The performance of quantum algorithms on near-term devices is heavily constrained by hardware noise, yet systematic comparisons of algorithmic vulnerability across diverse noise types remain limited. In this study, we benchmark three representative algorithms: quantum teleportation, Grover’s search, and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), under depolarizing, amplitude damping, phase damping, and thermal relaxation channels. Using exact density-matrix simulations, we characterize algorithmic performance by evaluating state fidelity decay as a function of noise strength. To enable fair, structure-aware comparisons across circuits of varying depths, we introduce a novel metric, the per-gate decay rate. Our analysis reveals that teleportation exhibits the lowest per-gate vulnerability, whereas Grover’s algorithm demonstrates substantially larger, super-linear decay driven by its repeated oracle–diffuser architecture. QAOA displays intermediate and stable noise resilience across system sizes. Finally, we validate our simulation framework through hardware experiments on an IBM Heron processor, demonstrating strong agreement with theoretical predictions (Pearson’s correlation coefficient r = 0.981). This work establishes a quantitative, structure-aware framework for assessing circuit-level noise sensitivity and offers actionable insights for algorithm selection in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum era.
The performance of quantum algorithms on near-term devices is heavily constrained by hardware noise, yet systematic comparisons of algorithmic vulnerability across diverse noise types remain limited. In this study, we benchmark three representative algorithms: quantum teleportation, Grover’s search, and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), under depolarizing, amplitude damping, phase damping, and thermal relaxation channels. Using exact density-matrix simulations, we characterize algorithmic performance by evaluating state fidelity decay as a function of noise strength. To enable fair, structure-aware comparisons across circuits of varying depths, we introduce a novel metric, the per-gate decay rate. Our analysis reveals that teleportation exhibits the lowest per-gate vulnerability, whereas Grover’s algorithm demonstrates substantially larger, super-linear decay driven by its repeated oracle–diffuser architecture. QAOA displays intermediate and stable noise resilience across system sizes. Finally, we validate our simulation framework through hardware experiments on an IBM Heron processor, demonstrating strong agreement with theoretical predictions (Pearson’s correlation coefficient r = 0.981). This work establishes a quantitative, structure-aware framework for assessing circuit-level noise sensitivity and offers actionable insights for algorithm selection in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum era.
As quantum processors move into the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era, the central question is no longer whether a quantum algorithm is asymptotically faster than its classical counterpart, but whether it can retain a meaningful speedup under realistic noise, compilation, and measurement constraints. This work develops a quantitative framework for characterizing the noise resilience of quantum advantage. We introduce the advantage robustness function RA(ε), which measures how the asymptotic and concrete performance of an algorithm A degrades with physical error rate ε, and we compute it analytically or numerically for twelve representative algorithm families, including Grover search, amplitude estimation, phase estimation, HHL, VQE/QAOA, Hamiltonian simulation, and sampling algorithms. For each class, we derive critical noise thresholds and depth limits beyond which classical algorithms regain supremacy, explicitly incorporating realistic connectivity and compilation overheads. We show that algorithms based on coherent amplitude amplification are more fragile to coherent errors than depolarizing noise, while variational algorithms display a tradeoff between expressivity and robustness. By combining these algorithm-specific robustness curves with current and projected hardware error rates for superconducting, trapped-ion, neutralatom, and photonic platforms, we map out a phase diagram of practical quantum advantage that links problem size, noise rate, and algorithm type. Our analysis identifies promising near-term application windows in risk analytics, small-molecule chemistry, and structured optimization, and also delineates regions where no advantage is realistic, providing valuable guidance for both algorithm designers and hardware architects.
Cloud-accessible quantum processors enable direct execution of quantum algorithms on heterogeneous hardware platforms. Unlike classical systems, however, identical quantum circuits may exhibit substantially different behavior across devices due to architectural variations in qubit connectivity, gate fidelity, and coherence times.
In this work, we systematically benchmark five representative quantum algorithms - Bell state preparation, GHZ state generation, Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT), Grover's Search, and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) - across trapped-ion, superconducting, and simulator backends using Amazon Braket. Performance metrics including fidelity, CHSH violation, success probability, circuit depth, and gate counts are evaluated.
Our results demonstrate a strong dependence of algorithmic performance on hardware topology and noise characteristics. For example, 10-qubit GHZ states achieved fidelities above 0.8 on trapped-ion hardware, while superconducting platforms dropped below 0.15 due to routing overhead and accumulated two-qubit gate errors. These findings highlight the importance of hardware-aware algorithm selection and provide practical guidance for benchmarking in the NISQ era.
Abstract Quantum algorithms on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices require optimization strategies matched to circuit structure. We present two complementary approaches: VERMICULAR, achieving 93.0% success rates for Grover’s algorithm through strategic dynamical decoupling (DD) placement (vs. 18.3% baseline), and systematic QAOA parameter optimization achieving 94.5% approximation ratios for MaxCut (vs. 39.6% with theoretical parameters). Through >15,000 circuit executions across IQM Garnet, Rigetti Ankaa-3, and IonQ Forte-1 (total cost: €70), we demonstrate that circuit structure determines which strategy succeeds: DD helps algorithms with substantial idle time (Grover: 34% idle → 5× improvement) but degrades continuously-active circuits (QAOA: 2.4% idle → 50% degradation with DD). We systematically characterize algorithm noise resilience via critical noise thresholds (σc), finding Bell states achieve 4× higher σc than product states (0.200 vs 0.050, p < 0.001) and that σc predicts hardware performance (r = 0.94, p = 0.006). QAOA scaling studies (3-40 qubits) reveal exponential decay with 56% plateau beyond 20 qubits. Simulator-optimized parameters transfer effectively to hardware (85-98% efficiency), but hardware-to-hardware transfer requires architecture-specific tuning. We provide SigmaCSuite, an open-source validation framework, and complete experimental protocols. These findings establish that optimization strategy must match circuit structure: idle-time protection for search algorithms, parameter tuning for variational algorithms—achieving 2.5-5× improvements through targeted approaches.
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is widely regarded as a promising near-term quantum algorithm for addressing hard combinatorial optimization problems on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices; however, its real-world effectiveness is severely constrained by hardware noise, including gate infidelities, decoherence, and measurement errors. This work explores an error mitigation–driven approach to enhance the performance and robustness of QAOA without altering its algorithmic structure or requiring fault-tolerant quantum resources. Measurement error mitigation and zero-noise extrapolation are incorporated into the execution and post-processing stages of QAOA circuits and evaluated using the Minimum Vertex Cover problem as a representative benchmark. Performance is assessed through approximation ratios, solution stability, and noise sensitivity across multiple circuit depths. The results indicate that error mitigation not only improves approximation accuracy but also stabilizes output distributions and delays performance degradation at increased circuit depths. Additionally, the mitigated executions demonstrate better consistency across repeated runs, highlighting improved resilience to stochastic noise. These findings emphasize that lightweight and hardware-efficient error mitigation techniques can significantly extend the practical usability of QAOA on current NISQ hardware, providing a scalable and realistic pathway for executing quantum optimization algorithms more reliably in near-term quantum computing environments.
Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) offer a compelling approach to quantum machine learning, but their effectiveness is heavily constrained by noise on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) hardware. Prior studies examine global noise effects, yet the sensitivity of individual QNN layers remains underexplored.This paper presents a layer-wise noise sensitivity analysis framework that isolates the impact of depolarizing, amplitude damping, and phase damping noise on the encoding, variational, and measurement layers of QNNs. Using Qiskit Aer, we simulate targeted noise injection and evaluate performance on the Iris dataset. We introduce the Layerwise Sensitivity Drop (LSD) metric to quantify degradation under noise.Results show that the encoding layer is most vulnerable (LSD up to 42.9%), while the measurement layer is comparatively robust. Additionally, entangling gates are found to be more noisesensitive than rotational gates. These insights inform future QNN design strategies, emphasizing layer-specific error mitigation to improve resilience on near-term quantum hardware.
This paper introduces a noise-aware distributed Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) tailored for execution on near-term quantum hardware. Leveraging a distributed framework, we address the limitations of current Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, which are hindered by limited qubit counts and high error rates. Our approach decomposes large QAOA problems into smaller subproblems, distributing them across multiple Quantum Processing Units (QPUs) to enhance scalability and performance. The noise-aware strategy incorporates error mitigation techniques to optimize qubit fidelity and gate operations, ensuring reliable quantum computations. We evaluate the efficacy of our framework using the HamilToniQ Benchmarking Toolkit, which quantifies the performance across various quantum hardware configurations. The results demonstrate that our distributed QAOA framework achieves significant improvements in computational speed and accuracy, showcasing its potential to solve complex optimization problems efficiently in the NISQ era. This work sets the stage for advanced algorithmic strategies and practical quantum system enhancements, contributing to the broader goal of achieving quantum advantage.