Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Benchmarking Error Mitigation: Artefactual Improvements in Zero-Noise Extrapolation

Dominik Köster, Wolfgang Mauerer

Published Jul 24, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This repository contains all scripts, data, and plotting code to reproduce the experiments and figures presented in the paper: Benchmarking Error Mitigation: Artefactual Improvements in Zero-Noise Extrapolation (QuBench 2026 @ QCE 2026)
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.21540564

Related papers

Claim against Measurement: Statistical Artefacts in Quantum Error Mitigation Benchmarks

Dominik Köster, Wolfgang Mauerer

This repository contains all scripts, data, and plotting code to reproduce the experiments and figures presented in the paper: Claim against Measurement: Statistical Artefacts in Quantum Error Mitigation Benchmarks (QCE 2026)

•Jul 24, 2026•0 citations

Benchmarking Error Mitigation: Artefactual Improvements in Zero-Noise Extrapolation

Dominik Köster, Wolfgang Mauerer

Reliable benchmarking of Quantum Error Mitigation (QEM) requires distinguishing genuine improvements from artefacts of the post-processing arithmetic. In this paper, we expose a failure mode in Richardson Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), a widely used technique routinely (and often implicitly) relied upon in benchmarks and experiments. When noise amplification operates beyond usable signals - a regime that is quickly reached on current hardware for non-trivial circuits - we show that the extrapolation no longer reflects the underlying physics, but collapses into a fixed rescaling of a single noisy measurement, producing a bogus apparent improvement that is independent of noise amplification. This poses a rarely considered threat to the validity of many empirical evaluations in quantum computing. Measurements on real hardware (IQM Euro-Q-Exa) confirm this collapse with ordinary folding alone: as circuit depth erodes the signal, the reported estimate decouples from the truth and overshoots the ideal by up to 21%. We further introduce a matched-cost "garbage-folding" negative control that carries no usable signal yet reports a larger apparent improvement than genuine folding - showing that the magnitude of an improvement is not evidence of its correctness - alongside a zero-cost check flagging the artefact from data a benchmark already holds. We distil both into a short reporting checklist for ZNE benchmarks.

quant-pharXiv:2607.09360•Jul 13, 2026•0 citations

Works on My QPU: Reproducibility in Quantum Computing Research

Dominik Köster, Maja Franz, Benjamin Zec +3 more

This repository contains all scripts, data, and plotting code to reproduce the experiments and figures presented in the paper: Works on My QPU: Reproducibility in Quantum Computing Research (QCE 2026)

•Jul 24, 2026•0 citations

Reducing Quantum Error Mitigation Bias Using Verifiable Benchmark Circuits

Joseph Harris, Kevin Lively, Peter Schuhmacher

We present a simple, malleable and low-overhead approach for improving generic biased quantum error mitigation (QEM) methods, achieving up to 15% fidelity improvements over standard QEM on 100-qubit circuits with up to 2000 entangling gates. We do so by constructing verifiable benchmark circuits which mirror the application circuit's native-gate structure and thus noise profile. These circuits can be used to benchmark and mitigate the bias of the underlying error mitigation method, requiring only the application circuit and hardware native gate set. We present two methods for generating benchmark circuits; one is agnostic to the target hardware at the expense of a small overhead of single-qubit gates, while the other is specific to the IBM superconducting hardware and has no gate overhead. As a corollary, we introduce benchmarked-noise zero-noise extrapolation (bnZNE) as a simple adaptation of zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE), one of the most popular error mitigation methods. We consider as an example the bias-mitigated ZNE and bnZNE of Trotterized Hamiltonian simulations, observing that our approaches outperform standard ZNE using both small-scale classical simulations and 100-qubit utility-scale experiments on the IBM superconducting hardware. We consider the measurement of both single-site observables as well as two-site correlations along a one-dimensional qubit chain. We also provide a software package for implementing the error mitigation techniques used in this research.

quant-pharXiv:2603.10224•Mar 12, 2026•0 citations

Methods and benchmarks for error mitigation on noisy quantum computers

Ryan LaRose, Tudor Giurgică-Tiron, Yousef Hindy +4 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 15, 2021•0 citations

Benchmarking error mitigation techniques on noisy quantum processors

Corentin Bisot, Emmanuel Lilette, Thomas Ayral

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 4, 2019•0 citations
Reliable benchmarking of Quantum Error Mitigation (QEM) requires distinguishing genuine improvements from artefacts of the post-processing arithmetic. In this paper, we expose a failure mode in Richardson Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), a widely used technique routinely (and often implicitly) relied upon in benchmarks and experiments. When noise amplification operates beyond usable signals - a regime that is quickly reached on current hardware for non-trivial circuits - we show that the extrapolation no longer reflects the underlying physics, but collapses into a fixed rescaling of a single noisy measurement, producing a bogus apparent improvement that is independent of noise amplification. This poses a rarely considered threat to the validity of many empirical evaluations in quantum computing. Measurements on real hardware (IQM Euro-Q-Exa) confirm this collapse with ordinary folding alone: as circuit depth erodes the signal, the reported estimate decouples from the truth and overshoots the ideal by up to 21%. We further introduce a matched-cost "garbage-folding" negative control that carries no usable signal yet reports a larger apparent improvement than genuine folding - showing that the magnitude of an improvement is not evidence of its correctness - alongside a zero-cost check flagging the artefact from data a benchmark already holds. We distil both into a short reporting checklist for ZNE benchmarks.
We present a simple, malleable and low-overhead approach for improving generic biased quantum error mitigation (QEM) methods, achieving up to 15% fidelity improvements over standard QEM on 100-qubit circuits with up to 2000 entangling gates. We do so by constructing verifiable benchmark circuits which mirror the application circuit's native-gate structure and thus noise profile. These circuits can be used to benchmark and mitigate the bias of the underlying error mitigation method, requiring only the application circuit and hardware native gate set. We present two methods for generating benchmark circuits; one is agnostic to the target hardware at the expense of a small overhead of single-qubit gates, while the other is specific to the IBM superconducting hardware and has no gate overhead. As a corollary, we introduce benchmarked-noise zero-noise extrapolation (bnZNE) as a simple adaptation of zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE), one of the most popular error mitigation methods. We consider as an example the bias-mitigated ZNE and bnZNE of Trotterized Hamiltonian simulations, observing that our approaches outperform standard ZNE using both small-scale classical simulations and 100-qubit utility-scale experiments on the IBM superconducting hardware. We consider the measurement of both single-site observables as well as two-site correlations along a one-dimensional qubit chain. We also provide a software package for implementing the error mitigation techniques used in this research.