Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nanoscale superconducting electronics

Giuseppe Carlo Tettamanzi

Published Jan 1, 2008• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Development of Nanoscale Superconducting Devices for Quantum Computing

B. L. T. Plourde, Timothy L. Robertson, Antonio García Martínez +5 more

APS•Mar 1, 2002•0 citations

Nanoscale superconducting quantum bits

Yuriy Makhlin, Gerd Schön, Alexander Shnirman

Physica C Superconductivity•Feb 1, 2001•0 citations

Nanoscale NbN/TaN/NbN Josephson junctions for superconducting memory cells

Zengxu Zheng, Lu Zhang, Y X Hu +8 more

Abstract Superconducting flux memory devices fabricated with nanoscale junctions and high-inductance materials can maintain high-speed access performance while significantly reducing the area required for superconducting loops. In this work, we present a method for preparing nanoscale NbN-based superconductor/normal-metal/superconductor (SNS) Josephson junctions that combines electron beam lithography with chemical mechanical planarization process. Scanning electron microscope images reveal that the junction has a very round shape, while cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy shows that it has a truncated cone structure, characterized by a narrow top and a wide bottom. The minimum diameter of the junction is 51 nm, with the diameter at the interface between the wiring layer and the top electrode being just 27 nm. These nanoscale junctions exhibit excellent Josephson properties with a critical current density J c of 673 ± 64 kA cm −2 and a characteristic voltage V c of 1.63 ± 0.45 mV at 4.2 K. Furthermore, we designed the superconducting memory cell based on the simulated inductance values of the NbN loop and the nanoscale NbN-based SNS junctions. The cell has a total area of 12.6 μ m × 6.5 μ m and contains a radio-frequency superconducting quantum interference device with one junction in the storage loop and a direct-current superconducting quantum interference device with two junctions in the readout loop. Using the flux-locked and feedback measurement method, a clear flux hysteresis curve can be obtained to verify the read-write functions of the device.

Superconductor Science and Technology•Sep 1, 2025•1 citation

Superconducting Electronics

Yonuk Chong, Yong‐ho Lee, Yong Hamb KIM

Physics and High Technology•Sep 30, 2011•3 citations

Nanoscale direct-write fabrication of superconducting devices for application in quantum technologies

J. M. De Teresa

Abstract In this Perspective article, we evaluate the current state of research on the use of focused electron and ion beams to directly fabricate nanoscale superconducting devices with application in quantum technologies. First, the article introduces the main superconducting devices and their fabrication by means of standard lithography techniques such as optical lithography and electron beam lithography. Then, focused ion beam patterning of superconductors through milling or irradiation is shown, as well as the growth of superconducting devices by means of focused electron and ion beam induced deposition. We suggest that the key benefits of these resist-free direct-growth techniques for quantum technologies include the ability to make electrical nanocontacts and circuit edit, fabrication of high-resolution superconducting resonators, creation of Josephson junctions and superconducting quantum interference device (SQUIDs) for on-tip sensors, patterning of high-Tc SQUIDs and other superconducting circuits, and the exploration of fluxtronics and topological superconductivity.

Materials for Quantum Technology•Feb 24, 2023•12 citations

Superconducting electronics

Aleksander I. Braginski

Physics Today•Jul 1, 1983•1 citation
Abstract Superconducting flux memory devices fabricated with nanoscale junctions and high-inductance materials can maintain high-speed access performance while significantly reducing the area required for superconducting loops. In this work, we present a method for preparing nanoscale NbN-based superconductor/normal-metal/superconductor (SNS) Josephson junctions that combines electron beam lithography with chemical mechanical planarization process. Scanning electron microscope images reveal that the junction has a very round shape, while cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy shows that it has a truncated cone structure, characterized by a narrow top and a wide bottom. The minimum diameter of the junction is 51 nm, with the diameter at the interface between the wiring layer and the top electrode being just 27 nm. These nanoscale junctions exhibit excellent Josephson properties with a critical current density J c of 673 ± 64 kA cm −2 and a characteristic voltage V c of 1.63 ± 0.45 mV at 4.2 K. Furthermore, we designed the superconducting memory cell based on the simulated inductance values of the NbN loop and the nanoscale NbN-based SNS junctions. The cell has a total area of 12.6 μ m × 6.5 μ m and contains a radio-frequency superconducting quantum interference device with one junction in the storage loop and a direct-current superconducting quantum interference device with two junctions in the readout loop. Using the flux-locked and feedback measurement method, a clear flux hysteresis curve can be obtained to verify the read-write functions of the device.
Abstract In this Perspective article, we evaluate the current state of research on the use of focused electron and ion beams to directly fabricate nanoscale superconducting devices with application in quantum technologies. First, the article introduces the main superconducting devices and their fabrication by means of standard lithography techniques such as optical lithography and electron beam lithography. Then, focused ion beam patterning of superconductors through milling or irradiation is shown, as well as the growth of superconducting devices by means of focused electron and ion beam induced deposition. We suggest that the key benefits of these resist-free direct-growth techniques for quantum technologies include the ability to make electrical nanocontacts and circuit edit, fabrication of high-resolution superconducting resonators, creation of Josephson junctions and superconducting quantum interference device (SQUIDs) for on-tip sensors, patterning of high-Tc SQUIDs and other superconducting circuits, and the exploration of fluxtronics and topological superconductivity.