid methods—including the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm, Variational Quantum Eigensolver, Grover search, Shor period finding, quantum kernels, and amplitude-estimation extensions—to six application classes: industrial optimization, logistics and energy systems, molecular simulation, financial modelling, cybersecurity, quantum machine learning, and education. To reduce premature or misleading application claims, the paper introduces a six-stage evidence model called the QForge Application Readiness Levels (QARL), progressing from problem identification to operational validation. It also defines a reproducible application gallery, classical-baseline discipline, end-to-end time accounting, and structured evidence reports. The paper deliberately distinguishes classical emulation from physical quantum execution and does not claim quantum advantage. Instead, QForge is positioned as an engineering environment in which application hypotheses can be formulated, verified, benchmarked, and prepared for future hybrid high-performance and quantum-computing infrastructures.

•Aug 10, 2026•0 citations

C2|Q>: A Robust Framework for Bridging Classical and Quantum Software Development

Boshuai Ye, Arif Ali Khan, Teemu Pihkakoski +4 more

Quantum Software Engineering (QSE) is emerging as a critical discipline to make quantum computing accessible to a broader developer community; however, most quantum development environments still require developers to engage with low-level details across the software stack—including problem encoding, circuit construction, algorithm configuration, hardware selection, and result interpretation—making them difficult for classical software engineers to use. To bridge this gap, we present C2 \(\lvert Q \rangle\) , a hardware-agnostic quantum software development framework that translates specific types of classical specifications into quantum-executable programs while preserving methodological rigor. The framework applies modular software engineering principles by classifying the workflow into three core modules: an encoder that classifies problems, produces Quantum-Compatible Formats (QCFs), and constructs quantum circuits, a deployment module that generates circuits and recommends hardware based on fidelity, runtime, and cost, and a decoder that interprets quantum outputs into classical solutions. This architecture supports systematic evaluation across simulators and Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) quantum devices, remaining scalable to new problem classes and algorithms. In evaluation, the encoder module achieved a 93.8% completion rate, the hardware recommendation module consistently selected the appropriate quantum devices for workloads scaling up to 56 qubits. End-to-end experiments on 434 Python programs and 100 JSON problem instances demonstrate that the full C2 \(\lvert Q \rangle\) workflow executes reliably on simulators and can be deployed successfully on representative real quantum hardware, with empirical runs limited to small- and medium-sized instances consistent with current NISQ capabilities. A proxy-based usability analysis further indicates substantial reductions in handwritten lines of code and explicit configuration steps compared to conventional quantum SDK workflows. These results indicate that C2 \(\lvert Q \rangle\) lowers the entry barrier to quantum software development by providing a reproducible, extensible toolchain that connects classical specifications to quantum execution. The open-source implementation of C2 \(\lvert Q \rangle\) is available at https://github.com/C2-Q/C2Q and as a ready-to-use Python package at https://pypi.org/project/c2q-framework/ .

arXiv:2510.02854•ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology•Mar 25, 2026•1 citation

Quantum Software and Its Engineering [Focus: Guest Editors’ Introduction]

Michael Epping, Michael Felderer, Vlad Gheorghiu +1 more

Quantum computing (QC) is gaining considerable attention from industry and academia alike. It has been making great progress in recent years, and quantum computers are increasingly available to a larger community. It is foreseeable that the technology will become established for specific use cases in optimization, machine learning (ML), or material simulation.

IEEE Software•Aug 6, 2025•0 citations
Quantum computing is transitioning from an academic discipline into an engineering technology. Yet despite substantial global investment in quantum hardware, the software ecosystem remains fragmented and mismatched to that transition. The dominant frameworks were built for physicists writing low-level quantum programs, and they typically depend on external cloud hardware. They are poorly suited to engineering design, industrial deployment, education at scale, and large-scale algorithm development. QForge™ was developed to address this gap. QForge is not another quantum programming library. It is an engineering-oriented quantumdesign environment in which users construct, analyse, optimise, simulate, verify and document quantum systems within a single unified workflow. It integrates visual circuit design, a multiengine simulation architecture, intelligent execution routing, engineering resource estimation, multi-level verification and automated documentation — the quantum analogue of what electronic design automation provides to classical hardware engineering. Three properties distinguish it. It is an engineering environment, not a library. The primary artefact is a circuit on a canvas, not code that generates a circuit. A complete workflow — design, validate, simulate, verify, estimate, report, export — is achievable without writing a line of anything. Code export exists as an exit ramp for users who want it, never as an entry requirement. It routes execution intelligently across multiple engines. Rather than relying exclusively on brute-force state-vector simulation, QForge analyses circuit structure and selects the appropriate computational method automatically. Exact simulation is used wherever feasible; specialised analytical methods are invoked for structured algorithms. Exact QAOA expectation values have been validated at 48 qubits through causal-cone decomposition, and a reduced-space engine handles Grover search on problem spaces intractable under naivedense simulation. Vectorised kernel engineering has delivered 26 ×–79 × speedups over the platform’s reference implementation. It never overstates what it computed.Every result carries explicit method provenance. Exact results are labelled exact and can be independently cross-checked. Approximations are labelled as approximations and carry their error characteristics. Where the platform cannot deliver what was asked, it says so rather than returning something adjacent. QForge runs entirely on commodity hardware with no quantum backend, no cloud account and no network connection — making it deployable in ordinary teaching laboratories, in low-resourceinstitutions, and in air-gapped government and defence environments.
Quantum Computing (QC) has evolved into a computational model that can potentially solve problems of classes that cannot be solved by classical systems. This review gives a discussion on the innovation of software frameworks, experimental platforms and quantum computing tools used to compute quantum algorithm development, simulation and implementation. It concentrates on widely used programming environments, which compile abstract quantum models into practical workflows, including Cirq, TensorFlow Quantum, ProjectQ and Qiskit. The paper, besides describing the long-lasting problems related to scalability, error correction, and hardware reliability, also considers the architecture of the modern quantum computing platforms. Finally, new advances are outlined, such as quantum cloud service and the integration of artificial intelligence and quantum computing, and their role in the development of QC to viable and lucrative deployments. All in all, the discussion suggests that even now quantum computing still needs to be taken to the next level in terms of hardware infrastructure and software development that would allow progressing to the next stage of quantum technology testing and implementation.
Developing state-of-the-art classical simulators of quantum circuits is of utmost importance to test and evaluate early quantum technology and understand the true potential of full-blown error-corrected quantum computers. In the past few years, multiple theoretical and numerical advances have continuously pushed the boundary of what is classically simulable, hence the development of a plethora of tools which are often limited to a specific purpose or designed for a particular hardware (e.g. CPUs vs. GPUs). Moreover, such tools are typically developed using tailored languages and syntax, which makes it hard to compare results from, and create hybrid approaches using, different simulation techniques. To support unified and optimized use of these techniques across platforms, we developed HybridQ , a highly extensible platform designed to provide a common framework to integrate multiple state-of-the-art techniques to run on a variety of hardware. The philosophy behind its development has been driven by three main pillars: Easy to Use, Easy to Extend, and Use the Best Available Technology. The powerful tools of HybridQ allow users to manipulate, develop, and extend noiseless and noisy circuits for different hardware architectures. HybridQ supports large-scale high-performance computing (HPC) simulations, automatically balancing workload among different processor nodes and enabling the use of multiple backends to maximize parallel efficiency. Everything is then glued together by a simple and expressive language that allows seamless switching from one technique to another as well as from one hardware to the next, without the need to write lengthy translations, thus greatly simplifying the development of new hybrid algorithms and techniques.
A quantum machine may solve some complex problems that are intractable for even the most powerful classical computers. By exploiting quantum superposition and entanglement phenomena, quantum algorithms can achieve from polynomial to exponential speed up when compared to their best classical counterparts. A quantum computer will be a part of a heterogeneous, multi-core computer in which a classical processor will interact with several accelerators such as FPGAs, GPUs and also a quantum co-processor. Figure 1 shows the different layers of the quantum computer system stack [1]. Building such a quantum system requires contributions from different fields such as physics, electronics, computer science and computer engineering for addressing the following challenges: i) build scalable quantum chips integrating qubits with long coherence times and high-fidelity operations, ii) develop classical control electronics at possibly cryogenic temperatures and iii) create the microarchitecture as well as the software for quantum computation.
Quantum-computing application studies often stop at the implementation of an isolated circuit or the solution of a small demonstration problem. Industrial adoption requires a more complete engineering process involving problem formulation, quantum encoding, algorithm selection, execution, verification, resource estimation, comparison with strong classical baselines, and assessment of operational relevance. This paper presents an application-oriented framework for QForge, extending its role as a quantum-computing design, emulation, verification, and algorithmdevelopment platform. The framework maps quantum and hybrid methods—including the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm, Variational Quantum Eigensolver, Grover search, Shor period finding, quantum kernels, and amplitude-estimation extensions—to six application classes: industrial optimization, logistics and energy systems, molecular simulation, financial modelling, cybersecurity, quantum machine learning, and education. To reduce premature or misleading application claims, the paper introduces a six-stage evidence model called the QForge Application Readiness Levels (QARL), progressing from problem identification to operational validation. It also defines a reproducible application gallery, classical-baseline discipline, end-to-end time accounting, and structured evidence reports. The paper deliberately distinguishes classical emulation from physical quantum execution and does not claim quantum advantage. Instead, QForge is positioned as an engineering environment in which application hypotheses can be formulated, verified, benchmarked, and prepared for future hybrid high-performance and quantum-computing infrastructures.
Quantum Software Engineering (QSE) is emerging as a critical discipline to make quantum computing accessible to a broader developer community; however, most quantum development environments still require developers to engage with low-level details across the software stack—including problem encoding, circuit construction, algorithm configuration, hardware selection, and result interpretation—making them difficult for classical software engineers to use. To bridge this gap, we present C2 ∣Q⟩\lvert Q \rangle∣Q⟩ , a hardware-agnostic quantum software development framework that translates specific types of classical specifications into quantum-executable programs while preserving methodological rigor. The framework applies modular software engineering principles by classifying the workflow into three core modules: an encoder that classifies problems, produces Quantum-Compatible Formats (QCFs), and constructs quantum circuits, a deployment module that generates circuits and recommends hardware based on fidelity, runtime, and cost, and a decoder that interprets quantum outputs into classical solutions. This architecture supports systematic evaluation across simulators and Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) quantum devices, remaining scalable to new problem classes and algorithms. In evaluation, the encoder module achieved a 93.8% completion rate, the hardware recommendation module consistently selected the appropriate quantum devices for workloads scaling up to 56 qubits. End-to-end experiments on 434 Python programs and 100 JSON problem instances demonstrate that the full C2 ∣Q⟩\lvert Q \rangle∣Q⟩ workflow executes reliably on simulators and can be deployed successfully on representative real quantum hardware, with empirical runs limited to small- and medium-sized instances consistent with current NISQ capabilities. A proxy-based usability analysis further indicates substantial reductions in handwritten lines of code and explicit configuration steps compared to conventional quantum SDK workflows. These results indicate that C2 ∣Q⟩\lvert Q \rangle∣Q⟩ lowers the entry barrier to quantum software development by providing a reproducible, extensible toolchain that connects classical specifications to quantum execution. The open-source implementation of C2 ∣Q⟩\lvert Q \rangle∣Q⟩ is available at https://github.com/C2-Q/C2Q and as a ready-to-use Python package at https://pypi.org/project/c2q-framework/ .